
EPA Employees Still in the Dark as Agency Dismantles Scientific Research Office
Employees of the crucial scientific research arm of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have been left with more questions than answers as the agency moves to officially wind down the office following months of back-and-forth.
On Friday evening, the EPA issued a press release announcing a reduction in force at the Office of Research and Development (ORD), citing the move as part of a larger effort to save a purported $748.8 million. On Monday, some employees at ORD, the largest office in the agency, began receiving emails detailing that they had been assigned new positions within the EPA.
'Please note, this is not an offer, but a notice of reassignment,' says a letter sent to an employee and viewed by WIRED states; the employee had previously applied to positions within the agency, as ORD employees were instructed to do in May. 'There is no action you need to take the reassignment, and there is no option to decline.'
On a call with ORD administrators and staff held Monday afternoon, audio of which was obtained by WIRED, leadership—including ORD acting administrator Maureen Gwinn—was unable to answer basic questions from employees, including a timeline for when the agency planned to permanently end ORD, how many employees would be transferred to other offices, and how many would lose their jobs. Employees at ORD who spoke with WIRED say that Friday's public-facing email was the first concrete news they had heard about their organization's future. One worker told WIRED that employees often learned more from news outlets, including WIRED, 'than we do from our management.'
"We wish we had more information for you," Gwinn told staff on the call. "I'll speak for myself, I wish we weren't at this point today."
An EPA spokesperson, who declined to give their name, wrote in response to a series of questions from WIRED that the agency is currently offering its third voluntary resignation period, known as a DRP, which ends on July 25. 'The RIF process entails a number of specific procedures in accordance with OPM regulations,' they said. 'The next step in this process is to issue intent to RIF notices to individual employees.' That number 'won't be clear,' they said, until after the DRP process was over.
'This is not an elimination of science and research,' the spokesperson wrote. 'We are confident EPA has the resources needed to accomplish the agency's core mission of protecting human health and the environment, fulfill all statutory obligations, and make the best-informed decisions based on the gold standard of science.'
At the start of the year, ORD was composed of between one and two thousand scientists at labs spread across the country as well as in Washington, DC. The branch's work provides much of the science that underpins the policy formed in the agency, from research on chemicals' impacts on human health and the environment to air quality and climate change to planning for emergencies and responding to contaminations in air, soil, and water. The office contains many groups and initiatives that are crucial to protecting the environment and human health, including a team that studies human health risks from chemicals.
Several EPA scientists stressed to WIRED that ORD's current structure, which allows research to happen independent of the policy-making that occurs in other parts of the agency, is crucial to producing quality work. One told WIRED that they worked in a scientific role in an EPA policy office under the first Trump administration. There, they felt that their job was to 'try and mine the science to support a policy decision that had already been made.' The structure at ORD, they said, provides a layer of insulation between decision-makers and the scientific process.
ORD was heavily singled out in Project 2025's Mandate for Leadership document, the policy blueprint that has closely anticipated the Trump administration's moves in office. It described the branch as 'precautionary, bloated, unaccountable, closed, outcome-driven, hostile to public and legislative input, and inclined to pursue political rather than purely scientific goals.' The plan did not, however, propose doing away with the organization. But in March, documents presented to the White House by agency leadership proposed dissolving ORD, resulting in backlash from Democrats in Congress.
In early May, the EPA announced it would be reorganizing its structure, which administrator Lee Zeldin wrote in a Newsweek op-ed would 'improve' the agency by 'integrating scientific staff directly into our program offices." The agency said that it would create a new Office of Applied Science and Environmental Solutions (OASES), which would sit under the Office of the Administrator.
Putting much of ORD's scientific work in policy offices, the scientist who previously worked in a policy office told WIRED, means that 'we're going to end up seeing science that has been unduly interested by policy interests. I don't think that's going to result in policy decisions that are empirically supportable.'
Following May's reorganization announcement, ORD employees were encouraged to apply for jobs within other parts of the agency. Multiple workers who spoke with WIRED say that the job postings for these new positions were barebones, with few descriptions of what the work would actually entail. One job posting seen by WIRED labels the posting simply as 'Interdisciplinary Scientific & Engineering Positions,' with no information about the topic area, team, or scientific expertise required.
The EPA's reorganization efforts were temporarily stalled by lawsuits. Earlier this month, the Supreme Court paused a preliminary injunction blocking further mass reductions in force at 17 federal agencies, including the EPA.
There was one bright spot on Monday's call: ORD leadership told employees that all of the ORD-affiliated labs would be kept open, a piece of news that ran contrary to some previous reports. Still, workers say that it's becoming increasingly difficult to do science at EPA. More than 325 ORD workers—around a fifth of ORD's ranks—had taken voluntary retirements since the start of the year, according to the EPA spokesperson. A scientist told WIRED that while they usually would have had a small team helping with their field work, they've been left to handle everything alone, including 'washing dishes and labeling bottles.' Cumbersome new financial approval processes, they said, have also resulted in chemicals that they ordered being delayed for months and expensive equipment sitting without any repairs.
Since taking office, Zeldin has made it clear that he intends to relax environmental regulations, especially around business: Last week, he authored an op-ed in Fox News advertising how the agency would essentially erase the Clean Air Act permitting process for power plants and data centers in order to 'make America the AI capital of the world.' ORD scientists fear that the dissolution of their office will only make this pro-business mission easier.
'If you're going to end up rolling back air quality regulations—and we know, conclusively at this point, that ozone pollution is causing premature mortality and chronic effects—if you roll back the rules, you're going to see excess cases of death and illness,' one scientist tells WIRED. 'My guess is that [EPA leadership] don't want to know the answer to the question of how bad it is going to be.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
JP Morgan Says Apple's Set To Beat Q3 Estimates
Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) looks set to beat when it reports Q3 fiscal 2025 on Thursday July 31 despite headwinds from cooling iPhone demand and modest Services growth. J.P. Morgan's Samik Chatterjee says the near?term setup is stronger than imagined given H1 pull?forward benefits, App Store link?outs in the US and the looming DOJ versus Google lawsuit in Services. The bank forecasts revenue of $89.6 billion, with iPhone at $39.9 billion, iPad at $7.7 billion, Mac at $7.4 billion and Services at $26.7 billion, some $600 million above the $88.96 billion consensus and sees EPS of $1.43. The firm keeps an Overweight rating and $250 price target after Apple has beaten revenue and EPS estimates for seven straight quarters. Services growth has remained healthy but lackluster, and the iPhone 17 rollout is failing to excite an install base used to major feature leaps. Apple's installed device base tops 2 B active units, giving it a cushion if upgrade cycles slow. Analysts will also watch for any updates on Siri enhancements and Vision Pro traction as Apple leans into AI amid peers. J.P. Morgan's Overweight thesis hinges on this resilience amid a tougher macro backdrop. Production headwinds have eased versus 90 days ago, hinting at smoother supply chains. Why it matters: A beat on July 31 could give AAPL shares a lift and set the stage for the iPhone 17 launch. Investors will be watching the Q3 result live and tracking early demand signals for Apple's next phone. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Wedbush Calls AI Microsoft's Shining Moment
Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) executive aren't losing any sleep over Q4, with Wedbush just stuck with its Outperform call and $600 target ahead of the July 30 report. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 7 Warning Sign with MSFT. Daniel Ives and the team reckon the AI revolution is in full swing, with enterprise deals accelerating across finance, government and retail. They see Azure and Office AI features driving Microsoft toward a $4 trillion market capand even $5 trillion in the next 18 months. Over the next three years, more than 70% of its installed base should be running AI tools, and early Copilot rollouts could tack on about $25 billion by FY 26. Wedbush calls this Redmond's shining moment, pointing out stronger cloud wins against Amazon (AMZN) and Google (NASDAQ:GOOG) and smoother supply chains compared to 90 days ago. They're clear that while FY 25 looks solid, FY 26 is when AI really kicks inand they don't think the Street has fully caught on yet. Investors will be watching the July 30 print for proof. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Solana Is Sinking Today
Key Points Valuations for Solana and other top cryptocurrencies are dipping today following new information in Tesla's quarterly report. Tesla sold 75% of its Bitcoin holdings in the second quarter. Despite some recent pullbacks, the crypto market has been on an impressive run -- and it's got a big test coming up at the end of this month. 10 stocks we like better than Solana › Solana (CRYPTO: SOL) is selling off Friday amid valuation pressures impacting the broader cryptocurrency market. The token was down 2% over the past 24 hours as of 5:20 p.m. ET. Meanwhile, Bitcoin was down 1.3%, and Ethereum was down 0.3%. Top cryptocurrencies are seeing sell-offs today following Tesla's disclosure that it had sold 75% of its Bitcoin holdings in the second quarter. The crypto market has seen a significant recovery since the morning trading hours, but Solana is still in the red. Solana slips as Tesla discloses Bitcoin sale With the Q2 report Tesla issued yesterday, the company showed that it had sold 75% of its Bitcoin holdings in Q2. The news has caused investors to become more cautious about valuations in the crypto market today, and Solana is seeing a moderate valuation pullback in conjunction with the trend. The cryptocurrency market has generally been on an impressive bull run, with Bitcoin's march above $123,000 per token and favorable political developments helping to power strong gains. On the heels of the rally, investors are taking profits, easing off on purchases, and waiting for indicators about where valuations might be heading next. What's next for Solana? Solana has climbed roughly 20% over the last three months, but it's still down 4% across this year's trading. The token now has a market capitalization of roughly $99 billion, and it ranks as the sixth-largest cryptocurrency by valuation. The Federal Reserve's Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) will meet on July 28 and July 29 and make a determination about whether to cut interest rates. Expectations that the FOMC will cut rates multiple times before the year is over have likely already factored in to gains for Solana and other cryptocurrencies over the last several months, but the upcoming Fed meeting still looks like the next big catalyst for the crypto market. Should you invest $1,000 in Solana right now? Before you buy stock in Solana, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Solana wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,774!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,064,942!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,040% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025 Keith Noonan has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why Solana Is Sinking Today was originally published by The Motley Fool