Gaza rescuers say Israeli strikes kill 14 as Trump teases ceasefire push
After nearly 21 months of war which has created dire humanitarian conditions in the Gaza Strip, home to more than two million people, the Israeli military said this week it had expanded its operations.
In southern Gaza on Wednesday, civil defence spokesman Mahmud Bassal told Agence France-Presse (AFP) that five members of the same family were killed and several others wounded in an Israeli air strike that hit a tent housing displaced people in the coastal Al-Mawasi area.
AFP images from the nearby Nasser Hospital, in Khan Yunis city, showed medics treating young children covered in blood.
Some appeared terrified while others lay still on hospital beds in bloodied bandages and clothes.
Despite being declared a safe zone by Israel in December 2023, Al-Mawasi has been hit by repeated Israeli strikes.
Further north, Bassal said that four people from the same family were killed in a pre-dawn Israeli air strike on a house in Gaza City, and another five in a drone strike on a house in the central Deir el-Balah area.
Media restrictions in Gaza and difficulties in accessing many areas mean AFP is unable to independently verify the tolls and details provided by rescuers.
Contacted by AFP, the Israeli military requested precise coordinates for the targeted locations and said it "will try to look into" the reports.
'End the war'
On Tuesday the military said that in recent days its forces had expanded operations across Gaza, "eliminating dozens of terrorists and dismantling hundreds of terror infrastructure sites".
After months of stalled mediation efforts to bring an end to the war, Trump on Tuesday said on social media that a new ceasefire proposal has Israel's support.
"Israel has agreed to the necessary conditions to finalize the 60 Day CEASEFIRE, during which time we will work with all parties to end the War," Trump said.
He added that Qatari and Egyptian mediators, who have been in direct contact with Hamas throughout the war, would deliver "this final proposal".
"I hope, for the good of the Middle East, that Hamas takes this Deal, because it will not get better -- IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE."
Trump is due to host Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House next week.
Israel launched its offensive in response to Hamas's attack on October 7, 2023, which resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on Israeli official figures.
Israel's retaliatory military campaign has killed at least 56,647 people in Gaza, also mostly civilians, according to Hamas-run territory's health ministry. The United Nations (UN) considers these figures to be reliable.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bangkok Post
6 hours ago
- Bangkok Post
Trump announces trade deal with Vietnam
US President Donald Trump has announced a trade deal with Vietnam following weeks of intense diplomacy between the two countries and ahead of a deadline next week that would have resulted in higher tariffs on the country's imports. A 20% tariff will be placed on imports of Vietnamese goods to the US, but a 40% levy will apply on any goods deemed to be transshipped through the country, Trump said in a social-media post on Wednesday. He said that Hanoi had agreed to drop all levies on US imports. 'In other words, they will 'OPEN THEIR MARKET TO THE UNITED STATES,' meaning that, we will be able to sell our product into Vietnam at ZERO Tariff,' Trump wrote on his Truth Social network. The president said he had secured the deal after discussions with Communist Party chief To Lam. Vietnam's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement that Trump had pledged to continue cooperating 'in resolving issues affecting bilateral trade relations' during the leaders' call on Wednesday. To Lam proposed that the US recognise Vietnam as a 'market economy and remove export restrictions on certain high-tech products', it added. The deal with Vietnam would be just the third announced following agreements with the UK and China, as trading partners race to cut agreements with the US ahead of a July 9 deadline. A delegation from Thailand is currently in Washington, seeking to reach an agreement that would include a tariff lower than the 36% rate Trump has threatened. Trump had announced a 46% duty on Vietnam as part of his initial rollout of so-called reciprocal tariffs in early April that were levied on dozens of countries, but were then pared back to 10% to allow time for negotiations. Vietnam posed a particular challenge for the Trump administration, as some of the president's top advisers view the country as a strategic partner in efforts to counter China in Asia. At the same time, its exports have become staples for American consumers. The country has seen its sales to US markets surge in recent years, partly because manufacturers shifted production there from China. It is a major supplier of textiles and sportswear, hosting factories for companies such as Nike, Gap and Lululemon. Vietnam was the sixth-biggest supplier of US imports last year, sending goods worth almost $137 billion, according to Census Bureau data. Its trade surplus with the US was the third-largest globally on a country basis, behind only China and Mexico. Shipments in May jumped 35% as firms sought to get goods onto vessels as quickly as possible ahead of the deadline. Some US officials wanted to calibrate tariffs for Vietnam and others in Southeast Asia to ensure they are sufficiently lower than what is imposed on China, to encourage production to leave that country. The higher 40% rate announced Wednesday would be imposed on goods deemed to be 'transshipping' — where components from China and possibly other nations are routed through Vietnam or subject to only minimal final assembly before being exported to the US. That has been a major concern for Trump's top trade advisers, including Peter Navarro, who described Vietnam as 'essentially a colony of communist China' during an April interview with Fox News. Full details of what goods would be subject to that higher rate were not immediately available. US exports to Vietnam were worth just $15 billion last year. Trump touted the prospect of a boost in auto sales as a result of the deal. Details yet to emerge Although Trump has announced the broad contours of the agreement, the White House has not yet released a term sheet or published any kind of proclamation codifying the arrangement. And some of the details could still be in development. The US and UK first announced their own trade deal in early May, but it wasn't until mid-June that Trump signed an executive order implementing the accord. And even then, key details have been set aside to be addressed later. While Trump and his team initially envisioned holding concurrent negotiations with dozens of trading partners, the president and his advisers have suggested in recent weeks that they will just focus talks with major economies and unilaterally issue levies on smaller countries or those that don't reach agreements. The deal with Vietnam was struck after weeks of discussions during which the US pressured the country to get tougher on trade fraud, ensure stricter enforcement against the transshipment of Chinese products, and also pushed for the removal of non-tariff barriers. Vietnam offered to remove all tariffs and repeatedly promised to purchase more American goods. Senior Vietnamese officials flew to the US to rally support and sign deals, including for $3 billion worth of agricultural goods. The trade minister also wooed executives from Nike, Gap and others to encourage them to get behind negotiation efforts. Officials in the country also touted the Trump Organization's plans to develop a $1.5-billion luxury resort complex, a project that will feature five-star hotels, golf courses and residential estates spanning more than 990 hectares. The president's son, Eric Trump, attended a groundbreaking event for the project in May, where he was joined by Vietnamese Prime Minister Pham Minh Chinh.
Bangkok Post
8 hours ago
- Bangkok Post
Ukraine left scrambling after US says halting some arms shipments
KYIV (UKRAINE) - Ukraine appealed to the United States for clarity on Wednesday after it was caught off-guard by a White House announcement that Washington was halting some arms shipments to the war-battered country. The Ukrainian defence ministry, which is deeply dependent on US arms, said it had not been prior notified about the reduction in aid announced one day earlier. Moscow revelled in the decision, saying that it could bring the end of the war closer. Any slowdown in US support could harm Kyiv's ability to fend off escalating Russian aerial bombardments or frontline gains. Kyiv has long feared halts to US aid after Donald Trump returned to the White House in January, having criticised the tens of billions of dollars in support and weapons sent by his predecessor, Joe Biden. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said in an evening address that Kyiv and Washington were clarifying details on supplies. "Continued American support for Ukraine, for our defence, for our people is in our common interest," he said. Washington's announcement prompted fear among Kyiv residents and warnings from experts that Ukrainian cities would be much more vulnerable to Russian air attacks. The US-made Patriot is now "a critical weapon which is impossible to get from Europe" and which Ukraine cannot substitute for now, said researcher Mykhailo Samus, director of the New Geopolitics Research Network, a Kyiv think tank. "Russian missiles will destroy Ukrainian cities" if Kyiv loses the ability to use Patriots, Samus told AFP. "It will be even more scary, even more painful, and even more civilians will suffer" if weapons supplies are reduced, Kyiv resident Yevgenia Prysiazhna told AFP, pointing to an increase in overnight drone and missile attacks on Ukraine. "I really hope that this is a temporary decision," the communications manager said. The foreign ministry summoned John Ginkel, the deputy chief of mission at the US embassy in Kyiv, in a rare diplomatic move that is usually reserved for foes and rivals, not vital allies, such is the uncertainty about what the cuts would mean for Kyiv. Politico and other US media reported that missiles for Patriot air defence systems, precision artillery and Hellfire missiles are among the items being held back. The White House had said that it was halting some key weapons shipments promised by the previous US administration, without elaborating. Under Biden, Washington spearheaded Western support for Ukraine, with Congress having approved more than $100 billion in aid, including $43 billion in weaponry. Trump instead has pushed the two sides into peace talks, including in phone calls with Russian President Vladimir Putin -- who rejected pleas for a ceasefire and demanded that Ukraine cede more territory if it wants Moscow to halt its invasion, which was launched in 2022. - 'Consistent pressure' - The US president has refused to announce new aid packages and Kyiv has been corralling Washington's European allies to step up their support. Kyiv remains "seriously dependent" on US arms supplies, a high-ranking source in the Ukrainian military told AFP. "Europe is doing its best, but it will be difficult for us without American ammunition," the source added. A May report by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) said that Europe "had only made limited progress" in strengthening its defence industries. But it said that "continued US aid remains extremely important for Ukraine's long-term effectiveness on the battlefield." In Moscow, the Kremlin said that reducing weapons deliveries to Kyiv would help end the conflict. "The fewer the number of weapons that are delivered to Ukraine, the closer the end of the special military operation," Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters in response to a question by AFP, using Russia's term for its more than three-year-long offensive. The White House told AFP in an email that the decision to reduce shipments was taken following a "review of our nation's military support and assistance to other countries". Kyiv said that it was caught off-guard by the move. The defence ministry said that the country had "not received any official notifications" on the issue. - Escalating drone attacks - Russia ramped up attacks on Ukraine in June, launching nearly twice as many missiles and more than 30 percent more drones than in May, according to an AFP analysis of Ukrainian air force data. Kyiv was in June subjected to at least four fatal attacks that left more than 40 people dead. Its residents are worried that a cessation of US aid would leave the capital even more vulnerable. "We had gotten used to seeing America as a country of values, a country that defends democracy," Igor Stambol, a Kyiv resident, told AFP.
Bangkok Post
12 hours ago
- Bangkok Post
Thailand's export-led model needs rejig
Time is running out for Thailand, and the stakes have never been higher. As Finance Minister Pichai Chunhavajira arrived in Washington this week for critical trade talks with the US negotiation team, Thailand confronts not just a tariff negotiation but an existential challenge to its export-dependent economic model. With US President Donald Trump's 90-day grace period expiring on July 8, Thailand must secure a deal or face a punishing 36% tariff that threatens to unravel decades of export-led development strategy. The domestic political vacuum resulting from the Constitutional Court's suspension of Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra over a leaked phone conversation with former Cambodian leader Hun Sen complicates matters further. The court's decision has plunged the government into crisis precisely when political stability is most crucial. Finance Minister Pichai's negotiation team may now have to convince their US counterpart not only of their proposals' merits but of their own government's tenure and authority to implement any agreement reached. The challenge is compounded by regional competitive dynamics that Thailand can no longer ignore. While Thailand scrambles to secure its first formal in-person meeting, Vietnam has already engaged in multiple rounds of talks with Washington. This late start means that Thailand must secure favourable terms while ensuring they remain competitive relative to what Vietnam and other Asean neighbours ultimately achieve. While the US has indicated an 18% levy, Thailand aims to reduce the 36% "reciprocal tariff" to the universal minimum of 10%. The US has requested Thailand address tax measures, non-tariff barriers, digital trade, and economic security concerns to reduce its US$45.6 billion (1.48 trillion baht) bilateral trade deficit. Thailand's earlier offer included greater market access and tighter screening of transshipments. While policymakers know a full-scale deal is unlikely before July 8, there is hope for an extension agreement. Yet Thailand's underlying vulnerabilities remain stark. The United States remains Thailand's largest export market, accounting for 15% of everything the country sells abroad. Thailand's top export categories -- industrial machinery and electrical equipment -- are particularly vulnerable, as the US accounts for more than one-fifth of total exports in these sectors. These intermediate products frequently serve as inputs for subsequent manufacturing stages, meaning supply chain disruptions can ripple across multiple production levels. When export-focused companies experience demand volatility, effects often reach smaller domestic suppliers who may not be directly exposed to export markets. This pattern extends to Thailand's other major export sectors, including processed food and rubber manufacturing, where smaller suppliers possess limited financial buffers to weather pricing pressures. This challenge extends beyond Thailand. Countries like Vietnam, Malaysia, and Singapore, which depend on comparable export portfolios, confront similar vulnerabilities, intensifying the race to reduce US market dependence. Additionally, foreign direct investment implications present more serious concerns. Thailand's export success has depended on attracting multinational corporations to establish manufacturing operations, capitalising on cost advantages and investment incentives. Tariffs disrupt this logic by raising costs of reaching crucial markets like the United States from Thailand. When multinational companies reassess operational strategies, options like reshoring, nearshoring, friendshoring, or consolidating operations gain increased appeal, pushing companies to rethink their global footprints. Thailand's deepening relationship with China further compounds these strategic challenges. China has become a rival to Japan as Thailand's most important foreign investment source, pouring money into electric vehicles, digital infrastructure, and real estate. While bringing significant benefits including technology transfer and capital inflows, being closer to China now poses risks in Mr Trump's worldview. Thailand's electric vehicle ambitions exemplify this dilemma. Chinese automakers like BYD have made massive investments as the country positions itself as Southeast Asia's EV hub. But if Mr Trump views Thailand as facilitating Chinese access to global markets, the carefully crafted EV industrial strategy could become a liability rather than an asset. Meanwhile, Thailand faces another China-related challenge: the flood of cheaper Chinese products entering the domestic market as Chinese exporters seek alternative outlets after being shut out of America. While Thai consumers may benefit from lower prices, smaller domestic manufacturers risk being eliminated by competition from Chinese companies dumping excess capacity throughout Southeast Asia. Thailand's diplomatic position has been weakened by recent policy missteps straining relations with Washington precisely when maximum leverage is needed. The deportation of Uyghurs to China, hosting Myanmar's junta leader in Bangkok, and arresting an American academic on lese-majeste charges have all sent wrong signals at the wrong moment. The current domestic political uncertainty simply does not help. Thailand's conciliatory offer to increase imports of US energy, agricultural products and aircraft might sound reasonable but is overly simplistic and reinforces asymmetric negotiations without securing meaningful concessions in return. As multinational companies rethink supply chain structures, the real challenge for Thailand is leveraging the country's competitive positioning based on deeper understanding of its roles within global industries. Countries that perform critical tasks or provide complete ecosystems are harder to replace in global value chains. Thai policymakers must begin by comprehensively mapping how Thailand-based firms participate in global value chains across industries. Thailand needs a granular understanding of what tasks are performed where, which firms are involved, how they connect to global networks, and what competitive advantages they provide. This analysis should inform policies that go beyond traditional tax incentives toward making operations in Thailand essential for multinational companies. As firms reassess their global footprints, Thailand must provide compelling reasons for their continued presence. Mr Trump's tariffs represent more than a trade policy challenge that can be overcome through negotiations. They signal a fundamental shift in how global economic relationships are structured and supply chains are reconfigured. Disruptions caused by rising nationalism, geopolitical rivalry, and unpredictable trade policy are the new rules of the game. As the July 8 deadline approaches, Thailand's future prosperity depends not just on what negotiators can achieve in Washington, but on securing terms that preserve competitiveness against regional rivals while building an economy resilient enough to thrive regardless of trade policy volatility. To thrive and survive in this new environment, countries need to think beyond tariff negotiations and re-evaluate how to fundamentally strengthen their economic foundations. Thailand's strategic recalibration is not just urgent, but existential.
