logo
Farmers in England fear for nature after sustainable farming funding frozen

Farmers in England fear for nature after sustainable farming funding frozen

The Guardian05-04-2025
Farmers fear they will no longer be able to afford to restore nature in England and reduce their carbon footprint after government funding for doing this was frozen.
The environment secretary, Steve Reed, recently announced that the sustainable farming incentive (SFI), which pays farmers for making space for nature on their land, would be paused and overhauled before June's spending review. The scope of the scheme – and its budget – are being reassessed.
He is considering blocking farmers who make a lot of money from agriculture from applying for the scheme, which is part of a package of payments that replaced the EU's common agricultural policy and paid land managers for the amount of land in their care, with the aim of paying farmers to look after nature, soil and other public goods, rather than simply for farming and owning land.
In England, 70% of land is farmed, so if nature is to recover, farmers need support to make space for it on their land. This includes planting trees and hedges, digging ponds and leaving strips of land for wildflowers.
Amelia Greenaway, 24, farms native cattle and pigs on 365 hectares (900 acres) of the National Trust's Killerton Estate in Devon. She was applying for £94,000 worth of SFI payments when the application was frozen.
'We are already sustainable as we are organic. We have highland cattle and rare breed pigs which we conservation graze,' she said. But she wanted to go one step further.
'We were going to start growing our own pig feed to create a circular system in our farm, we were going to sow wildflowers in there as well, and it was going to be a good thing for pollinators. We now can't afford the seed to do that,' she said.
It is hard for tenant farmers to apply for schemes as they have to work with the landlords. Greenaway had been working on her funding application for months – time that has been wasted. 'The planning we have had to do over SFI has been immense,' she said. 'This has seriously wasted our time. We had to do so many paperwork applications that delayed the process.'
She said farmers were giving up on the government to provide funding and solutions for nature, and had to accept they would need to do it themselves. 'I hope this gives farmers the opportunity not to put their heads in the sand. We weren't reliant on subsidy but it was great to have that cash boost we could reinvest. Not having the reinvestment will make us become a bit stagnant if the SFI doesn't become available again.'
Greenaway says she is lucky to have a good landlord in the National Trust, which supports nature-friendly farming, but not all farmers are so fortunate: 'Since the shocking news of SFI closure, it's just reminded us of our gratitude towards the National Trust. Without the support of empathetic landlords who want to allow sustainable farming to be a viable business we wouldn't be a sustainable business. I am very stagnant now, not moving forward with nature recovery. I have to count my blessings, but I have to look forward to the future and work even more closely with my landlords.'
She feared other farmers may be discouraged from nature-friendly farming: 'I am really worried for the landscape actually; for those farmers who were considering going into regenerative farming, the chopping and changing has completely reduced confidence so it's caused them to want to intensify instead.'
Anthony Curwen, 63, is the country estate manager of Quex Park in Kent, which grows wheat, oilseed rape, oats, beans, potatoes and maize silage across 1,012 hectares (2,500 acres) of arable land.
He applied for the SFI just before the application window closed, and has now been left in limbo.
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
'It is just very shocking and surprising that it was withdrawn last week,' he said. 'What we are doing is helping sustainable farming, pollen and nature strips. We don't use insecticides, we plant cover crops. We have already started doing everything. We were hoping to get the money for doing it.'
Curwen has loved seeing nature come back to the farm. 'I've noticed more insects, more birds. Lots of things were here 40 or 50 years ago and disappeared then came back. We've seen turtle doves come back to the farm, we've seen yellow hammers which I haven't seen for a long time. It is joyous to see it all return.'
He is worried other farmers will not get this same opportunity: 'We've been on this journey for several years, but the vast bulk of farmers don't know what to do. They need persuasion, they need help. It will take a lot of rebuilding trust to hit government targets on biodiversity, carbon and soil regeneration. It is quite scary going on that route as it is very different to what they would have been doing.'
Curwen does not agree with the government's plans to means test it, as it will encourage larger farms to intensify food production with more pesticides and less nature. 'Who could say that nature doesn't matter on a big farm? Nature matters on every farm. Many big farms may go in the opposite direction and intensify and that will hurt nature. It is trying to divide and rule to be honest with you.'
Despite using fewer pesticides and creating more space for nature, productivity has not reduced on his farm: 'Less inputs and more circular farming actually give us more food security. This is all being put at risk because of the clumsy way this is all going on.'
He did not realise this would be the case to begin with, but now is a true convert and a member of the Nature Friendly Farming Network.
'I was sceptical of regenerative farming but we have now realised it makes a huge difference to everything around you,' he said. 'I am in despair. I am just saddened as I think it is going to be harder now. I thought we were a world leader in this journey and now it's all up in the air.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK's huge plan to launch direct trains from Britain to EU hotspot 681 miles away
UK's huge plan to launch direct trains from Britain to EU hotspot 681 miles away

Daily Mirror

time3 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

UK's huge plan to launch direct trains from Britain to EU hotspot 681 miles away

A 'landmark' partnership between the UK and Germany will 'explore a direct rail link' between London and a stunning EU city dripping in history and culture - but it won't happen any time soon Millions of passengers could benefit from new trains connecting Brits to yet another European hotspot - but there's a catch. In what has been described as a 'landmark' partnership, the UK and Germany have unveiled a joint taskforce to 'explore a direct rail link' between the two countries. ‌ The move, announced as part of the bilateral treaty to be signed by Keir Starmer and Friedrich Merz, will see the nations break down logistical barriers stagnating European connectivity and establish the necessary border and security controls for direct long-distance rail passenger services. ‌ ‌ READ MORE: Beautiful 31-mile train journey past both mountains and beaches named UK's best It aims to provide an effective route linking London to Berlin, the capital and largest city of Germany renowned for its rich history, stunning architecture and vibrant nightlife. Here, you'll find the Holocaust memorial, the Berlin Wall's graffitied remains, and the 18th-century Brandenburg Gate. However, it appears the new route won't be launching any time soon, and could take as long as 10 years to get up and running. While the exact demand for a direct train from London to Berlin isn't clear, the route will provide a greener way of travelling than flying. ‌ Currently, travelling from London to Berlin via train takes around 10-11 hours, and includes stopovers in both Brussels and Cologne. "We're pioneering a new era of European rail connectivity and are determined to put Britain at the heart of a better-connected continent," said Transport Secretary, Heidi Alexander. "This landmark agreement – part of a new treaty the Prime Minister signed with Chancellor Merz - has the potential to fundamentally change how millions of people travel between our two countries, offering a faster, more convenient and significantly greener alternative to flying." ‌ The politician went on to explain how a new taskforce will help bring the two nations 'closer together' as well as create new opportunities for tourism, business and cultural exchange. She described the economic potential as 'enormous', adding: "A direct rail link would support the creation of jobs and strengthen the vital trade links that underpin our economic relationship with Germany. "British businesses will have better access to European markets, whilst German companies will find it easier to invest and operate in the UK. This is central to our Plan for Change – breaking down barriers, thinking boldly about the future, and making long-term decisions that better connect Britain to the world. Working with Germany, we're building bridges between our people and paving the way for a more sustainable, connected future." ‌ The news comes hot off the heels of Eurostar's announcement that it will soon whizz Brits over from London to Frankfurt, home to one of the largest financial hubs in Europe, as well as launching direct routes from London to Geneva in Switzerland. As previously reported, the railway firm is ramping up its offerings as part of a major €2 billion (approximately £1.7bn) investment- following its impressive 2024 earnings. "Despite the challenging economic climate, Eurostar is growing and has bold ambitions for the future," Eurostar's CEO Gwendoline Cazenave said. "Our new fleet will make new destinations for customers a reality – notably direct trains between London and Germany, and between London and Switzerland for the first time. A new golden age of international sustainable travel is here."

Protests in Kyiv as Ukraine clamps down on anti-corruption bodies
Protests in Kyiv as Ukraine clamps down on anti-corruption bodies

Times

time4 hours ago

  • Times

Protests in Kyiv as Ukraine clamps down on anti-corruption bodies

Ukraine is no longer a genuine democracy, a prominent critic of President Zelensky has alleged, as protesters rallied in Kyiv against a government crackdown on two major anti-corruption organisations that could derail the country's bid to join the European Union. On Tuesday, the Ukrainian parliament approved a bill that brought the national anti-corruption bureau, known as Nabu, and the specialised anti-corruption prosecutor's office, Sapo, under the direct control of the country's prosecutor general, who answers to the president. Zelensky signed the legislation into force just hours later. He said it was necessary to purge the organisations of 'Russian influence,' but gave no other details. Both organisations were founded with western assistance following the 2014 Maidan revolution in Kyiv that toppled Viktor Yanukovych, the country's notoriously corrupt pro-Moscow leader. They were tasked with acting as independent groups that would root out and prosecute corruption without political interference. Last month, Nabu named Oleksii Chernyshov, who was at the time a Ukrainian deputy prime minister, as a suspect in a 'large-scale' corruption scheme led by a property developer from Kyiv. Chernyshov, who is said to be a close friend of Zelensky's, was the highest-placed Ukrainian official in history to be charged with corruption. He denied the charges, but lost his post in government this month when Zelensky appointed a new cabinet. At a rally near the presidential office in Kyiv on Tuesday evening, several thousand protesters, who included soldiers, condemned the move against the anti-corruption groups as a sign of growing authoritarianism and a betrayal of the ideas that powered the Maidan revolution. 'Ukraine is not Russia!' some chanted, while others held up signs saying 'Corruption = Death.' Zelensky's government has also recently proposed legislation that would block investigating corruption in the defence sector. The demonstration was the first significant show of public dissent against Zelensky since Russia's full-scale invasion in 2022. Vitali Klitschko, the mayor of Kyiv who has frequently clashed with Zelensky, was among the protesters. 'Sapo and Nabu must remain independent institutions,' he said. Dmytro Kuleba, Ukraine's former foreign minister, called the measures 'a bad day' for Ukraine. Marta Kos, the EU's top official for enlargement, warned that the move to clamp down on the agencies was 'a serious step back' for Kyiv's membership bid. She also said that their ability to operate without interference from the government was 'essential for Ukraine's EU path.' The offices of the two agencies were raided by Ukraine's security services on Monday over the claims that they had been infiltrated by Moscow. Opposition figures said the searches were an act of intimidation. Zelensky's move came after Vitaliy Shabunin, a well-known anti-corruption activist, was charged with fraud and evading military service in a case that was widely condemned as politically motivated. He faces up to ten years in prison, if found guilty. He is currently serving with the Ukrainian military. His house in Kyiv was raided by masked Ukrainian investigators while his wife and two small children were at home and he was stationed at a military base. 'After these events, I feel like Ukraine is no longer a full-fledged democracy. It feels more like a hybrid regime, still democratic, but with elements of authoritarianism and kleptocracy,' Shabunin, 40, told The Times in an interview from a location around 20 miles from the frontline. The co-founder of Ukraine's Anti-Corruption Action Center, an independent group, Shabunin said the charges against him were absurd because he had volunteered for service on the first day of the war and was then later seconded to work on anti-corruption efforts, an order he could not legally refuse. 'This is pure political persecution,' he said. Ukraine's State Bureau of Investigation has denied that the case is linked to Shabunin's anti-corruption activities. The raid on his home came almost five years to the day since his house was set on fire in apparent retaliation for his work. No one has been arrested over the attack. Shabunin also warned that Zelensky had crossed a 'red line' by moving against anti-corruption organisations. 'Ukrainians have always had a very, very strong demand for justice. And Ukrainians, like no one else, sense when the president does not give a damn about justice, and when he personally attacks it.' He suggested that Zelensky had become confident that he now had a free hand in Ukraine because Kyiv's western allies were now less focused on strengthening the country's democracy. 'Zelensky is showing his true face because the West, to put it mildly, is turning a blind eye. This is the real Zelensky, not the person we saw when the United States and the European Union demanded reforms and a fight against corruption,' he said. He also warned that Zelensky's determination to rein in independent anti-corruption groups could lead to violent protests. 'We will not be dancing on Maidan this time,' he said. 'Half of the country has combat experience. This is a scenario that [President] Putin is likely dreaming about. God forbid it should come to this. This is why it is in the interests of the West to stop Zelensky now, before such a confrontation.' He said, however, that western countries should continue to arm Kyiv. 'I don't think Zelensky will forgive me for speaking out so loudly. [But] whatever happens to me or whatever happens in the country, we want the West to continue to give weapons to Ukrainians and Ukraine. We need to survive. We know how to deal with our corrupt authoritarian elites. But without weapons we will die.' Zelensky's first term was due to end in May 2024, but Ukraine has banned elections during wartime, a policy that has wide support across the country. Although his popularity has slipped since the early days of the 2022 invasion by Russia, the Ukrainian president is still the country's second most trusted figure after Valery Zaluzhny, the former commander of the Ukrainian armed forces who is now Kyiv's ambassador in London, according to polls. It is unclear, however, how the unfolding row will impact Zelensky's ratings. One European diplomat speaking on the condition of anonymity described the measures against the anti-corruption groups as 'unfortunate,' but insisted there was still hope for Ukrainian democracy. 'Is it a setback? Yes. Is this a point of no-return? No,' the official said, according to the AFP news agency. However, the confrontation has opened up an unprecedented rift between the Ukrainian leader and civil society. The Kyiv Independent, Ukraine's main English-language website, accused Zelensky of betraying the country's democracy. 'Zelensky is making a choice to undermine Ukrainian democratic institutions in pursuit of expanding his personal power,' it wrote in an editorial. 'The same man who represents Ukraine's fight against Russia can't represent the destruction of Ukraine's democracy.' Back in Kyiv, protesters said that they were determined to keep battling to ensure Ukraine did not slide back into its authoritarian past. 'They are legalising corruption, and I have to fight against this' said Artyom, an 18-year-old protester. 'Our democratic institutions and democracy itself is collapsing,' said Kateryna, another protester.

Steve Reed is leading a campaign of disinformation on Scottish water
Steve Reed is leading a campaign of disinformation on Scottish water

The National

time5 hours ago

  • The National

Steve Reed is leading a campaign of disinformation on Scottish water

I'm proud to live in a country with a publicly-owned water company that is demonstrably delivering for the people who live here. Our water is cheaper – we pay much less for our water than people in England and Wales. And our water is cleaner – 87% is judged to be either 'high' or 'good' quality by our environmental regulator, Sepa. READ MORE: Broadcast watchdog called in over Labour's 'misleading' Scottish water claim Any profit that Scottish Water makes off our bills is invested in making improvements to its infrastructure – rather than lining the pockets of shareholders. The benefits of Scotland's approach were outlined this week in the Independent Water Commission's recent report into the water industry in England and Wales. It gave special mention to the way we manage our water sector – specifically highlighting the way the Scottish Government works as good practice. The report also draws attention to our long-term vision, the ongoing flexibility in our investment programme, our approach to sharing costs across generations and our ethical-based regulation model – which ensures we deliver the best outcomes possible for the public. But you wouldn't have heard of this if you listened to the UK Environment Secretary Steve Reed talking about it. Instead, he has taken to the airwaves with a campaign of disinformation about Scotland, designed to undermine the idea of public ownership of water. You might expect this from a Tory politician, but the last time I checked, this UK Government was meant to be a Labour government. Mr Reed's repeated assertion that pollution in Scotland's rivers is worse than England is simply wrong. The independent report commissioned by his own department clearly shows that is not the case, noting that 66% of Scotland's water bodies are of good ecological status as compared with 16.1% in England. Even allowing for differences in the timeframe for those figures, it is clear that Scotland has far higher water quality. Much of the improvement is due to significant investment in the water industry and efforts made by Sepa to address pollution from other sources In fact, we take the issue of pollution so seriously that we have already committed up to £500 million to further improve water quality, specifically to increase monitoring of the highest priority waters and tackle debris and spills. While companies in Labour-run England aren't delivering for anybody except shareholders, Scottish Water has been labelled the UK's top-performing water company and as the most trusted utility in the UK according to the Customer Service Institute. READ MORE: SNP minister calls on UK counterpart to retract 'misleading' Scottish water comments There is much we have to be proud of when it comes to our water. There is also a lot that others can learn from the Scottish Government's approach to managing the sector. However, we are not complacent. Like the rest of the UK, Scotland shares pressures relating to ageing assets and climate change and we will need to do more and more to manage this. But if we're going to make progress and deliver the best outcome for households and businesses, that has to start with an understanding of the facts. So we'll leave Labour to explain to people in England and Wales why they can't have what people have in SNP-run Scotland – and we'll get on with ensuring that our natural resources truly benefit the people of Scotland.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store