'I still occupy real estate in his head': Tesla co-founder Martin Eberhard takes a swipe at Elon Musk in rare interview
A Founding Story Often Overshadowed
You Might Also Like:
Was Elon Musk really a Tesla co-founder? How he became synonymous with the brand
On AI and Disappointments with ChatGPT
You Might Also Like:
Man asked his Tesla to take him somewhere new. What happened next left even Elon Musk in splits
In a rare and revealing interview with YouTuber Kim Java, Tesla co-founder Martin Eberhard opened up about the early days of the electric car company—and offered some sharp commentary on Elon Musk , the man who would eventually become its most recognizable face.Recounting how the company got its iconic name, Eberhard shared an unexpectedly charming anecdote. 'The idea of Tesla came to me because I was thinking about the motor I wanted to use. It came to me while I was on a date with a woman who became my wife,' he said. The couple were dining at the Blue Bayou restaurant inside Disneyland, overlooking the Pirates of the Caribbean ride. It was there, amidst candlelight and creaky boat rides, that the name Tesla sparked to life.'Naming a company is difficult,' Eberhard reflected. 'I had thought of a lot of lame names that I didn't like.' But Tesla, a nod to the legendary inventor Nikola Tesla , struck the perfect balance between heritage and futuristic promise.Eberhard founded Tesla Motors in July 2003, long before Elon Musk entered the frame. Musk joined as an investor and became chairman of the board in 2004, later taking the reins of the company. While Musk is widely credited with catapulting Tesla into a global brand, Eberhard's foundational role is often overlooked in public narratives.That erasure, however, hasn't gone unnoticed by Eberhard. In the interview, he noted with subtle but pointed sarcasm, 'I've been out of the company since the end of 2007 and yet every now and then he [Musk] decides to attack me again on some social media platform—or even on the stage at TED, he's done that—which is kind of weird.'In what seemed like a mic-drop moment, Eberhard added with a smirk: 'Somebody pointed out that I'm still occupying real estate in his head. Which is kind of funny when you think about it.'Eberhard didn't just dish on Tesla's origin story and his dynamic with Musk. He also weighed in on today's hottest tech topic—Artificial Intelligence. When asked if he uses tools like Grok or ChatGPT , he responded plainly, 'No.'He elaborated that he had 'fooled around' with the tools but found the experience 'disappointing.' According to him, ChatGPT would answer with complete confidence—even when it was wrong. 'I find this to be dangerous,' he said, emphasizing the risks of AI confidently providing incorrect information on topics the user might not fully understand.When asked whether reconciliation with Musk was ever on the cards, Eberhard shut down the possibility. 'No, I don't think so. No, I can't imagine how that would happen from either one of us. He's pretty set in his ways.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
Elon Musk-led Tesla to pay $243 mn in Florida crash case: Jury finds autopilot technology partly at fault; EV maker calls verdict 'wrong'
Elon Musk-led Tesla to pay $243 mn in Florida crash case A federal jury in Miami has ruled that Tesla must pay over $200 million in damages after finding its Autopilot driver-assist technology was partly responsible for a fatal 2019 crash that killed 22-year-old Naibel Benavides Leon and severely injured Dillon Angulo in Florida. The jury awarded $200 million in punitive damages and $43 million out of a total $129 million in compensatory damages to be paid by Tesla, concluding that the company's driver-assist system failed and bore significant responsibility for the crash. This decision makes Tesla liable for nearly two-thirds of the total damages, reported AP. The verdict also comes at a critical time for CEO Elon Musk, who is pushing to expand Tesla's autonomous vehicle technology and roll out a driverless taxi service in multiple US cities. The incident occurred when George McGee, who was driving a Tesla vehicle, ran through flashing lights, a stop sign, and a T-intersection at 62 mph, crashing into the parked Chevrolet Tahoe. Responding to the ruling, Tesla issued a statement calling the verdict 'wrong,' and argued that it undermines the industry's efforts to develop lifesaving technology.'Today's verdict is wrong," and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardize Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement lifesaving technology'. They said the plaintiffs concocted a story 'blaming the car when the driver from day one admitted and accepted responsibility. ' The plaintiffs' lead attorney Brett Schreiber, conceded that the driver, George McGee, acted negligently by running through flashing lights, a stop sign, and a T-intersection at a speed of 62 miles per hour before crashing into a parked Chevrolet Tahoe. 'I trusted the technology too much,' McGee said during his testimony. 'I believed that if the car saw something in front of it, it would provide a warning and apply the brakes.' However, Schreiber maintained that Tesla also bore responsibility. He argued that the company enabled dangerous driving behavior by failing to automatically disable Autopilot when drivers became distracted, and by permitting its use on roads like the one McGee was on—routes the system wasn't intended to operate on. Tesla's lead defense attorney in the Miami trial, Joel Smith, responded by emphasizing that the company clearly instructs drivers to stay attentive and keep their hands on the wheel. He said McGee ignored those warnings while searching for a dropped cellphone and was speeding, increasing the risk. Smith pointed out that McGee had driven through the same intersection 30 to 40 times without incident, concluding, 'The cause is that he dropped his cellphone. ' Jury called out Tesla's use of the term 'Autopilot' as Schreiber argued that while other automakers use terms like 'driver assist' or 'copilot,' Tesla's branding gave consumers a false sense of full autonomy, leading to over-reliance on the system. Lawyers for the family of the deceased also claimed that Tesla either hid or lost key evidence, including data and video recorded seconds before the accident. Financial analyst Dan Ives of Wedbush Securities comments on the verdict, 'It's not a good day for Tesla. It's a big number that will send shock waves to others in the industry.' The ruling marks a rare outcome in product liability litigation against Tesla. A car crash lawyer Miguel Custodio, said, 'This will open the floodgates.' 'It will embolden a lot of people to come to court.' Several similar lawsuits have been filed against the company in recent years, but many have been dismissed or settled before reaching trial. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . Discover stories of India's leading eco-innovators at Ecopreneur Honours 2025
Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
BYD's July production falls for first time in 17 months as expansion spree slows
BYD 's vehicle production fell 0.9 per cent in July from a year earlier, ending a 16-month growth streak that has catapulted the Chinese automaker into the world's largest electric vehicle maker. BYD made 317,892 electric vehicles and plug-in hybrids (PHEVs) globally last month, while sales edged up 0.6 per cent to 344,296 vehicles, slowing sharply from a 12 per cent increase in June, according to a monthly filing with the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. Its EV sales and production still grew in July versus last year, but PHEV sales dropped 22.6 per cent and production shrank 24.6 per cent. The company last saw shrinking production in February 2024, in line with an industry-wide fall due to the timing of China's Lunar New Year holiday, which fell in February versus January in the prior year. Sales contracted in February 2024 as well. BYD, which is the biggest Chinese rival to Tesla, saw both production and sales hit record highs in the fourth quarter of 2024 before trending down this year. With electric car sales accounting for 41 per cent of its more than 4 million vehicle sales last year, BYD has overtaken the US EV specialist as the world's top EV seller. BYD, engaged in a bruising price war in the world's largest auto market, has slowed its production pace in recent months by reducing shifts at some factories in China and delayed plans to add new production lines, Reuters reported in June.
Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
Tesla sales in Portugal slump 48.5% in July, total EVs rise
Tesla's new car registrations in Portugal fell 48.5 per cent in July from a year ago to 284 units, as overall new registrations of light electric vehicles rose about 9.5 per cent , the country's automobile industry association ACAP said on Friday. In the January-July period, Tesla sales fell 27.4 per cent in Portugal to 4,372 units, while the total of light electric cars rose 27.2 per cent . Data from several other key European markets earlier on Friday showed Tesla registrations fell in July despite a revamp to its signature Model Y, as the EV maker struggles with a backlash to CEO Elon Musk's political views, regulatory challenges and rising competition.
