Arab Nations Join Call for Hamas to Disarm, End Gaza Rule
The declaration stated, 'In the context of ending the war in Gaza, Hamas must end its rule in Gaza and hand over its weapons to the Palestinian Authority,' emphasizing the need for international engagement and support to achieve a sovereign and independent Palestinian state. This call followed a request from the Palestinian delegation at the UN for both Israel and Hamas to withdraw from Gaza, allowing the Palestinian Authority to govern the coastal territory.
The text also condemned the deadly attacks by Hamas on 7 October, 2023, which resulted in significant casualties. Notably, the UN General Assembly has yet to address these attacks. Potential Recognition of Palestinian Statehood
France, which co-chaired the conference with Saudi Arabia, described the declaration as 'both historic and unprecedented.' French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot stated, 'For the first time, Arab countries and those in the Middle East condemn Hamas, call for its disarmament, and express their intention to normalize relations with Israel in the future.'
The declaration, co-signed by France, Britain, and Canada, also proposed the potential deployment of foreign forces to stabilize Gaza after hostilities cease, though Israel and the United States did not participate in the meeting.
During the conference, Britain announced its consideration of recognizing a Palestinian state in September. British Foreign Secretary David Lammy indicated that London would proceed with recognition if Israel did not meet specific conditions, including implementing a ceasefire in Gaza and allowing sufficient humanitarian aid.
French President Emmanuel Macron recently stated he would formally announce France's recognition of Palestinian statehood at the UN General Assembly in September. For decades, the majority of UN members have supported a two-state solution, envisioning Israel and a Palestinian state coexisting peacefully. International Support for Two-State Solution
However, after more than 21 months of conflict in Gaza, the ongoing expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank raises concerns about the feasibility of a Palestinian state. Israeli officials have also expressed intentions to annex occupied territories, further complicating the situation.
The current war in Gaza erupted following Hamas's attacks on Israel, which resulted in over 1,200 fatalities. In response, Israel launched extensive military operations that have claimed tens of thousands of Palestinian lives and devastated much of the region's infrastructure.
Furthermore, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres remarked at the meeting on Monday that 'the two-state solution is farther than ever before.' In a statement issued late Tuesday, 15 Western nations, including France and Spain, reaffirmed their 'unwavering support for the vision of the two-state solution.'
Among the signatories, nine countries that have not yet recognized a Palestinian state expressed their willingness to consider doing so, including Andorra, Australia, Canada, Finland, Luxembourg, Malta, New Zealand, Portugal, and San Marino.
Short link :
Post Views: 16
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leaders
25 minutes ago
- Leaders
When Will Arabs Form Deterrent Force to Protect Themselves?
By: Dr. Atef Al-Shabrawy International Expert in Development and Social Economy In 1966, the classic theorist Thomas Schelling introduced a novel concept at the time: 'deterrence.' After World War II, military strategy shifted away from what was known as 'military victory' and began to rely on the art of coercion, intimidation, and deterrence. Schelling argued that the ability to inflict harm on another state is a threatening factor that influences the behavior of that state, compelling it to refrain from aggressive actions. In response to a question from French television in 1974 about whether Iran planned to acquire nuclear weapons, the Shah of Iran cleverly replied, 'My country has signed a non-proliferation treaty. If we trust the major nuclear powers because they are responsible, we wonder: what would happen if there were a 'frivolous' state in the region seeking to acquire such weapons, and who would it attack?' The Concept of Deterrence This approach was echoed by France in the same year when it announced its possession of what President de Gaulle termed 'nuclear deterrence.' This weapon was developed independently by France to avoid reliance on the United States, allowing it to leave NATO. De Gaulle himself, using similar justifications, provided Israel with nuclear weapons under the pretext of protecting it from the Arab threat. In a jab at President Nasser for supporting the Algerian revolution, French diplomat Stéphane Hessel wrote in his memoirs in 2011: 'Helping Israel acquire nuclear weapons is a mandatory task; we created Israel, and we must protect it from a dangerous Arab world that opposes it.' Nuclear Experiments Researcher Dominique Schnapper noted in her 2021 book 'De Gaulle in the Eyes of the Jews' that between 1960 and 1966, France conducted dozens of nuclear tests, some of which were attended by Israeli experts. Consequently, Israel did not need to conduct its own nuclear tests, as France shared the results of its experiments, effectively granting Israel entry into the nuclear club. Mordechai Vanunu Exposes Israel Despite this, Israel continued to deny possessing nuclear weapons until its project engineer, Mordechai Vanunu, leaked classified information and photographs from the Dimona reactor to the British press in 1986, revealing the 'Israeli nuclear ambiguity' that had persisted for decades. Israeli-Iranian Bombardment During the 12 days of mutual Israeli-Iranian bombardment, it became evident that the struggle for control over the Middle East and its resources involves preventing certain countries from acquiring any deterrent capabilities, monitoring and stifling their attempts, and even destroying them. Iraq was destroyed under the pretext of possessing fictitious weapons of mass destruction, and similar arguments were used against Iran, as if nuclear weapons were the exclusive domain of major powers and their allies. In May 1998, India announced that it had become a nuclear power following secret tests that went undetected by American satellites. Shortly thereafter, its historical rival, Pakistan, declared its entry into the nuclear club, becoming the only Muslim nation to achieve this feat while the major powers were distracted. Dr. Abdul Qadeer Khan, the father of the Pakistani bomb, conducted tests in the Baluchistan mountains before being arrested for allegedly assisting Iran, Libya, and North Korea in developing nuclear technology. He was forced to make a televised apology but remained under house arrest until his death in 2021. Ballistic Missiles The intense Iranian bombardment of Israel highlighted the fact that nuclear technology is not the only deterrent weapon; ballistic and hypersonic missiles can also serve as strategic deterrents. The world witnessed their use in Iranian attacks on Israeli cities, which caused global panic and compelled major powers to intervene. These missiles effectively deterred and broke the aggressor, and the brief conflict, which aimed to divert attention from the ethnic cleansing in Gaza, appeared to be a test of weapons and technologies in preparation for a larger battle whose participants we do not yet know, but we do know its location. Extreme Democracy With the cessation of bombardment, a new dimension of nuclear and strategic deterrence emerged, particularly for Arab nations in the region. The alarming increase in economic exchanges and investments between regional countries and the West seems to have provided us with no negotiating advantage or satisfaction regarding our positions and orientations. It has not erased the cultural and ideological divisions among us, nor the greed for our resources. There is now a tangible threat from the 'Western democracy' that once brought forth Hitler as a symbol of the extremism produced by the ballot box. Recently, 'democratic' extremist leaders have emerged in the United States, Israel, and most European countries, with increasing possibilities of future leadership that may be even more extreme and violent, potentially unleashing bloodier wars. NATO has decided to raise member contributions to military spending from 2% to 5% of GDP by 2035. Enormous Military Budgets It is worth imagining that the 32 NATO countries do not spend more on defense than they do on healthcare or education. Nevertheless, adopting a 5% contribution means these countries will allocate more to their militaries than to education. These enormous budgets could become a more aggressive and extreme force, potentially turning against any friendly nations. The Future of Arabs The future of Arabs is now at the mercy of existential threats that require us all to form an independent intellectual, scientific, and material force, seeking a 'entity' that achieves the strategic deterrence necessary to prevent future generations from suffering and being destroyed by a new right-wing extremist. I recall the words of Saudi writer Othman Al-Omeir: 'We are heading into the future with the people of the future.' I doubt that the 'people of the future' he referred to will take us along with them, given our weaknesses. It is perhaps better to say: 'We are heading into the future with our strength; for strength secures us a place among the people of the future.' Short link : Post Views: 3
Arab News
an hour ago
- Arab News
Fair climate finance requires debt reform
When delegates from around the world convened in Bonn, Germany, for the 62nd session of the UN Climate Change Subsidiary Bodies, the specter of sovereign debt loomed large. For African countries, in particular, debt is no longer a problem unfolding in parallel with escalating climate shocks and widening development deficits, but rather the key obstacle to effective crisis responses. Debt reform and climate finance are two sides of the same coin. According to the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, African countries owe $655 billion in external debt, while debt-service payments have more than doubled since 2010, driven by rising interest rates and currency depreciation. This year, the continent's collective debt-service bill will amount to a whopping $79 billion. In 2023, 34 African countries spent more on debt service than on health or education, let alone disaster relief or green infrastructure. Comprehensive debt cancelation is a prerequisite to progress on sustainable development. But it is only the beginning. Shaped by colonial power dynamics, the global financial architecture is practically designed to entrench inequality. When issuing loans to developing economies, institutions like the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank often impose conditions that constrain these countries' fiscal space and hardwire austerity into domestic policy. Short-term relief thus comes with long-term shackles. Many believe that mobilizing private investment is the key to closing the climate finance gap. 'Derisking' climate finance and attracting private capital through tools such as green bonds and blended finance are among the G20's flagship priorities. The decision on the New Collective Quantified Goal on Climate Finance, made at COP29 in Baku last year, likewise emphasizes the importance of private sector participation. South Africa, which assumed the G20 presidency in December 2024, has echoed this approach. For example, at the G20 finance ministers' meeting in February, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa called on the private sector, together with international financial institutions and development banks, to implement 'innovative financing and insurance mechanisms' aimed at scaling up funding for disaster prevention and post-disaster reconstruction. But the private sector has long struggled to engage effectively in climate negotiations or identify viable projects that serve climate, development and commercial objectives simultaneously. Since the infrastructure projects that are needed to strengthen climate resilience mature over a period of 20 to 30 years, countries need reliable access to long-term finance. But credit markets operate on three to five-year time horizons, meaning that borrowers often end up scrambling for more capital, which can be both unpredictable and expensive. According to the ONE Campaign, the average interest rate on bonds for African countries in 2021 was 5.78 percent, compared to 1.14 percent on loans from the World Bank. These countries will pay $56 billion in additional interest over the lifetime of loans contracted in 2017 to 2021, compared to what they would have paid if they had borrowed at World Bank rates. The much-touted 'blended finance' model does not solve this problem, because it often combines public and private funds in ways that leave countries exposed to credit market risk. Private finance is structurally biased against the Global South, owing partly to fundamental flaws in sovereign risk assessments. Mohamed Adow The real issue is that private finance is structurally biased against the Global South, owing partly to fundamental flaws in sovereign risk assessments. If the private sector is to help close the climate finance gap without trapping developing countries in cycles of repayment and dependency, we must first resolve the information asymmetries that enable credit rating agencies and institutional investors to define 'risk' in ways that penalize developing economies. Ramaphosa — who has voiced support for reforming global credit-rating systems — should help spearhead this process. At the same time, however, we must recognize the limits of private capital, particularly when it comes to financing for adaptation and loss and damage. There is no substitute for a major expansion of grants and public financing. The responsibility for tackling biases in the global financial system falls on the entire international community — not least the advanced economies that are now cutting their climate aid budgets. Nonetheless, African countries must take more responsibility for driving change. Africa has often failed to take a unified approach to global issues and maximize its collective bargaining power. Consider the Baku to Belem Roadmap — a joint initiative by the COP29 and COP30 presidencies to deliver at least $1.3 trillion in climate finance annually by 2035. Though the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change Secretariat and the COP30 presidency began regional consultations on the roadmap in February, inviting stakeholders to share their input, Africa has not submitted an aligned position or set of recommendations. Meanwhile, many African countries pursue bilateral debt deals in isolation, while others are entangled in opaque and protracted restructuring processes like the G20's Common Framework for Debt Treatments. Zambia's debt restructuring, for example, dragged on for more than three years. What is needed now is for African countries to build a consensus around a common agenda that links COP30 to the G20. Priorities must include comprehensive debt cancelation for climate-vulnerable countries; the reform of credit rating systems and capital cost structures that unfairly penalize African economies; and the greater use of instruments such as grants to finance climate action. A global taxation regime, which could use revenues to fund resilience in developing economies, should also be on the table. Such efforts should build on existing initiatives and proposals, such as the proposed UN Framework Convention on Sovereign Debt, which would offer a credible, cooperative and rights-based approach to debt reform. The Africa Climate Summit, convening in Addis Ababa this September, will serve as an important moment to cement progress and speak with a unified voice in advance of COP30. Along with South Africa, the African Union — now a permanent member of the G20 — should play a leading role in this process, steering global debates toward the creation of a financial system that reflects today's multipolar realities, not the colonial dynamics of the past. This is a matter of justice, not charity. And, with developing economies on the front line of the climate crisis, it could not be more urgent.
Leaders
3 hours ago
- Leaders
Sydney's Historic March for Gaza: Tens of Thousands Call for Ceasefire
Demonstrators gathered to cross the Sydney Harbour Bridge on Sunday, chanting 'Ceasefire now,' after the Supreme Court authorized the march just one day before, allowing the event to proceed despite initial resistance. Organizers hailed this decision as 'historic.' Despite torrential rain, tens of thousands joined the March for Humanity, carrying placards demanding politicians end the war. Notably, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange attended, alongside federal MP Ed Husic and former NSW Premier Bob Carr, marking the bridge's first closure for a public assembly since 2023. Court Ruling and Public Safety Justice Belinda Rigg approved the 'March for Humanity' just 24 hours before it began, stating she acknowledged safety risks but found the organizers' arguments about the urgent Gaza crisis compelling. Consequently, police closed the bridge to vehicles, granting protesters legal protection against assembly-related charges. However, families, including those with small children, joined the peaceful demonstration. Police officers from the riot squad monitored the event. 'I know it's the other side of the world, but it affects us here massively,' said Alec Beville, a father who compared the children in Gaza to his son, Frankie. 'We could be helping a lot more with aid.' 'Our government hasn't imposed decent sanctions on Israel,' added Zara Williams, carrying her baby, Avery. 'We can't do nothing while there's a forced starvation of an entire population.' Two hours into the event, NSW Police texted attendees, ordering an immediate halt 'due to public safety.' They instructed the crowd to turn back towards the city 'in a controlled way.' Police have not yet provided any crowd size estimate. Transport for NSW warned motorists of major city delays after road and public transport networks faced significant disruption throughout Sydney. Growing Pressure for Palestinian Statehood Meanwhile, Australia faces mounting pressure to recognize Palestinian statehood, following similar indications from France, Canada, and the UK. However, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese emphasized the need for lasting security for Israel before considering recognition of a Palestinian state. The historic march on Sydney Harbour Bridge underscores the global call for a ceasefire in Gaza. Despite logistical challenges and legal hurdles, the protest highlighted urgent humanitarian concerns and the growing pressure on governments to take action. Short link : Post Views: 15
