logo
National Parks Asked For Feedback. The Response They Got Was Devastating

National Parks Asked For Feedback. The Response They Got Was Devastating

Newsweek08-07-2025
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The Trump administration has placed signs up across National Parks asking for visitors to report any "negative" sentiments about American history shared at the park. Instead, much of the feedback so far expresses negative sentiments about the Trump administration, as seen in responses sent to Newsweek by a National Parks Service (NPS) employee.
Over 200 responses leaked to Newsweek by an NPS employee, who has asked to remain anonymous out of fear of retribution, show visitors' anger and frustration at President Donald Trump's climate policies and dismay at the White House's request for feedback on language that is "negative about either past or living Americans."
For example, a visitor to Ohio's Cuyahoga Valley National Park said: "I would like the new excuse of a government to keep their hands off our national parks. The orange one doesn't care about the beauty of this landscape otherwise he wouldn't be allowing logging.
"Please fight. Please pull us in and tell us how we can help you. Make it easy for the public to get our lands back into the right hands."
J. Elizabeth Peace, senior public affairs specialist at the Department of the Interior, told Newsweek: "We welcome public feedback—always have, always will. In fact, it's a core part of how we ensure our programs remain transparent, accountable, and responsive."
A woman holds up a sign during a "Protect Our Parks" rally at the Lake Mead National Recreation Area Visitor Center Saturday, March 1, 2025, near Boulder City, Nevada.
A woman holds up a sign during a "Protect Our Parks" rally at the Lake Mead National Recreation Area Visitor Center Saturday, March 1, 2025, near Boulder City, Nevada.
Steve Marcus/Las Vegas Sun via AP)
Why It Matters
A number of National Parks in the U.S. document controversial events and bloody battles in American history, including, for example, the use of Japanese internment camps during World War II and Civil War battlefields.
Some of the visitor responses shared with Newsweek expressed anger at what they say is the Trump administration attempting to rewrite some of America's history. The initiative reflects a broader federal effort to promote what the administration describes as "patriotic education" by emphasizing the nation's achievements and historical progress.
Cynthia Novellano listens to a speaker during a "Protect Our Parks" rally at the Lake Mead National Recreation Area Visitor Center Saturday, March 1, 2025, near Boulder City, Nevada.
Cynthia Novellano listens to a speaker during a "Protect Our Parks" rally at the Lake Mead National Recreation Area Visitor Center Saturday, March 1, 2025, near Boulder City, Nevada.
Steve Marcus/Las Vegas Sun via AP
Visitors Push Back on Trump
The feedback is given via QR codes which have been popping up across National Parks that tell people to report language in the parks that is "negative about either past or living Americans or that fails to emphasize the beauty, grandeur, and abundance of landscapes."
One visitor to Joshua Tree said: "Climate change science says there may be no Joshua Trees left in Joshua Tree National Park in the next 100 years. Why isn't there more signage talking about that?"
"Yosemite is awesome! Stop cutting funds for staffing, research, and visitor services. I want to know ALL US history, not just what the government tells me to know. As a country, we need to know the history of all Americans, not just about white men. Hands off my parks!" said a Yosemite visitor.
"National Parks are not just about scenic beauty; they're vital classrooms for American history...Embracing unvarnished history makes our parks more relevant and inclusive, ensuring all Americans see their stories reflected. It's about honesty, healing, and building a more complete understanding of who we are as a nation," said another National Parks visitor.
What To Know
Interior Secretary Doug Burgum issued a secretarial order to implement the signs, saying they are intended to allow parks to "remind Americans of our extraordinary heritage."
His announcement about these signs came after President Trump issued his executive order on "Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History," which aims to give the federal government more control over Smithsonian exhibits in order to "restore Federal sites dedicated to history, including parks and museums, to solemn and uplifting public monuments that remind Americans of our extraordinary heritage, consistent progress toward becoming a more perfect Union, and unmatched record of advancing liberty, prosperity, and human flourishing."
Burgum quoted that paragraph of the executive order twice in his secretarial order, adding parks should be "Recognizing that the natural and historical resources managed by the Department should accurately reflect American history and not partisan ideology."
"[Parks should] take action, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law, to ensure that all public monuments, memorials, statues, markers, or similar properties within the Department's jurisdiction do not contain descriptions, depictions, or other content that inappropriately disparage Americans past or living (including persons living in colonial times), and instead focus on the greatness of the achievements and progress of the American people or, with respect to natural features, the beauty, abundance, and grandeur of the American landscape," Burgum said.
This order is clearly not popular among those National Parks visitors who have taken the opportunity to respond to his survey by criticizing this request.
Some also took the opportunity to criticize other Trump administration moves such as trying to make Alcatraz an active prison again, and firing parks employees.
Only one response out of the 274 sent to Newsweek by the NPS employee aligned with Trump's assertation that government employees are poorly representing American history.
That person said: "I am shocked by the amount of false information, false history, and other very negative to the glory of the United States that is currently being presented at the White House & President's Park Site.
"Government employees at this site are damaging the reputation of America with their never ending falsehoods, attacks against people of the United States, and misguided and incorrect view of American history and policy."
Not all of the responses to the survey provided to Newsweek mention the president, and focus instead on parks upkeep, with people asking for better signage on trails, and better trail maintenance.
A visitor to Sarasota National Historical Park said: "Better signage needed for the handicapped parking areas at the visitor's center. It's very hard to see the signs that show that there is parking up behind the visitor center which is paved nice level ground for wheelchairs."
And one hiker in Congaree National Park said: "Too many mosquitos."
This type of feedback has been thanked by the Department of the Interior.
"Since the President's Executive Order was issued, the Department has received citizen-submitted concerns about historical accuracy at National Park Service sites and materials and took actions to correct errors," Peace told Newsweek.
Peace pointed to how a visitor reported that a souvenir postcard mislabeled a nearby landmark and appeared to copy text from Wikipedia without attribution, and another visitor said a video on the Monument's website inaccurately quoted George Washington with a phrase that historians say definitive sourcing.
"The National Park Service reviewed the claims and took appropriate corrective or clarifying action," said Peace. "These examples underscore the value of public feedback in helping us maintain historical accuracy across our sites and materials."
A billboard at an intersection in Cleveland points out DOGE cuts at Cuyahoga Valley National Park, Thursday, June 5, 2025.
A billboard at an intersection in Cleveland points out DOGE cuts at Cuyahoga Valley National Park, Thursday, June 5, 2025.
Sue Ogrocki/AP Photo
What Happens Next
The signs do not appear to be disappearing any time soon as they are based on an executive order and a secretarial order.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Delta Air assures US lawmakers it will not personalize fares using AI
Delta Air assures US lawmakers it will not personalize fares using AI

CNBC

time3 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Delta Air assures US lawmakers it will not personalize fares using AI

Delta Air Lines said on Friday it will not use artificial intelligence to set personalized ticket prices for passengers after facing sharp criticism from U.S. lawmakers and broad public concern. Last week, Democratic Senators Ruben Gallego, Mark Warner and Richard Blumenthal said they believed the Atlanta-based airline would use AI to set individual prices, which would "likely mean fare price increases up to each individual consumer's personal 'pain point.'" Delta said it has not used AI to set personalized prices but previously said it plans to deploy AI-based revenue management technology across 20% of its domestic network by the end of 2025 in partnership with Fetcherr, an AI pricing company. "There is no fare product Delta has ever used, is testing or plans to use that targets customers with individualized prices based on personal data," Delta told the senators in a letter on Friday, seen by Reuters. "Our ticket pricing never takes into account personal data." Senators praised Delta's commitment not to use AI for personal pricing but expressed many questions and want more details about what data Delta is collecting to set prices. "Delta is telling their investors one thing, and then turning around and telling the public another," Gallego said. "If Delta is in fact using aggregated instead of individualized data, that is welcome news." Delta declined comment on Gallego's statement. The senators cited a comment in December by Delta President Glen Hauenstein that the carrier's AI price-setting technology is capable of setting fares based on a prediction of "the amount people are willing to pay for the premium products related to the base fares." Last week, American Airlines CEO Robert Isom said using AI to set ticket prices could hurt consumer trust. "This is not about bait and switch. This is not about tricking," Isom said on an earnings call, adding "talk about using AI in that way, I don't think it's appropriate. And certainly from American, it's not something we will do." Democratic lawmakers Greg Casar and Rashida Tlaib last week introduced legislation to bar companies from using AI to set prices or wages based on Americans' personal data and would specifically ban airlines raising individual prices after seeing a search for a family obituary. They cited a Federal Trade Commission staff report in January that found "retailers frequently use people's personal information to set targeted, tailored prices for goods and services -- from a person's location and demographics, down to their mouse movements on a webpage." The FTC cited a hypothetical example of a consumer profiled as a new parent who could intentionally be shown higher-priced baby thermometers and collect behavioral details to forecast a customer's state of mind. Delta said airlines have used dynamic pricing for more than three decades, in which pricing fluctuates based on a variety of factors like overall customer demand, fuel prices and competition, but not a specific consumer's personal information. "Given the tens of millions of fares and hundreds of thousands of routes for sale at any given time, the use of new technology like AI promises to streamline the process by which we analyze existing data and the speed and scale at which we can respond to changing market dynamics," Delta's letter said.

Smithsonian slated to restore Trump impeachment exhibit
Smithsonian slated to restore Trump impeachment exhibit

The Hill

time32 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Smithsonian slated to restore Trump impeachment exhibit

The Smithsonian's National Museum of American History said it is slated to restore the placard with information about President Trump's two impeachments after removing it from the exhibit last month. The museum said in a Saturday statement that the section will be 'updated in the coming weeks to reflect all impeachment proceedings in our nation's history.' The Washington Post reported on Thursday, citing an unnamed source familiar with the exhibit plans, that the removal of the placard occurred as part of an internal content review the institution agreed to after pressure from President Trump's administration to get rid of the art museum director. The Smithsonian said on Saturday that the placard, part of the exhibit 'The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden,' did not meet the institution's standards and argued no one within the administration asked the museum to remove the information. 'The placard, which was meant to be a temporary addition to a twenty-five-year-old exhibition, did not meet the museum's standards in appearance, location, timeline and overall presentation. It was not consistent with other sections in the exhibit and moreover blocked the view of the objects inside its case,' the Smithsonian said in a statement. 'For these reasons, we removed the placard. We were not asked by any Administration or other government official to remove content from the exhibit,' the museum added. The placard, before being removed last month, detailed Trump's two impeachments and was featured as part of the exhibit since September 2021, the Smithsonian previously told The Hill. 'It was intended to be a short-term measure to address current events at the time, however, the label remained in place until July 2025,' a Smithsonian spokesperson said. 'The section of this exhibition covers Congress, The Supreme Court, Impeachment, and Public Opinion,' the spokesperson added. 'Because the other topics in this section had not been updated since 2008, the decision was made to restore the Impeachment case back to its 2008 appearance.' The president was impeached two times during his first White House term: once over a phone call where he allegedly asked Ukraine to investigate then-ex-President Biden and his son, Hunter Biden, and the other over his alleged role in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. He was acquitted by the Senate in both instances. The removal of the placard drew backlash from Democratic Party lawmakers. Trump signed an executive order in March, ordering the removal of 'divisive narratives' from the Smithsonian museums that are not compatible with the administration's views and 'remind' Americans 'of our extraordinary heritage.' 'As the keeper of memory for the nation, it is our privilege and responsibility to tell accurate and complete histories. As has been recently reported, in July, a placard was removed from the National Museum of American History's exhibit 'The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden,'' the Smithsonian said on Saturday. 'The intent of the Impeachment section of the exhibit is to reflect all impeachment proceedings in our nation's history,' the institution added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store