Thune's troublesome senators to watch
Majority Leader John Thune wants to force an initial vote on the " big, beautiful bill" around 4pm ET — here is an update on the senators most likely to cause headaches.
Why it matters: Thune can only afford to lose three GOP senators and still manage to move forward with — and eventually pass — the bill, with a tie-breaking vote from Vice President JD Vance. It could be close.
The nos:
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) has long been clear that he would vote against the package because it raises the debt ceiling. He is not one to fold — like, ever.
Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) told reporters after a GOP lunch Saturday that he would vote "no" both on Saturday afternoon's initial procedural vote and on the final bill.
He has concerns about how the Medicaid changes would impact his state, and he's up for re-election next year.
The question marks:
Sens. Mike Lee (R-Utah), Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.) and Rick Scott (R-Fla.) are coordinating and planning to vote as a conservative bloc.
"We are waiting, among other things, to see how this scores," Lee told reporters on Saturday.
Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) is no stranger to being a swing vote. She has raised concerns about the Medicaid measures in the bill, but has also managed to win Alaska-specific caveats and tax breaks, which could be enough to win her over.
Sen. Tim Sheehy (R-Mont.) is threatening to vote no to move forward if a public lands sale measure makes it into the bill. A tweaked version of that language is awaiting a decision from the parliamentarian. Several GOP senators are adamantly opposed to the provision.
The reluctant yeses:
Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) is another frequent swing vote and is running for re-election next year in a blue state. She said she will vote yes to move forward, but is leaning toward "no" on final passage.
Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) is also running for re-election next year and had been raising some concerns about the provider tax provision, but told reporters he was a "yes" on the motion to proceed and was "still reviewing" the overall bill.
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) told reporters Saturday that he plans to vote yes on both the procedural vote and bill passage, due to the newest text delaying the implementation of reduced Medicaid provider taxes.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
19 minutes ago
- The Hill
Louisiana hospitals press Johnson over megabill Medicaid cut proposals
As the 'big, beautiful bill' teeters towards passage in the Senate, every major health system in Louisiana sent a letter Saturday to the state's entire congressional delegation, including Speaker Mike Johnson (R), warning that planned cuts to Medicaid would be 'historic in their devastation.' The letter said that the Senate's version of the bill would cut more than $4 billion in Medicaid funding, with a loss of more than 16,000 jobs. Even the House's version of cuts, the letter stated, would be a more palatable solution. However, the 'economic consequences pale in comparison to the harm that will be caused to residents across the state, regardless of insurance status, who will no longer be able to get the care that they need,' the letter reads. 'Steep cuts will force consolidation of services, staffing reductions and closures, reducing healthcare access to everyone in our communities. Our rural communities will especially feel the impact as many of these hospitals are already in difficult financial situations and are likely to experience a significant reduction of services.' The letter was also sent to Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), who expressed concerns about the cuts to Medicaid in the Senate version of the bill Thursday and said that the House version would be preferable. However, Cassidy has not since spoken out against the bill, a vote for which kicked off in the Senate Saturday night.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stephen A. Smith: Republicans' voices resonating, GOP ‘sitting pretty'
Sports commentator Stephen A. Smith offered his diagnosis of the Democratic Party's woes in a Friday interview with NewsNation's Chris Cuomo, bashing lawmakers on the left and musing on messaging from both parties. Smith credited conservative media figures, including Candace Owens, for helping Republican viewpoints reach voters. 'This is why the GOP are sitting pretty right now. It's not just because of the power that they have in office with the president that won the popular vote, the electoral college vote, and every swing state,' Smith asserted. 'It's also because their voices are resonating better. If you look at a lot of voices on the GOP side, they're a lot more popular than the voices on the left.' Smith spelled doom in upcoming elections for the Democrats if they can't figure out a populist message with wide appeal. 'If they don't pull that off, it's going to amount to nothing. They'll lose the midterms. They'll lose the general election in 2028,' he said. Smith has been sharply critical of the Democrats in recent months, saying in May the party would need to be 'purged' in response to speculation over whether he would run for president. On Cuomo's show, he took swipes at Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), saying they have accomplished 'pretty close to nothing.' 'They make suggestions. They speak very, very loudly. They're very, very popular. They go out there on television shows and beyond,' he said. 'But at the end of the day, what have they really, really done?' Smith participated in a NewsNation town hall with Cuomo, Bill O'Reilly and President Trump in April and shared some kind words for the president. The commentator has also hosted increasingly prominent political figures on his podcast, 'The Stephen A. Smith Show.' Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) joined him Thursday to discuss Trump, immigration and the New York City mayor's race. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Schumer to force reading of 1,000-page GOP mega bill, delaying it by half a day
Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) told Democratic senators Saturday that he will force the clerks to read the 1,000-page Republican megabill on the Senate floor once Republicans vote to proceed to the legislation, a procedural act of defiance that will take an estimated 12 hours and delay final passage of President Trump's agenda by half a day — at least. Schumer told his caucus to prepare to force a full reading of the bill, according to a Democratic source familiar with the internal discussion over floor strategy. The question is whether Senate GOP leaders will force the clerks to read the bill late into Saturday night and early Sunday morning to complete the time-and energy-consuming task or whether staff will get some time to sleep before the Senate is expected to launch into a multi-hour series of votes known as a vote-a-rama. Senate Republicans were anticipating that Schumer might force a reading of the bill as an act of protest. Schumer's action comes as Senate Republicans are hustling to pass President Trump's massive tax and spending bill by the president's assigned July 4 deadline. GOP leaders were initially planning for an initial procedural vote Saturday afternoon, followed by up to 20 hours of debate and then an unlimited series of amendment votes known as a vote-a-rama. With Schumer's push, the expected timeframe for the 'vote-a-rama' has been pushed back. It remains unclear if Republicans have the votes to advance the Senate's version of the spending bill. Senate Republicans can only afford to lose three votes, and three lawmakers — GOP Sens. Rand Paul (Ky.), Ron Johnson (Wis.) and Thom Tillis (N.C.) — say they will vote 'no.' Updated at 6 p.m. EDT. Sarah Polus and Regina Zilbermints contributed to this report. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
