
Rs 3.2 lakh monthly income, no home yet: Is a Rs 32 lakh car too much?
Hidden Costs and Practical Considerations
As rising incomes reshape the lifestyle aspirations of young professionals in India, big-ticket purchases like high-end cars are increasingly seen as attainable. However, these decisions often raise difficult questions about long-term planning and financial prudence. Is it wise to splurge on a luxury car before owning a home or securing other essentials? This dilemma recently took centre stage on Reddit, where a financially stable couple questioned whether purchasing a Rs 32 lakh car would be a sound decision at their stage in life.In the post, a 30-year-old man shared that he and his wife, both working in the IT consulting sector, bring home a combined Rs 3.2 lakh per month. Their monthly expenses, which include vacations, family support, and daily needs, average around Rs 1.7 lakh. Financially, they appear well-prepared, with Rs 15 lakh in savings, Rs 22 lakh in mutual funds, and Rs 45 lakh in provident funds. They also maintain a Rs 30 lakh health insurance policy.Although they currently rent and do not own property, they hope to buy a home within the next decade. With no children yet, but plans to start a family next year, the poster explained that he was drawn to a car priced at Rs 31–32 lakh on-road, and is considering making the purchase next year after accumulating more savings for a higher down payment.The response from Reddit users was largely cautious. Many highlighted the risk of investing in a depreciating asset like a car over appreciating assets like real estate. Some urged the user to prioritise home ownership, pointing out that a property not only builds equity but also gains value over time. One commenter even stated plainly that buying a Rs 32 lakh car without a house should be ruled out entirely.Others offered practical benchmarks, suggesting that car purchases should ideally not exceed six months' worth of take-home salary—in this case, approximately Rs 19–20 lakh. Anything significantly beyond that was seen as financially risky, especially considering job market uncertainties and future obligations like raising a child.Several users weighed in on the question of whether to buy the car outright or through a loan. Some argued in favour of financing, saying that with vehicle loan interest rates generally ranging from 7–12%, the remaining funds could be invested in mutual funds, which historically offer better long-term returns. However, others pushed back, cautioning that salaried individuals don't benefit from the same tax deductions on vehicle loan interest as businesses do, and investment gains are still taxable.Beyond the purchase price, commenters also brought attention to the ongoing costs of owning a premium vehicle. Higher insurance premiums, servicing charges, and repair expenses were flagged as important considerations. Several users also pointed out the poor road conditions in many Indian cities and the potential for frequent vehicle wear and tear—factors that could further diminish the value of an expensive car.Some respondents suggested buying a smaller, more affordable car under Rs 10–12 lakh and investing the remaining money into long-term goals such as a child's higher education or eventual home interiors.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Far from dead': Economy that Trump buried ‘outpaces' US
1 2 Ludhiana: Indian business leaders have pushed back firmly against US President Donald Trump's recent remarks describing the Indian and Russian economies as "dead", calling the claim baseless and out of step with the country's economic trajectory. The resilient economy politely declines to attend its own funeral, and the critic must answer: "If we're dead, who's eating all the global market share?" Industrialists from Ludhiana, one of the country's leading manufacturing hubs, said on Sunday that while US tariff hikes may temporarily affect some sectors, the Indian economy remains vibrant, resilient, and driven by robust domestic demand. "India can never be a dead economy — our population and internal demand alone ensure that," said Ashpreet Singh Sahni, managing director of Sehaj Solutions and former chairman of the Confederation of Indian Industry's Ludhiana chapter. "Yes, tariffs may slow us down for a year or two, but we'll bounce back stronger." Sahni, who was in the US when the new tariff regime was announced, said American manufacturers were also feeling the pinch. "There's nervousness on both sides. US companies look actively for alternatives to China, and India is high on their list. I believe the US will have to reconsider these tariffs, eventually." Upkar Singh Ahuja, president of the Chamber of Industrial and Commercial Undertakings (CICU), echoed the sentiment, arguing that India's global reputation was rising. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Ask A Pro: "I'm 70 with $1.4M in IRAs. Should I convert $120K/Year to a Roth?" SmartAsset Undo "During my visit to Europe, I saw firsthand the interest in Indian goods. Yes, IT and pharma may face short-term pressure, but they're already exploring new, tariff-friendly markets." Ahuja warned that Washington's protectionist stance could have unintended consequences. "Such tariffs are inflationary. They may backfire on the US economy itself. In the long term, it's not sustainable." Pankaj Sharma, president of the Association of Trade and Industrial Undertakings (ATIU), said India should seize the moment. "This is a time to turn adversity into opportunity. The tariffs aren't India-specific — they affect many countries. Our govt should ramp up support for manufacturing and help Indian firms enter new global markets." He called for stronger policy support, including incentives to help exporters tap into emerging economies and underserved regions. "The Indian economy is not just surviving — it's adapting. And that's the hallmark of a living, breathing market." The remarks come as global economic tensions continue to rise, with supply chains still reeling from pandemic aftershocks and shifting geopolitical alignments. Indian industry, local leaders say, is determined not to be left behind. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !


Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
High Court stays YEIDA order to cancel land allotted to company over Rs 118 crore dues
Noida: Allahabad high court's Lucknow bench has restrained the Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority (YEIDA) from cancelling the land allotment of Greenbay Infrastructure for its 100-acre township project in Sector 22D. YEIDA has been restrained from cancellation until the company's two revision applications before the state govt — seeking relief under the "zero period" policy due to non-possession of 30–35% of the land — are disposed of. The zero period policy refers to a period during which developers are granted relief from interest and penalties on land dues for stalled projects. You Can Also Check: Noida AQI | Weather in Noida | Bank Holidays in Noida | Public Holidays in Noida The court's interim order came on July 30, just a day before YEIDA's July 31 deadline for the builder to pay Rs 118 crore in pending dues or face cancellation of the land parcel. Justice Pankaj Bhatia, who heard the matter, directed that no coercive action be taken based on YEIDA's July 8 plot cancellation notice. Since the realtor filed a revision application before the state govt in Jan, the court observed that while the issue remains under review, YEIDA cannot cancel the land allotment. The court instructed the state govt to decide on the interim relief application within 10 days and complete proceedings on the revision application filed by Greenbay within four weeks. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Access all TV channels anywhere, anytime Techno Mag Learn More Undo Greenbay said it has so far deposited Rs 60 crore out of the Rs 118 crore and has sought "zero period" relief from the date of allotment till now, citing incomplete land possession and stalled construction due to farmers' unwillingness to vacate around one-third of the land. The dispute stems from a prolonged standoff between the developer and YEIDA. The land was allotted to Greenbay in Feb 2011, with a lease deed executed in March 2012. In Jan 2014, Greenbay subleased a portion of the land to Emerald Properties for a group housing society. The company later launched the Golf Village township project, comprising 691 plots. However, the developer said it could not take possession of two-thirds of the land until 2019 and about one-third still remains outside its control. According to YEIDA officials, the latest ultimatum followed repeated defaults by the developer under the UP govt's "legacy stalled projects" policy introduced on Dec 21, 2023, which aims to revive long-pending housing projects and ensure timely possession for homebuyers. After the developer gave its consent, the dues were recalculated to Rs 441 crore, of which Greenbay was required to pay 25% (Rs 110 crore) by April 28, 2024. After it deposited the 25% amount, YEIDA in July 2024 issued a revised payment schedule for the remaining 75% dues. The Authority further revised this schedule a month later when the developer requested a recalculation of the amount with 10% simple interest and inclusion of Rs 2.4 crore in unpaid lease rent from 2021. Under the new payment schedule, the first instalment was due on Jan 15 and the last by July 15, 2026. Based on the initial amount paid, YEIDA allowed the developer to proceed with tripartite sublease registrations for proportionate land areas. In Oct 2024, Greenbay requested another extension for paying the remaining dues, citing continued difficulty in obtaining full physical possession of the plot. The company claimed that about 30% of the land remained under cultivation by farmers, preventing access. Taking this into account, YEIDA granted a three-month extension in Nov 2024, pushing the deadline from Jan 15 to April 15, 2025. However, Greenbay again failed to meet the extended deadline of April 15, 2025. Instead of clearing dues, it submitted a letter on April 15 seeking permission to sublease a 4,330-square metre commercial plot within the township and requested another revision of its payment schedule. During a board meeting on June 18, YEIDA issued a final deadline of June 30, asking Greenbay to deposit around Rs 118 crore or face cancellation of its township project in Sector later extended the deadline by one month, giving Greenbay until July 31 to clear the dues. In a letter dated July 8, the Authority made it clear this was the final ultimatum. The company said it has deposited Rs 60 crore and plans to pay the remaining amount, but it wants its grievances to be heard. Project director of the company Amit Kumar Sharma said, "To fulfil these financial transactions, we need immediate permission to proceed with the sublease of the commercial plot. This authorisation is critical for us to take the necessary steps towards fulfilling our payment obligations. Should we fail to adhere to the agreed timeline for payment, we accept that the sublease may be cancelled without any objection on our part. " Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !


Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
BRS neglected irrigation sector during their 10-year regime: Bhatti
Hyderabad: Deputy chief minister Bhatti Vikramarka on Sunday said that Telangana's irrigation water needs are still being met by projects built by previous Congress govts on the Krishna and Godavari rivers. He added that the BRS did nothing for the development of the irrigation sector during their 10-year regime. "Not a single drop of irrigation water that rightfully belongs to Telangana will be given up. The state's interests are more important than politics. The previous BRS govt was responsible for allowing the Andhra Pradesh to take the Banakacherla project," he said after laying the foundation stone for the construction of 10,000-metric-tonne-capacity warehouses at Kamalapuram village in the Mudigonda mandal of the Khammam district. The warehouses are being built by the Telangana State Warehousing Corporation at a cost of ₹10 crore. He added: "It is because of chief minister A Revanth Reddy and irrigation minister N Uttam Kumar Reddy's effective presentation of arguments to the Union Jal Shakti Ministry in New Delhi that the Banakacherla project was halted." You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad The deputy chief minister also alleged that the previous BRS govt did not complete a single useful irrigation project. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Access all TV channels anywhere, anytime Techno Mag Learn More Undo "Though they spent Rs 1 lakh crore on the Kaleshwaram project, not a single acre received water from it. When Polavaram was being constructed, they just watched. When construction of the Banakacharla project began, they showed no concern. In fact, they rolled out the red carpet for AP leaders and mortgaged the interests of our state. Even when seven mandals of the Khammam district were merged into AP through an ordinance that was not included in the Reorganisation Act, they failed to stop it." Bhatti said, "We are correcting all the mistakes committed by the previous BRS govt. We are moving forward with a concrete action plan to make full use of the waters of the Krishna and Godavari rivers and ensure that Telangana's rightful share will not be taken by AP." Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !