Stephen Colbert needles Kamala Harris after she fails to answer simple question
'The Late Show' host Stephen Colbert asked Harris — who announced this week she would not be running for Governor of California next year — to identify who she believes is in the driver's seat for her party.
But Harris balked at the simple question and refused to name a single Democrat.
Advertisement
'There are lots of leaders,' she said.
CBS via Getty Images
Colbert, who wasn't satisfied with the answer, pressed her, asserting there's 'generally a leader' of the party and asked again if any names come to mind.
Still, Harris wouldn't budge.
Advertisement
'I think there are a lot — I'm not going to go through names because then I'm going to leave somebody out and then I'm going to hear about it,' she said.
'But let me just say this. I think it is a mistake for us who want to figure out how to get … through this and get out of it to put it on the shoulders of any one person. It's really on all our shoulders,' she added.
The soon-to-be-axed talk show host then swiftly ended the nearly half-hour interview.
Advertisement
Democrats Harris could have named include former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg and California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who were both able to muster double-digit support from Democrats and Democrat-leaning voters in an early 2028 presidential primary poll.
Other top-ranking congressional Democrats she could have named are Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) or House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY).
Harris' appearance on Colbert's canceled late night talk show was her eighth on the program ahead of the release of her book, '107 Days,' which she described as a 'behind-the-scene sharing of what it means to run for president.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
7 minutes ago
- NBC News
White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett defends Trump's firing of labor statistics head
White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett on Sunday defended President Donald Trump's decision to fire the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, as well as the president's claim that weaker-than-expected jobs reports were 'rigged,' but failed to produce any evidence to support Trump's claim. 'What we need is a fresh set of eyes over the BLS,' Hassett, the director of the National Economic Council, told NBC News' 'Meet the Press.' On Friday, the Bureau of Labor Statistics released a monthly jobs report that included weaker-than-expected numbers for July, plus major downward revisions of May and June's numbers. In a post on Truth Social on Friday, the president said the jobs numbers were 'rigged' and that he'd asked his team to fire BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer. 'We need accurate Jobs Numbers. I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY. She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified. Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate,' Trump wrote. In another Truth Social post, the president added, 'In my opinion, today's Jobs Numbers were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad.' On Sunday, Hassett cast similar doubt on the accuracy of the jobs numbers, pointing to past revisions that were made to jobs reports after then-President Joe Biden stopped running for re-election last year. 'There have been a bunch of patterns that could make people wonder. And I think the most important thing for people to know is that it's the president's highest priority that the data be trusted and that people get to the bottom of why these revisions are so unreliable,' Hassett told 'Meet the Press' moderator Kristen Welker. He added later in the interview that the Trump administration's goal was to understand why there was such a sizable revision to past months' jobs numbers. 'The bottom line is that there were people involved in creating these numbers. And if I were running the BLS and I had a number that was a huge, politically important revision, the biggest since 1968 actually ... then I would have a really long report explaining exactly what happened. And we didn't get that,' Hassett said. It's not uncommon for jobs reports to be revised in the months following their release, but Hassett on Sunday emphasized that July's revision was one of the largest he's seen in decades. Trump faced criticism from Democrats and Republicans in Congress on Friday when he decided to fire McEntarfer, with several Republican senators questioning whether the firing would actually help the Trump administration improve future jobs numbers. 'We have to look somewhere for objective statistics. When the people providing the statistics are fired, it makes it much harder to make judgments that, you know, the statistics won't be politicized,' Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., told NBC News on Friday. 'I'm going to look into it, but first impression is that you can't really make the numbers different or better by firing the people doing the counting,' he added. On Sunday, Hassett said that installing Trump's 'own people' will help achieve more 'transparent and reliable' jobs reports in the future. 'The president wants his own people there so that when we see the numbers, they're more transparent and more reliable. And if there are big changes and big revisions — we expect more big revisions for the jobs data in September, for example — then we want to know why, we want people to explain it to us,' he said.
Politico
7 minutes ago
- Politico
Trade representative backs Trump's punitive approach to global tariffs
A Brazilian official told POLITICO last week that the country's legal system is entirely separate from its executive branch, and that its government could only stop the trial with the help of a sweeping amnesty law. Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, who prosecutors allege was to be poisoned in a coup plot agreed to by Bolsonaro, has flatly refused U.S. demands. But Trump is standing by Bolsonaro and drawing connections to his own entanglements with the U.S. legal system. 'This is nothing more, or less, than an attack on a Political Opponent — Something I know much about!' he charged on Truth Social in July. 'It happened to me, times 10, and now our Country is the 'HOTTEST' in the World! The Great People of Brazil will not stand for what they are doing to their former President.' Greer on Sunday said Trump's tariffs on Brazil had full legal backing under a 1977 law known as the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. This is true, he said, even though the U.S. has long enjoyed a trade surplus with the South American country. 'The president of the United States, historically, whether it's a Democrat or Republican, they have used IEEPA to impose sanctions for all kinds of geopolitical reasons in all kinds of countries,' he told Brennan. 'Sometimes it's countrywide, sometimes it's specific to certain, you know, individuals and often foreign leaders and foreign officials. So, this is not way outside the market.'
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Eric Holder backs Democratic response to Texas redistricting plan
Eric Holder, chair of the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, called Texas' attempt to redraw its congressional maps for the second time in less than a decade 'an authoritarian move' by the White House. Holder, attorney general under President Barack Obama, has led the charge among Democrats to eliminate gerrymandering for years. But speaking with "This Week With George Stephanopoulos" on Sunday, Holder said that Texas' plan means Democrats need to 'do things that perhaps in the past I would not have supported.' 'I think that responsible Democrats in other states have to take into account the threat to our democracy, the need to preserve our democracy, so that we can ultimately try to heal it,' Holder said. 'And I would hope that they will take steps that are, again, as I said, temporary but responsible.' 'And we're seeing talk about that in California, we're seeing talk about that in New York, as well. "But those attempts are more longshots, aren't they?' Stephanopoulos asked, referring to laws on the books in those states that protect against partisan gerrymandering. Trump's political operation floated the prospect of redistricting in June in efforts to shore up the GOP's fragile House majority. Trump said his party could pick up five seats if Texas redraws its congressional map. He suggested that there "could be" other states that follow suit but didn't identify them. The Department of Justice told Texas in a letter in July that four majority-minority districts represented by Democrats needed to be redrawn, arguing they were "unconstitutional racial gerrymanders." While Holder conceded that the actions Democrats could take would ultimately depend on each state, he argued that those protections are an advantage. 'What they're trying to do in Texas is simply impose a new map on, an unpopular new map, on the people of Texas. To do it in California, you actually have to go to the people and ask them to suspend that which they have in place, which is a really well-functioning, independent redistricting committee,' Holder said. 'So the people will have a voice in what California does. The people do not have a voice, a meaningful voice, it appears so far in Texas.' This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.
