Is the Trump-Fueled Crypto Mania Dying Down?
The president's official token has hurt the sector.
The newly proposed policies and newly appointed leaders could be positives.
10 stocks we like better than Official Trump ›
President Donald Trump didn't invent speculative exuberance, but he has a knack for bottling it. In mid-January, the Official Trump (CRYPTO: TRUMP) meme coin debuted with fireworks on Solana, very briefly driving the entire meme coin complex higher and padding early buyers' wallets before collapsing and inflicting dramatic losses. Even sober observers had to concede that the president knows how to move markets.
Yet euphoria can often wither quickly in crypto. To some, today the cup feels half empty, and it's natural for investors to be wondering whether the Trump-powered party is winding down or just taking a breather. Let's take a look at the evidence here.
With the Official Trump meme coin, enthusiasm met gravity in record time, and there was plenty of fallout as a result.
By Feb. 3, the token had surrendered roughly 75% of its peak value amid significant insider selling despite the president's cheerleading on social media. A broader February slide wiped almost $1 trillion off aggregate crypto market caps, erasing most of the post-election bump.
Some seasoned crypto investors attributed this dip to the lost capital that the president's coin extracted from the ecosystem, since it also may have discouraged new investors from participating immediately after their entry to buy the president's token.
Even now, the Trump coin still has a $1.9 billion market cap, with 80% of its circulating supply controlled by accounts linked to the Trump family and a single allied firm. Concentration that steep limits the token's natural public float and makes every incremental seller more painful for newcomers.
Volume tells the same story. Spikes align with promotional events featuring the token, like the president's dinner raffles, but fall off quickly, signaling speculative rather than sticky demand.
If you arrived late, you're effectively wagering that fresh money will underwrite insiders' paper gains. That is possible, but not exactly a margin of safety or the basis for a sound investment thesis.
Before writing the post-mortem on the crypto market run, recall that presidents wield policy levers, not just Twitter flair.
On March 6, Trump signed an executive order mandating the creation of a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve (SBR) as well as a Digital Asset Repository, instructing the U.S. Treasury to hang on to seized crypto rather than auction it. Though these two stockpiles have not yet been implemented, the order theoretically turns the government into a structural non-seller, tightening supply for Bitcoin and other major cryptocurrencies.
Regulatory tone is changing as well thanks to the administration's appointments of senior leaders.
Paul Atkins, a longtime critic of financial regulation enforcement, now chairs the Securities and Exchange Commission and has already reassigned several enforcement lawyers away from crypto probes while floating various exemptions for decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. A friendlier set of rules tends to invite bigger pools of capital to the markets.
On that note, Bitcoin notched a fresh all-time high of $123,000 on July 14. That move has more than a few causes, but recent regulatory changes are doubtlessly part of the story.
Meanwhile, Trump-controlled enterprises keep inventing fresh crypto on-ramps. For example, World Liberty Financial's dollar-pegged stablecoin and forthcoming governance token have already raised more than $550 million.
During the week of July 11, a company from the United Arab Emirates injected another $100 million into the platform, elevating a project entwined with presidential branding, and raising numerous unanswered questions regarding the high likelihood of conflicts of interest. Regardless of one's view on the propriety of foreign businesses investing in ventures that the president has a direct financial interest in, those funds are real bids that lift valuations across adjacent tokens.
Add in the White House's June 30 crypto summit and appointment of a dedicated crypto czar, and it's hard to argue the administration is backing away from the sector.
So, is the crypto mania dying? Nope. It's actually picking up after a lull.
Price charts of Trump-related coins say enthusiasm cooled, but policy and capital flows suggest the broader Trump-crypto axis still has horsepower, and that the president's impact on the market is far wider than his impact on his branded tokens.
Long-term investors should separate the noise of meme token gyrations from the signal of structural supply constraints and increasingly dovish regulators. Assuming Washington follows through on developing sound custody rules and with its reserve accumulation plans, crypto's rise will persist well beyond this news cycle -- though it is unlikely that the Official Trump tokens will ever keep pace with the sector's flagship assets.
Before you buy stock in Official Trump, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Official Trump wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $680,559!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,005,670!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,053% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of July 15, 2025
Alex Carchidi has positions in Bitcoin and Solana. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Bitcoin and Solana. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Is the Trump-Fueled Crypto Mania Dying Down? was originally published by The Motley Fool
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘I've Called Him So Many Things…': Jasmine Crockett's New Donald Trump Slam Goes Viral
Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) dropped a damning new label for Donald Trump this weekend as she explained why she ultimately doesn't expect Republican lawmakers to break ranks with the president over the Jeffrey Epstein controversy. Trump has recently sought to downplay demands for transparency around the investigations into the late convicted sex offender, his onetime close friend. But there's growing anger and calls for the files to be released within his own MAGA base. Epstein died in jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. 'They want to show that they are loyal to this, you know, I don't even know what to call him. I've called him so many things, but this wannabe Hitler, for sure,' Crockett said. 'They want to pledge their loyalty to him and they know that he does not want this released,' she added. 'I think they also are concerned about the damage that it may do.' 'If he's trying to hide it, they understand that it is most likely problematic for him, as well as the MAGA brand — as well as the Republicans,' Crockett said. 'So, I don't anticipate that they will be on board for doing anything that may harm them or their fearless leader.' Watch here: Related... 'Uhhh, What?': Nancy Mace's Trump-Coldplay Kiss Cam Meme Leaves Critics Baffled Gavin Newsom Exposes A Sketchy Detail In Trump's Epstein Denial Adam Schiff's On-Air Message To Trump Had Colbert's Audience Cheering. Then He Went Further. Comedians Pull Off Brazen Epstein Prank Inside Trump Tower Gift Shop
USA Today
13 minutes ago
- USA Today
President Trump, I supported you. Release the Epstein list – or resign.
Trump has said we should stop talking about Epstein. What do you think? USA TODAY readers sound off in our Opinion Forum. President Donald Trump wants Americans to stop talking about Jeffrey Epstein. But judging from recent polling and responses from USA TODAY readers, many people aren't ready to do that. Trump and other top administration officials had played up the case of the disgraced financier who died in jail on charges of sex trafficking girls. They pumped up the idea that once Trump was elected he would let loose explosive revelations. Instead, the Justice Department and FBI closed the case. Now the president is facing blowback from many quarters, including once-loyal MAGA supporters who are expressing a sense of betrayal – and Democrats pointing to Trump's backtracking as a lack of transparency. As part of our Opinion Forum, we turned to USA TODAY readers, asking if they thought an Epstein "client list" existed – and if they thought the Trump administration had access to it, as well as what they thought of Trump's calls to move on from the Epstein affair. Read the responses below. I believe Trump administration has access to an Epstein client list I do believe a Jeffrey Epstein client list exists. And I believe the Trump administration had access to it. They can't release it because the billionaires, corporations and deep state that rule the country wouldn't allow it. I think Trump believed he couldn't be told what to do. The only thing I cared about was criminal "pedos" being brought to justice, but we know that will never happen. Epstein wasn't the only one out there doing what he was doing. Another view: I believe Trump has access to an Epstein client list. But it no longer helps him. | Opinion Forum While Trump has said repeatedly he wants people to stop talking about Epstein, he's one who used this for his campaign platform. If that's what he wants, he should've never brought it up. As for whether MAGA will split with Trump over this Epstein fallout – maybe some of MAGA will break with him but most will stay loyal. — Christine Luongo, Rockaway, New Jersey Mr. President, I supported you. Please release the list. Yes, I believe a Jeffrey Epstein client list exists. Court records indicate that massive amounts of information exists, documenting Epstein's (apparently shared) need and enjoyment in having predatory sex with perhaps hundreds of underage and emotionally vulnerable girls. I believe that he and others used the girls to feed their addiction to selfish, self-gratifying sex. And that he and others are on the "list." And that many, many highly visible people are on the list; it appears that the president is protecting them (and possibly himself). Because of this I think we will start to see a greater divide among his supporters. Musk proposes America Party: Do you think the US needs a third party? Tell us. | Opinion Forum I would say to the president: Despite your (more than several) less-than-likeable personality traits, we supported you because we love America and you also love America. However, we also stand for truth, justice and the American way. Please put our minds at ease and release the list. I supported you, attended many of your rallies and even greeted Kamala Harris at three of her rallies with a 6-foot Trump banner. Follow American ideals, Mr. President. Please release the list ... or resign. — Phil Parlock Sr., Huntington, West Virginia MAGA cult has been brainwashed I'm not sure if an Epstein client list exists. It's obvious they spent so much time talking about it because it fueled the conspiracy theorist-type thinking that Trump has been able to manipulate people's reality with so easily. That, and it supported a narrative that the Biden administration was withholding information that he, Trump, would release. When asked about releasing presumably hidden files such as those on President John F. Kennedy's assassination or the 9/11 attack, Trump always affirmed without hesitation that he would make them public. When asked about the Epstein files however, he seemed to always qualify their release with the condition that unnamed innocent people who he seemed to be aware were on the list could be protected. This caution can only be explained either by his knowledge that the files did in fact exist or by his awareness from personal experience that their existence was plausible. I do care about the Epstein case, and in a perfect world it should get more attention than it currently is. However, the MAGA cult has been brainwashed to automatically see the media reporting on Trump's bad behavior as evidence of Trump's righteousness. I fear more attention by the media would trigger their persecution complex and override the cognitive dissonance they feel by having their 'open book' president 'deep state' them. The Trump administration should focus on resigning and making way for competent people to lead the country. The most likely explanation for Trump saying we should stop talking about Epstein is that he did something illegal with Epstein that he knows all but his most loyal followers would condemn him for. The likelihood of this explanation is supported by Trump's resistance to releasing any such list and his attempts to explain away the files, saying things like, there are innocent people who would get hurt, they don't exist, the Clintons fabricated them, etc. In terms of whether MAGA will split with Trump over the Epstein issue, I think maybe some in the movement will break away, but most will stay loyal. — Samuel Barnes, Saint George, Utah I don't care if there's an Epstein list I don't believe any client list existed. But I also don't care. Epstein struck me as too wily to leave any kind of written record of his business, clients or victims. But MAGA folks love a conspiracy and this one has everything: salacious details, mysterious death, famous names and money. Lots of money. Epstein is dead. His empire crumbled. And Americans have far too much going on in the U.S. and in the world that requires our attention. I don't agree with Trump on much, but I certainly do when it comes to his recent repeated calls for us to stop talking about Epstein. He really needs to focus on urgent matters now – flooding in Texas and elsewhere, uncontrolled wildfires in Arizona, education and immigration battles. Then there are the international problems, many of which seem to have no easy answers. But I do think we will start to see a greater divide among his supporters. — Kathleen Bryson, Globe, Arizona
Axios
13 minutes ago
- Axios
How Trump's game-planning for the 2026 midterms
President Trump is already fixated behind the scenes on next year's midterm elections for the House and Senate — unleashing his billion-dollar political operation and personally burrowing into the minutiae of races. Why it matters: Now that his "big beautiful bill" has passed Congress, Trump's ability to accomplish more big things there — and avoid impeachment — hinges on keeping the GOP's razor-thin majorities in both chambers of Congress in his last two years in office. Zoom in: Even with all that's swirling around Trump — foreign conflicts, deportations, tariffs, the Jeffrey Epstein fallout — he's micro-level focused on 2026 races. One example: Trump's been particularly locked in on the already messy GOP Senate primary in Texas, where polls indicate Sen. John Cornyn is trailing scandal-plagued state Attorney General Ken Paxton, a longtime Trump loyalist. After Paxton's wife announced she was filing for divorce, White House insiders say, Trump — who hasn't endorsed in the race — was aware of it within an hour. He's been asking others about its political impact. Here's how Trump's team is laying the groundwork for 2026: 1. Money muscle Trump's biggest asset could be his enormously well-heeled political operation, for which he continues to aggressively raise money. Trump has told congressional Republicans he plans to spend heavily on their races. He's also planning to headline a big Republican National Committee fundraiser in D.C. this fall. Trump political lieutenants James Blair and Tony Fabrizio are slated to appear at an upcoming donor retreat to be held by House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.). Trump's operation will soon set up fundraising vehicles for candidates in several high-profile races to allow the Trump team to quickly raise money for them. 2. Recruit aggressively The White House is seeking candidates to run in several key races. Trump himself is expected to get involved if an on-the-fence prospect needs a push. Trump aides currently are trying to land a recruit in the race for New Hampshire's vacant Senate seat, for example. White House political director Matt Brasseaux has been attending House candidate recruitment meetings being organized by Georgia Rep. Brian Jack, a former Trump aide. 3. Early redistricting Trump is pushing for Texas Republicans to redraw the state's House districts five years early to create more GOP-friendly seats. That could net as many as five new GOP-held seats and dilute Democrats' voting power — but it carries risks. It almost certainly would face court challenges, and some Republicans worry that some of the party's incumbents could be endangered by shifting GOP voters to districts now represented by Democrats. It also could lead blue states to try the same thing to favor Democrats. California Gov. Gavin Newsom has threatened as much in that state. Democrats already outnumber Republicans in California's House delegation, 43-9. Trump urged members of Texas' congressional delegation to get on board with his plan during a call this week, and his team is eyeing other states for possible redistricting. 4. Keep selling Trump's big bill The White House is drawing up plans to spend the next year-plus selling Trump's domestic policy mega-bill to voters. That won't be easy: Polls indicate the measure — which includes tax cuts and a range of cuts to social programs — isn't popular. Trump and his cabinet members plan to travel to battleground areas to promote provisions of the bill Trump's team sees as politically palatable. Last week, Vice President Vance touted the bill in eastern Pennsylvania. Fabrizio spoke to a small group of House Republicans a few days ago to offer guidance on messaging, and Blair recently addressed a Senate GOP lunch with Trump pollster David Lee. The White House is planning an August retreat for congressional staffers to discuss how to promote the bill. 5. Stave off retirements Trump is trying to use his political sway to persuade battleground Republicans from vacating their seats. Trump this month helped get Iowa Rep. Zach Nunn to seek reelection to his competitive district, rather than run for governor. The White House also is trying to keep Iowa Sen. Joni Ernst from retiring. Ernst drew fire — and a Democratic opponent — recently when she told a group of constituents, "We all are going to die," in response to concerns about Medicaid cuts in Trump's megabill. But top Republicans worry her retirement would complicate their prospects of keeping the Republican-friendly seat. 6. Endorse — and attack — in primaries Trump plans to use his dominance over the GOP to shape primaries — either to ensure the party nominates who he sees as the most electable candidates for the general election, or to punish Republicans who've crossed him. He's endorsed more than a dozen House Republicans from swing seats to try to protect them from costly primary challenges, and is expected to endorse more. He recently met with Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp to discuss the state's Senate primary for the seat now held by Democratic Sen. Jon Ossoff. The White House is eager to avoid a bloody primary and is determining how to engage, similar to its wait-and-see posture in the Texas Senate primary. Trump's political operation has run a pair of ads targeting Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie, who was one of two House Republicans to vote against the megabill. What they're saying: " The president understands that good politics makes even better policy and has embarked on ... a multidimensional effort aimed at expanding the House and Senate majorities," said Chris LaCivita, a senior Trump political adviser.
