
Diddy's legal team claims win after judge issues ruling in civil sexual assault case
On July 8, New York State Supreme Court Justice Leslie Stroh issued a ruling that narrowed the scope of a civil lawsuit against Combs, who was accused of sexual assault and battery by a woman named April Lampros in May 2024.
According to a court document obtained by USA TODAY, Stroh agreed to Combs' request to dismiss claims about any incidents that are found to have occurred before Dec. 19, 2000, when the Gender-Motivated Violence Act went into effect in New York City.
Lampros had alleged four unwanted sexual advances from Combs – a rape in 1995, a sexual assault in 1996, a coerced sexual performance and rape in 1998, and a sexual assault in her apartment either at the end of 2000 or early 2001.
In an Aug. 19 bid to dismiss Lampros' lawsuit, Combs' lawyers said she "filed this baseless lawsuit more than twenty years after the end of her romantic relationship with Mr. Combs" and added that "each and every one of her false claims is deficient on its face and must be dismissed."
Combs has maintained his innocence in response to at least 70 sexual assault lawsuits, which detail alleged incidents dating back to the 1990s. The 55-year-old music producer and businessman, who was convicted of prostitution charges on July 2, has been jailed since September amid his recently wrapped criminal case.
He will be sentenced on Oct. 3.
Diddy accuser's lawyer says 'it is full steam ahead'
In a statement to USA TODAY, Lampros' attorney Tyrone Blackburn confirmed that "the sole claim against Sean Combs is now the (New York City Gender-Motivated Violence Act) claim."
Blackburn added that he notified Combs' team of plans to depose the mogul within two months and "will be serving discovery demands" in the case within a day. "It is full steam ahead — playtime is over," he said.
In a statement, Combs' team said the ruling shows his motion to dismiss the suit largely "prevails."
Combs' team also said he "has not yet had an opportunity to contest those false allegations, and the Court's decision thus does not address their truth."
Trial recap: Everything that came to light, from disturbing claims to photos of belongings
April Lampros' lawsuit alleged Diddy assaulted her from 1995 to 2001
Lampros, a former New York Fashion Institute of Technology student, alleged Combs raped her on multiple occasions, including one instance in which she claimed he forced her and his then-girlfriend Kim Porter, who died in 2018, to take ecstasy and have sex together before he raped her.
Earlier in the year, Lampros withdrew three of the four causes of action in her suit: battery, sexual assault, and negligent infliction of emotional distress. She also dismissed the companies she'd named as defendants: Bad Boy Records and Sony Music's Arista Records, where she'd allegedly worked at the time of the assaults.
The legal development comes on the heels of Combs' landmark sex-crimes trial in Manhattan court, which concluded on July 2 with a split verdict that found Combs guilty of two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution. The Grammy-winning rapper was acquitted on the most serious charge of racketeering and a pair of sex trafficking counts.
Despite not being found guilty of the charges that carried the most prison time, Combs was denied bail by U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian just hours after the verdict was handed down. The judge cited, in part, Combs' history of domestic violence as he explained the reasoning for his decision.
Combs faces up to 20 years in prison for his convicted charges. But prosecutors have said sentencing guidelines could ultimately have him serve only 51 to 63 months in prison. Meanwhile, the defense said guidelines subject him to a maximum of two years.
If you or someone you know has experienced sexual violence, RAINN's National Sexual Assault Hotline offers free, confidential, 24/7 support in English and Spanish via chat and at 800-656-4673.
Contributing: Taijuan Moorman, Patrick Ryan, and Aysha Bagchi, USA TODAY
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
3 hours ago
- USA Today
Mom charged with manslaughter after leaving son in hot car to go to med spa
A California mother has been charged with child abuse and manslaughter after she left her two sons in a vehicle in 100-degree weather to get facial injections, according to police. Amillio Gutierrez, a 1-year-old, and his 2-year-old brother were allegedly left strapped in their car seats in Bakersfield, Calif. on June 29 while their mother, Maya Hernandez, 20, visited Always Beautiful Med Spa, according to a police report obtained by USA TODAY. Both children were taken to a local hospital, where the youngest child died. The older sibling was in stable condition and placed in protective custody, according to police. The Bakersfield woman was charged with one count of involuntary manslaughter and two counts of willful cruelty to a child, according to online court records. She is being held on a bond set at just over $1 million. Police: Mother was at medical spa while boys were in hot car At approximately 5 p.m. on June 29, police received a call about an unresponsive child in Bakersfield, located around 110 miles northwest of Los Angeles, according to the police report. Upon arrival, authorities observed that the youngest child was unconscious, not breathing, and had a bluish discoloration around his lips while the other brother had "soaking wet" hair and "appeared lethargic," the report read. By 5:48 p.m., Amillio, the youngest, was pronounced dead. Investigators soon spoke to Hernandez, who stated that she had left the boys in her 2022 Toyota Corolla with the air conditioner on, according to the police report. While she went into the spa, the boys were in their carseats with snacks, milk, water, and her phone propped up to watch television, Hernandez told police. The car's air conditioner was set to 60 degrees with the fan on level 4 out of 7, but when officers consulted a car expert, they discovered that the Toyota she drove automatically shuts off after an hour of inactivity. Authorities believe that the boys spent approximately 1½ hours in the car without air conditioning while outside temperatures ranged from 99 to 101 degrees Fahrenheit. According to a doctor who treated him, Amillio's body temperature reached 107.2°F. Mom was told she could bring boys inside but they'd have to stay in waiting room According to witness statements given to police, Hernandez allegedly asked the nurse performing the procedure if she could bring her children to the appointment, and was told the boys could stay in the waiting room. Before paying, Hernandez told the nurse she had to run to her car. That's when she realized something was wrong. One of her sons looked like he was having a seizure and was "foaming at the mouth and shaking," Hernandez told police. Hernandez returned to the spa with her child in her arms, while a customer was holding the other child. One of the children, the nurse said, "looked like he was going to have a stroke." The officers also interviewed witnesses who recalled walking by Hernandez's car, which was turned off. 'His brother will forever be without his best friend' Katie Martinez, Amillio's grandmother on his father's side, told KFSN-TV that her son is incarcerated, and just wanted to bring her grandson's body home for a burial. 'His mom left him and his 2-year-old brother alone in her car,' Martinez wrote in a fundraiser description. 'His brother will forever be without his best friend.' "They were strapped in their car seats,' Martinez told the outlet. 'They couldn't even get up to save themselves. She literally locked them in their car seats and shut their doors." 'Amillio was so special,' said his grandmother. 'He always had a smile no matter what. He is loved by so many, our lives will not be the same.' Saleen Martin is a reporter on USA TODAY's NOW team. She is from Norfolk, Virginia – the 757. Email her at sdmartin@
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Sean Combs Trial Alternate Juror ‘Believed' Cassie and Jane, but ‘Intent' Was Issue
When Sean Combs was acquitted of two sex trafficking charges after harrowing testimony from R&B singer Casandra 'Cassie' Ventura and a more recent ex-girlfriend who testified under the pseudonym Jane, some surmised the jury simply didn't believe the women. But there's another possible explanation, experts and an alternate juror who sat through the seven-week trial tell Rolling Stone. The verdict may have hinged on jurors' appraisal of Combs' 'intent.' It's possible jurors believed that either Cassie or Jane, or both, felt coerced by Combs into at least one commercial sex act with a male escort, but that still wasn't enough for a conviction on sex trafficking. Jurors were required to find that Combs intended to commit sex trafficking, or at least that he recklessly disregarded how his actions might compel someone into sex trafficking, U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian said in his instructions. More from Rolling Stone Sean Combs' Sentencing Set for October Sean Combs Alternate Juror Speaks Out Beating RICO Charges Doesn't Make Diddy a Hero It's a high bar to clear, especially with the element of reasonable doubt, the juror and experts say. 'Both women, I believe they were very credible. They wouldn't go up there and want to lie. I believe the women. [But] I think having a smoking gun for intent, that was one of the things we were looking for,' the alternate juror, who asked to be identified only by his first name, George, tells Rolling Stone. 'I was looking for something that would prove intent. And the defense did raise some doubt whether there was intent to coerce.' While George was effectively excused last week just as deliberations started, he heard the same live testimony from the govenment's 34 witnesses and filled up three spiral notebooks with notes. He says that for him, the hard evidence in the case — the text messages and the so-called 'freak off' videos — fell short of proving that Combs knew the women felt coerced. According to George, the freak-off videos shown to jurors on privacy screens not visible to the courtroom gallery depicted some sexual activity, but they were mostly 'just talking and rubbing oil.' He says in some of the footage, Ventura appeared to be setting up candles or otherwise helping with 'the ambiance' of the alleged drug-fueled threesomes that could last for days while Combs recorded video and masturbated. George says 'nothing in the video' showed a bright line of coercion. In other words, any distress or thoughts of coercion going on in the minds of the participants wasn't visible to him. Even so, he believed the women's testimony about feeling coerced, he reiterates. 'I really give credit and kudos to Cassie for coming in early on, heavily pregnant, testifying for days on end, and getting cross-examined. To put yourself through that — that testimony was very important,' he says. 'Listening to both women, I did find them credible. But there were holes … Sometimes everything didn't exactly fit.' Two former federal prosecutors who secured the 2021 racketeering conviction of R. Kelly in Brooklyn say proving intent is notoriously difficult. 'I thought the government built a compelling case as to trafficking Cassie on at least some occasions. But the reality is that it's very hard to prove that a defendant had the requisite intent to compel a person to perform labor, or engage in commercial sex, even if his conduct arguably had the effect of compelling the labor,' Elizabeth Geddes, the former EDNY prosecutor who delivered the closing arguments in the R. Kelly case, tells Rolling Stone. 'Put another way, the jury could have credited that Cassie felt compelled to engage in the freak-offs for fear of otherwise enduring serious harm but found that there was not enough evidence to prove that Combs' intent was for her to do so.' Maria Cruz Melendez, the other lead prosecutor on the R. Kelly case — now a partner at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom — says proving intent is 'one of the hardest elements' of prosecuting a crime. 'Essentially, it's because you have to enter the mind of the defendant and then prove his intent to the jurors so they can say beyond a reasonable doubt that they knew what Combs was thinking when he engaged in the alleged conduct,' she says. 'So, it's understandable that some jurors will have a hard time with that, absent a confession or other type of admission that, from their perspective, is crystal clear.' She says the law recognizes confessions aren't the norm, so jurors are allowed to look at circumstantial evidence and the actions of defendants. 'But ultimately, each juror is different,' she says. 'What constitutes reasonable doubt for each person is different. That's part of the challenge — whether you've met each individual juror's threshold for reasonable doubt. And, in many ways, it is the same for meeting the intent element.' When the jury's unanimous verdict was read, Combs covered his face, let out a massive sigh and pumped his fist by his side. He was acquitted of two counts of sex trafficking and a single count of racketeering conspiracy. The jury convicted him on two lesser counts of transportation to engage in prostitution. He is due to be sentenced in early October. In a letter to the court after the verdict, Combs' defense calculated his expected sentencing guidelines to range between 21 and 27 months. Lead defense attorney Mark Agnifilo said he planned to argue Combs is 'entitled' to 'a below-guidelines sentence' considering he wasn't a 'pimp' making money off the escorts. Prosecutors, meanwhile, said the correct calculation for Combs' sentencing range was at least 51 to 63 months imprisonment, meaning about four to five years. Federal judges aren't required to follow sentencing guidelines and may treat them as a starting point while considering other factors, including certain evidence at trial they considered credible. In the Southern District of New York, judges stuck to guideline ranges 34.5 percent of the time in the last fiscal year, according to the U.S. Sentencing Commission. 'Today is a great victory for Sean Combs. It's a great victory for the jury system,' Agnifilo told reporters outside the courthouse last week. 'Today is a win. Today is a victory of all victories for Sean Combs.' In his closing arguments, Agnifilo told jurors they were faced with a 'tale of two trials.' He said one trial was 'told from the mouths of witnesses,' while the other was based on the text messages and videos. He said the texts exchanged between Ventura and Combs around the time of their breakup in 2018 were 'some of the most beautiful things I've ever read.' He called the couple's relationship a 'great modern love story.' Summing up the heart of the defense case, Agnifilo said Combs owned the fact he was violent at times, but domestic violence didn't make Combs a sex trafficker leading a criminal enterprise. Agnifilo challenged jurors to search through the hundreds of text messages between Combs and Ventura. 'You won't find one, you won't find one where she is like, 'I didn't like that sex. I am not attracted to you. I don't like our sex life,'' he argued. In her four days of grueling testimony, Ventura said she regularly faced physical beatings and threats at the hands of Combs, so she learned to feign enthusiasm as a survival tactic. 'It was always in the back of my mind that I would somehow be hurt by him,' she said. 'Make the wrong face, and the next thing I knew, I was getting hit in the face.' Still, George said the text messages Ventura and Jane exchanged with Combs raised doubt. 'The general feel of the messages was that they knew what they were doing, they knew what was happening,' he said. 'Beyond a reasonable doubt, that's such a high standard. But believe me, if we did find there was true intent, and there was an opportunity to convict [Combs] on any of the charges he was found not guilty on, the jury would have done that.' After the verdict, Agnifilo said the jury got the verdict right, 'or at least right enough.' He then said the defense planned to keep fighting in the face of the two prostitution convictions. 'We're not going to stop until [Combs] walks out of prison a free man to his family,' the lawyer vowed. Best of Rolling Stone Sly and the Family Stone: 20 Essential Songs The 50 Greatest Eminem Songs All 274 of Taylor Swift's Songs, Ranked
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Search teams scour for more than 160 still missing in Texas flooding: Live updates
Hopes for finding some of the at least 161 missing people in the wake of devastating flooding along Texas' Guadalupe River were dwindling as officials in the hardest-hit county say they haven't rescued anyone alive since the day of the flood. The July 4 flash flooding has claimed the lives of at least 110 people, a toll that has steadily risen as search and rescue teams and volunteers comb through debris. At least 27 of those deaths were children and counselors at Camp Mystic, a beloved girls' Christian camp that sits along the river. It, along with homes and campgrounds in the area, was inundated in the early morning hours on Friday with little time to act. At least 161 people are missing in Kerr County alone, Gov. Greg Abbott told reporters on Tuesday afternoon. The county received the brunt of the flooding impacts, and reported at least 87 of the state's deaths. There are still five missing campers and one counselor from Camp Mystic, officials said. The last "live rescue" was made on Friday, said Jonathan Lamb with the Kerrville Police Department, and the chances of finding survivors dwindle as time passes. "The hearts of our fellow Texans are breaking every single day because of what people in this community and the surrounding area are going through,'' Abbott said. Meanwhile, on Wednesday, the impacts of catastrophic flooding in Ruidoso, New Mexico, were becoming clear as authorities said at least three people were killed, including two young children, after torrential rains overwhelmed Rio Ruidoso on Tuesday. Contributing: Reuters This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Live updates: Texas scours for more than 160 missing after flooding