logo
If Jake Berry is the answer, what's the question?

If Jake Berry is the answer, what's the question?

Few who were there will quickly forget the 2022 Conservative Party conference in Birmingham. After a tropically hot leadership race summer, beginning with the collapse of Boris Johnson's government in June, punctuated by sweaty candidate launches in feverish think tank offices over the following weeks, and terminating in the surreal spectacle of Liz Truss's uninspired victory speech to a Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre audience of stone-faced Tory MPs in September, the party gathered in Birmingham to tear itself to shreds.
The aforementioned Queen had died – of natural causes. The British economy died around the same time – murdered by Kwasi Kwarteng's mini budget. The Chancellor himself would not survive conference. An argument about scrapping the 45p tax rate descended into farce over the four days. Multiple ministers providing multiple interpretations of the policy. Jacob Rees-Mogg haunted the fringe, like a bad folk memory vomited up from the 19th century, cracking jokes about sending children back up the chimneys. Suella Braverman talked about her dream: A Telegraph front page exclaiming the first successful deportation flight to Rwanda. Truss had been Prime Minister for mere weeks, yet the sound of ministerial jostling to hack her out of Downing Street was audible in Birmingham. The stage scenery of the Conservative Party was being removed. Without it, the party was naked and vulnerable and, frankly, confusing. The Conservatives no longer appeared to know what Conservatism was anymore. The public still haven't forgiven them for their impudence, and punished them accordingly less than 18 months later.
Of no help at all as the party descended into self-defeating blather was Jake Berry, its then chairman and minister without portfolio. In Birmingham, Berry's laboured attempts to calm things down were a painful sideshow, largely hidden by the greater pain of his more famous colleagues. But still. Berry managed to spend a Sunday of media appearances defending the end of the 45p rate only for it to be retracted by Kwarteng hours later on Monday morning. Berry also made it clear that any of his colleagues who failed to back the mini-budget in an eventual parliamentary vote should lose the whip. On Sky News Berry suggested, in a sub-Norman Tebbit moment, that families being immiserated by high energy bills, 'can either cut their consumption, get a higher salary, or go out there and get that new job'.
'He's probably our worst performing cabinet minister so far – one disaster per utterance,' a former minister told the Guardian. 'Even Kwasi has a better record.' Berry fled the chairmanship when Rishi Sunak became Prime Minister, two weeks after he recieved his knighthood.
Yesterday evening Sir Jake Berry reappeared in a new guise: as a member of Reform. He joined eleven other ex-Tory MPs who have fled to the party including Lee Anderson, Dame Andrea Jenkyns, Anne Marie Morris, Macro Longhi, David Jones, Alan Amos, Michael Brown, Aiden Burley, Chris Butler and the indestructible Ann Widdecombe.
Berry, an MP during every year of the Cameron, May, Johnson, Truss and Sunak governments who held several ministerial posts as well as chairing the Northern Research Group, said that the Tories had 'lost their way'. He was also, before the referendum, a Remainer. It's a bit like serving five tours in Vietnam and deciding that maybe Ho Chi Minh had a point all along. Intellectually justifiable, but perhaps a bit late in the day: you might have been more advised to discover your views mid-way through your second tour of duty.
Why are Reform leading the polls? Why do those polls show the North, Midlands and the Coasts turning teal in 2029. Because Reform are not the Conservative Party or the Labour Party. They do not have a record of failure that stretches back to 1997. Farage, once toxic, is still less toxic than what Reform voters are encouraged to call 'the Uniparty'.
Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe
It might be fun – and in the short-term advantageous – for Reform to welcome Tory defectors. Kemi Badenoch's low speed, low energy, low ambition leadership is going nowhere. Defections only underline that further by deepening the awkward embarassment so many Conservatives, whether they are MPs or members, feel about their leader.
But if too many former Conservative MPs with, lets face it, hardly sparkling records or reputations, join Reform they risk losing their essential advantage over Labour and the Tories. If you are one of Reform's new members, or even one of its old ones, why should Jake Berry get parachuted into what will likely by a very safe seat for your party in 2029? Why should somebody at the coalface of fourteen years of failure be welcomed up into the air of your new party?
Berry's announcement was welcomed by Nigel Farage. As with so many of the short-term moves made by Reform's leader in recent months, it raises one of the most important questions in British politics today: does Nigel Farage have understand what he is doing? If Reform is joining the Uniparty, what's the point of Reform?
Related
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Thousands being relocated to UK after personal data leak of Afghans
Thousands being relocated to UK after personal data leak of Afghans

BreakingNews.ie

timean hour ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

Thousands being relocated to UK after personal data leak of Afghans

Thousands of people are being relocated to the UK as part of a secret £850 million scheme set up after a personal data leak of Afghans who supported British forces, it can now be reported. A dataset containing the personal information of nearly 19,000 people who applied for the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (Arap) was released 'in error' in February 2022 by a defence official. Advertisement The breach resulted in the creation of a secret Afghan relocation scheme – the Afghanistan Response Route – in April 2024. The scheme is understood to have cost around £400 million so far, with a projected cost once completed of around £850 million. Millions more is expected to be paid in legal costs and compensation. The UK ministry of defence (MoD) only became aware of the breach over a year after the release, when excerpts of the dataset were anonymously posted onto a Facebook group in August 2023. Advertisement Details on the dataset include the the names and contact details of the Arap applicants and names of their family members. Arap was responsible for relocating Afghan nationals who had worked for or with the UK government and were therefore at risk of reprisals once the Taliban returned to power in Kabul in 2021. Between 80,000 and 100,000 people, including the estimated number of family members of the Arap applicants, were affected by the breach and could be at risk of harassment, torture or death if the Taliban obtained their data, judges said in June 2024. However an independent review, commissioned by the UK government in January 2025, concluded last month that the dataset is 'unlikely to significantly shift Taliban understanding of individuals who may be of interest to them'. Advertisement Around 4,500 people – made up of 900 Arap applicants and approximately 3,600 family members have been brought to the UK or are in transit so far through the Afghanistan Response Route. A further estimated 600 people and their relatives are expected to be relocated before the scheme closes, with a total of around 6,900 people expected to be relocated by the end of the scheme. Projected costs of the scheme may include relocation costs, transitional accommodation, legal costs and local authority tariffs. It is understood that the unnamed official had emailed the dataset outside of a secure government system while attempting to verify information, believing the dataset to only have around 150 rows. Advertisement However, there were more than 33,000 rows of information which were inadvertently sent. An unprecedented superinjunction was made at the High Court in September 2023 to reduce the risk of alerting the Taliban to the existence of the data, with the decision to apply for an order made by then-defence secretary Ben Wallace. The Information Commissioner's Office and Metropolitan Police were also informed. The superinjunction, lifted on Tuesday, is thought to be the longest lasting order of its kind and the first time the Government has sought such a restrictive measure against the media. Advertisement At multiple hearings, lawyers for the MoD said in written submissions that there was a 'very real risk that people who would otherwise live will die' if the Taliban gained access to the data. However, a recent report by retired civil servant Paul Rimmer said: 'Given the data they already have access to as the de facto government, we believe it is unlikely the dataset would be the single, or definitive, piece of information enabling or prompting the Taliban to act.' Mr Rimmer further found that the Government possibly 'inadvertently added more value to the dataset' by seeking the unprecedented superinjunction and creating a bespoke resettlement scheme. Under plans set out last October, the Afghanistan Response Route was expected to allow up to 25,000 people – most of whom were ineligible for Arap but deemed to be at the highest risk from Taliban reprisals – to be relocated. One internal Government document from February this year said: 'This will mean relocating more Afghans to the UK than have been relocated under the Arap scheme, at a time when the UK's immigration and asylum system is under significant strain. This will extend the scheme for another five years at a cost of c. £7 billion.' This figure is understood to be a previous estimate of the cost of all Afghan relocations, with projected costs now between £5.5 billion and £6 billion. The resettlement schemes are closing, with the review suggesting that the Afghanistan Response Route may be 'disproportionate' to the impact of the Taliban obtaining the information. As of March 2025, around 36,000 people had been relocated to the UK under Arap and other resettlement schemes. Arap, which was launched in April 2021, is now closed to new applicants after immigration rule changes were laid in Parliament earlier this month. The Government had originally outlined plans to launch a compensation scheme for those affected by the breach, with an estimated cost of between £120 and £350 million, not including administration expenses. Hundreds of data protection legal challenges are also expected, with the court previously told that a Manchester-based law firm already had several hundred prospective clients. A High Court judge lifted the superinjunction. Photo: PA. The breach can now be reported after a High Court judge lifted the superinjunction – which prohibited making any reference to the existence of the court proceedings and is thought to have been the longest and widest ranging of its kind – on Tuesday. In one of several rulings, judge Mr Justice Chamberlain noted the superinjunction 'imposed very wide-ranging restrictions', with information about the breach limited to selected officials. In a decision in November 2023, Mr Justice Chamberlain said while the superinjunction did not constrain what could be said in Parliament, 'MPs and peers cannot ask questions about something they do not know about'. The judge ruled in May 2024 that the order should be lifted, stating there was a 'significant possibility' the Taliban knew about the dataset, adding it was 'fundamentally objectionable' that decisions about thousands of people's lives and 'enormous sums of public money now being committed' were being taken in secret. However, judges at the Court of Appeal overturned this ruling the following month, finding that he had not properly considered the consequences of lifting the order and that the superinjunction should stay in place. Following the retired civil servant's review, the MoD agreed on July 4 that the order could be lifted. It is expected that the cost of seeking and maintaining the superinjunction will be several million pounds. Reading a summary of his judgment in court on Tuesday, Mr Justice Chamberlain noted that the grant of the superinjunction had 'given rise to serious free speech concerns'. He added: 'The superinjunction had the effect of completely shutting down the ordinary mechanisms of accountability which operate in a democracy. 'This led to what I describe as a 'scrutiny vacuum'.'

Freed British hostage Emily Damari's delight as Hamas gunman who snatched her is killed
Freed British hostage Emily Damari's delight as Hamas gunman who snatched her is killed

Daily Mirror

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mirror

Freed British hostage Emily Damari's delight as Hamas gunman who snatched her is killed

Israel says it has killed Muhammad Nasr Ali Quneita, the Hamas gunman who snatched British hostage Emily Damari from her kibbutz in the attacks on October 7 2023 Freed British hostage Emily Damari today spoke of her delight at the announcement that the Hamas gunman who kidnapped her has been killed by Israel. ‌ Emily was snatched on October 7th 2023 from her kibbutz by Muhammad Nasr Ali Quneita. Now Israel has revealed that Quneita has been killed in a targeted operation inside Gaza. ‌ In a post on her Instagram account, Damari welcomed the news and stated: "One of many. Yes, there should be many more good news like this and we will hold them accountable for it all, God willing..." ‌ Emily, 28, reiterated her call for her fellow hostages still being held inside Gaza to be freed, adding: "But the real victory will be when Gali, Ziv and the other 48 hostages return." She described in detail that fateful day Quneita took her. She said: "I remember his face that day when he transferred me to the tunnels deep beneath the ground. Where there's no air, no light, and no will to live. Above us, we could hear planes, bombs, and an entire war unfolding. Then he looked at me with the smile of a deceiver and told me 'That's it, tomorrow you're going home.'" ‌ "And no, he didn't say that because it was true. He said it so I would start to have hope. So I would wait and wait, and nothing would happen. I looked at him and told him he was a liar (and if you knew what it's like to tell a terrorist the word liar...). He looked at me angrily and asked, 'Me? A liar? Why do you think that?' And I said to him, 'Because I hear the planes. There's no ceasefire and no deal close.' And sadly, between the two of us, I was right." ‌ Emily was one of 251 hostages captured by Hamas when they attacked settlements in Israel killing 1,200 people. She was shot in the hand as she was dragged from her kibbutz home. Emily, who lost two fingers after being shot, was held hostage by Hamas for 471 days until her release. Her mum Mandy, 63, is from Beckenham, South East London. The Mirror revealed how they returned to London after her release to watch her beloved Spurs play and Emily was able to meet stars like Ledley King, Gary Mabbutt and Ossie Ardiles. In earlier interviews Emily revealed how she had risked immediate death when she got into a fight with one of her other captors underground. One of them grabbed a fellow hostage and she feared that young woman was about to be raped. Emily says she fought the attacker, not caring if they killed her on the spot. She said: "Would I have got a bullet? Fine, then I'll die and won't be in captivity, thank you very much. Sucks for my family, for my friends, but I'll be out of this nightmare.' She heard nicknames being used for her among her kidnappers - Mowgli, Tarzan and 'The Brave One'. The Israeli military said Quneita was killed on June 19th inside Gaza City.

Minister vows ‘improvements' to Internal Market Act
Minister vows ‘improvements' to Internal Market Act

Glasgow Times

timean hour ago

  • Glasgow Times

Minister vows ‘improvements' to Internal Market Act

Mr Alexander however made clear that ministers have not considered scrapping the Internal Market Act (IMA), with the Scottish Government branding the results of the Westminster review 'completely unacceptable'. Angus Robertson, the Scottish Government's Constitution Secretary, insisted the legislation – which Holyrood has twice voted against – 'undermines' the Scottish Parliament. Mr Alexander however said the UK Government has 'been explicit about the need for businesses to have certainty', saying this is 'why the review has not considered repeal of the Act or any of its provisions'. He said the UK Government has instead 'pledged to explore improvements in the way the Act's provisions operate', adding 'very real concerns' have been raised. Following the UK's departure from the European Union, the then Tory UK government introduced the IMA in order to create a single market across the four nations of the UK. The legislation however caused difficulties for the Scottish Government when it attempted to introduce a deposit return scheme for empty cans and bottles ahead of the rest of the UK. In the wake of the review, the UK Government is promising changes, including the introduction of exclusions to the legislation, that have been agreed by all governments within a common framework. Angus Robertson claimed the Act 'undermines the ability of the Scottish Parliament to use its powers to pursue devolved social and economic objectives' (PA) As well as considering economic impacts, issues of environmental protection and public health will also be looked at for exclusions – with the UK Government saying this ensures a 'balance of factors is considered'. Mr Alexander stressed the importance of having a 'well-functioning UK internal market' as part of the Government's 'ambition to improve economic growth for the benefit of businesses and people in all parts of our country'. He added: 'Latest figures show that trade between the four nations of the UK is valued at £129 billion and that it is particularly important to the economies of Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland.' But Mr Robertson insisted the IMA had been introduced by the previous Conservative government 'without the consent of any devolved government or Parliament'. Speaking about the legislation, he added: 'It undermines the ability of the Scottish Parliament to use its powers to pursue devolved social and economic objectives in Scotland for the people to which it is accountable. 'It introduces radical new uncertainty as to the effect of laws passed by the Scottish Parliament and effectively provides a veto to UK ministers. 'Nothing set out in the UK Government's response to the review changes this position, which is completely unacceptable. 'The conclusion of the review falls well short of our stated position of repeal and replace the Internal Market Act, and indeed short of the legislative change required to mitigate the most damaging aspects of the operation of the IMA. 'It is important also to note that the Scottish Parliament has twice voted to repeal the Act – since it is fundamentally misconceived and incompatible with devolution.' While he said the Scottish Government welcomes the UK Government's intention 'to address some of the most egregious issues with the function of the IMA exclusions process', he added that SNP ministers 'remain concerned that there is no clear vehicle to give meaningful effect to these changes, which work against our shared interests to promote growth, protect jobs and ensure seamless trade across the UK nations'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store