'Welfare reforms remain cruel policy despite changes - they are fatally flawed'
The UK government claims its latest benefits shake-up will help disabled people back into work, offering 'opportunity' and 'support.'
But, despite the concessions the government has made, beneath the surface of their welfare reforms remains a cruel, short-sighted policy that risks driving thousands of disabled people in the future into poverty. This is still a fatally flawed bill.
At Mind, we've heard from nearly 600 people with mental health problems who currently receive benefits.
Nearly two-thirds (63%) said a reduction in welfare support would harm their ability to work or even look for a job. That's hardly surprising when 93% said the changes would damage their finances.
How can anyone focus on job hunting if they can't afford the bus fare to an interview, or are too busy working out how to feed their children to polish up a CV?
The government has agreed that protections will remain in place for disabled people currently receiving benefits. But if these protections are right for disabled people now, why are they not also right for disabled people in the future?
The most controversial changes around future access to PIP (Personal Independence Payments) remain. The way new applicants will be assessed from next year will strip away PIP from thousands of people who would previously have qualified. PIP isn't about work incentives, it's there to help cover the extra costs disabled people face.
Scope estimates disabled households need at least an extra £1,000 a month just to have the same standard of living as others. Taking that away might make a government spreadsheet look better, but it strips away a vital lifeline for people who become unwell in the future. Unless the bill is scrapped altogether, it will lead to poverty.
Follow our Mirror Politics account on Bluesky here. And follow our Mirror Politics team here - Lizzy Buchan, Mikey Smith, Kevin Maguire, Sophie Huskisson, Dave Burke and Ashley Cowburn.
Be first to get the biggest bombshells and breaking news by joining our Politics WhatsApp group here. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you want to leave our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.
Or sign up here to the Mirror's Politics newsletter for all the best exclusives and opinions straight to your inbox.
And listen to our exciting new political podcast The Division Bell, hosted by the Mirror and the Express every Thursday.
People tell us they use PIP to pay for essentials like transport (81%), food (78%), and help with daily living when they're too unwell to leave home (70%). Half said that they needed PIP to cover the cost of treatments unavailable through the NHS, such as therapy for debilitating conditions like PTSD.
The extra costs of mental illness may be invisible, but they are no less real. Side effects of antipsychotics, for example, can include tremors, heart problems and drowsiness, which impact on day-to-day life significantly.
Even with concessions, the cuts this bill introduces to future benefits makes it untenable. What we need instead is decent mental health services, evidence-based employment programmes, and compassionate, flexible workplaces.
We urge MPs to oppose these plans and call on the government to build a system that supports people to live, recover and Thrive.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
38 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Keir Starmer cuts to push 150,000 people into poverty
Modelling published by the Department for Work and Pensions said the estimate does not include any 'potential positive impact' from extra funding and measures to support people with disabilities and long-term health conditions into work. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall announced last week that changes to the personal independence payment (Pip) will only apply to new claimants from November 2026, and ministers also rowed back on plans to cut the health-related element of Universal Credit after 126 Labour MPs signed an amendment that would have effectively killed the Government's Bill. Read More: The changes will reduce the amount of money the reforms will save, adding to Chancellor Rachel Reeves' headaches as she seeks to balance the books for day-to-day spending. Ms Kendall will update MPs on the changes later on Monday, with the Labour leadership still braced for a substantial revolt despite the changes aimed at averting a Government defeat in the Commons on Tuesday. A No 10 spokesman said: 'The broken welfare system we inherited is failing people every single day. 'It traps millions, it tells them the only way to get help is to declare they'll never work again and then abandons them. 'No help, no opportunity, no dignity and we can't accept that. 'For too long, meaningful reform to a failing system has been ducked.' Government whips are expected to continue talking to would-be rebels in the lead-up to Tuesday's vote, when the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Bill faces its first Commons test. The No 10 spokesman said the poverty modelling was 'subject to uncertainty' and showed 'the effect of these measures on poverty in isolation in 2029-30, it doesn't reflect the full picture'. He added: 'You have to look at the record levels of investment in the health and care system, £29 billion more day-to-day funding in real terms, than in 2023-24, to help people get the treatment they need on time to return to work.' An additional £1 billion a year by the end of the decade to help people with disabilities and long-term health conditions into jobs 'will directly help people move into work and become financially independent'. Downing Street would not be drawn on whether any Labour rebels will face losing the party whip. Baroness Jacqui Smith – who served as a chief whip under Sir Tony Blair – said it was not 'constructive' to talk about potential punishments for rebels. The education minister said it was important to keep talking to Labour MPs about the legislation. She told Sky News: 'I don't think talking about punishments, even as a former chief whip, is the constructive way forward here.' The Labour revolt has centred around support for a 'reasoned amendment', which would have halted the Bill, tabled by Dame Meg Hillier. But she has welcomed last week's concessions and the threat of a revolt on a scale big enough to defeat the Government appears to have receded. However, experts believe the Government still faces a 'non-trivial rebellion', an extraordinary situation as Sir Keir prepares to mark a year in No 10. According to analysis by Professor Philip Cowley of Queen Mary University of London, the largest revolt so far under Sir Keir has been 16, on the Planning and Infrastructure Bill. The largest rebellion in the first year of the Blair administration was 47, and in the course of his first parliament, it was 67 – both on welfare reform issues. The largest rebellion by Labour MPs at second reading of a Bill is 72 – shared by votes in 1947 on national service and 2004 on university fees. If the 126 Labour MPs signed up to Dame Meg's amendment did vote against the Government on Tuesday, the revolt would have been of a scale similar to the 139 who voted against the Iraq War.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Labour MPs call out Keir Starmer's 'rushed' disability cuts
The Prime Minister faced losing the July 1 vote on his Government's proposals to save £5 billion per year, primarily by cutting back Personal Independence Payments (Pip) – the main disability benefit paid to people in and out of work – and the health element of Universal Credit. After some 129 Labour MPs, as well as dozens from other parties, backed a 'reasoned amendment' which threatened to topple the cuts, Starmer rowed back and now plans to create a staggered system whereby current claimants will have their incomes protected in real terms, while claimants after November 2026 face cuts. UK Government figures projected that Starmer's original plans would force 250,000 people, including 50,000 children, into relative poverty. Under the revised plans, 150,000 people will be pushed into poverty. READ MORE: Tommy Sheppard: SNP must treat the Holyrood lists as the most important votes Labour MP Cat Eccles told the BBC that the concessions from the UK Government had come 'far too late'. 'We're not going to hear what the Secretary of State has got to say until later this afternoon, and then just 24 hours later, we're going to be expected to vote on this and just take the government's word that everything will be OK,' she went on. 'I just feel the bill is being really rushed through. The committee stages and 3rd reading will occur during the following seven days. These are processes that would normally take several weeks. 'They'd go in front of committee and hear oral evidence from people involved in organisations, people with lived experience, and we're not getting any of that.' Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall will outline the changes to the Labour Government's proposed cuts on Monday afternoon in a bid to quell the rebellion. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz KendallHowever, Eccles said the new proposals had been 'quickly drafted over a weekend just to rush it through'. 'I just cannot understand what the hurry is,' she added. Asked how many Labour MPs may still be planning to rebel and vote against the cuts, Eccles said there were 'a very large number of MPs who are awaiting the statement today, a large number who are just still completely opposed, and there's a number of people that we don't know what they're thinking at all, but we do know they're uncomfortable'. 'So I think it's still all up in the air about what could happen [at Tuesday's vote]', she added. Vicky Foxcroft, the Labour whip who resigned over the proposed welfare cuts, told The Guardian on Monday that the UK Government's concessions do not go far enough to win her round. READ MORE: UK Government wins High Court battle over exports of F-35 parts to Israel 'I would hope that actually we start to ensure we listen to disabled people and their organisations right across government. This isn't just about warm words. This is about making sure we get policy right', she said. 'Right now, we're kind of tinkering in terms of things to make it the least worst situation we can, and we need to learn lessons from that and make sure that we get these things right going forward.' And Simon Opher, a Labour MP and GP, also criticised the revised plans. 'It's not that we don't appreciate the concessions, we just feel that really, it's not going to help the situation,' he told the BBC. 'We want to really design a really good benefits system that looks after people, encourages people back to work, and also doesn't incorporate a two-tier system into the benefit system, which will cause problems in the future I'm sure.' Diane Abbott was among the Labour MPs to criticise Keir Starmer (Image: PA) Starmer has further faced criticism from Labour grandee Diane Abbott, who called out his claim to have been too focused on international affairs to head off the backbench rebellion. 'The PM surely does not expect anyone to believe he did not realise taking over £5 billion from the disabled was wrong because he was abroad,' Abbott wrote on social media.
South Wales Argus
an hour ago
- South Wales Argus
Welfare reforms could push 150,000 into poverty, official modelling suggests
The figure is down from the 250,000 extra people estimated to have been left in relative poverty after housing costs under the original proposals. Modelling published by the Department for Work and Pensions said the estimate does not include any 'potential positive impact' from extra funding and measures to support people with disabilities and long-term health conditions into work. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall is battling to get the welfare reforms through the Commons (Jacob King/PA) Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall announced last week that changes to the personal independence payment (Pip) will only apply to new claimants from November 2026, and ministers also rowed back on plans to cut the health-related element of Universal Credit after 126 Labour MPs signed an amendment that would have effectively killed the Government's Bill. The changes will reduce the amount of money the reforms will save, adding to Chancellor Rachel Reeves' headaches as she seeks to balance the books for day-to-day spending. Ms Kendall will update MPs on the changes later on Monday, with the Labour leadership still braced for a substantial revolt despite the changes aimed at averting a Government defeat in the Commons on Tuesday. A No 10 spokesman said: 'The broken welfare system we inherited is failing people every single day. 'It traps millions, it tells them the only way to get help is to declare they'll never work again and then abandons them. 'No help, no opportunity, no dignity and we can't accept that. 'For too long, meaningful reform to a failing system has been ducked.' The Prime Minister is expected to continue talking to would-be rebels in the lead-up to Tuesday's vote, when the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Bill faces its first Commons test.
