
Wild cats spotted in Muktsar village, forest dept sets up cages
Panic gripped Muktsar after a pair of wildcats were spotted roaming near Sangu Dhaun village on Wednesday evening.
The state forest department confirmed that no man-wildlife conflict has been reported in the area and rebutted claims of a few Punjabi news portals that identified the animals as leopards.
Wildlife officials said wildcats are larger and stouter than domestic cats and native to this part of the state.
Punjab's chief wildlife warden Dharminder Sharma said on Thursday that a team is working to rescue the wild cats, and there is nothing to panic about.
'We are identifying the online content that has posted unverified information about the identity of the wildlife. One portal has assured us that it will remove the online content that may unnecessarily cause panic among the residents,' said Sharma.
Muktsar district forest officer (DFO) Amritpal Singh said that wildcats are a common phenomenon in the agricultural fields in the region, and villagers have been sensitised about their movement in and around Sangu Dhaun.
He said that the traps had been laid for their safe rescue.
'It's mating season for the wild cats and it generally look for a wet area to stay away from the scorching heat. After spotting the wildcats in the fields, a section of villagers panicked. Our teams have engaged the panchayats and the community leaders to reassure them that the movement of wildcats has not harmed any humans or cattle. Villagers are now exercising utmost restraint, and our teams are working to rescue them from the area,' he added.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
18 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Bengaluru mom defends viral video of domestic worker's son eating on floor: ‘Doesn't need your pity'
A Bengaluru nutritionist's video sharing parenting tips went viral after it showed her domestic worker's child eating while sitting on the floor, drawing sharp criticism online. Nutritionist Sonakshi Sharma shared the video to highlight how baby-led weaning (BLW) is not a Western concept, but something Indian mothers have practised for generations. In the video, Sonakshi Sharma explains how baby-led weaning has been used by Indian mothers for generations.(Instagram/ 'Remember our moms being so busy with housework that they used to leave us with the food, and in that process we learnt to eat. BLW is just the same story wrapped in a seemingly exorbitant cover!,' Sharma says in the video. The clip shows her sitting on a sofa while her baby eats from a high chair. However, in the next shot, her domestic worker's three-year-old son is shown sitting on the floor, eating kheer and roti. Take a look at the video here: The contrast drew backlash from viewers who said it highlighted inequality, especially given the difference in how the two children were presented. Sharma defended her video, clarifying that the clips were filmed on different days and that the child simply preferred to sit on the floor. 'I don't practice idiotic things like untouchability in 2025 for god's sake! We just valued this child's preference, that's it. I understand that those showing concern are good people, but this child doesn't really need your pity for such a trivial thing,' she said. She also criticised the online response, claiming viewers were reading into it the wrong way. 'You're seeing a 'Househelp's child' sitting on the floor, while I'm seeing just a child who chose to sit on the floor—the same way my daughter would sometimes choose to do—the same floor where we regularly sit and eat,' she added. The video drew mixed reactions online. While some users supported Sharma's explanation, others felt the comparison was not needed. 'Whatever your justification is for why your help's three-year-old is sitting on the floor, it still does give out wrong message. This comparison reel was unnecessary in the first place,' one user wrote. Another countered, 'God! All the drama queens crying in the comments because kid is sitting on the floor. It's an Indian household, we all sit on the floor.'


Indian Express
19 hours ago
- Indian Express
Like, follow, fear: Punjab's women take on patriarchy, one reel at a time
Written by Kumool Abbi The death of popular Punjabi YouTube influencer Kamal Kaur Bhabhi, also known as Kanchan Kumari, has sparked a complex debate spanning religion, gender, migration, and morality. It reflects the tension in traditional societies like Punjab that are caught between entrenched values and modern transformations. But this incident is just the tip of the iceberg. It exposes deeper fractures within a state in crisis. Post-Green Revolution Punjab is a shadow of its once-vibrant self. Agrarian distress, marked by declining returns, groundwater depletion, crop failure, soil salinisation, rising indebtedness, and farmer suicides, has driven marginal and small farmers along with agricultural labourers out of farming. The myth of Punjab as a prosperous agrarian state has faded. As the rural economy shrinks, families are increasingly turning to the secondary and tertiary sectors for survival. Amid this economic downturn, a subtle social transformation has been taking place, largely among the poor and Scheduled Castes. These communities, despite their vulnerability, have quietly altered the position of the girl child. Once devalued, daughters are now more likely to be born, nurtured and educated. Punjab's total fertility rate, at 1.6 according to NFHS 2019–21, is lower than the replacement level. This decline is linked to urbanisation, migration, enforcement of the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques Act, and improved female literacy. The 2011 Census showed female literacy in Punjab at 70.73 per cent, higher than the national average of 64.6 per cent. Among Scheduled Castes, female literacy stood at 58.33 per cent. These figures mark a quiet inversion of patriarchal norms, especially in poorer households where daughters are increasingly seen as assets. But this shift is not without complications. Girls from economically weaker backgrounds still face structural barriers. Higher education is often inaccessible due to safety concerns, limited mobility, and family preference for educating sons. Many women, after basic schooling, seek work in an oversaturated informal sector, often migrating to towns or city outskirts. There, they enter new public spheres, grappling with both opportunity and risk. At the same time, the image of Punjab's young men has undergone a tragic transformation. Once seen as vigorous, hard-working farmers, many are now perceived as idle, directionless and addicted to drugs or alcohol. The decline of male economic contribution has pushed families to depend increasingly on their daughters, who are also withdrawing from agriculture. The Periodic Labour Force Survey 2024 shows that the female labour force participation rate for ages 15 to 29 declined from 45 per cent in January to March to 44.1 per cent in April to June. Unemployment among young women stood at 21.8 per cent, compared to 14.7 per cent for men. The work participation rate was just 15.7 per cent for women, compared to 56.1 percent for men. This growing female agency exists in contradiction with the patriarchal structures that still dominate Punjab. As women step into offices, markets, the gig economy, and increasingly onto social media, they challenge traditional norms of honour, shame, and sexuality. Modernity and globalisation have created space for self-expression, fuelling a sense of individuality, aspiration, and desire. Punjab's large diaspora further complicates this, exposing families to global values while reinforcing strong caste, ethnic, and religious ties. For many subaltern women, social media offers an alternative economic strategy. According to the NITI Aayog's SDG Index 2020–21, nearly 84.3 out of 100 people in Punjab were internet subscribers, with 61.2 per cent of women having mobile phone access. Unlike middle-class women producing 'respectable' content, these women often turn to YouTube, Facebook and Instagram for monetised self-expression. Cringe content and soft-porn appeal in global digital markets can translate into income. Algorithms reward sensationalism, driving creators to push boundaries. Figures like Kamal Kaur Bhabhi and Preet Jatti reflect this shift. These women often use cultural codes to satirise patriarchy, drawing in male viewers while mocking the gaze that seeks to control them. But this digital transgression provokes backlash. The subverted male gaze produces anxiety over the loss of control. Women, seen as male property, are suddenly visible, vocal and economically independent. In response, men try to reassert control, often through violence or extrajudicial means justified as 'moral cleansing'. Such reactions are not just personal but social. Honour becomes collective, and the merging of reel with real fuels moral panic. Patriarchal dogma, often backed by religion, seeks to censor, contain, and silence. The remarks by influencers like Ranvir Allahabadia and Samay Raina only underline the urgency for regulation. A framework to protect women, minors and other vulnerable groups from obscene content is necessary. But equally important is understanding that these moral panics mask deeper anxieties about agency, autonomy, and the shifting gender balance in a society struggling to adapt to change. (The writer is Professor, Department of Sociology, and Director, Population Research Centre, Panjab University)


Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
IAS officers' honest take on bureaucracy goes viral on LinkedIn-- Here's why
credit: linkedin A recent LinkedIn post shared by an IAS officer from the Rajasthan cadre of the 1996 batch has sparked debate online. Mr. Ajitabh Sharma, who has dedicated so many years of his life to the Indian bureaucracy, breaking away from the polished narratives, admits that 'in IAS, any assignment ain't difficult,' highlighting a bigger concern: are all claims about this job misleading? His post reflected on how many in governance present a simplified view of their work, making it seem like all tasks are equally manageable. He says, 'I have always found it difficult, much less for the assignments and more so for the narrative,' expressing his disagreement with the idea that every administrative assignment carries the same weight and complexity. Ajitabh Sharma pointed out that more than 80% of an IAS officer's time is consumed by what he calls 'non-core work,' noting that the core work for each department is different. The non-core work includes HR issues, departmental and interdepartmental meetings, prepping countless reports, managing data, etc. These tasks, although important, often take up so much time that there's little left for anything that truly matters. Screenshot of the post (credit: linkedin) What is core work? He explains: 'Anything that is mission-driven, departmentally unique—water, social justice, education, health, and the list goes on. These are the areas where officers can actually make a difference, shape policy, and deliver impactful governance.' Further, Mr. Sharma warns that spending countless years under non-core duties can lead to a false sense of expertise. 'You may feel like you are the 'expert,' but it may take your department on a downward slide in the service industry,' he explained. With over 4,000 likes and 500+ comments, his post has struck a chord on the internet. Once again, somebody chose to speak reality—and people are loving it. Citizens who are often at the receiving end of administrative delays and inefficiencies have also voiced their support. This post is a timely reminder that meaningful public service requires time, focus, and the ability to rise above the noisy routine of paperwork.