ICC issues arrest warrants for Taliban over women's rights violations
The ICC warrants, issued on Tuesday, accuse the leaders of "ordering, inducing or soliciting" the crime against humanity of persecution on the grounds of gender since they seized power four years ago.
They name the Taliban supreme leader Hibatullah Akhunzada and the head of Afghanistan's Supreme Court, Abdul Hakim Haqqani.
As well as persecuting women and girls, the ICC also accuses the leaders of targeting "other persons...because certain expressions of sexuality and/or gender identity were regarded as inconsistent with the Taliban's policy on gender."
People "perceived as 'allies of girls and women'" have also been persecuted on political grounds, it said.
Since seizing power in August 2021, the Taliban has severely curtailed the rights of girls and women, limiting their rights to "education, privacy and family life and the freedoms of movement, expression, thought, conscience and religion" using edicts and decrees.
The rollback of women's rights in Afghanistan has been wide-ranging and severe. The new regulations include so-called morality laws that require women to wear face coverings and prohibits them from leaving the house or travelling without a male "guardian."
There have been surges in child marriage and cases of arbitrary detention for those fleeing abuse, according to Amnesty International.
The Taliban has enacted a ban on women's voices being heard in public as part of a requirement for a woman to conceal her face, body and voice outside the home.
The Taliban's leader, Akhunzada, in March 2024 announced that authorities would resume publicly stoning women to death.
The Taliban has also banned girls from accessing secondary education and barred women from most public sector roles.
Men and boys have also faced alleged gendered violations, including beatings or detention for breaching rules against "un-Islamic" clothes or hairstyles, according to the Centre for Information Resilience's Afghan Witness project.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
Supreme Court ruling opens door for Trump mass firings of government employees
The US Supreme Court cleared the way on Tuesday for President Donald Trump to begin carrying out mass firings of federal workers. The court, in an unsigned order, lifted a block imposed by a lower court on Trump's plans to potentially lay off tens of thousands of government employees. US District Court Judge Susan Illston had paused the planned sweeping layoffs in May on the grounds that the moves required a green light from Congress. A coalition of labor unions, non-profit groups and others had sued the Trump administration arguing that it had exceeded its authority by ordering mass firings and agency reforms without congressional approval. After returning to the White House in January, Trump directed federal agencies to prepare sweeping workforce reduction plans as part of wider efforts by the then- Elon Musk -headed Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to downsize the government. In a February 11 executive order, the Republican president called for a "critical transformation of the Federal bureaucracy" and directed agencies to cull workers not designated essential. The Supreme Court said "the Government is likely to succeed on its argument that the Executive Order and Memorandum are lawful." But the justices said they were not taking a position at this point on the legality of specific agency reorganization plans, which will continue to be the subject of legal battles. "The plans themselves are not before this Court, at this stage, and we thus have no occasion to consider whether they can and will be carried out consistent with the constraints of law," said Justice Sonia Sotomayor, one of three liberals on the top court. "I join the Court's stay because it leaves the District Court free to consider those questions," Sotomayor said. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, an appointee of former Democratic president Joe Biden, lodged the sole dissent among the nine justices on the court. "For some reason, this Court sees fit to step in now and release the President's wrecking ball at the outset of this litigation," Jackson said. "Under our Constitution, Congress has the power to establish administrative agencies and detail their functions. "Thus, over the past century, Presidents who have attempted to reorganize the Federal Government have first obtained authorization from Congress to do so. "While Presidents possess some discretion to reduce federal employment, they may not fundamentally restructure the Federal Government all on their own." Trump has moved to fire tens of thousands of government employees and slash programs -- targeting diversity initiatives and eliminating the US humanitarian aid agency USAID and various other departments.
LeMonde
5 hours ago
- LeMonde
US Supreme Court clears the way for Trump's plans to downsize the federal workforce
The Supreme Court on Tuesday, July 8, cleared the way for President Donald Trump's plans to downsize the federal workforce despite warnings that critical government services will be lost and hundreds of thousands of federal employees will be out of their jobs. The justices overrode lower court orders that temporarily froze the cuts, which have been led by the Department of Government Efficiency . The court said in an unsigned order that no specific cuts were in front of the justices, only an executive order issued by Trump and an administration directive for agencies to undertake job reductions. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was the only dissenting vote, accusing her colleagues of a "demonstrated enthusiasm for greenlighting this President's legally dubious actions in an emergency posture." Jackson warned of enormous real-world consequences. "This executive action promises mass employee terminations, widespread cancellation of federal programs and services, and the dismantling of much of the Federal Government as Congress has created it," she wrote. The high court action continued a remarkable winning streak for Trump, who the justices have allowed to move forward with significant parts of his plan to remake the federal government. The Supreme Court's intervention so far has been on the frequent emergency appeals the Justice Department has filed objecting to lower-court rulings as improperly intruding on presidential authority. The Republican president has repeatedly said voters gave him a mandate for the work, and he tapped billionaire ally Elon Musk to lead the charge through DOGE. Musk recently left his role. Tens of thousands of federal workers have been fired, have left their jobs via deferred resignation programs or have been placed on leave. There is no official figure for the job cuts, but at least 75,000 federal employees took deferred resignation and thousands of probationary workers have already been let go. Partner service Learn French with Gymglish Thanks to a daily lesson, an original story and a personalized correction, in 15 minutes per day. Try for free In May, US District Judge Susan Illston found that Trump's administration needs congressional approval to make sizable reductions to the federal workforce. By a 2-1 vote, a panel of the US 9th Circuit Court of Appeals refused to block Illston's order, finding that the downsizing could have broader effects, including on the nation's food-safety system and health care for veterans. Illston directed numerous federal agencies to halt acting on the president's workforce executive order signed in February and a subsequent memo issued by DOGE and the Office of Personnel Management. Illston was nominated by former Democratic President Bill Clinton. 'A serious blow' The labor unions and nonprofit groups that sued over the downsizing offered the justices several examples of what would happen if it were allowed to take effect, including cuts of 40% to 50% at several agencies. Baltimore, Chicago and San Francisco were among the cities that also sued. "Today's decision has dealt a serious blow to our democracy and puts services that the American people rely on in grave jeopardy. This decision does not change the simple and clear fact that reorganizing government functions and laying off federal workers en masse haphazardly without any congressional approval is not allowed by our Constitution," the parties that sued said in a joint statement. Among the agencies affected by the order are the departments of Agriculture, Energy, Labor, the Interior, State, the Treasury and Veterans Affairs. It also applies to the National Science Foundation, Small Business Association, Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency. The case now continues in Illston's court.
Euronews
8 hours ago
- Euronews
ICC issues arrest warrants for Taliban over women's rights violations
The International Criminal Court has issued arrest warrants for the Taliban's supreme leader and the head of Afghanistan's Supreme Court on charges of persecuting women and girls in the country. The ICC warrants, issued on Tuesday, accuse the leaders of "ordering, inducing or soliciting" the crime against humanity of persecution on the grounds of gender since they seized power four years ago. They name the Taliban supreme leader Hibatullah Akhunzada and the head of Afghanistan's Supreme Court, Abdul Hakim Haqqani. As well as persecuting women and girls, the ICC also accuses the leaders of targeting "other certain expressions of sexuality and/or gender identity were regarded as inconsistent with the Taliban's policy on gender." People "perceived as 'allies of girls and women'" have also been persecuted on political grounds, it said. Since seizing power in August 2021, the Taliban has severely curtailed the rights of girls and women, limiting their rights to "education, privacy and family life and the freedoms of movement, expression, thought, conscience and religion" using edicts and decrees. The rollback of women's rights in Afghanistan has been wide-ranging and severe. The new regulations include so-called morality laws that require women to wear face coverings and prohibits them from leaving the house or travelling without a male "guardian." There have been surges in child marriage and cases of arbitrary detention for those fleeing abuse, according to Amnesty International. The Taliban has enacted a ban on women's voices being heard in public as part of a requirement for a woman to conceal her face, body and voice outside the home. The Taliban's leader, Akhunzada, in March 2024 announced that authorities would resume publicly stoning women to death. The Taliban has also banned girls from accessing secondary education and barred women from most public sector roles. Men and boys have also faced alleged gendered violations, including beatings or detention for breaching rules against "un-Islamic" clothes or hairstyles, according to the Centre for Information Resilience's Afghan Witness project.
