logo
BRICS Summit 2025 — hard reset might be needed to reverse the bloc's flagging momentum

BRICS Summit 2025 — hard reset might be needed to reverse the bloc's flagging momentum

Daily Maverick09-07-2025
A back-to-basics approach might be needed amid mounting concerns about the blocs' continued relevance in shaping the international order.
The recently concluded BRICS Leaders' Summit in Rio took place against the backdrop of great geopolitical flux. After years of growing relevance, the group appears to be struggling to maintain forward momentum. As its expanded membership grapples with its own internal contradictions and an increasingly unpredictable international system, a hard reset may be needed to get back to basics.
In recent years, BRICS has enjoyed a resurgence. In 2022, the Ukraine war and fatigue with Western-dominated global governance and finance institutions bolstered interest in alternative power centres, particularly among Global South countries.
The group's utility for its five core members has centred on shared interests, South-South cooperation and progressive internationalism. Global events bolstered the club's attractiveness as countries worldwide grappled with their geopolitical hedging strategies, seen, for example, through multi-alignment and active nonalignment behaviours.
This was clear at the 2023 Johannesburg summit, which unexpectedly (and perhaps prematurely) led to BRICS' expansion. Invitations were extended to six new members – five officially joined, including Indonesia in 2025. Saudi Arabia has yet to formally accept. At the 2024 Kazan summit, the new 'partner country' model allowed 10 more states to participate in annual summits, with limited influence on declarations and outcomes.
The group has become a vital platform for geopolitical recalibration among member states. Kazan, for example, led to a considerable strategic thaw in Indo-China relations following the first formal bilateral meeting between Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping in more than five years.
Despite this positive momentum, concerns about BRICS' continued relevance in shaping the international order have intensified. This is mainly due to the bloat of its growing agenda, internal contradictions of its increasing membership and lack of a robust normative bedrock. Without this foundation, members will struggle to agree on a strategy to reform global governance and financial institutions.
This year's summit appears to have dimmed the group's prospects further. Two of the five core members' heads of state did not attend in person. Xi's absence owing to a 'scheduling conflict' arguably points to Beijing's preoccupation with domestic priorities, as it grapples with mounting economic stresses. This was the first time Xi had not attended (either virtually or in person) since assuming office more than a decade ago.
Russian President Vladimir Putin participated online, due to his International Criminal Court arrest warrant for alleged war crimes in Ukraine. This is reminiscent of South Africa's quandary as an ICC Rome Statute signatory and BRICS summit host in 2023.
While this approach has seemingly become accepted by BRICS members, it points to deep contradictions in their respective international legal commitments – another impediment to pursuing global institutional reforms for a more just world.
Also absent were the Egyptian, Iranian and United Arab Emirates presidents, who sent senior representatives. Two other core BRICS members, South Africa and host Brazil, appeared preoccupied with preparations for hosting other forthcoming multilateral summits: the G20 Leaders' Summit in Johannesburg and the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Belém.
External pressures compound these challenges. President Donald Trump's administration had warned the bloc against initiatives to displace the US from its dominant position in global affairs. He asserted during the summit that 'any country aligning themselves with the anti-American policies of BRICS will be charged an additional 10% tariff'.
Trump had threatened earlier that any moves to replace the US dollar with a BRICS-backed reserve currency would be accompanied by 100% tariffs, perhaps forcing a more circumspect approach from BRICS members. BRICS support for de-dollarisation, led by China and Russia, is high on the group's agenda – but internal disagreement around achieving it reveals fractures in the bloc's strategic unity, geopolitical strategist Velina Tchakarova told ISS Today.
The German Marshall Fund's Dr Garima Mohan also highlighted these tensions, telling ISS Today: 'Given strained ties between two of its major founding members, India and China, it seems unlikely that the grouping will be able to speak in one voice or provide a credible critique of the current system of global governance.
'Additionally, China seeks to promote its own model – within BRICS and in other international formats – which is not more representative/democratic than the system we have in place today. This raises the question [of] whether BRICS is the right kind of platform for the reforms we need today.'
With its core members spread so thin, it is unsurprising that this year's summit produced no fireworks. Expectations were limited to institutional developments focused on consolidating BRICS membership and thematic focus areas relating to cooperation on global health, trade and finance, climate change and artificial intelligence.
The leaders' declaration contained several (fairly predictable) statements on global policy issues, and the outcomes largely validated the mild expectations for the Rio gathering. In sum, BRICS' approach this year has been to simply keep things turning over.
This logic may not be entirely misplaced. Dr Samir Puri, the security director at Chatham House's Centre for Global Governance, says: 'BRICS has not emerged as a loud challenger to the controversial steps being taken by the second Trump administration, prompting questions over whether the platform has any worth.
'But a low-key BRICS summit may prove to be [smarter]. The BRICS countries are playing the long game, and there's little gain in provoking a loud clash with a conflictual US president.'
However, this could equally be viewed as a missed opportunity. For all its flaws, BRICS remains uniquely positioned to represent global realities. Its diversity, non-ideological cooperation and growing economic heft allow coordination among nations that don't always agree but share common interests (not values). BRICS offers a platform that is pragmatic, strategic and unconstrained by the bureaucratic inertia of other multilateral bodies like the UN.
While BRICS' incremental institutionalisation is a net positive, it will not move the needle in the prevailing global environment.
The group's members are grappling with the weaponisation of trade policy, unilateral military interventionism, surging global defence expenditure and the impact of all this on the global institutional order. In this context, how will BRICS chart a new way forward for international cooperation?
For the moment, it seems content responding to the volleys being served from Washington DC, rather than pre-empting major geopolitical developments, or placing other powers on the back foot.
Against the headwinds of a revisionist US, a shaky Western alliance and a global system in crisis, bold and decisive moves by BRICS leaders are needed to usher in a more multipolar order. Simply keeping the ball rolling won't be enough. DM
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Birkin v Wirkin: the backlash against the global elite and their luxury bags
Birkin v Wirkin: the backlash against the global elite and their luxury bags

Daily Maverick

timean hour ago

  • Daily Maverick

Birkin v Wirkin: the backlash against the global elite and their luxury bags

The Birkin bag made by luxury retailer Hermès is a must-have for the global elite. Listen to The Conversation Weekly podcast to hear two sociologist discuss what it symbolises. The Birkin bag made by French luxury retailer Hermès has become a status symbol for some of the global elite. Notoriously difficult to obtain, a select few obsess over how to get their hands on one. But when US retailer Walmart recently launched a much cheaper bag that looked very similar to the Birkin, nicknamed a 'Wirkin' by others, it sparked discussions about wealth disparity and the ethics of conspicuous consumption. In this episode of The Conversation Weekly podcast, we speak to two sociologists about the Birkin and what it symbolises. For the rich housewives of Delhi, the Birkin bag is a must-have, says Parul Bhandari. A sociologist at the University of Cambridge in the UK, she's spent time interviewing wealthy Indian women about their lives and preoccupations. She told us: A bag that is carried by rich women of New York, of London, of Paris, is something that you desire as well, so it's a ticket of entry into the global elite. Birkins are also used by some of these rich women as a way to show off their husbands' affection, Bhandari says: ' Not only from the point of view of money, because obviously this bag is extremely expensive, but also because it is difficult to procure.' The harder your husband tries to help you get the bag, the more getting one is a testimony of conjugal love. Manufactured scarcity Named after the British actress Jane Birkin, Hermès's signature bag can cost tens of thousands of dollars, or more on the resale market for those made in rare colours or out of rare leathers. But you can't just walk into any Hermès store to buy one, as Aarushi Bhandari, a sociologist at Davidson College in the US, who studies the internet – and is no relation to Parul – explains. You need to have a record of spending tens of thousands of dollars even before you're offered to buy one. But spending that money doesn't automatically mean you get a bag. You have to develop a relationship with a sales associate at a particular Hermès store, and the sales associate really gets to decide, if there's availability, whether or not you get offered a bag. Bhandari became intrigued by online communities where people discuss the best strategies for obtaining a Hermès. So when US retailer Walmart launched a bag in late 2024 that looked very similar to a Birkin, and the internet went wild, Bhandari was fascinated. She began to see posts on TikTok discussing the bag. First, it was fashion accounts talking it up, but then a backlash began, with some users criticising those who would spend thousands on a real Birkin and praising the 'Wirkin' as a way to make an iconic design accessible to regular people. Bhandari sees this as an example of an accelerating form of anti-elitism taking hold within parts of online culture. @chronicallychaotic_ Why aren't people ashamed and embarrassed to flaunt wealth? ♬ original sound – Chronically Chaotic In February, the chief executive of Hermès, Axel Dumas, admitted that he was 'irritated' by the Walmart bag and that the company took counterfeiting 'very seriously'. The Walmart bag quickly sold out, and no more were put on sale. It has since entered into a partnership with a secondhand luxury resale platform called Rebag, meaning customers can buy real Birkins secondhand through Walmart's online marketplace. The Conversation approached Hermès for comment on the Walmart bag, and to confirm how the company decides who is eligible to buy a Birkin. Hermès did not respond. DM This story first appeared in The Conversation. Gemma Ware is the Host of The Conversation Weekly Podcast, The Conversation. Listen to the full episode of The Conversation Weekly podcast to hear our conversation with Parul Bhandari and Aarushi Bhandari, plus an introduction from Nick Lehr, arts and culture editor at The Conversation in the US. This episode of The Conversation Weekly was written and produced by Katie Flood. Mixing and sound design by Eloise Stevens and theme music by Neeta Sarl.

Witness recounts chilling details of murder trial linked to July 2021 unrest in Phoenix
Witness recounts chilling details of murder trial linked to July 2021 unrest in Phoenix

IOL News

time3 hours ago

  • IOL News

Witness recounts chilling details of murder trial linked to July 2021 unrest in Phoenix

An emotional State witness has described to the Durban High Court how some July unrest victims were brutally attacked in phoenix Image: Nomonde Zondi Durban High Court heard on Wednesday morning that one of the victims of the 2021 July unrest in Phoenix was hit on his head by a rock and a hammer. This is after one of the four Indian men was heard saying that they needed to put heat on the 'darkie ous'. Four men, Ravine Naidoo, 67, from Phoenix, Trevor Gopal, 52, from La Mercy, Tyreece Govender, 21, from Phoenix, and Timothy Govender, 46, from Phoenix, are on trial for murder, attempted murder, malicious damage to property, and public violence. Additionally, Gopal is also charged with incitement to commit public violence. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading The State is alleging that the four men killed Njabulo Allen Dlamini by hitting him with golf sticks, an iron rod, a sjambok, and setting him alight. It also alleges that the accused attempted to kill Nkosikhona Madlala and Sandile Colin Sambo by hitting them with golf sticks, baseball bats, putting wooden pallets on their bodies, and pouring fuel on them with the intent to burn them to death. The State alleges that Gopal had addressed his co-accused and some community members to attack black Africans outside his tavern. A State witness, Anard Chetty, who said he used to reside at Gopal's tavern after he lost his job during Covid-19, told the court that on July 12, 2021, when the victims were attacked, Tyreece hit Dlamini with a rock on his head. He stated that Dlamini arrived at the tavern in a taxi bearing the Africa Touch logo, accompanied by others. Chetty testified that Gopal used to sell alcohol illegally, as it was banned during that time because of Covid-19 lockdown restrictions. He said a female and two males had alighted from the taxi to go to the tavern, and within minutes, they came back running. At that time, a lot of vehicles came, with one being driven by Gopal's brother, blocking the taxi. He said the taxi occupants, including Dlamini, who were left inside, were told to come out and lie down on the floor. He said there was resistance from the taxi occupants and stated that the people who had come in vehicles had sticks and they assaulted the victims. He said they ran in different directions. 'A female and one male ran to the container behind the tavern and came out the next day around 6.00 in the morning,' Chetty said. He said that when Dlamini jumped out of the taxi, he was tripped by Gopal's brother, and he fell. 'More people came to assault him,' he added. Additionally, Chetty, who would constantly get emotional and cry, said that as Dlamini was being assaulted, Tyreece picked up a rock and hit him with it. 'After the third accused (Tyreece) picked up the big rock, Accused Four (Timothy) took the hammer and beat him with it. Those are the two fatal blows that ended that guy. He couldn't move,' he said, crying. Additionally, Chetty told the court that Dlamini was his friend. He said Tyreece is the son of Timothy. During his testimony, Judge Mluleki Chili kept on reminding him to slow down as they took notes. At some stages, when Chetty got emotional, he would tell him to drink water and take a minute. All the accused are out on bail. The trial continues.

MK Party files motion of no-confidence in Ramaphosa over 'failure' to fire Mchunu
MK Party files motion of no-confidence in Ramaphosa over 'failure' to fire Mchunu

The Herald

time3 hours ago

  • The Herald

MK Party files motion of no-confidence in Ramaphosa over 'failure' to fire Mchunu

The MK Party has filed a motion of no-confidence in President Cyril Ramaphosa over his 'failure' to fire police minister Senzo Mchunu because of alleged interference in policing matters. Ramaphosa placed Mchunu on special leave pending a judicial commission of inquiry. Law academic Prof Firoz Cachalia was appointed acting police minister. The MK Party approached the Constitutional Court to have Ramaphosa's decision revoked. In court papers, the party said the decision was irrational, invalid and inconsistent with obligations in the constitution and presidential oath of office. It claimed Ramaphosa failed to meet the July 22 deadline set by the chief justice to file opposing papers responding to the legality of placing Mchunu on special leave and appointing Cachalia in his role as a non-cabinet member. 'This is clear defiance of the directives issued by the chief justice,' MK Party spokesperson Nhlamulo Ndhlela said. 'This latest move by Ramaphosa raises significant constitutional questions and concerns about transparency, accountability and his leadership. The failure to respond also undermines the integrity of the judiciary as well as the public's right to answers regarding the allegations made by Lt-Gen Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi.' The MK Party has written to National Assembly speaker Thoko Didiza about its intention to table a motion of no-confidence, alleging the nation has lost confidence in him. During a media briefing on Tuesday the party also criticised how Ramaphosa dealt with Nobuhle Nkabane, who was fired as higher education minister. 'She was an easy and soft target, a sacrificial lamb to the GNU altar,' MK Party parliamentary chief whip Colleen Makhubele said. 'Mchunu should have been fired in the same breath. This is a clear act of cowardice and a decisive moment by the president.' TimesLIVE

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store