Fed takes fresh steps to defend renovations as White House intensifies attacks
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Top administration officials, including James Blair, the White House's deputy chief of staff, have demanded a tour of the construction site. On Friday, Blair, newly appointed to the National Capital Planning Commission, rejected an offer by the Fed to visit at 7 p.m. that evening and said he did not want to see the site after-hours. 'We want to see what's going on,' he told reporters. 'We want to see what the construction is like.'
Advertisement
Blair has referred to the Fed's headquarters as the 'Taj Mahal on the National Mall.' He also has gone after Powell directly, posting a meme on social media of the central bank chair dressed as Marie Antoinette that read, 'Let them eat basis points.'
Advertisement
The renovations, which have been happening since 2021 and are around $700 million over budget, have become the administration's latest attack line against Powell, whose hesitancy to lower interest rates has made him a frequent target of President Donald Trump.
Trump has called for borrowing costs, which are in range of 4.25% to 4.5%, to be roughly 3 percentage points lower. He has argued, incorrectly, that there is no inflation, and has said that by maintaining interest rates, the Fed is costing the country trillions of dollars in expenses associated with the government covering interest payments on its debts.
The president, who has repeatedly insulted Powell, has advanced his pressure campaign. Last week, Trump more openly toyed with trying to fire the Powell despite protections granted by the Supreme Court that limit Trump's ability to do so, and he also brandished a draft letter firing Powell to House Republicans in the Oval Office.
Powell can be removed from his post only if there is 'cause,' an ambiguous term that legal experts have often interpreted to mean gross misconduct or a violation of the law. That has caused the administration to try to build a case against Powell, alleging that he mismanaged the renovations. Trump has even gone so far as to question if Powell had committed 'fraud.'
'I mean it's possible there's fraud involved with the $2.5 billion renovation,' Trump said last week.
Advertisement
Despite the pressure campaign, the Fed is widely expected to again hold interest rates steady when its officials gather for their July meeting next week.
This article originally appeared in
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mike Johnson Shuts Down U.S. House Until September to Prevent Congress from Voting to Release Epstein Files
The GOP House speaker opted to send lawmakers home for the summer a day early after pressure began mounting for Republicans to defy Trump and demand more Epstein evidence House Speaker Mike Johnson is shutting the House of Representatives down early in order to prevent lawmakers from voting on the release of the Epstein files. On Monday night, the House Rules committee came to a stalemate, with Democrats — and some Republicans — pushing to include Epstein-related proposals in bills up for debate this week. Rather than allow more votes on the Epstein evidence, Republicans recessed the committee. This means that, while the House was due to be in session until Thursday, July 24, they won't have anything to vote on after Wednesday, and representatives will adjourn for their summer break. Johnson toed President Donald Trump's party line when addressing the decision with reporters. ADVERTISEMENT "We all understand that the 'America First' agenda and the American people are best served by putting an end to the Democrat side shows, and that's what we're doing by not allowing the Rules Committee to continue with that nonsense this week," the Louisiana Republican said. "We are not going to let them use this as a political battering ram," he added. "The Rules Committee became the ground for them to do that." Andrew Harnik/Getty President Donald Trump and Speaker of the House Mike Johnson speak to the press on May 20, 2025 Earlier this month, the Department of Justice and FBI released a joint memo, which stated that their investigation into Epstein's alleged crimes and subsequent death in prison was complete. The memo also stated the investigation found that Epstein's long-rumored "client list" did not exist. Since then, calls for the Trump administration to release the evidence in the 2019 child sex trafficking case against the billionaire and alleged predator have come from Democrats and Republicans alike. ADVERTISEMENT Trump, who campaigned last year on promises that he would declassify and release more evidence related to the Epstein case, has since backtracked, referring to interest in the case as the "Epstein hoax," and shunning followers who "bought into" it. Earlier this week, he did direct Attorney General Pam Bondi to release "any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony," though it's unclear how much evidence the president's social media orders will be able to make public. By law, grand jury testimony is kept secret, except in matters of national security or counterintelligence, neither of which applies in this case. Moreover, some legal experts have said that the release of the grand jury testimony may be a misdirect to appease the public and distract from the other evidence in the case. 'Trump knows SDNY prosecutors seeking to indict Epstein and Maxwell didn't ask questions about him in their grand jury presentations while he was POTUS. It's a red herring to distract from the evidence that matters: witness interview notes, videos, photos, etc.,' wrote Kristy Greenberg, a legal analyst for MSNBC and a former federal prosecutor, on X on July 17. Davidoff Studios/Getty Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago in 1997 According to an itemized list from the Department of Justice, the evidence in their custody includes photos, cameras, computers, hard drives and more, including one CD labeled "girl pics nude book 4." ADVERTISEMENT However, Trump's grand jury orders were enough for Johnson, who continued on Tuesday to accuse Democrats of playing "political games" in the House. "The president has said clearly, and he has now ordered his DOJ to do what it is we've all needed DOJ to do for years now, and that is to get everything released," he said. "So they're in the process of that. There's no purpose for Congress to push an administration to do something that they're already doing." "We can both call for full transparency and also protect victims. And if you run roughshod or you do it too quickly, that's not what happens," the House speaker added. Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie, a libertarian-aligned lawmaker, is one of the few congressional Republicans who has pushed back against Trump during his second term. He one of only two House Republicans who voted against Trump's "Big, Beautiful Bill" earlier this month and has been one of the most vocal members of the House calling for a vote on releasing the Epstein docs. This has placed him in Trump's crosshairs and earned him a social media rant from the president on Tuesday. ADVERTISEMENT "Thomas Massie, the worst Republican Congressman, and an almost guaranteed NO VOTE each and every time, is an Embarrassment to Kentucky," Trump wrote. "He's lazy, slow moving, and totally disingenuous - A real loser! Never has anything positive to add. Looking for someone good to run against this guy, someone I can Endorse and vigorously campaign for!" Never miss a story — sign up for PEOPLE's free daily newsletter to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Speaking with a reporter outside the Capitol building later in the day, Massie didn't seem bothered by the president's threats. "They're trying to beat up on me to keep everybody else in line here," he said. "I think it's not working. I think what's gonna happen is this will be a referendum on whether the executive branch controls the legislative branch." "I'm gonna prevail, and what they're gonna find out is, it will embolden members of Congress here to go with their heart, with their mind, with their constituents, and not just toe the party line," Massie added. Read the original article on People
USA Today
10 minutes ago
- USA Today
Tanks and thousands of soldiers marched in DC Army parade. What was the cost?
WASHINGTON – The Army spent $30 million on the massive 250th anniversary parade that rumbled down the streets of the nation's capital for hours on June 14, coinciding with President Donald Trump's birthday, Army officials told reporters on July 22. The cost of the military parade was initially estimated at $25 million to $45 million. The money covered the cost of hauling dozens of tanks and armored vehicles by train and truck from military bases in Texas to the nation's capital. Approximately 7,000 soldiers also converged on Washington for the occasion, with some marching the route in historic costumes. Warplanes flew overhead, and Army parachutists sailed down from the skies before a crowd of thousands. The Army's final tabulation does not include the cost of the parade's significant security requirements, including for the Secret Service, Department of Homeland Security, FBI and local police personnel to secure a chunk of downtown Washington and monitor possible threats. The parade was designated as a "National Security Special Event," a category for large events that could be targets for terrorist attacks and thus require additional work for law enforcement. Before the parade, authorities laid down 18.5 miles of fencing and installed 175 magnetometers to screen everyone who entered the restricted area to watch the parade or participate in the Army festival held that day. Local officials in Washington raised concerns in the lead-up to the parade about possible damage to city streets. Officials on July 22 said that it did not turn out to be a major problem. Steve Warren, an Army spokesperson, said damage done by the tanks to Washington's roads was "minimal" – one street curb at a park along the Potomac River was crushed. The Army had promised to cover the cost of repairs for damage to the city's roads after Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser said she was "concerned" the tanks would chew them up. Critics, including Democratic lawmakers, said the parade politicized the military in a celebration of Trump's birthday that seemed reminiscent of the ostentatious scenes to celebrate dictators abroad. Trump presided over the parade from a presidential booth, but the Army and White House denied allegations that his birthday was the reason for the event or that the timing was intentional. Trump opponents across the country held thousands of "No Kings Day" protests on the day of the parade. Demonstrators in Washington marched to the White House in a "Refuse Fascism" protest. Warren said the Army experienced a marketing boost in the two weeks leading up to the parade, including a spike in website and social media views and a 31% increase in incoming calls. "We wanted Americans to feel connected to the Army," he said.
USA Today
10 minutes ago
- USA Today
U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee ban transgender women athletes, per Trump's order
Bowing to pressure from President Donald Trump, the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee quietly changed its rules to prevent participation by transgender women athletes. Buried on page five of its "Athlete Safety Policy" is a paragraph stating, "The USOPC is committed to protecting opportunities for athletes participating in sport. The USOPC will continue to collaborate with various stakeholders with oversight responsibilities, e.g., IOC, IPC, NGBs, to ensure that women have a fair and safe competition environment consistent with Executive Order 14201 and the Ted Stevens Olympic & Amateur Sports Act." While that mentions nothing about transgender athletes, the executive order signed by Trump is designed to prevent transgender girls and women from participating in sports. In a letter sent Tuesday to the U.S. Olympic community, USOPC president Gene Sykes and CEO Sarah Hirshland said the change came after "a series of respectful and constructive conversations with federal officials" following the executive order, which Trump signed in February. "As a federally chartered organization, we have an obligation to comply with federal expectations. The guidance we've received aligns with the Ted Stevens Act, reinforcing our mandated responsibility to promote athlete safety and competitive fairness," the letter read. The letter also said individual national governing bodies are required to update their policies to align with the USOPC's change, first reported by the New York Times. Prior to this change, which was adopted last month, the USOPC had said decisions on transgender participation were to be made based on "fairness" and should be up to each individual sport's governing body. "In our world of elite sport, these elements of fairness demand that we reconcile athlete inclusion and athlete opportunity. The only way to do that for all genders, and specifically for those who are transgender, is to rely on real data and science-based evidence rather than ideology," according to a page on the USOPC's website, which now carries a note at the top referring to the Athlete Safety Policy. The United States has never had an openly transgender woman athlete compete at the Olympics. In fact, in the 20 years the IOC allowed the participation of transgender athletes, New Zealand weightlifter Laurel Hubbard is the only openly transgender woman to compete at an Olympic Games. Hubbard was knocked out in the opening round. But inclusion of transgender athletes has become an increasingly charged political issue, despite a lack of science showing they have a competitive advantage. World Athletics and World Aquatics have both banned transgender women who have gone through male puberty from competing, and International Olympic Committee president Kirsty Coventry last month announced the creation of a task force to examine how to "protect the female category." The USOPC had said little about the issue. But with Los Angeles hosting the Summer Games in 2028, it has been careful not to say or do anything that could draw the ire of the Trump administration. While the USOPC is not funded by the government, as many other countries are, it does use government services. The Department of Homeland Security, for example, will help provide security for Los Angeles.
