
Health needs to be put to ministers
Health Action Wānaka have secured a private meeting with the Minister of Health Simeon Brown on July 1 in Auckland, in addition to a meeting with Associate Health Minister Matt Doocey on the same day, during his visit to Wānaka for the Rural Health Roadshow.
The group published a health report two months ago exposing urgent unmet health needs in the region and criticising the lack of strategic health planning to meet the Upper Clutha's rapid population growth.
Before publishing the report, Health Action Wānaka wrote to Mr Brown sharing their findings and requesting a meeting which they were offered a day after the report went public.
As part of the report, they worked with healthcare providers and interviewed locals who have faced inequity when trying to access services.
The report exposed gaps across a range of services including mental health, maternity care and aged care, while also highlighting key barriers, such as travel costs, for locals trying to access healthcare in the region.
Four members of the group's steering committee are set to travel to Auckland next month for a meeting with Mr Brown, while the remaining member and two representatives from youth mental health NGO, ADL will meet Mr Doocey.
Health Action Wānaka spokesperson Monique Mayze said in a statement that they wanted to leave both meetings feeling confident the ministers were considering their recommendations.
Part of the group's proposal are three "quick wins" which will include the introduction of telehealth psychiatric consultations, publicly funded blood collection within the next two years and funded radiology services.
Ms Mayze said that with the strong evidence they have collected, the ministers will be held directly accountable to the local community for what they choose to do with the information.
"Sometimes you have to be the squeaky wheel to get stuff done," she said. "And that's what we will continue to be until our community gets access to the publicly funded health services it needs".
The group announced both meetings on their social media and called for community involvement as they plan the specific questions they want to ask during the meetings.
They are also urging the community to attend the public questions and answers event with Mr Doocey as a way of showing solidarity in the fight for a more equitable healthcare system.
"We need hundreds of locals to turn up," Ms Mayze said. " ... to send a message to Minister Doocey and Minister Brown that something has to be done about the health services inequity in our community."
The group's meeting with Mr Doocey will take place before the public event and will be attended by one member of Health Action Wānaka and two representatives from ADL.
Ms Mayze said the representatives from ADL will be able to give Mr Doocey insights into the reality of mental health services in the region.
This will also help make a strong case for the group's proposal to introduce psychiatric telehealth services for NGOs like ADL.
The public event will be held on July 1 at the Lake Wanaka Centre, from 12pm to 1.30pm, as part of the Rural Health Roadshow.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
New medical school at University of Waikato boasts better cost-benefit ratio, case shows
University of Waikato. Photo: Supplied / Google Maps A new medical school at the University of Waikato has been found to have a better cost-benefit ratio than other options, although only slightly. The business case for the new school has been released, which said it would have lower operating costs than other options, and would produce a higher proportion of graduates going on to become GPs. The University of Auckland has raised concerns over some of the business case's assumptions, but the health minister insists the new school was the most effective proposal at building New Zealand's "critical" health workforce. Last week, the government confirmed it would move ahead with the Waikato school, and was confident it presented the best value for money. From 2028, students will be able to start at the four-year graduate entry programme, which is intended to boost the country's rural GP workforce. National had campaigned on establishing the school at the 2023 election, but a [ full cost-benefit analysis was required as a condition of its coalition agreement with ACT. The Ministry of Health dumped a series of documents on Friday evening, including various Cabinet papers and minutes, the cost-benefit analysis conducted by Sapere, and the Ministry's detailed business case. The business case looked at three options: increasing the intake at the existing University of Auckland and University of Otago schools, a joint rural training programme run by the two schools, and the new Waikato school. The first option was estimated to cost $10.9b over the years between 2026 and 2042, and deemed the more expensive option. The joint rural training programme was estimated to cost $10.27b over the same period, while the new school - the cheapest option - was estimated to cost $9.1b. While it had the most expensive capital costs ($236.3m) the new school's operating costs ($361.6m) were deemed to be cheaper than increasing the intake at the existing schools ($513.6m) or the joint rural training programme ($508m). The lower operating costs were due to the Waikato course being shorter, the business case said. Prior degrees were also out of scope of the business case, despite the Waikato course being a graduate-entry programme. Professor Warwick Bagg, Dean of the University of Auckland's medical school, said this meant it was not a fair comparison, as it did not take into account the total cost of education. Professor Warwick Bagg. Photo: Supplied "In order to enter a graduate programme, you need to have graduated from a degree. So that's a minimum of three years, possibly longer, but at least three years which will have been funded by the government if it's been completed in New Zealand," he said. The new school also had the most favourable cost-benefit ratio, at 1.986 (meaning for every dollar invested, the benefits were worth $1.99), compared to increasing Auckland and Otago's intake (1.495) and the joint rural training programme (1.798). Waikato was also estimated to have a much higher estimated proportion of new graduates that would go on to become GPs than the other two options. The analysis estimated 38 percent of Waikato graduates would become GPs, compared to increasing the intake at Auckland and Otago (23 percent) and the joint rural training programme (33 percent). However, this is only an assumption, based on figures from the University of Wollongong's medical school, which has been used as a model for Waikato's programme. "It offers a new model, provided by a new entrant, underpinned by proven performance in an Australian context. It offers the greatest opportunity to increase GP propensity," the business case said of the Waikato option. "Option 3's propensity to provide a pathway for GPs is a consequence of a purposeful curriculum, training environments connected to communities, and a different way of selecting students. It can do this as a new entrant medical school, whereas change in an existing academic institution may be more difficult." Bagg said the modelling seemed "experimental" and "speculative," and the Australian context was different to the New Zealand context. "There are very big incentives for rural general practice in Australia that, at least to date, haven't existed in New Zealand, and certainly not historically. That's an important market force that will change behaviour. To my way of thinking, they've used the most optimistic possible outcome that could be found to make the case for the new programme." He also said the rate of graduates from the existing universities working as GPs was "quite a lot" higher than what the business case reported, saying it about 35 percent were working as GPs eight years after graduation. The health minister is standing by the figures, saying Sapere's cost-benefit analysis drew upon information about the existing Auckland and Otago graduates, as well as from Australian universities with a similar curriculum to Waikato. Health Minister Simeon Brown . Photo: RNZ/Marika Khabazi Simeon Brown said the decision was a "game-changer" for the long-term growth of New Zealand's medical workforce. "The Waikato Medical School will offer a post-graduate medical qualification based on similar successful programmes in Australia. These programmes include a year-long primary care placement and encourage students to work in primary care settings following graduation. The selection criteria of students alongside their long-term placements in primary care will both support a higher degree of these medical students to work in primary care after graduation," he said. "The Waikato Medical School will support growth of the number of general practitioners who play a critical role in keeping people healthy in the community and in managing long-term health conditions outside of hospital settings. " Labour's tertiary education spokesperson Shanan Halbert said Otago and Auckland were clear that they would be able to produce more doctors faster, if they were funded to do so. "We've got to make sure we're comparing degree with degree, apples with apples, so to speak. Because what we're seeing, as an example, is that we're comparing degrees at different lengths already." The Green Party's tertiary education spokesperson Francisco Hernandez said the dumping of the documents on a Friday evening showed the government was not confident in the business case. "The cost benefit analysis repeats the main mistake the government has made that has made this such a flawed process - rather than engaging in good faith with Otago and Auckland, and running an open process for a new graduate programme, they have deliberately stacked the deck to produce the outcome they want," he said. "The cost benefit analysis also assumes no further cost escalations - and with the minister refusing to rule out further funding - we just don't know how deep the government's blank cheque will extend to back this flawed proposal." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.


Otago Daily Times
7 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Dead teen's family told they had to get his body back to hometown
A teenager's death from complications after surgery revealed troubling gaps in complex care across the South Island at the time, the Health and Disability Commissioner says. The 19-year-old died in 2015 in circumstances where his family never had the chance to say goodbye. In addition, within minutes of them being told the teen was 'brain dead' they were asked if they would like to donate his organs. The teen's family was also told by a social worker that it was up to them to organise transportation of their son's body back to where they lived. A complaint to the coroner was referred to the HDC. In a decision released today, Deputy Health and Disability Commissioner Vanessa Caldwell found that Health NZ breached a section of the Health and Disability Services Consumers' Rights code, around gaps in information and delays associated with the air retrieval team. She was also critical of why alternative transport options had not been considered for the teen who had been taken to and from various hospitals for specialised treatment and care. Health NZ had sincerely apologised for its departure from the standard of care. Death unexpected The teen died unexpectedly after suffering complications related to a postoperative wound infection. He had undergone elective surgery at a South Island tertiary hospital for the removal of benign tumours from his nervous system. Caldwell said it was complicated by postoperative infection and meningitis which required further hospitalisations at a secondary hospital and later, another tertiary hospital. The postoperative infection was treated successfully, but the teen continued to suffer complications. He was later re-admitted to hospital with ongoing headaches and vomiting but a further lumbar puncture was not done because of concerns over how the teen was coping. A decision was made to send him back to the tertiary hospital where the initial surgery was done, to insert a shunt to drain excess fluid surrounding his brain and spinal cord. Because he was considered 'neurologically stable' and there were operational delays by the air retrieval team, a decision was made to delay the transfer for a few days. While waiting, he collapsed and had a cardiac arrest. The neurosurgeon's team rushed to the hospital where he was and administered critical care but he continued to deteriorate. He was transferred back to the tertiary hospital but certified brain dead after he arrived. Outcome linked to delayed transfer Caldwell said there was dispute as to whether he would have benefited from an earlier transfer. Caldwell acknowledged the family's concerns regarding the neurosurgical care provided but she considered that Health NZ provided him with a reasonable standard of care. She said the teen's poor outcome was attributed to the delay by the air retrieval team in transferring him. However, his care was triaged and prioritised appropriately based on the information available to the team at the time, Caldwell said. An initial referral was made at 6pm and triaged by the flight coordinator with input from a senior medical consultant. Because he was considered neurologically stable and the air retrieval team was scheduled to return from another job, a collective decision was made to depart the next morning, with an expected arrival back by early afternoon. The air retrieval team stated that this was the nature of prioritisation under a resource-constrained environment, Caldwell said. On the morning of the scheduled transfer, a further delay occurred because a flight nurse had to stand down for rest after attending an overnight retrieval. Efforts were made to contact other flight nurses and intensive care nurses who were not on the roster, but none were available. At the time, the air retrieval team had been experiencing increased demands but nurse staffing levels had not increased, Caldwell said. She said between March 2015 and March 2016, there were 60 occasions when a second retrieval had been requested but could not respond. An expert's advice was that road transfer could have been considered as an alternative option but the surgeon disagreed. He said that in his experience, moving patients by road had led to a negative outcome, because of the lack of ambulance staff and inability of the ambulances to cross boundaries between healthcare districts at the time. List of changes made since The air retrieval team had since made a comprehensive list of changes, including additional nursing staff, and has introduced improved communication and operational guidelines. Caldwell said a 'significant number of changes' to the health sector had since been made. She said the amalgamation of the 20 district health boards into Health NZ had created better service integration, sharing of resources, and communication between treating teams. Health NZ Southern and Health NZ Waitaha Canterbury districts were asked to provide a formal written apology for the breaches identified in the report. Tracy Neal, Open Justice reporter


Otago Daily Times
8 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Teen's death exposed gaps in South Island healthcare: HDC decision
A teenager's death from complications after surgery revealed troubling gaps in complex care across the South Island at the time, the Health and Disability Commissioner says. The 19-year-old died in 2015 in circumstances where his family never had the chance to say goodbye. In addition, within minutes of them being told the teen was 'brain dead' they were asked if they would like to donate his organs. The teen's family was also told by a social worker that it was up to them to organise transportation of their son's body back to where they lived. A complaint to the coroner was referred to the HDC. In a decision released today, Deputy Health and Disability Commissioner Vanessa Caldwell found that Health NZ breached a section of the Health and Disability Services Consumers' Rights code, around gaps in information and delays associated with the air retrieval team. She was also critical of why alternative transport options had not been considered for the teen who had been taken to and from various hospitals for specialised treatment and care. Health NZ had sincerely apologised for its departure from the standard of care. Death unexpected The teen died unexpectedly after suffering complications related to a postoperative wound infection. He had undergone elective surgery at a South Island tertiary hospital for the removal of benign tumours from his nervous system. Caldwell said it was complicated by postoperative infection and meningitis which required further hospitalisations at a secondary hospital and later, another tertiary hospital. The postoperative infection was treated successfully, but the teen continued to suffer complications. He was later re-admitted to hospital with ongoing headaches and vomiting but a further lumbar puncture was not done because of concerns over how the teen was coping. A decision was made to send him back to the tertiary hospital where the initial surgery was done, to insert a shunt to drain excess fluid surrounding his brain and spinal cord. Because he was considered 'neurologically stable' and there were operational delays by the air retrieval team, a decision was made to delay the transfer for a few days. While waiting, he collapsed and had a cardiac arrest. The neurosurgeon's team rushed to the hospital where he was and administered critical care but he continued to deteriorate. He was transferred back to the tertiary hospital but certified brain dead after he arrived. Outcome linked to delayed transfer Caldwell said there was dispute as to whether he would have benefited from an earlier transfer. Caldwell acknowledged the family's concerns regarding the neurosurgical care provided but she considered that Health NZ provided him with a reasonable standard of care. She said the teen's poor outcome was attributed to the delay by the air retrieval team in transferring him. However, his care was triaged and prioritised appropriately based on the information available to the team at the time, Caldwell said. An initial referral was made at 6pm and triaged by the flight coordinator with input from a senior medical consultant. Because he was considered neurologically stable and the air retrieval team was scheduled to return from another job, a collective decision was made to depart the next morning, with an expected arrival back by early afternoon. The air retrieval team stated that this was the nature of prioritisation under a resource-constrained environment, Caldwell said. On the morning of the scheduled transfer, a further delay occurred because a flight nurse had to stand down for rest after attending an overnight retrieval. Efforts were made to contact other flight nurses and intensive care nurses who were not on the roster, but none were available. At the time, the air retrieval team had been experiencing increased demands but nurse staffing levels had not increased, Caldwell said. She said between March 2015 and March 2016, there were 60 occasions when a second retrieval had been requested but could not respond. An expert's advice was that road transfer could have been considered as an alternative option but the surgeon disagreed. He said that in his experience, moving patients by road had led to a negative outcome, because of the lack of ambulance staff and inability of the ambulances to cross boundaries between healthcare districts at the time. List of changes made since The air retrieval team had since made a comprehensive list of changes, including additional nursing staff, and has introduced improved communication and operational guidelines. Caldwell said a 'significant number of changes' to the health sector had since been made. She said the amalgamation of the 20 district health boards into Health NZ had created better service integration, sharing of resources, and communication between treating teams. Health NZ Southern and Health NZ Waitaha Canterbury districts were asked to provide a formal written apology for the breaches identified in the report. Tracy Neal, Open Justice reporter