
Unionists' British identity will have to be respected in a united Ireland, says Conor Murphy
'I think we have to find a way to make sure that there isn't just tolerance, and we're not about tolerating, because if you start tolerating people then it's very easy to come to intolerance' Senator Conor Murphy said during a speech in Dublin on Tuesday.
Saying he would be 'rubbished' for naming just a few issues of concern to unionists, he highlighted the relationship they have with the royal family, the honours system and British universities.
'You have to embrace people, respect what they wish for, respect how they express themselves in a way obviously that isn't intolerant of other identities and to ensure that there is space for that,' he told the Institute for International and European Affairs.
READ MORE
However, he warned that the need for reconciliation cannot become a veto for unionists opposed to a united Ireland, saying that there would never have been a Belfast Agreement if that rule had been set then.
'What you need is a majority, but what we need to do is to make it as seamless and as painless as possible for people who have doubts and concerns about it, and to move in a very wholesome way to address those concerns,' he added.
The campaign for Irish unification will not be successful if it is dominated by any one party, but must instead, be 'a project for the whole of the people on the island', the former Stormont economy minister said.
Fine Gael and Fianna Fáil had both committed before last year's general election to 'active preparation' for Irish unity, but speaking to the Dublin-based institute on Tuesday, Mr Murphy accused of both of having 'retreated from that position since'.
The Irish Government 'is not just best placed but it is duty-bound' to lead planning for unity,
said Senator Murphy, who was elected earlier this year to the Seanad.
Calling for an all-island forum to lay down the preparations, he said Sinn Féin 'will bring our ideas to the table, and we will argue for them, as we're entitled to do as a democratic political party, and others will do likewise.'
He continued: 'The fears of the unionist community need to be addressed in a meaningful way. We need to look at what they mean when they say they are British and be willing to explore that and be open to new ideas.
'Respect and cooperation must be the cornerstone on which a new Ireland is built. And for unionists this means a new Ireland must be shared and integrated and that they play a key role in building it,' he said.
A united Ireland must be 'a place where unionists have equal ownership, where there will be respect for their cultural identity and where it has been demonstrated to them that they are welcome, needed and belong'.
Two of the most significant dates in Irish history in the last 30 years saw the Belfast Agreement in 1998 and 2016 when the United Kingdom voted by a majority to exit the European Union.
However, that exit happened though 'the people of the north of Ireland voted to remain inside the EU and reject Brexit, and yet the British government ignored that democratic will and forcibly removed us from the EU in January 2020', Mr Murphy said.
'In both those referenda, large numbers of the unionist and Protestant population voted in favour of the Good Friday Agreement and against Brexit,' said Senator Murphy.
Criticising the effects of the partition of the island in 1921, he said it 'disrupted the natural circuits of commerce in Ireland, discouraging investment, creating inefficiencies and hindering trade.
'An irony given that the British government gerrymandered the new Northern States to protect the privilege of a unionist ruling class, the North East of Ireland is now at the island's weakest region economically,' he said.
Northern Ireland has today 'slipped from being the most dynamic and industrial part of Ireland just before partition, to trailing the South on every measure of economic success and quality of life'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Examiner
3 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Tariff uncertainty means 'tighter' spending for Budget 2026
Ministers will be told of the need to 'moderate' spending ahead of this year's budget as the Government unveils its financial package this week. The Government will today release the summer economic statement, which will outline the broad parameters of this year's budget. While Government sources say there will be money to spend and it will roll out a €30bn national development plan update, economic uncertainty means that current spending will need to be managed. A Government source said the ongoing uncertainty on the impacts of the Trump administration's tariffs on EU goods as well as any potential EU countermeasures means that the future of Irish finances is harder to predict and will necessitate a 'tighter' budget this year. It is expected that Tánaiste Simon Harris will tell Cabinet this year's document will be 'different' from previous years, given the continued uncertainty with tariffs, and that decisions made in the budget will 'have to focus on protecting jobs and investment during what could be an economically turbulent period ahead'. Government sources have said that the increase in protectionism, rising tariffs, and the 'fragmentation of global supply chains' pose a threat to Ireland's economic model, but that Budget 2026 will see additional spending and taxation measures delivered. Privately, some ministers have pointed to existing level of service (ELS) commitments as a concern in meeting additional demands. ELS is often referred to as 'standing still money' and covers previous commitments and demographic growth. In last year's summer statement, the projection for this year's budget was that there would be around €2bn for additional expenditure and €1.2bn for tax-related changes. Sources said that they believed these figures would be close to the final package available later this year. Sources said there will be a surplus, but that future budgets could be impacted by tariffs and their fallout. The Government will today reiterate three strands to its budget approach by committing to investment in infrastructure, as well as pledging funds for public services, and contributing to two long-term funds aimed at mitigating external shocks such as tariffs. Finance minister Paschal Donohoe is expected to tell Cabinet that increased investments in the likes of health and education will be made on a permanent basis and that the Government is also focused on 'maintaining the stability of the public finances'. The Government will continue to put money away in the infrastructure, climate, and nature fund, as well as the future Ireland fund. Sources said the focus has been on finding 'the right balance between enhancing our public infrastructure, improving public services, and maintaining the long-term sustainability of the public finances'. The summer economic statement is designed to 'form the basis for political discussions on the budgetary process and increase transparency in the Government's approach to planning for the provision of key public services' and 'outlines the broad parameters that will underpin discussions of economic and fiscal policy over the medium term'. In recent parliamentary question responses, Mr Donohoe has said that the SES 'will incorporate all available information and data including the latest developments in the trade policy landscape'. 'That said, it is clear that we are now in a fast-evolving and more challenging global environment, with elevated levels of uncertainty; this is the reality of the situation we face.'


Irish Examiner
3 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Government delays introduction of alcohol warning labels until 2028
The Government is to delay the introduction of health warnings on alcoholic drinks until 2028, coming amid concerns the plan would undermine Irish trade competitiveness internationally. Cabinet will today approve the deferral of health warnings, with a memo due to be brought by health minister Jennifer Carroll MacNeill. The labels, which warn of links between alcohol and cancer, had been due to come into effect in May 2026. Last week, it was expected the delay would be until 2029. However, it will now only be until 2028. The delay comes amid concerns about the impact of such labels, with warnings from the Government's trade forum that it could undermine Irish products on international markets. Both domestic and international alcohol producers will have additional time to prepare for their introduction in 2028. The delay has already been criticised by Alcohol Action Ireland, with the advocacy group saying the decision shows both the Taoiseach and health minister 'turning their backs on public health'. 'It is bizarre that the Government should even contemplate delaying this measure, which has been in planning for years,' CEO Sheila Gilheany said. Meanwhile, Tánaiste Simon Harris is due to update Cabinet on the ongoing trade talks between the EU and US. The Fine Gael leader is set to tell Government that there is still uncertainty over a deal. Mr Harris is expected to outline that the EU will intensify negotiating efforts with the US ahead of the August 1 deadline. Elsewhere on trade, enterprise minister Peter Burke will bring forward the new action plan on market diversification. The plan aims to assist Irish companies seeking to export their goods. While the policy will be approved by the Government today, it is not expected that the plan will be published until late August. Housing minister James Browne will seek Cabinet approval for more funding to be allocated towards community water schemes. It is understood that a total of €73.9m is expected to be allocated towards 291 community water schemes. The funding is expected to benefit approximately 63,000 households in rural Ireland. Funds are being allocated through the multi-annual rural water programme, which aims to improve local water infrastructure in areas not serviced by Uisce Éireann. Meanwhile, children's minister Norma Foley is expected to receive government approval for the Office of the Director of Authorised Intervention, Tuam, to come under the remit of the State Claims Agency. This will see any potential claims taken against the office to be handled by the State Claims Agency. Read More Introduction of health labelling on alcoholic drinks to be delayed until 2029


RTÉ News
4 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Geldof's threat to quit Tony Blair's Africa Commission
A furious Bob Geldof threatened to storm out of Tony Blair's Commission for Africa -warning it was in danger of becoming "a laughable grotesque", according to newly-released UK government files. The Live Aid campaigner was instrumental in persuading Mr Blair to set up the commission to examine the problems of the continent ahead of a crucial summit of the G8 at Gleneagles in Scotland, which the UK was chairing. But official papers released to the National Archives in Kew, west London, show he was outraged when - after just one meeting - the commissioners were sent a document setting its "emerging conclusions". In an angry letter to the commission's director of policy, the economist Nick Stern, dated 9 August 2004, he said it was impossible to have come to any conclusions it such a short period of time. The Boomtown Ratts front man warned that he was not prepared to serve on a body which was simply there to push "pre-determined government policy". "To be clear, policy must be determined by the commission independently sitting and independently deliberating and concluding of its own volition. This distinction is vital. If I have got this wrong please inform me so I may tender my resignation," he wrote. "More broadly, the whole notion of emerging solutions is laughable. If the solution to the misery of Africa can be 'concluded' within a mere six week time span, it is a truly remarkable feat. "How blind we must all have been these past years. The fact is that there are not and cannot as yet be any emerging conclusions. "The commission will lose all credibility if it is not clearly seen to be an independent entity. If it seems to advance pre-determined government policy it will be correctly viewed as a laughable grotesque." Geldof went on to complain that the involvement of some of the commissioners - including some of those from Africa - appeared to have been "minimal". "Is it not the secretariat's function, on behalf of the chair, to ensure that this is not the case? Or is this all some farcical political game played out at the expense of the wretchedly poor? If so, I ain't playing." Mr Stern wrote back hurriedly to assure him the that the document was not an attempt pre-empt the commission's findings, and that the input from British politicians had been "comparatively minor". "Far from being an attempt to rush conclusions the paper is intended to be a tool to help promote discussion and ensure a real interchange between commissioners at the second meeting in October," he wrote. "I would be very keen to sit down and discuss these questions with you; perhaps we could meet for a drink as soon as we are both around?" Geldof's reply is not recorded in the files, but he was sufficiently placated to carry on. After the Gleneagles summit the following year agreed to double aid to Africa and extend debt relief, he hailed it as "mission accomplished".