How Do Cyprus and Croatia Fit Into India's Europe Strategy?
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to Cyprus, Canada, and Croatia earlier this month was significant in many ways. Notably, it was the first foreign trip by the Indian prime minister after India's Operation Sindoor.
The visit to Canada as part of India's G-7 partnership monopolized most analysts' attention. It signaled a thaw in relationship between the two countries, which had soured in the last year. Nevertheless, the G-7 could not produce tangible results in its 50th anniversary, and a rupture in the Western world was visible with U.S. President Donald Trump leaving the summit early.
The other two countries on Modi's itinerary – Cyprus, which Modi visited en route to Canada and Croatia, where he stopped on his way back to India– deserve a closer look.
India quickly established diplomatic relations from the moment Cyprus acquired freedom in 1960, molded by the shared experience of anti-colonial struggle – the British had colonized both countries – and a mutual commitment to non-alignment. Following U.N. resolutions and opposing any legitimization of the self-declared Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, India firmly established its support of Cyprus's sovereignty, and deepened the relationship after the 1974 Turkish invasion.
This was not only solidarity amid the Cold War. Supporting Cyprus, for India, has long represented its belief in the dignity of international law, its resistance to foreign intervention, and its voice for the post-colonial Global South. In turn, Cyprus has been a consistent friend, supporting India's U.N. Security Council ambitions, standing with New Delhi in several multilateral venues, and backing India's stance on Kashmir.
But the relationship has lagged amid shifting geopolitical conditions. The Eastern Mediterranean is now a theater for energy politics, maritime rivalry, and EU border security, not a passive space. Although Cyprus is not a significant EU power, its location and its foreign policy approach make it a perfect partner for India in influencing debates on the rule of law, maritime order, and the course of multilateralism. Cyprus will also hold the Council of Europe rotating chair for the first six months of 2026, helping India reap dividends from this relationship.
The unwavering support that Pakistan got from Turkiye after the Pahalgam terror incident also arguably had something to do with Modi's visit to Cyprus. India may be signaling to Turkiye that it will also support its adversaries, just as Ankara supported Islamabad.
Modi's visit to Croatia was the first such visit by an Indian prime minister since the Balkan country gained independence from the disintegrated Yugoslavia in 1991. Yugoslavia has been a torchbearer alongside India in the Non-Aligned Movement. With a considerable soft power presence in Croatia, which has a strong tradition of Indology and a fondness for Sanskrit literature, India wants to extend these cultural linkages to economic and political spheres. In 2019, then-Indian President Ram Nath Kovind headed a delegation-level talks with Croatia; however, much of its focus was mainly on cultural, educational and tourism ties.
There has been a steady growth in trade between India and Croatia, from $204.15 million in 2019-20 to $291.36 million in 2023-24. Croatia, located around the Adriatic Sea, provides an ample opportunity for the India-Middle East Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC). Other than that, it also provides India with much-needed access to Central and Eastern Europe and the Baltic Sea region, providing a link to an effective network of European road transport. India currently uses the Hamburg and Rotterdam ports, which are already very busy. The Croatian ports of Rijeka, Ploce, and Zadar can be good choices to divert some trade volumes.
Modi's talks with his Croatian counterpart focused mainly on discussion involving 'trade and investment, science and technology, defense and security, space, cultural cooperation, and people-to-people ties.' According to India's Ministry of External Affairs, 'The two leaders agreed that there were significant opportunities for increased cooperation in sectors such as infrastructure, ports and shipping, digitization, AI, renewable energy, Pharma and tourism and hospitality.' Other than that, the two leaders have also focused on enhanced business-to-business ties between the two countries.
The liberal free market idea suggests that the growth of unregulated markets produces a bigger pie, which can be divided among all concerned parties. In a time when free markets are disturbed by tariffs, regional conflicts, and states' weaponization of supply chains, it makes perfect sense for India to increasingly engage with big players in Europe and smaller ones with considerable heft in European political affairs.
In a fractured Western world, where apparent differences are visible between the United States and continental Europe, the latter is also searching for like-minded partners that can be relied on in turbulent times. For Cyprus and Croatia, there is also a balance to be found between India and China, embracing greater relations with the former to avoid overdependence on the latter. Nevertheless, India needs to extend this momentum to other states lying between the Adriatic and Baltic Sea regions. Only then can some tangible outcome can be expected for India's European strategy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Today
19 hours ago
- Japan Today
Irish hip-hop trio Kneecap play Glastonbury despite calls for ban
FILE PHOTO: Irish rap group Kneecap perform on stage at the Fairview Park music festival, in Dublin, Ireland, June 19, 2025. REUTERS/Clodagh Kilcoyne/File Photo By Paul Sandle and Kristian Brunse Irish hip-hop group Kneecap played to a huge crowd at Glastonbury Festival on Saturday despite criticism by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and pressure from some in the music industry to pull the gig. Frontman Liam O'Hanna, whose stage name is Mo Chara, was charged with a terrorism offence last month for allegedly displaying a flag in support of Iran-backed militant group Hezbollah at a concert in November. He denied the charge. Starmer told the Sun newspaper this month it was "not appropriate" for Kneecap, who rap in Irish and English, to appear at Glastonbury. With the outdoor arena at full capacity and scores of Palestinian flags waving in the blazing sun, the Northern Irish trio took to the West Holts stage at the festival in southwest England on Saturday. Festival-goer Greg Robertson, 30, said: "I don't think politicians should really have too much of an impact on a weekend where everyone's trying to have fun and trying to maybe create a more optimistic future." Sara Majid, 29, said she liked what Kneecap stood for. "I'm intrigued by them," she said. Opposition leader Kemi Badenoch had said the BBC, which broadcasts the festival, should not show Kneecap, and 30 music industry bosses asked organisers to pull the band from the line-up, according to a letter leaked by DJ Toddla T, cited by the Guardian newspaper. In response, more than 100 musicians have signed a public letter in support of the group. Kneecap's manager, Dan Lambert, said the group had expected calls for the performance to be cancelled. "We knew that the biggest pressure would come on Glastonbury because Glastonbury's an institution," he told Reuters, adding that it had not been an issue for organisers. "We didn't bring it up and they didn't bring it up," he said. "They treated us professionally." Organiser Emily Eavis said on Wednesday the festival was a platform for artists from all over the world, adding that "everyone is welcome here". The footage of O'Hanna displaying the flag came to light after the trio projected pro-Palestinian messages on stage at the Coachella Valley Music and Arts Festival in California in April, ending with: "F... Israel. Free Palestine." Kneecap, whose other members have the stage names Móglaí Bap and DJ Próvaí, have said they do not support Hamas or Hezbollah. O'Hanna said on Friday the group were "playing characters" on stage, and it was up to the audience to interpret their messages. © Thomson Reuters 2025.
Japan Today
19 hours ago
- Japan Today
G7 agrees to avoid higher taxes for U.S. and UK companies
FILE PHOTO: A man walk past the G7 members flags at the Manoir Richelieu before the G7 Foreign Ministers summit in La Malbaie, Quebec, Canada March 12, 2025. REUTERS/Mathieu Belanger/File Photo By Harshita Meenaktshi, Bipasha Dey and Promit Mukherjee The United States and the Group of Seven nations have agreed to support a proposal that would exempt U.S. companies from some components of an existing global agreement, the G7 said in a statement on Saturday. The group has created a 'side-by-side' system in response to the U.S. administration agreeing to scrap the Section 899 retaliatory tax proposal from President Donald Trump's tax and spending bill, it said in a statement from Canada, the head of the rolling G7 presidency. The G7 said the plan recognizes existing U.S. minimum tax laws and aims to bring more stability to the international tax system. UK businesses are also spared higher taxes after the removal of Section 899 from President Donald Trump's tax and spending bill. Britain said businesses would benefit from greater certainty and stability following the agreement. Some British businesses had in recent weeks said they were worried about paying substantial additional tax due to the inclusion of Section 899, which has now been removed. "Today's agreement provides much-needed certainty and stability for those businesses after they had raised their concerns," finance minister Rachel Reeves said in a statement, adding that more work was need to tackle aggressive tax planning and avoidance. G7 officials said that they look forward to discussing a solution that is "acceptable and implementable to all". In January, through an executive order, Trump declared that the global corporate minimum tax deal was not applicable in the U.S., effectively pulling out of the landmark 2021 arrangement negotiated by the Biden administration with nearly 140 countries. He had also vowed to impose a retaliatory tax against countries that impose taxes on U.S. firms under the 2021 global tax agreement. This tax was considered detrimental to many foreign companies operating in the U.S. © Thomson Reuters 2025.
Japan Today
19 hours ago
- Japan Today
U.N. bids to salvage global development summit after U.S. boycott
FILE PHOTO: The logo of the United Nations is seen in the General Assembly hall before heads of state begin to address the 76th Session of the U.N. General Assembly in New York City, U.S., September 21, 2021. REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz/Pool/File photo By David Latona and Marc Jones Scores of world leaders will be sweltering in the summer sun of southern Spain this week at a once-a-decade United Nations development financing summit aimed at curbing global poverty, disease and the worst-case threats of climate change. Despite the scorching temperatures, though, a major chill looms over the event - the decision early this month by the United States, traditionally the world's largest aid giver and key finance provider, not to show up. U.N. countries want to close a $4 trillion-a-year funding gap they now estimate prevents the developing world achieving the organization's Sustainable Development Goals that range from cutting infant death rates to minimizing global warming. Critics say the promises at the heart of the conference - called the "Seville Commitment" - are nowhere near bold enough. The measures, agreed by consensus after a year of tough negotiations, include tripling multilateral lending capacity, debt relief, a push to boost tax-to-GDP ratios to at least 15%, and shifting special IMF money to countries that need it most. The run-up, however, has been marred by the U.S. decision to withdraw over what it said was the crossing of a number of its red lines, including the push to triple development bank lending, change tax rules and the use of the term "gender" in summit wording. The European Union only joined the summit with reservations, particularly over how debt is discussed within the U.N. Speaking to reporters, U.N. Deputy Secretary-General Amina Mohammed described Washington's boycott as "regrettable", especially after its "catastrophic" recent aid cuts that she said had cost lives and livelihoods. Speaking alongside officials from summit host Spain and Zambia, which has helped organize it, she said the final outcome document agreed reflected both "ambition and realism" and that the U.N. would try to re-engage the U.S. afterwards. Remy Rioux, chief executive officer of the French Development Agency, said Washington's withdrawal had not been a total surprise given Donald Trump's views. The hope is that agreements will allow bolder action at the U.N. climate talks in Brazil in November. "We will push for the new framework... (and) its operationalization from Seville to Belem," he added, referring to the Brazilian city that will host COP30. AID IN DECLINE Other measures to be announced include multilateral lenders automatically giving vulnerable countries the option to insert repayment break clauses into their loans in case of hurricane, drought or flood. Another buzz phrase will be a "Global SDR playbook" - a plan where the wealthiest countries rechannel the IMF's reserve-like Special Draw Rights they hold to the multilateral banks, who then leverage them as capital in order to lend more. Campaigners warn that it will fall far short of what is needed, especially as more than 130 countries now face critically high debt levels and many spend more on repayments than on health or education. Aid and support from rich countries, who themselves have rising debts, is dropping too. In March, the U.S. slashed more than 80% of programs at its USAID agency following federal budget cuts spearheaded by billionaire Elon Musk. Britain, France, Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden have all made cuts in recent years too. The OECD projects a 9–17% drop in net official development assistance (ODA) in 2025, following a 9% decline in 2024. It looks set to hit the poorest countries hardest: bilateral ODA to least developed countries and sub-Saharan Africa may fall by 13-25% and 16-28% respectively, the OECD estimates, and health funding could drop by up to 60% from its 2022 peak. So what would be a good outcome in Seville, especially given the U.S. pull-out? "We should make sure we are not backtracking at this point," said Orville Grey at the International Institute for Sustainable Development, referring to funding commitments. "We should at least remain stable." © Thomson Reuters 2025.
