What will it take to restore J&K statehood
Last month, J&K Chief Minister Omar Abdullah made a forceful plea to the Centre for restoring statehood. 'We're not asking for something that is not our due. Statehood is the right, it was promised to the people,' he had said on July 20. What would restoration of statehood mean for J&K? What would it take for that to happen?
Statehood will empower CM
The J&K Reorganisation Act was passed in Parliament on August 6, 2019. It gave the Centre, through the Lieutenant Governor, a heightened legislative role in J&K, and put the bureaucratic apparatus in the UT under the Union Home Minister.
Both policing and public order were placed within control of the Centre. Subjects on the Concurrent List in the Constitution were taken off the plate of the legislative Assembly as well.
The Act also barred the UT's legislature from introducing bills with any fiscal, monetary or taxation implications without the recommendation of the L-G. This is particularly limiting since virtually every policy decision requires taxation, expenditure or revenue adjustments.
So a restoration of statehood would effectively empower the elected government in J&K and vastly reduce the powers of the L-G, who, according to Section 53 of the Reorganisation Act, has the 'final' say on almost every administrative and legislative decision.
'…The decision of the Lieutenant Governor in his discretion shall be final, and the validity of anything done by the Lieutenant Governor shall not be called in question on the ground that he ought or ought not to have acted in his discretion…,' Section 53 states.
Act of Parliament will be needed
The J&K Reorganisation was without precedent — no state had ever been reduced to a UT before. But granting statehood would not be without precedent.
Five UTs have previously been granted statehood by Parliament: Himachal Pradesh in 1971, Manipur and Tripura in 1972, and Arunachal Pradesh and Mizoram in 1987. Additionally, the state of Goa was carved out of the then UT of Goa, Daman and Diu in 1987.
For statehood to be restored to J&K, the Reorganisation Act would have to be repealed, and the Centre would have to introduce a fresh bill in Parliament, which then would have to be passed in both Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha.
Article 3 of the Constitution empowers Parliament to form a new state out of the territory of any other state or UT, as well as to change the area or name of a state. But a bill to this effect can only be introduced on the recommendation of the President.
Since the President acts only on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers — led by the Prime Minister — this essentially means that it is up to the Centre to recommend the introduction of the bill for restoration of statehood.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
2 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Soon, SOPs to curb non-consensual content
BENGALURU The Union government has set up an expert committee to create a standard operating procedure for combating the spread of non-consensual intimate images (NCII), following directions from the Madras high court in a case involving a woman lawyer whose private images were leaked and repeatedly resurfaced online. Centre told the court that the committee, composed of six experts and representatives from the Union government, will come up with a framework to deal with all cases involving NCII content. (Getty Images/iStockphoto) Senior counsel Abudu Kumar Rajarathinam, who appeared for the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY), told the court that the committee, composed of six experts and representatives from the Union government, will come up with a framework to deal with all cases involving NCII content. The government made the submission before a bench of justice Anand Venkatesh of the Madras high court that was hearing the woman advocate's petition against the continued circulation of her private photos and videos, which her former partner had recorded without her consent and shared online. Despite multiple takedowns, the images kept reappearing, prompting Venkatesh to intervene and demand urgent systemic solutions. The government informed the court that MeitY had constituted a committee with representatives from the ministries of home affairs, women and child development, communications (department of telecommunications), and MeitY itself. The joint secretary of MeitY will head the panel, which also includes cyber law experts and nodal officers from the participating ministries, it said. The committee will draft an SOP (standard operating procedure) that combines 'legal and technical strategies to immediately and effectively' tackle NCII content. It will also propose long-term solutions and outline clear steps that victims themselves can take when their private content is leaked online. The Centre told the court that sensitising government agencies to the issue will form another key part of the committee's mandate. The high court recorded the submissions and said the committee should treat the present case as a 'test case' to find a robust mechanism to block such content and prevent it from resurfacing. 'This is like Ravana's head. Each time you cut it, it grows back. Even when we block the video, it reappears. The real problem is relapse,' justice Venkatesh said, referring to the woman lawyer's videos and photos resurfacing online despite the government and police authorities repeatedly blocking them. The court then suggested that MeitY can take the same steps it took to block over 1,400 URLs, including international links, spreading anti-India propaganda during 'Operation Sindoor'. Justice Venkatesh said the same intensity and technological tools must apply when a 'citizen's dignity' is at stake. 'The nation is nothing but a conglomerate of its citizens. If we can take swift action to protect the country's image, we must do the same when one individual's fundamental right under Article 21, right to dignity, is under attack,' the judge said. The court noted that NCII content remains a pervasive and recurring issue, especially affecting women who face stigma, threats, and long-lasting trauma. 'This isn't just one woman's fight. It reveals systemic gaps that harm thousands of women across the country,' the judge said. The petitioner's counsel pointed out that while MeitY had previously blocked six URLs, the video had now resurfaced across 13 new links. Senior counsel Rajarathinam confirmed that the URLs were inaccessible in Delhi and Mumbai but still active in Tamil Nadu. He said this was probably because of coordination issues with local service providers and said the authorities will fix it. The court reiterated that the committee must take the present case as a blueprint and evolve a method that works, so it can be replicated in future cases. 'This court will not allow this to become just another committee with a report that gathers dust,' justice Venkatesh said. During a previous hearing last month, the court had directed MeitY to detect and remove all private content of the petitioner within 48 hours. The woman had filed a police complaint after discovering that her ex-partner had secretly filmed their private moments and shared the content online. Despite repeated takedown efforts, the videos continued to resurface on pornographic websites, messaging apps, and social media platforms.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
32 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Best of BS Opinion: Soggy dribbles in finance, films, and diplomacy
There's something oddly thrilling about playing football in the park when it's raining heavily. You know it's not the ideal setting as every pass splashes water, every dribble slows down as the ball skids unpredictably across the soggy grass. But somehow, the game goes on. Strategy shifts. You focus more. Every movement demands improvisation. The mess, the friction, and the lost grip, it all becomes part of the play. Today's writeups hint at something similar. Institutions, industries, and individuals navigating a slippery, waterlogged pitch — trying to dribble ahead, adjusting each move to the terrain beneath. Let's dive in. Take India's state finances. A Crisil report shows revenue bouncing back slightly, with GST and liquor excise pulling their weight, but petroleum taxes dragging like waterlogged boots. Despite the slip-and-slide, states have kept their fiscal balance mostly intact. Yet deeper puddles remain: heavy dependence on the Centre and a debt-to-GDP ratio still high, notes our first editorial. Reform now means finding better studs: tighter GST compliance, digital tax trails, and predictable federal transfers. The game is on, but the pitch is far from ideal. In cinema too, the ball's taking unexpected turns. Aamir Khan's move to YouTube's pay-per-view model isn't just disruptive, it's democratic, highlights our second editorial. It bypasses uneven theatre access and expensive OTT subscriptions, bringing big films to small screens at Rs 100 or less. But success here hinges on how well creators learn to play on mobile-first grounds, use AI dubbing, and price smartly. If they can adapt, this could be the rain-slick breakthrough the film industry didn't know it needed. Meanwhile, on the foreign policy field, R Jagannathan argues India must stop kicking the ball around passively. Modi's rapport with world leaders may look good in photo-ops, but it hasn't kept adversaries from pushing forward. As geopolitical puddles deepen (Ukraine, Gaza, China), India must build influence through strategy, not symbolism. Think of it as learning to pass not just wide, but wise. And in corporate India, the Tata Trusts have moved early to back N Chandrasekaran, like a captain handing the armband before kick-off, writes Nivedita Mookerji. This preemptive support is not just procedural, it's tactical, especially as Tata Sons faces decisions on shareholding exits and RBI-mandated listings. It's a slippery pitch, and Tata seems determined to control the midfield. Lastly, L aveesh Bhandari reviews A World in Flux: India's Economic Priorities. Essays in Honour of Shankar Acharya, a collection of essays honouring Dr Shankar Acharya, thinkers reflect on economic playbooks past and future. While celebrating Acharya's policy genius, the book, edited by Amita Batra and A K Bhattacharya, also challenges today's players to update their formations for a world where climate, inequality, and politics increasingly shape the economy.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
32 minutes ago
- First Post
Vance ‘most likely' Maga successor, ‘probably' won't run for third term: Trump
Trump said Vance was 'most likely' to succeed him as the leader of the Maga movement, though he stressed it was too early to decide. He also said he would 'probably not' run for a third term read more US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (August 5) said Vice President JD Vance was 'most likely' the heir to his Make America Great Again (Maga) movement, though he added it was still too early to make a definitive call. Earlier, during an interview with CNBC, Trump also said he would 'probably not' run for a third presidential term, a comment that follows ongoing speculation about his political future. Although the US Constitution limits presidents to two terms, Trump has previously hinted at the possibility of seeking a third run in 2028, sparking debate over whether he might try to push for an amendment. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'I'd like to run,' Trump said in the interview. 'I have the best poll numbers I've ever had.' Trump's comments came in response to a question about Secretary of State Marco Rubio's praise for JD Vance. Rubio had said Vance 'would be a great nominee if he decides he wants to do that.' Asked if Vance was his likely political successor, Trump replied, 'I think most likely, in all fairness, he's the vice president.' He added, 'I think Marco is also somebody that maybe would get together with JD in some form.' Trump also noted that there were several strong voices within the movement. 'I also think we have incredible people, some of the people on the stage right here,' he said. 'So it's too early, obviously, to talk about it, but certainly he's doing a great job, and he would be probably favored at this point.'
