Washington Police Are Using Phone Data To Catch Speeders
Washington State Patrol is using cellphone data to combat speeding on public roads in the state. That might sound a little too Big Brother for most people, but don't worry, troopers aren't using your phone to bust you speeding on the highway… yet.Instead, the Washington law enforcement agency harvested data from people back in 2023, using that to identify stretches of road where people tend to speed, reports King 5. That's all done through Michelin Mobility Intelligence, which provided cellphone data to the state.
During covid lockdowns, we saw local governments in some areas using cellphone data to see if people were violating mandates. In other words, this type of thing is being used to see where people like to speed, but it could be used for any number of other purposes.
For now, the data is being used to see where people like to speed and at what times of the day. Washington State Patrol says it's going to concentrate on four areas it identified as hot spots. This is being done to protect the public, so the intentions are good, right?
We expect if other law enforcement agencies around the nation haven't started doing similar things, they will in the near future. Michelin Mobility Intelligence is undoubtedly talking with a few agencies about what they've done in Washington and how that can be done elsewhere.
Just like any tool, this sort of thing can be used for good or ill. But once you put it in the hands of government, you might get a mixture of the two.
Don't get us wrong: using real time cellphone data to track and break up street takeovers would be great in theory. While real time data isn't on the table right now, we think it's only a matter of time before it's a thing law enforcement uses and everyone just accepts it as the way things are.
After all, doing mass surveillance is okay as long as the government is trying to keep us safe, right?
Image via Washington State Patrol/Facebook
Join our Newsletter, subscribe to our YouTube page, and follow us on Facebook.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jurors partially deadlocked at Sean ‘Diddy' Combs' sex trafficking trial
NEW YORK — Jurors weighing the sex trafficking and racketeering case against Sean 'Diddy' Combs on Tuesday told the court they had reached a verdict on all counts but one. In a note sent out after 4 p.m., the eight men and four women on the jury said they had decided on one count of sex trafficking, one count of racketeering and two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution. The note did not indicate what their verdict was on those counts. The outstanding charge is a sex trafficking count tied to allegations by Combs' ex, Casandra 'Cassie' Ventura. Manhattan Federal Judge Arun Subramanian asked lawyers for the government and Combs' team to email him their proposals about what to do next. He said he could tell them to keep deliberating or accept a partial verdict. Combs appeared shell-shocked in court and was seen dabbing his eyes after his attorneys received the note. The development came as a thunderstorm broke out amid darkening skies above the courthouse. Earlier Tuesday, in a morning note, the jury asked to review the testimony of Ventura regarding Combs brutally assaulting her in March 2016 at the Intercontinental Hotel in Los Angeles. Explosive footage of the assault shows Combs pummeling Ventura in a hallway, dragging her by the hair, kicking her while she curls up on the floor, and hurling a vase at her. Ventura on May 13 testified that the assault occurred after she tried to leave a 'freak-off' session after Combs punched her in the face. Jurors also wanted to look back over Ventura's testimony regarding her interactions with Daniel Phillips, a former male revue performer, whom she and Phillips testified was hired multiple times to sleep with Ventura for Combs' sexual gratification between 2012 and 2013. The panel also asked to review Phillips' testimony, during which he said he was once directed to urinate on Ventura, that she was once so heavily drugged he could not sleep with her, and that the only time he communicated with her alone, she appeared 'terrified.' Phillips said he stopped meeting the couple after witnessing Combs physically assault Ventura. The jury note also requested a review of accounts that Ventura shared about traveling with Combs to the Cannes Film Festival one year. In her testimony about the trip to the French film festival, Ventura said Combs had accused her of stealing his drugs and kicked her off his yacht without her shoes or her passport. After the tense trip, Ventura said she had swapped seats with someone on a commercial flight back to New York, but Combs switched them back. She said he spent the flight playing humiliating footage of her at freak-offs that she thought had been deleted, and then when they got back to the city, she felt she had no choice but to submit to another of the depraved events. Combs, 55, could be sentenced to life in prison if found guilty of sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy. He's pleaded not guilty to all charges. The Manhattan U.S. attorney's office alleges Combs abused his notoriety and his wealth for two decades to sexually exploit women at weekly sex parties, directing them to perform sordid sex acts with a rotation of male escorts while high on his supply of drugs. Prosecutors say members of Combs' Bad Boy Records empire helped organize the vile sessions and resorted to crimes like kidnapping, arson, witness tampering, and bribery to intimidate women into submission and terrorize anyone who threatened Combs' authority. Combs, a New York native who launched the careers of iconic hip hop artists like the Notorious B.I.G., maintains that he never pressured women into sexual performances against their will, that he paid escorts for their time, not sex, and that his employees were not hired to commit crimes. The trial continues Wednesday. _____
Associated Press
14 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Son of ‘El Chapo' to plead guilty in US drug trafficking case
CHICAGO (AP) — The son of notorious Mexican drug kingpin 'El Chapo' intends to plead guilty to drug trafficking charges in the U.S., according to court documents filed Tuesday. Prosecutors allege Ovidio Guzman Lopez, along with his brother, Joaquin Guzman Lopez, ran a faction of the cartel known as the 'Chapitos,' or little Chapos, that exported fentanyl to the United States. Ovidio Guzman Lopez's father is Joaquin 'El Chapo' Guzman, the former leader of the Sinaloa cartel who smuggled mountains of cocaine and other drugs into the United States over 25 years. Ovidio Guzman Lopez was arrested in Mexico in 2023 and extradited to the United States. He was charged in federal court in Chicago with money laundering, drug and firearm offenses. He previously pleaded not guilty, but online court records indicate he is scheduled to appear in court on July 9 to change his plea as part of a deal with prosecutors. Court documents filed Tuesday indicate he intends to plead guilty after word of a possible deal was disclosed during an October hearing. Ovidio Guzman Lopez would be the first of the brothers to enter a plea deal. Joaquin Guzman Lopez is also in U.S. custody. He and another longtime Sinaloa leader, Ismael 'El Mayo' Zambada, were arrested in July in Texas after they landed in the U.S. on a private plane. Joaquin Guzman Lopez has pleaded not guilty to charges including money laundering, drug dealing and conspiracy to distribute drugs. Zambada also pleaded not guilty. The men's dramatic capture prompted a surge in violence in Mexico's northern state of Sinaloa as two factions of the Sinaloa cartel clashed. Federal prosecutors and Ovidio Guzman Lopez's attorney, listed in online court records as Jeffrey Lichtman, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jury reaches verdict on four out of five counts in Sean ‘Diddy' Combs sex trial
The jury in Sean 'Diddy' Combs' sex trafficking trial has said it has reached a verdict on four of five counts against the hip-hop mogul and was unable to reach a decision on the top charge, racketeering conspiracy. The judge indicated that he would instruct the jury to continue weighing the charge, echoing the sentiments of prosecutors and Combs' defence team that just two days into deliberations was too soon to give up on reaching a verdict on all counts. Judge Arun Subramanian said he had received a note at 4.05pm indicating the jury had reached a partial verdict. The note said the jury was unable to reach a unanimous verdict on the racketeering conspiracy charge because there were jurors with 'unpersuadable views' on both sides. Combs' lawyers surrounded him at the defence table soon after the note was sent to the court. The hip-hop mogul appeared morose as they explained to him what was happening. At one point, lead defence lawyer Marc Agnifilo stepped away from the huddle, returned with a piece of paper and handed it to Combs, who read it solemnly. Meanwhile, prosecutors were at their table glued to their phones and laptop computers. Assistant US attorney Maurene Comey suggested the judge give the jury a modified version of what is known as an Allen charge — instructions encouraging them to keep deliberating after reaching an impasse. Racketeering conspiracy — count one on the jury's verdict sheet — is the most complicated of the charges against Combs because it requires the jury to decide not only whether he ran a 'racketeering enterprise', but also whether he was involved in committing some or all of various types of offences, such as kidnapping and arson. The charge falls under Rico — the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organisations Act — which is best known for being used in organised crime and drug cartel cases. The jury has been deliberating since Monday. Earlier on Tuesday they asked to review critical testimony from one of the prosecution's most important witnesses: the hip-hop mogul's former longtime girlfriend Casandra 'Cassie' Ventura. Jurors requested the testimony about 75 minutes into their second day of weighing charges that Combs used his fame, wealth and violence to force two girlfriends into drug-fuelled sex marathons with male sex workers known as 'freak-offs' or 'hotel nights'. The panel of eight men and four women asked for Ms Ventura's account of Combs beating, kicking and dragging her at a Los Angeles hotel in 2016 — an assault captured on now-infamous security camera footage. They also asked to see Ms Ventura's testimony about an incident in which she said Combs accused her of taking drugs from him and kicked her off of their yacht at the Cannes Film Festival in France in 2013. On their way back to the US, she said, he threatened to release explicit videos of her having sex. The jury's testimony request came soon after Combs' lawyers and prosecutors began the day haggling with Judge Subramanian over a jury question left over from the end of the first day of deliberations on Monday. Jurors wanted clarification about what qualifies as drug distribution, an aspect of the racketeering conspiracy charge that will help determine whether Combs can be convicted or exonerated on the count. Judge Subramanian said he would remind jurors of the instructions he gave them on that part of the case before they started deliberating on Monday. Combs' lawyers had pushed for a more expansive response, but prosecutors argued — and Judge Subramanian agreed — that doing so could end up confusing jurors more. On Monday, the panel deliberated for more than five hours without reaching a verdict. Defence lawyers contend that prosecutors are trying to criminalise Combs' swinger lifestyle and that, if anything, his conduct amounted to domestic violence, not federal felonies. Combs, 55, could face 15 years in prison to life behind bars if he is convicted of all charges. After pleading not guilty, Combs chose not to testify as his lawyers built their arguments for acquittal mostly through lengthy cross-examinations of dozens of witnesses called by prosecutors, including some of Combs' former employees who took the witness stand reluctantly only after being granted immunity.
