Thousands being relocated to UK after personal data leak of Afghans
A dataset containing the personal information of nearly 19,000 people who applied for the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (Arap) was released 'in error' in February 2022 by a defence official.
Advertisement
The breach resulted in the creation of a secret Afghan relocation scheme – the Afghanistan Response Route – in April 2024.
The scheme is understood to have cost around £400 million so far, with a projected cost once completed of around £850 million.
Millions more is expected to be paid in legal costs and compensation.
The UK ministry of defence (MoD) only became aware of the breach over a year after the release, when excerpts of the dataset were anonymously posted onto a Facebook group in August 2023.
Advertisement
Details on the dataset include the the names and contact details of the Arap applicants and names of their family members.
Arap was responsible for relocating Afghan nationals who had worked for or with the UK government and were therefore at risk of reprisals once the Taliban returned to power in Kabul in 2021.
Between 80,000 and 100,000 people, including the estimated number of family members of the Arap applicants, were affected by the breach and could be at risk of harassment, torture or death if the Taliban obtained their data, judges said in June 2024.
However an independent review, commissioned by the UK government in January 2025, concluded last month that the dataset is 'unlikely to significantly shift Taliban understanding of individuals who may be of interest to them'.
Advertisement
Around 4,500 people – made up of 900 Arap applicants and approximately 3,600 family members have been brought to the UK or are in transit so far through the Afghanistan Response Route.
A further estimated 600 people and their relatives are expected to be relocated before the scheme closes, with a total of around 6,900 people expected to be relocated by the end of the scheme.
Projected costs of the scheme may include relocation costs, transitional accommodation, legal costs and local authority tariffs.
It is understood that the unnamed official had emailed the dataset outside of a secure government system while attempting to verify information, believing the dataset to only have around 150 rows.
Advertisement
However, there were more than 33,000 rows of information which were inadvertently sent.
An unprecedented superinjunction was made at the High Court in September 2023 to reduce the risk of alerting the Taliban to the existence of the data, with the decision to apply for an order made by then-defence secretary Ben Wallace.
The Information Commissioner's Office and Metropolitan Police were also informed.
The superinjunction, lifted on Tuesday, is thought to be the longest lasting order of its kind and the first time the Government has sought such a restrictive measure against the media.
Advertisement
At multiple hearings, lawyers for the MoD said in written submissions that there was a 'very real risk that people who would otherwise live will die' if the Taliban gained access to the data.
However, a recent report by retired civil servant Paul Rimmer said: 'Given the data they already have access to as the de facto government, we believe it is unlikely the dataset would be the single, or definitive, piece of information enabling or prompting the Taliban to act.'
Mr Rimmer further found that the Government possibly 'inadvertently added more value to the dataset' by seeking the unprecedented superinjunction and creating a bespoke resettlement scheme.
Under plans set out last October, the Afghanistan Response Route was expected to allow up to 25,000 people – most of whom were ineligible for Arap but deemed to be at the highest risk from Taliban reprisals – to be relocated.
One internal Government document from February this year said: 'This will mean relocating more Afghans to the UK than have been relocated under the Arap scheme, at a time when the UK's immigration and asylum system is under significant strain. This will extend the scheme for another five years at a cost of c. £7 billion.'
This figure is understood to be a previous estimate of the cost of all Afghan relocations, with projected costs now between £5.5 billion and £6 billion.
The resettlement schemes are closing, with the review suggesting that the Afghanistan Response Route may be 'disproportionate' to the impact of the Taliban obtaining the information.
As of March 2025, around 36,000 people had been relocated to the UK under Arap and other resettlement schemes.
Arap, which was launched in April 2021, is now closed to new applicants after immigration rule changes were laid in Parliament earlier this month.
The Government had originally outlined plans to launch a compensation scheme for those affected by the breach, with an estimated cost of between £120 and £350 million, not including administration expenses.
Hundreds of data protection legal challenges are also expected, with the court previously told that a Manchester-based law firm already had several hundred prospective clients.
A High Court judge lifted the superinjunction. Photo: PA.
The breach can now be reported after a High Court judge lifted the superinjunction – which prohibited making any reference to the existence of the court proceedings and is thought to have been the longest and widest ranging of its kind – on Tuesday.
In one of several rulings, judge Mr Justice Chamberlain noted the superinjunction 'imposed very wide-ranging restrictions', with information about the breach limited to selected officials.
In a decision in November 2023, Mr Justice Chamberlain said while the superinjunction did not constrain what could be said in Parliament, 'MPs and peers cannot ask questions about something they do not know about'.
The judge ruled in May 2024 that the order should be lifted, stating there was a 'significant possibility' the Taliban knew about the dataset, adding it was 'fundamentally objectionable' that decisions about thousands of people's lives and 'enormous sums of public money now being committed' were being taken in secret.
However, judges at the Court of Appeal overturned this ruling the following month, finding that he had not properly considered the consequences of lifting the order and that the superinjunction should stay in place.
Following the retired civil servant's review, the MoD agreed on July 4 that the order could be lifted.
It is expected that the cost of seeking and maintaining the superinjunction will be several million pounds.
Reading a summary of his judgment in court on Tuesday, Mr Justice Chamberlain noted that the grant of the superinjunction had 'given rise to serious free speech concerns'.
He added: 'The superinjunction had the effect of completely shutting down the ordinary mechanisms of accountability which operate in a democracy.
'This led to what I describe as a 'scrutiny vacuum'.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
8 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
CHRIS HUGHES: 'Afghans who helped our troops deserve loyalty - they were betrayed'
Brave Afghan colleagues gave British troops invaluable eyes and ears on the ground over many years of war, saving countless lives - but they were betrayed when Kabul fell to the Taliban British troops who spent years on the Afghan frontline know first-hand many of their Afghan colleagues and friends were invaluable. Of course many of the Afghans allowed to come to the UK because of their UK associations had jobs outside translating or working with the military. There were civilian contractors throughout from Helmand Province to Kabul, employing hundreds of locals for a variety of jobs. Embassies, consular buildings, charities, foreign office schemes all had the opportunity to employ or have links to local Afghans. They felt safe and committed to the coalition project to dispense democracy, education, security, investing in a future vibrant and bustling economy. In 2021 that all fell to dust as the Taliban stormed Kabul, surprising everyone even though they had been bragging this was what they planned to do for a decade. In 2013 in Peshawar, Pakistan veteran Taliban commander Qari Nasrullah met me and gave me an interview and bragged about Taliban plans for Afghanistan. He said openly that the Taliban had shadow governments set up throughout Afghanistan and that soon they would retake the entire country. It took them a little longer but they did just that and Afghanistan's hopes for democracy fell to dust - and our Afghan friends were betrayed. They had gambled on UK promises we were there to stay and could not believe it when the last plane left Kabul in a hurry. On many occasions whilst embedded with UK forces in Helmand Province I witnessed translators intercepting Taliban radio calls and warning of forthcoming ambushes. These brave souls gave UK troops eyes and ears on the ground and save many lives - and they deserved our loyalty. Many made it to the UK but we may never know what sad ends some of them may have come to in mountain and desert villages throughout Afghanistan. I saw how hard the interpreters worked. Often they were at opposite ends of Afghanistan to where their families were yet they took enormous risks. I saw them hunched over radios all night listening to local Taliban chatting and suddenly they would call over an officer. After hours of listening they would learn of an arms cache, a roadside bomb being planted or plans to attack the base. The information - especially in real time during a patrol - was life-saving, especially if an ambush was planned. Without them the troops could not talk to local farmers and pick up crucial information about Taliban movements. Always cheery and affable, these highly educated Afghans were alone, foreigners in their own land and surrounded by troops. And yet they always seemed to be smiling and unconcerned for their own safety. And some were killed or injured too. What has happened to some of them is tragic and clearly a betrayal.
BBC News
11 minutes ago
- BBC News
Children at risk of being recruited by hostile states, police warn
Counter-terror police have warned the activity of hostile states on British soil is posing a growing threat and urged families to watch for signs their children are being along with petty criminals and disillusioned people, may be more vulnerable to recruitment by Russia, Iran and China, they states are increasingly using proxies to carry out acts of sabotage and targeted violence in the UK, counter-terror police said, adding that investigating such activity now accounts for about 20% of their and teachers should "be inquisitive" and "seek help" if they think a child is at risk, police advised. Since the Salisbury poisonings in 2018 – which targeted Russian double agent Sergei Skripal – there has been a five-fold increase in police work to tackle hostile activity, commanders said."The breadth, complexity and volume of these operations has continued to grow at a rate that I'm not sure that us, or our partners internationally, or any intelligence community predicted," Dominic Murphy, head of the Metropolitan Police's Counter-Terrorism Command, told reporters."We are increasingly seeing these three states, but not just these three states, undertaking threat to life operations in the United Kingdom."The youngest person arrested or investigated on suspicion of involvement is aged in their "mid-teens", he Evans, Counter Terrorism Policing's senior national co-ordinator, expressed concern other children may be encouraged online to carry out activities to earn money, without realising the implications of their actions."We really encourage people, parents, teachers, professionals just to be inquisitive," she said."If they're concerned, ask those questions, and if they think there's something they need to be concerned about, seek help and act, because we want to make sure that we're protecting people from inadvertently being drawn into this sort of activity."The Metropolitan Police is now putting additional resources into tackling hostile state activity, with training for officers in "foreign interference" and hundreds taking part in recent exercises in how to respond."We're working with local force chiefs up and down the country to raise awareness and ensure that there really is an increased understanding about this threat," Ms Evans this month, two low-level criminals were among five people convicted of involvement in an arson attack on a warehouse storing communications equipment for said the attack had been ordered by Russia's Wagner group, and that one of the ringleaders, 21-year-old Dylan Earl, had been plotting to kidnap its owner, a Russian dissident. The Met said it was also dealing with a "high volume" of threats from Iran, focused on those considered to be opponents of the Islamic Republic."We know that they are continuing to try and sow violence on the streets of the United Kingdom, they too are to some extent relying on criminal proxies to do that," Mr Murphy use of criminal proxies offers "arms-length deniability," according to Ms Evans, who blames the rising threat on the "continued erosion of the rule-based international order".The warnings came in the first specific briefing for journalists from counter-terrorism police on the threat of hostile state activity."Foreign regimes are more willing than ever to undertake aggressive actions overseas," Ms Evans said.
Telegraph
14 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Finally, the ineptitude I saw first-hand has been exposed
Now the public can see for the first time the true scale of the ineptitude of the British state, through two successive governments, concerning Afghanistan. Even after the loss of 457 British personnel, and the billions of pounds it cost to prosecute, the war in Afghanistan reveals yet another cataclysmic skeleton in the cupboard when it comes to how we have treated our Afghan allies. It is mind-boggling that the Ministry of Defence (MoD) could email a spreadsheet of all those with ties to the British state to an Afghan national, over the internet, to post on Facebook for the Taliban to see. But not for me. Whilst there will no doubt be a rush to blame the individual who sent it (I know who he is), it would be entirely unfair and wrong to do so. Because I can honestly say this whole farcical process has been the most hapless display of ineptitude by successive ministers and officials that I saw in my time in government, of which this poor individual was just the end of the line. I was subject to the injunction. I created and ran an Afghan task force to work rehome eligible Afghans under Rishi Sunak, the then prime minister. The Home Office, MoD, Department for Levelling Up and the Foreign Office just could not seem to work together; the prime minister asked me to try and unblock it from my neutral position in the Cabinet Office. I had also made no secret of my desire to relocate Afghan special forces personnel from that country to this, in the wake of August 2021. I stand by that wholeheartedly. These brave souls fought alongside us cheek by jowl; they carried stretchers of dead UK soldiers; they fought hard and battled bravely. But there were only ever about 1,000-1,200 badged members of CF 333 and CF444. I couldn't understand where all these Afghans were coming from. Everyone seemed to know about it I had no idea why the injunction existed in the first place; the list had appeared on Facebook and everyone, including the media, seemed to know about it. Officials seemed to get a bit of a kick out of something being 'Top Secret'. I thought it was weird, and it wasn't a secret. It was a direct result of the chaos that engulfed the MoD at the end of the Afghanistan war. Those on the ground during Op Pitting saw awful things, were incredibly brave and saved thousands of lives. I also saw how hard Ben Wallace worked to do the right thing. But since then it has been awful. The MoD has tried at every turn to cut off those from Afghan special forces units from coming to the UK, for reasons I cannot fathom. They also lied to themselves about doing it. The UK's director of Special Forces told me personally that he was offended and angry by my suggestion that his organisation was blocking the Triples. Certain MoD ministers had a criminal lack of professional curiosity as to why the Triples were being rejected when there were so many subject matter experts who said they clearly should be eligible. They even tried for a long time to say that Afghan special forces were not eligible. When I contradicted them, one 'friend' made an official complaint to the Cabinet Office permanent secretary about me not being 'collegiate', or going along with government policy. I had to inform them that they were directly lying to Parliament, and any statement I made publicly would repeat that. I think the whips told him to piss off too after he went moaning to them about me. And the net result of this spectacular cluster is that we've let into this country thousands with little or tenuous links to the UK, and still some Afghan special forces we set up the bloody schemes for, remain trapped in Afghanistan, Pakistan or worse, Iran. I feel furious, sad and bitter about the whole thing, and do as much as I can to get through each day not thinking about Afghanistan. But some don't have that luxury. Naveed, a sergeant from Commando Force 333, a partnering unit of Task Force 42, a British SBS Task Force who I was with in Afghanistan in 2008-09, thinks about it every day. Every day his comrades still reach out to him, thinking I can do something about it. His parents and immediate family, despite being under significant threat, remain in Afghanistan, three times rejected from resettlement pathways. I am ashamed of the MoD and how they have acted on these schemes for three years now. I don't think it is a conspiracy surrounding the Afghan inquiry – that sort of thing requires a level of competence I have never seen in either UK Special Forces or the MoD. Even now, there are brave folk in Afghanistan who soldiered alongside elite troops from this country prosecuting the highest level of UK objectives in Afghanistan, who are still hiding from the Taliban. I secured a review of all Afghan special forces applications after I pointed out that they were all being rejected in February 2024. It was supposed to take 12 weeks. Seventy-nine weeks later that review is yet to report. I've promised Naveed I will get his family too. Short of hiring a Land Rover and going for it, I'm running out of ideas.
