logo
Stepping off the Trump treadmill: A CBC correspondent bids farewell to Washington

Stepping off the Trump treadmill: A CBC correspondent bids farewell to Washington

CBC2 days ago
I got a journalism tip over drinks from a veteran Canadian correspondent when I first landed in Washington more than a decade ago — a formula for stories guaranteed to thrill audiences back home.
In summary? The more ridiculous Americans look, the better. Guns, rednecks, cultural stereotypes, I was told, if you've got that, you've got gold. Canadians eat that stuff up.
The exchange never left me. As I depart Washington a dozen years later, it's still on my mind, and not because it was inaccurate.
I'll confess, on occasion, I had my fun. A piece of personal trivia: I met Lauren Boebert years before she became famous as a rabble-rousing congresswoman. I popped into her restaurant near the foothills of the Rocky Mountains whose main news draw was that the waitresses all carried guns.
"It's not just the fried jalapeños packing heat," is how I began my Canadian Press story. "A spicy hamburger, here, comes with a side of handgun."
Over time, though, that type of story got old. Like gorging on empty calories — briefly fun, ultimately unfulfilling.
Here I was, reporting from a nation that's won more Nobel Prizes than a string of runners-up combined. It's produced a staggering number of patents, thriving metropolises, inventions spanning the assembly line to the internet, not to mention the blues, jazz and rock 'n' roll.
Surely there were more useful tales from this place? Surely it's more than a backdrop for ego-stroking entertainment — a comedy to mock, a tragedy to pity.
To be fair, every country has its quirks, flaws and tragedies. But we'll talk politics in a second.
The America behind the camera
Let's start with an accurate stereotype. Anybody in our community of foreign correspondents can confirm it: Americans are easy to interview. Absent rare exceptions, they love to talk.
This can be jarring to a foreigner, especially if you come from a country with a culture rich in talking points and "No comment" responses.
But here, you stick a mic in someone's face, and before you know it, you're invited into the kitchen, you're having coffee, your notepad's suddenly filling up with their life story.
I'm thinking of all those people who spilled their lives out to me, a total stranger. People who've cried, even offered me hugs when I left.
I was blessed to criss-cross this country and talk to people thousands of kilometres apart — literally and figuratively. People who, if seated together, might barely last a minute chatting politics without arguing. But they shared a willingness to talk to me, and, by extension, to you.
They like Canadians, by the way; even now, the vast majority of Americans do. The feeling lately is not mutual. The news from Washington has Canadians aggrieved and angry.
There's plenty to be aggrieved about. Much of the news is disturbing lately. But the news is a finite window onto the world. Its lens captures tragedy, better than it does the countless cases of everyday decency. Like the 100-year-old woman I just met — on a sidewalk, protesting because she's worried about health care and education for future generations.
I stopped seeing the U.S. as a two-dimensional entity on a screen as it became the surroundings of my life, filled with people and places in three dimensions.
In some circles, this is referred to as going native. I don't think so. What I encountered was layer after layer, of story after story, and found it harder to tell. It's more work, and less fun, writing stories sprinkled with qualifiers — however s and although s and not quite s.
I'll pick a classic example of our national difference: health care. The canonical story is straightforward — it's public in Canada, private in the U.S., and that's how it goes.
The reality's messier. Nearly 40 per cent of Americans have public health care. In Canada, it's 72 per cent publicly funded. It's a notable difference, yes, but perhaps not Venus and Mars.
A decade-plus on the Trump treadmill
I recall a specific case of starting to see the world through American eyes. It was the day of the school massacre in Uvalde, Texas, in 2022. I read a take from a European commentator who felt no sympathy for Americans — after all, he said, these people keep voting for this.
He saw the country as an entity. I saw my toddler. She mentioned a delightful teacher of hers during the ride home from daycare that day. I had just read about a teacher murdered while defending students, and I remember feeling my chest and throat flip upside-down in the car.
I was enraged when I read that commentator's casual slur. Reducing this place to an amoral monolith wasn't just cruel — it ignored this country's reality of constant debate, fierce fights and razor-thin politics, where a fraction of one per cent of the electorate shifting across three states can alter the course of history.
Now let's talk about Donald Trump. We can only avoid him for so long.
Here's a snapshot of life covering this president. It's top of mind because it happened to unfold on June 4, while I was planning this piece. It all occurs within 22 minutes.
It's bathtime. I'm preparing the kids for bed. One, two, three major news stories land while I'm soaping, shampooing and towelling.
Here's my perspective as the White House emails a string of executive orders, as experienced through my smartwatch:
7:40 p.m. Ping! Trump bans travel from 12 countries.
7:45 p.m. Ping! Trump launches investigation into predecessor, hints he may invalidate past pardons, opening door to prosecuting enemies.
8:02 p.m. Ping! Foreign students banned from Harvard. In the time this happens, I field several demands for attention, and foil one plot to stuff cotton balls into the bath drain.
There's no time to cover any of them the next day. By then, Trump is at war with Elon Musk. A day later, a twist in a burgeoning constitutional crisis. And there's a tense standoff — masked immigration officers against protesters, escalating Trump's battle against the state of California, in which he eventually shatters generations of precedent by taking over the state National Guard.
WATCH | The final days of the Trump-Musk bromance:
Will Donald Trump and Elon Musk destroy each other? | About That
20 days ago
Duration 15:38
How did two of the most powerful men on the planet — Donald Trump and Elon Musk — go from friends to foes embroiled in a public meltdown? Andrew Chang explains what drove a wedge between them and why it may be in their best interests to reconcile sooner rather than later. Images provided by Getty Images, The Canadian Press and Reuters. (Additional credits: 4:35 - MSNBC/YouTube; 4:37 - CNN/YouTube; 4:29 - CBS News/YouTube)
By the end of the month, he'd bombed Iran, threatened new tariffs, suspended trade talks with Canada, then un-suspended them.
It's a marathon. Except when you're about to reach the finish line, someone moves it another few dozen kilometres down the road.
Watching a political system fall apart
I thought it was over on Jan. 6, 2021. I stood among the crowd that stormed the U.S. Capitol on Trump's behalf.
Indelible memories of that day include riding on the Washington, D.C., metro, hearing Trump supporters speculate about a military execution for Vice-President Mike Pence.
One scene that stuck with me was rioters berating police for not joining them. A man in his 60s, standing in the street with a buddy, heckled officers: "What side are you on?"
This is the kind of scene that happens at the outset of a civil war in countless other places: Who are the police backing? What about the army?
It just doesn't happen across the river from the Pentagon. Not between the Capitol and the White House, on, of all places, Constitution Avenue.
So I briefly thought Trump was finished. That assessment was fleeting. I'd written before Jan. 6, and wrote again after, about him coming back.
WATCH | How the U.S. Capitol riot unfolded:
How the siege on the U.S. Capitol unfolded
4 years ago
Duration 3:44
It became obvious by 2023 that he could be president again, and I listed his plans for a second term. Most of what he's doing now was in the platform. His plans included a global trade war, which I started writing about more than a year ago. It's been more chaotic than expected, but it was coming.
After he won, I wrote that Trump would squeeze Canada on three fronts: trade, the border and military spending. And here we are.
I saw him nominated twice, inaugurated twice, come back from a shooting once, convicted once, and I spent so many hours seated behind him in a Manhattan courtroom that if you gave me a pen and a cocktail napkin, I could sketch from memory a patent application for that inimitable hairdo.
WATCH | Alex Panetta on Trump being convicted of falsifying business records in May 2024:
CBC's Alex Panetta was in the courtroom as the Trump verdict came in. Here's what he saw
1 year ago
Duration 1:18
The most important story is still unfolding. After his first-term near-overthrow of a constitutional republic, and his second-term stress-test on it, we're on the precipice of the previously unthinkable: the United States of America losing its ranking as a full-fledged democracy. I felt a disorienting melancholy as I typed those words in a story earlier this year.
Had I remained here through 2028, I'd have been covering Trump's story for 13 years.
A country of optimists loses faith
I'll never forget my first morning in Washington, in 2013. It was love at first sight.
On a morning walk north of Dupont Circle, I got John F. Kennedy's pollster on the phone for stories about the 50th anniversary of his death.
An elderly Lou Harris described how JFK had sent him on a secret mission to Canada, carrying a fake passport, to help Lester Pearson defeat John Diefenbaker. Foreign election interference? The Russians didn't invent it.
I received this oral history lesson while strolling about pastel-coloured Victorian rowhouses, and while it was almost December, it was as balmy as late summer, the trees still blazing red and yellow. I recall thinking, I'm never leaving here.
But now I am leaving. For a couple of years, at least. I'm going to get a master's in artificial intelligence policy, spend more time with my kids and join my wife on a diplomatic posting.
I got advice when I arrived here; now I'm happy to give some. There are little tricks for finding news that affects Canada. The U.S. domestic story presents a separate challenge. One day, you'll cover Trump courting a constitutional crisis; the next, he'll do something outrageous, controversial, the cable networks will be all over it, but it might be legal, even popular, and it's your job to figure out which story matters.
Good luck!
Also: Never forget that Trump didn't emerge in a vacuum. He identified problems Americans had concluded their political class failed to solve. Survey after survey shows Americans gloomy about the state of their country, and Trump found a receptive audience.
WATCH | How Trump pulled off a comeback:
How Trump pulled off his historic comeback win
8 months ago
Duration 6:50
In a stunning political comeback, Donald Trump expanded his coalition with more popular support than ever. The National asks political strategists Kevin Sheridan and Aisha Mills to break down his winning campaign, and what the next four years could hold.
A famously optimistic people has lost faith in its institutions. That celebrated ingenuity? It's fallen behind China in patents per capita. Life expectancy? Down, too. Note that areas suffering the most opioid deaths swung most heavily to Trump.
Because it's more impactful hearing this from one of Trump's supporters, I'll quote Tucker Carlson: "Happy countries don't elect Donald Trump president. Desperate ones do."
Trump set the tone by launching his political career 10 years ago this month in a speech laced with bigotry.
He promised renewed greatness if America stood up to three forces, all foreign: illegal immigration, trade deals and military spending overseas.
I became increasingly convinced Trump would win again as the election approached last year. I visited a bellwether district in Pennsylvania, talking to less politically engaged voters — working-class folks in an overwhelmingly Latino area.
They were upset about inflation. They weren't reading mainstream news. And they certainly weren't following the specifics about just who had stalled Joe Biden's agenda; they blamed the party in power, the Democrats.
Trump managed to reach apolitical voters like these. Democrats haven't.
The parts of the country that are politically engaged are hyper-polarized, and I got to report on the different poles.
I spent time with people on both sides of heated fights — the Canadian-connected Keystone XL oil pipeline; policing and crime; water rights; and migration. I've stood at the Mexican border, talking to families about their perilous journey. I've also walked that desert with members of a militia clutching AR-15s, and heard from locals fed up with illegal crossing.
I only experienced hostility once. In the runup to Jan. 6, outside a Trump rally, a supporter started swearing, pulling middle fingers, trying to rile up the crowd as reporters boarded the media bus, shouting: "Fake news! Hey everybody, it's the fake news bus!"
That was it. It's the only hostility I encountered in 12 years as a reporter in the U.S. I never encountered any as a Canadian — just one yappy guy at a hockey game.
A story to remember
My favourite story involved a road trip. The country was reopening during the COVID-19 pandemic. Vaccines were being distributed.
And I visited a place I called the fertile crescent of American song, a small sliver of geography that gave the world the blues, rock 'n' roll and country music.
The musical soil was sprouting back to life in a Mississippi blues joint, in Elvis Presley's first recording studio in nearby Memphis and on the Grand Ole Opry stage in Nashville.
It wasn't an entirely happy story — it rarely is. COVID wasn't over. But this was mostly joyful. It was about humans doing their thing again, in a language without borders.
It's an extraordinary country. I won't pretend I'm not worried about it. But I'm pulling for it.
WATCH | CBC visits a region renowned for music as it emerges from COVID lockdown:
Post-pandemic life: The party's back in a U.S. region renowned for music
4 years ago
Duration 6:01
Oh, wait, sorry. I'd planned to end my piece right there but just remembered something I feel compelled to add.
I am emphatically not rooting for the United States on one specific front: international ice hockey. In that domain, I crave its defeat, and that's exactly what happened as I watched February's Four Nations final from New Orleans.
A funny thing occurred, though. I received celebratory texts from American friends and neighbours. A couple said they were rooting for Canada — they didn't like our country being insulted, and wanted it to win.
I never put that in a news story. But I thought you should hear it. It's a big, complicated country, with people who defy clichés. You won't see them all on TV, but they're every bit as American. And they're still there.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Timbaland used an independent producer's work to train AI — but without the artist's consent
Timbaland used an independent producer's work to train AI — but without the artist's consent

CBC

time21 minutes ago

  • CBC

Timbaland used an independent producer's work to train AI — but without the artist's consent

Timbaland recently used hip-hop artist K Fresh's beat to train his artificial intelligence music platform, Suno — but without K Fresh's permission. This isn't the first time that the music producer has gotten into hot water around using AI in his music. But he's not the only big name using the technology to enhance his music. Fans also decried Erykah Badu and the Alchemist for using AI in the cover art of their new single together. Today on Commotion, guest host Rad Simonpillai speaks with music journalist Dylan Green and veteran music industry insider Michelle Santosuosso to discuss the Timbaland backlash and what protections artists need in the age of AI. We've included some highlights below, edited for length and clarity. For the full discussion, listen and follow Commotion with Elamin Abdelmahmoud on your favourite podcast player. WATCH | Today's episode on YouTube: Rad: Timbaland was claiming that he's not trying to jack this original beat from this producer, he was just trying to demonstrate the ways that AI could be used to remix an already existing composition. Is that right? Dylan: That's what he claims. But a lot of people, myself included, think it really just borders on straight-up stealing. Generative AI is a whole bag of worms that I'm sure we're going to get into here, just in the sense that this is a computer spitting back out stuff that it's already learned, as opposed to creating anything — which is very, very close to theft, at least in my opinion. Rad: Dylan, you've written some criticisms about not just Timbaland, but other high profile artists like Erykah Badu and the Alchemist, who've all been receiving their fair share for using AI, with criticisms coming, in large part, from the hip-hop world. What are people saying? Dylan: People are upset that real artists are being cut out of actual financial opportunities. The fact that these are all people that can afford to put people on, essentially, and they're just not, in a way to save as much money as they can. Being a legacy artist, and a Gen Xer in particular, just trying to get in on the ground floor of what you think is going to be the most popping thing in five years, it just reeks of laziness in so many ways, in my and a lot of people in my circles' opinion. It starts to feel predatory after a while. Because it's a difference between being on TikTok and listening to people's music and giving criticisms, giving praise and then being like, "Hmm, I like this thing, let me see what happens if I feed it into this thing without telling them." It's an abuse of trust in a lot of ways. Rad: Michelle, speaking of that abuse of trust, because I think it's interesting that Timbaland is getting all this heat for how he's using AI and how troubling it is from an ethical perspective. But when we talk about the legal perspective, his actions actually seem okay. And that's baffling to me. But tell me, why is that? Michelle: It's because there's no real legislation around it. Now, using K Fresh's music without consent, that violated Suno's terms of service. But under current law, there's nothing that you need to delete if AI learned from that actual beat, from the ingestion of it. And this is the rub: music and lyrics that are 100 per cent made by AI are ineligible for copyright protection. But the legal complications, I call it the three C's: there are no laws around consent, credit or compensation for artists who generative AI is training on. So while these systems are freely training on both copyrighted material and independent artists — which is the case with this producer — until we get legislation around credit, compensation and consent to use it in the first place, this is, I agree with Dylan, it's mostly going to disenfranchise smaller artists that are trying to come up. Rad: Ultimately, how are you seeing these tensions — between AI and then human artists and then their fan bases and just the music industry at large — playing out? Michelle: It's clearly shaping up to be a battle. And unlike streaming's pro-rata royalty problem, which was very confusing for consumers, this subject has successfully hit the radar of the music consumers. But I want to point something out to people about artists' paycheques. I want to put it out that copyright ownership has a bundle of rights with it, that each of those rights has their own income stream attached to it, and there's five of them: to reproduce the work, to distribute the work, perform the work, make a derivative work, or display it. And each one of those has an income stream attached to it. So the tech oligarchy is going to continue to try to normalize copyright theft. If you look at how music has been devalued in the digital age already — and I'm saying from filesharing Napster, company that I actually worked at — it's upwards of 90 per cent from the sales area, in terms of the devaluation of music. So we have to compensate people for the artistic endeavors that they make. And that piece is not part of law.

"Go Habs Go: Quebec language watchdog now says it's OK to use 'go' to support sports teams
"Go Habs Go: Quebec language watchdog now says it's OK to use 'go' to support sports teams

National Post

time23 minutes ago

  • National Post

"Go Habs Go: Quebec language watchdog now says it's OK to use 'go' to support sports teams

MONTREAL — Quebec's language watchdog has changed its tune on whether it's acceptable to use the word 'go' to cheer on sports teams. Article content In a new guideline posted in its online dictionary, the Office quebecois de la langue francaise says that while 'allez' is the preferred term, it's now 'partially legitimized' to use the English word to show encouragement. Article content The flip-flop comes after the office took a hard line with Montreal's transit agency, pressing it for months in 2024 to scrub the word 'go' from the electronic signs on more than 1,000 city buses. Article content The watchdog confirmed it had changed its position after The Canadian Press obtained a series of emails through access to information legislation, revealing it gave the transit agency a green light to use 'go' in June. Article content The reversal followed a public outcry on the eve of the Montreal Canadiens' first playoff home game in April, when the Montreal Gazette reported how the transit agency had replaced 'Go! Canadiens Go!' with 'Allez! Canadiens Allez!' to stay on the watchdog's good side. Article content The revelations prompted French-language Minister Jean-Francois Roberge to intervene, declaring that the expression 'Go Habs Go' is part of Quebec culture, and that any future complaints about the slogan would be dismissed. Article content That statement verged on political interference and placed the watchdog in a difficult position, according to one expert. Article content 'The office had to respond to a political order,' said Benoit Melancon, emeritus professor of French literature at Universite de Montreal. 'The minister said, 'You will accept this,' so the office had to find a way to accept it.' Article content Article content The transit agency says it hasn't decided whether it will put the word 'go' back on its bus displays. On Wednesday, a spokesperson said the agency is now 'beginning its reflection on the subject.' Article content In an April statement, Dominique Malack, the president of the language office, agreed that the slogan 'Go Habs Go' is anchored in Quebec's history. Still, she went on to say that the word 'go' is an anglicism, and that public bodies have an obligation to use 'exemplary' French, which includes using only French words in their signage. Article content Emails released to The Canadian Press show the transit agency asked the watchdog in May, following the uproar, for authorization to start using 'go' again. A month later, on June 6, the language office directed transit officials to its new entry for the word 'allez' in its online dictionary of terminology, a reference guide for the proper use of French in Quebec. Article content The page notes how the anglicism 'go' has been used in Quebec since at least the 1980s and is 'well-established' in common parlance. 'It is considered to be partially legitimized,' the entry says.

Colby Cosh: Carney's surrender to Trump was inevitable
Colby Cosh: Carney's surrender to Trump was inevitable

National Post

time33 minutes ago

  • National Post

Colby Cosh: Carney's surrender to Trump was inevitable

One funny thing about the 'elbows up!' slogan of the New Canadian Nationalism is that in real life it's pretty hard to hit yourself with your own elbow. But in the actual policy sphere, most of what we might do to put our elbows up against the United States involves self-harm or, at a minimum, self-denial. Article content On Sunday the Department of Finance issued a terse circular announcing that the Digital Services Tax announced in 2021 would not, as originally planned, begin to be collected on Monday. The DST (R.I.P.) was designed to exclusively target Canadian revenues of American 'web giants' that provide online services, advertising, or streaming content. As the Finance memo observes, it is being dropped at the last minute in the hope of restarting negotiations with the U.S. on an updated version of continental free trade. Article content The idea of a DST was framed by the Trudeau government as a moral necessity of the 21st century: something had to be done about foreign vampires like Netflix and Google which had built businesses with millions of Canadian customers out of digital ether, but paid no tax in Canada. Everybody recognized, however, that much of the cost of the tax was bound to come out of the pockets of the customers rather than the vampires. Article content Article content It's inherently difficult to know how the tax incidence would have worked out, because the process of digital price discovery isn't especially mature: some of these companies are still figuring out their own optimum, revenue-maximizing price points in plain sight. But from a selfish point of view, Canadian consumers, considered strictly as such, can only feel relief at the sudden abandonment of the DST. Article content Is this a craven surrender on the part of the post-Trudeau Liberals? Well, this is the problem with interpreting everything in brute terms of animalistic personal combat, isn't it? The governments of the developed nations largely agree (perhaps against the interests of their own citizens) that there ought to be an international framework for digital-services taxation, and the OECD reached an agreement that nobody would run wild and introduce their own digital taxes until the issue could be sorted out collectively. Article content From that neoliberal-nerd point of view, Canada went rogue when it announced a homebrewed DST — one that would have had a nasty retroactive effect, that was designed specifically only to collect from large American companies with recognizable names, and that didn't address double-taxation issues. And let's recall that Joe Biden was still president when this happened. Article content Article content It's worth noting that this isn't just a question of playing chess against Donald Trump. Canada was really forced to withdraw the DST by the terms of the Trump-designed One Big Beautiful Bill passed by the U.S. House of Representatives in May, and now before the Senate. The OBBB reflects the fact that there's genuine bipartisan distaste in the U.S. toward the digital taxes hypothecated by Canada and already in effect in some other countries; it allows for tax-withholding countermeasures against countries that impose 'unfair' taxes on U.S. digital companies, countermeasures whose size could easily have dwarfed the relatively meagre revenues from the DST. In other words, if the government hadn't pulled the plug on the DST, we might have quickly found out how a one-armed man does in a battle of elbows. Article content

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store