Dutch political party says European sustainability rules threaten competitiveness
The Dutch political party, VVD, has sent a strong message to Brussels. On June 12, members of parliament Thom van Campen and Claire Martens-America submitted a motion to the House of Representatives stating that two European directives concerning sustainability hinder European businesses from competing with businesses outside the EU, such as those in China and the US.
The directives in question are the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). The motion urged the Dutch government to advocate for the withdrawal of these directives. The Dutch newspaper Het Financieele Dagblad (FD) was the first to report on this.
The CSRD requires large companies to report extensively on the sustainability of their business operations. The CSDDD (also known as the 'anti-blind eye law' or 'supply chain responsibility and liability') holds companies accountable for abuses in their global supply chains. Both directives aim to promote corporate social responsibility, but according to the motion's authors, "these rules threaten European competitiveness and put unnecessary pressure on businesses".
The FD noted that the motion represents a significant shift in the VVD's stance, as the party previously supported European sustainability directives. Critics, including civil society organisations, worry that such a position allows companies to ignore issues like child labour, pollution, and poor working conditions in their production chains. Netherlands joins France and Germany
The Netherlands follows other EU member states that have opposed the legislation, including Germany and France. Last month, French president Emmanuel Macron joined German CDU party leader Friedrich Merz in calling on the European Union to abolish a directive on corporate sustainability.
Whether the motion will garner enough support in the House of Representatives to influence government policy towards Brussels remains to be seen. The vote is scheduled for Tuesday, June 17. The discussion regarding the balance between corporate social responsibility and economic competitiveness is once again high on the political agenda. This article was translated to English using an AI tool.
FashionUnited uses AI language tools to speed up translating (news) articles and proofread the translations to improve the end result. This saves our human journalists time they can spend doing research and writing original articles. Articles translated with the help of AI are checked and edited by a human desk editor prior to going online. If you have questions or comments about this process email us at info@fashionunited.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
24 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Elon Musk calls Trump's big bill ‘utterly insane and destructive' as senate debates
The billionaire tech entrepreneur Elon Musk on Saturday criticized the latest version of Donald Trump's sprawling tax and spending bill, calling it 'utterly insane and destructive. 'The latest Senate draft bill will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country!' Musk wrote on Saturday as the Senate was scheduled to call a vote to open debate on the nearly 1,000-page bill. 'Utterly insane and destructive,' Musk added. 'It gives handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future.' Passing the package, Musk said, would be 'political suicide for the Republican Party.' Musk's comment reopens a recent fiery conflict between the former head of the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) and the administration he recently left. They also represent yet another headache for Republican Senate leaders who have spent the weekend working overtime to get the legislation through their chamber so it can pass by Trump's Fourth of July deadline. Earlier this month, the Tesla and SpaceX CEO also came out against the House version of Trump's 'big, beautiful bill', denouncing that proposal as a 'disgusting abomination'. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it, he wrote at the time. Musk's forceful denouncement of Trump's spending plans triggered a deep and public rift between the billionaire and the president, though Musk in recent weeks has been working to mend relations. On Saturday, Musk posted a series of disparaging comments about the senate version of the bill, which argued the legislation would undermine US investments in renewable energy. Musk boosted several comments from Jesse Jenkins, a macro-scale energy systems engineer who teaches at Princeton. After Jenkins wrote, 'The energy provisions in the Republicans' One Big Horrible Bill are truly so bad! Who wants this? The country's automakers don't want it. Electric utilities don't want it. Data center developers don't want it. Manufacturers in energy intensive industries don't want it.' Musk replied: 'Good question. Who?' Musk's continued criticism of Trump's budget proposals comes as the bill faces a rocky path in the senate. Republicans are hoping to use their majorities to overcome Democratic opposition, but several Republican senators are concerned over provisions that would reduce spending on Medicaid and food stamps to help cover the cost of extending Trump's tax breaks. Meanwhile, fiscal conservatives are worried about the nation's debt are pushing for steeper cuts.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
The quiet change made to the iconic American red cup that no one noticed
Millions of Americans likely didn't notice that one of the most recognizable consumer products has quietly changed. The red Solo cup — synonymous with college parties, birthday celebrations, and backyard barbecues — lost the four iconic lines that once wrapped around its sides after a recent redesign. Instead of the linear indents, Solo cup buyers will now see a squared-off bottom and arched incisions. The redesigned cups offer enhanced holding comfort. Tactile dots make it easier to grip the cups, while the arched structure reinforces the cup's strength. But, a presumably unintended result came with the redesign: it dispelled one of the most persistent consumer rumors in America. According to Solo's parent company, Dart Container, those lines were not designed for mixology. For years, drinkers believed those lines served as liquid measurements: one ounce for liquor, five for wine, and twelve for beer. The company enjoyed sales success for its party-hard imagery. The cup became part of iconic imagery, inspiring Toby Keith songs and national holidays. But in reality, the cup's indented design was engineered for vending machines and packagers to grab without the cups sticking together. Despite its party-hard reputation, the Solo cup is the result of decades of thoughtful design — much of it led by Robert Hulseman, the inventor behind the plastic version made popular know today. Before Hulseman filed patents for the party cups, Solo sold pyramid-shaped paper cups. But the product tended to stick together, creating havoc for consumers who tried to quickly grab a single cup. Hulseman's innovations resulted in a heavily-engineered product that has underwent dozens of changes through the years, adding structural reinforcements to limit spillage and a square bottom to make the cups easier to balance. The enhancements have had other benefits the company likely didn't intend, including new cup-stacking competitions. 'For our littler fans, it means they can stack and unstack our cups into a pyramid without them sticking together,' the company said on an FAQ page. The cups are also helpful measuring tools in for dozens of household chores. The red Solo cup - synonymous with American party culture and found at nearly every US grocery store - went through an identity change Users discovered that the indented lines were great for finding the right amount of water to put in rice or estimating the proper amount of mouthwash. Hulseman passed away in 2016 at the age of 84. While his cups remained a common sight at alcohol-fueled parties, Hulseman was known as deeply religious and liked to pen poems to God. He was described as 'supporting a variety of organizations and causes committed to Catholic education, anti-poverty initiatives, and religious communities.'
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Elon Musk blasts new version of Trump's spending bill as 'utter madness'
Elon Musk reignited his feud with Donald Trump as he tore into the president's spending bill in a blistering social media tirade. The world's richest man condemned Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' as 'utter madness', hours before Senate Republicans are expected to hold an initial vote on the latest version of the bill on Saturday afternoon. 'The latest Senate draft bill will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country,' Musk wrote in one of his X posts. 'Utterly insane and destructive. It gives handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future.' Trump's massive spending bill was notably the trigger for Musk and the president's dramatic fall out just three weeks ago, with Musk taking issue with the bill's estimated $2.8 trillion spending increases. Musk - who celebrated his 54th birthday Saturday as he slammed Trump's bill - also criticized the impact the bill will have on the energy industry, with Musk recently pushing for a sharp increase in solar energy in the US. Responding to a post that noted the Senate vote 'could wipe out 500 (Giga Watts) of potential energy generation' by 2030, Musk wrote: 'This would be incredibly destructive to America!' 'At the same time, this bill raises the debt ceiling by $5 TRILLION, the biggest increase in history, putting America in the fast lane to debt slavery!' he added in another post. Earlier this month, Musk's opposition to the legislation saw his time in Trump's White House come to an acrimonious end as he tore into the president. Musk had spent the start of the year slashing the federal government's programs through his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), but saw the $150 billion he claimed to have saved wiped out by the spending increases in Trump's bill. In a shock X post that captured international headlines, Musk vented his fury by writing: '(Trump) is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' Musk also claimed that Trump couldn't have won the 2024 presidential election without him, and said in a post that Trump's bill showed 'such ingratitude.' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told the Daily Mail at the time: 'This is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted.' Trump's sweeping Big Beautiful Bill encapsulates much of his domestic agenda, covering everything from tax breaks and immigration to national defense and energy. Democrats are united against the bill, with Congressional Republicans - who hold majorities in both the House and Senate - set to decide whether President Trump's signature's domestic policy package will become law. Trump told Republicans to skip their holiday vacations and deliver the bill by the Fourth of July. Republicans say the bill is crucial because there would be a massive tax increase after December when tax breaks from Trump's first term expire. The legislation contains roughly $3.8 trillion in tax cuts. The existing tax rates and brackets would become permanent under the bill. It temporarily would add new tax breaks that Trump campaigned on: no taxes on tips, overtime pay or some automotive loans, along with a bigger $6,000 deduction in the Senate draft for older adults who earn no more than $75,000 a year. It would boost the $2,000 child tax credit to $2,200 under the Senate proposal. Families at lower income levels would not see the full amount. The bill would also fund the hiring of 10,000 new Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers, and would provide Homeland Security with a new $10 billion fund for grants for states that help with federal immigration enforcement and deportation actions. For the Pentagon, the bill would provide billions for ship building, munitions systems, and quality of life measures for servicemen and women, as well as $25 billion for the development of the Golden Dome missile defense system. The Defense Department would have $1 billion for border security. To help partly offset the lost tax revenue and new spending, Republicans aim to cut back some long-running government programs: Medicaid, food stamps, green energy incentives and others. It's essentially unraveling the accomplishments of the past two Democratic presidents, Biden and Barack Obama.
