
CT Follow-up Strategy Optimises Lung Cancer Screening
METHODOLOGY:
Researchers conducted a retrospective study to assess the safety of a short-term follow-up low-dose CT (LDCT) scan for consolidation in a regional lung cancer screening programme in the United Kingdom.
Participants aged 55-74 years who were ever smokers underwent lung health checks and risk assessment, and those meeting specific risk thresholds qualified for an LDCT scan.
Overall, 10,247 CT studies from 8778 participants (mean age, 68 years) were analysed; consolidation was detected in 113 participants, and they underwent a 6-week repeat LDCT scan.
Study outcomes included the proportion of participants with non-resolving consolidation at 6 weeks, the risk for malignancy at the 6-week follow-up period, and the risk for upstaging over a 6-week delay. Cost savings were estimated on the basis of the National Schedule of National Health Service costs.
TAKEAWAY:
Among 110 participants who attended a follow-up CT scan, consolidation spontaneously resolved or significantly shrank in 57.3% of participants.
Of 47 participants with persistent consolidation, 32 underwent PET-CT imaging, with 13 cases subsequently confirmed as malignant.
Among those for whom final outcomes were available, the risk for malignancy in those with indeterminate consolidation on the initial scan was 13.5%, increasing to 29.8% in those with non-resolving consolidation (stage IA, n = 8; stage IB, n = 2; stage IIA, n = 3; and stage IE [lymphoma], n = 1).
None of the patients with stage IIA malignancy experienced upstaging during the 6-week follow-up period.
A cost analysis revealed potential savings of £47,600 per 10,000 screening CTs through the implementation of short-term interval CT vs immediate PET-CT investigation.
IN PRACTICE:
"In conclusion, short-interval LDCT imaging for focal indeterminate consolidation in LCS [lung cancer screening] is a cost-effective and safe strategy that reduces unnecessary investigation of inflammatory spontaneously resolving abnormalities. This could be a reasonable approach in a national screening programme, thereby reducing costs of investigation whilst ensuring appropriate follow-up of indeterminate consolidation," the authors wrote.
SOURCE:
This study was led by Emily C. Bartlett, Department of Radiology, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, England. It was published online on May 02, 2025, in European Radiology .
LIMITATIONS:
The evaluation of indeterminate focal consolidation warranting a 6-week CT scan was based on the judgement of the reporting radiologist, which may have varied according to reader expertise and judgement. Long-term outcomes were unknown for some participants who attended the 6-week follow-up scan, limiting the completeness of the data. Additionally, the results did not apply to consolidation identified at 3-month nodule follow-up CT, which was not evaluated in this study, nor to clearly mass-like or lobar consolidation.
DISCLOSURES:
This study did not receive any specific funding . Several authors reported receiving speaker or consulting fees and having other ties with various sources.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Study reveals the foods which help avoid illness in later life
What you eat could determine how many chronic illnesses you get later in life, scientists warn. Research has revealed that a healthy diet - such as the Mediterranean diet which is high in plants, fish and unsaturated fats - could slow down the accumulation of chronic diseases including dementia in older adults. Inflammatory diets full of processed meat and sugar may accelerate it. Researchers from Karolinska Institutet in Sweden studied four diets to investigate their impact on chronic diseases in older adults. Three of the diets studied were healthy and focused on the intake of vegetables, fruit, whole grains, nuts, legumes, unsaturated fats and reduced intake of sweets, red meat, processed meat and butter/margarine. The fourth diet, however, was pro-inflammatory and focused on red and processed meat, refined grains and sweetened beverages, with lower intake of vegetables, tea and coffee. Researchers followed the diets of 2,400 adults aged 60 and older in Sweden for 15 years and tracked their chronic conditions. Dietary intake was measured using food frequency questionnaires, and adherence to four dietary patterns: the Empirical Dietary Inflammatory Index (EDII), AHEI, the Alternate Mediterranean Diet (AMED), and the MIND (Mediterranean–DASH Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay). Multimorbidity was defined as the number of chronic diseases and grouped by organ system - musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and neuropsychiatric. The results published in the journal Nature Aging revealed those who followed the healthy diets had a slower development of chronic diseases. For example, long-term adherence to healthy dietary patterns, particularly the AMED, AHEI, and MIND, was linked to a slower accumulation of chronic diseases in older adults. This applied to cardiovascular disease and dementia, but not to diseases related to muscles and bones. But those who followed the pro-inflammatory diet, on the other hand, increased their risk of chronic diseases. 'Our results show how important diet is in influencing the development of multimorbidity in ageing populations,' said co-first author Adrián Carballo-Casla, postdoctoral researcher at the Aging Research Centre, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet. The protective effects of diet may be explained by reduced inflammation, a key factor in aging-related diseases. Study authors want to further their research by identify the dietary recommendations that may have the greatest impact on longevity and the groups of older adults who may benefit most from them, based on their age, gender, psychosocial background and chronic diseases.


Geek Tyrant
an hour ago
- Geek Tyrant
Behind-the-Scenes Video Revealing How SUPERMAN's Most Criticized Flight Shot Was Filmed — GeekTyrant
James Gunn has cleared the air on one of Superman 's most talked-about moments, revealing exactly how the controversial barrel-roll flying shot was pulled off. In a new behind-the-scenes video shared on Instagram, Gunn shows David Corenswet strapped into a practical rig on a soundstage at Trilith Studios. The actor is being physically spun by a crew member to simulate the dynamic mid-air roll, while massive LED screens project a snowy mountain backdrop filmed on location in Svalbard, Norway. 'On the stage at Trilith shooting the barrel roll through the mountains. All the plates were shot previously in Svalbard. 7.26.24,' Gunn wrote in the caption. The footage confirms a mix of old-school practical work and cutting-edge digital environments, shutting down earlier theories that the shot was entirely CG. This moment became a flashpoint back when it debuted in a Superman TV spot earlier this year. Some fans criticized the sequence for looking 'off,' even claiming Corenswet's face had been digitally replaced. Gunn addressed those claims head-on months ago, writing, 'There is absolutely zero CG in his face. People's faces can look different when you put a wide-angle lens up close. The background plate in Svalbard is 100% real, as is David.' Now, the new video offers proof. What looked like pure CGI to many was actually Corenswet on a practical rig with real-world elements integrated into the shot. Gunn's reveal highlights the creative process behind bringing Superman's flight to life in a way that feels tangible. It's a fascinating look at how the film blends practical effects with advanced tech, staying true to the cinematic ambition Gunn promised from the start.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
RFK Jr. says cancer screenings are too 'woke' now. As an actual doctor, I disagree.
A 6-centimeter mass. These are the words that shattered my patient's heart, but ultimately gave her a chance at saving and prolonging her life. Weeks earlier, without any worries about her health, she had seen a doctor for a checkup. Following the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations, her doctor found out she was a former smoker and ordered a scan. Lung cancer was found, which is how she ended up in my hospital for chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Without the task force guidelines, my patient's primary care doctor may not have ordered this scan, and her cancer may not have been caught before it spread to Stage 4, or it was uncurable. The task force has released screening recommendations for patients over the past 40 years that have caught infections, detected cancers and otherwise saved lives countless times. However, it is now reported that Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is considering removing and replacing all 16 expert members of this task force for purely political and culture war reasons. This would be a disaster for public health. RFK Jr. thinks preventing curable disease is too 'woke' The Preventive Services Task Force is tasked with providing screening recommendations for finding diseases before they become deadly. These guidelines are evidence-based and updated frequently as new scientific studies are released. Primary care doctors rely on these as they approach which diagnostic tests are most impactful and highest yield for their patients. Insurance companies use the task force's recommendations to know what studies to cover. Their work is important and essential. But we'll be in danger if RFK Jr. wants to upend this institution. Opinion: RFK Jr. is an unserious man. But his misinformed vaccine policy will be deadly. He has already done it once. In June, Kennedy fired all 17 members of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, a committee that makes recommendations on vaccine schedules, for reasons that made little sense. He replaced them with known vaccine skeptics, hampering both sound scientific work and public trust in the organization. This, by the way, at a time when measles cases in the U.S. are at their highest in 30 years. Now it's reported that Kennedy might make these removals within the Preventive Services Task Force because the members are too "woke.' Don't make America backward again in public health Keep in mind, these are individuals who are recommending things like cervical cancer screening is good, or look for post-partum depression in pregnant persons. Opinion: I'm a doctor. Trump's crusade against universities undermines the future of your health. These are sound recommendations that should be noncontroversial. What is woke in that? Some point to things like the word choice of 'persons' instead of 'women'? Don't be a snowflake, and get over yourself. These are important recommendations that are meant to reach all Americans. Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. Even if he doesn't go through with this purge, RFK Jr. is instilling a distrust in our expert medical and scientific institutions. If he does go through with it, he will undermine the pillar of public health that is preventative services at the same time that another pillar, access to care for the vulnerable, has been hacked away at by the Medicaid cuts in the Big Beautiful Bill. Taking these actions will not make America healthy again. It'll make America backward again in public health, and backward in the fight against cancer and disease. We need to sound the alarm to stop all these actions that are harming our fellow Americans. Dr. Thomas K. Lew is an assistant clinical professor of Medicine at the Stanford University School of Medicine and an attending physician of Hospital Medicine at Stanford Health Care Tri-Valley. All expressed opinions are his own. Follow him on X: @ThomasLewMD You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Kennedy is making a culture war out of cancer prevention | Opinion Solve the daily Crossword