logo
Newest forecast data projects $2B less in revenue

Newest forecast data projects $2B less in revenue

Yahoo16-04-2025
Chief budget architects Sen. Ryan Mishler, R-Mishawaka, and Rep. Jeff Thompson, R-Lizton, react to new forecast data projecting $2 billion less in state revenue on April 16, 2025. (Whitney Downard/Indiana Capital Chronicle)
In a sharp turnaround from the flush financial fortunes of the last budget cycle, Indiana's projected revenue for the next budget cycle fell by $2 billion according to new forecast data publicized on Wednesday.
The current budget cycle for the 2025 fiscal year is also short by an estimated $400 million, though closing that gap will likely rely on reserves.
Indiana's tax revenue is still growing but not at the rate anticipated.
According to chief budget architects Sen. Ryan Mishler and Rep. Jeff Thompson, 'everything is on the table' when it comes to potential cuts.
'We just have a lot of tough decisions to make and we have to be disciplined,' said Mishler, R-Mishawaka. '… K-12 education is the last thing we want to do anything with so I would prefer to put everything else in front of that.'
When it came to increasing so-called sin taxes — whether on gaming, cigarettes or alcohol, Thompson didn't rule it out.
'All of those things have to be discussed,' said the Lizton Republican.
For longtime lawmakers, the news invoked memories of budgeting after the 2008 recession, when the state weathered more than a billion-dollar shortfall.
'This one scares me a lot more because the number is a lot higher. And back then, if you remember, we had federal money to backfill. We don't have any federal money to backfill. This is all on us,' said Mishler. 'So we're going to have to live within our means.'
With a goal to finish the 2025 legislative session next week, lawmakers don't have much time to identify potential cuts — though the two Republicans anticipated long nights ahead to meet that preferred deadline.
Democrats pointed to the need to protect Hoosiers during uncertain economic times and minimizing harm through state resources.
'We are extremely concerned for Hoosiers across the state, because the same underlying conditions that are impacting the state budget are impacting Hoosiers,' said Sen. Fady Qaddoura, D-Indianapolis. 'From the price of goods and services to the challenges of those who rely on retirement funds to small businesses relying on their products that they ship.'
Qaddoura noted that Senate Democrats had pushed to incorporate sin taxes into the budget earlier in the week, adding that a $2 cigarette tax increase would bring in an estimated $800 million.
Moments after release of the downgraded forecast, the Indiana Chamber of Commerce called for the General Assembly to pull the trigger on that tax.
'A big action still on the table this legislative session is a minimum $2 per pack increase to the cigarette tax,' said President and CEO Vanessa Green Sinders. 'We urge lawmakers to put the increase in the state budget – both for the positive impact on the health of Hoosiers who smoke and the additional revenue.'
The December forecast data included roughly $800 million in new revenue for the state over the next two years, though nearly all of that came in the first year. Now even that marginal growth is gone.
Much of the loss can be attributed to economic uncertainty, including worries about the impact of tariffs in the country's most manufacturing-intensive state.
'When the U.S. gets a cold, Indiana gets pneumonia,' said Rep. Greg Porter, D-Indianapolis. 'We're a manufacturing state and (with) the tariffs and other issues out there in the federal government … this really affects our bottom line.'
According to an analysis from Axios Indianapolis, Indiana is the third-most reliant state when it comes to China, which imported $6.1 billion in Hoosier goods in 2023. More than half of that was in pharmaceuticals and medicines followed by oilseeds and grains.
Democrats pointed to potential areas for savings, including pushing back anticipated income tax cuts and clawing back money from the Indiana Economic Development Corporation.
Qaddoura went even further, targeting the use of vouchers by wealthy families to attend private schools.
'I think if we're looking at K-12 cuts, we definitely need to look at reversing the voucher program back to the 2021 level to be sure that the ultra-wealthy are not benefiting while we're cutting … funding for K-12 education across the state,' he said.
He said such a move would save an estimated $309 million.
Potentially the biggest bill in the 2025 session altered property taxes with an explicit goal to give two-thirds of homeowners relief, at a loss for local units of governments and school corporations.
Thompson said that effort, which has been signed into law, doesn't need to be revisited in light of the news about the state's finances.
'I can tell you right now that the Indiana projected revenue is probably less than most locals. We're probably in a tougher spot than they are,' Thompson said.
Gov. Mike Braun focused on cutting waste, eliminating overhead, and getting back to the basics.
'We must finalize a biennial budget that respects the revenue forecast and protects Hoosier taxpayers from a worst-case scenario,' he said. 'I will work with the General Assembly to craft a budget that is structurally balanced, maintains strong reserves, and funds vital services like public safety and education.'
In a small spot of positive news, Mishler noted that the growth of Medicaid appeared to be slowing.
Medicaid rolls were just over 1% lower than previously estimated, a difference of less than 30,000 Hoosiers. More than 2 million residents rely on the program for their health care coverage.
Breaking down budgets: Why Medicaid expenses are growing
But, as an entitlement program, much of the program can't be cut — meaning that the state will likely remain committed to spending roughly $10 billion over the next two years.
'We're trying to make some changes to try to help us in the Medicaid space,' said Mishler, pointing to his efforts under Senate Bill 2.
However, much remains uncertain about Medicaid's future, especially with several large pieces of legislation still up in the air.
Under Mishler's bill, most able-bodied working-age adults would be required to work at least 20 hours a week to keep their benefits.
Additionally, changes to the state's calculation of the hospital assessment fee or implementing the managed care assessment fee weren't included in Wednesday's presentation, though the latter could bring in $1.4 billion if fully implemented.
But Mitch Roob, who helms the agency overseeing Medicaid, said he didn't believe the Trump administration would allow the state to leverage the tax to the maximum extent.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump attacks Charlamagne Tha God over criticism
Trump attacks Charlamagne Tha God over criticism

Politico

time22 minutes ago

  • Politico

Trump attacks Charlamagne Tha God over criticism

Trump said on Truth Social that Charlamagne was a 'dope' who voted for Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris. Charlamagne said he personally will benefit from tax breaks approved in Trump's tax-and spending law, but said, 'There's going to be so many people that's hurt by that bill.'' 'Anything that takes away Medicaid from people and will put people in a worse financial situation than they were previously in, I'm not for,' he added. Charlamagne also predicted that 'traditional conservatives' are going to take back the Republican Party from Trump's Make America Great Again movement, citing controversy over Trump's refusal to release files related to disgraced financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. 'I think there's a political coup going on right now in the Republican Party that people aren't paying attention to,' Charlamagne said. 'I think this Epstein thing is going to be a way for traditional conservatives to take their party back. I really do. I think that they know this is the issue that has gotten the base riled up, the MAGA base isn't letting this issue go and for the first time they can probably take their party back and not piss off the MAGA base. I think they're going to do that.' Trump on social media called Charlamagne a 'racist sleazebag' and criticized his use of God in his professional nickname. 'Can anyone imagine the uproar there would be if I used that nickname?' Trump asked. Charlamagne told Lara Trump that his criticism of the Republican president was not new, adding that he 'gave President Biden the same hell' when he didn't think the Democrat was doing a good job.

Texas House Democrats flee to Chicago to deny GOP's congressional redistricting effort
Texas House Democrats flee to Chicago to deny GOP's congressional redistricting effort

Chicago Tribune

time23 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Texas House Democrats flee to Chicago to deny GOP's congressional redistricting effort

Opting to use what Texas politicians called a nuclear option, Democratic members of the Texas House of Representatives left for Chicago on Sunday under threat of fines and arrest to deny Republicans the quorum they need to redraw five congressional districts aimed at helping President Donald Trump and the national GOP maintain a U.S. House majority in next year's midterm elections. The Texas Democrats were scheduled to be met by a supportive Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker upon their arrival in Chicago. Pritzker issued a statement echoing Texas Democratic arguments that Republicans were using a special legislative session in Austin, aimed at providing relief for last month's flood victims in the state's Hill Country, to please Trump and 'as political cover to push through a racially gerrymandered congressional map.' 'This is not a decision we make lightly, but it is one we make with absolute moral clarity,' state Rep. Gene Wu, the chair of the Texas House Democratic Caucus, said in a statement. 'We're leaving Texas to fight for Texans,' Wu said. 'We will not allow disaster relief to be held hostage for a Trump gerrymander. We're not walking out on our responsibilities; we're walking out on a rigged system that refuses to listen to the people we represent. As of today, this corrupt special session is over.' By coming to Illinois, the Democrats from Texas are leaving a state where Republicans dominate and will find themselves in a state where the opposite is true. Pritzker, in his statement, said the move denies Texas Republican Gov. Greg Abbott a quorum 'to pass his rigged redistricting scheme,' which was encouraged by Trump's political allies. Pritzker and Abbott clashed often in the last few years over the Texas governor's decision to bus and fly thousands of immigrants from the southern border to Chicago in part to mock state and city sanctuary policies, resulting in Illinois and the city spending tens of millions of dollars for services. A source close to Pritzker said discussions about Texas Democrats seeking help from the governor began June 28, when Pritzker attended a dinner for the Oklahoma Democratic Party. There, Pritzker met with Kendall Scudder, the head of the Texas Democratic Party, and the two spoke about the challenges facing Texas Democrats. Pritzker vowed to support and defend them if they came to Illinois, the source said. The topic came up again a little more than a week ago when the governor met on Chicago's South Side with some Texas Democratic lawmakers to discuss that state's GOP midterm redistricting effort, the source said. The 150-member Texas House has 88 Republicans and 62 Democrats, with 100 members required to be present for a quorum call in order to conduct legislative business. It was not immediately clear how many Democrats were making the trip to Chicago. It's not the first time that Texas House Democrats fled the state capital in Austin to deny a quorum. In July 2021, when Republicans in the state pushed for tighter restrictions on voting, they spent five weeks in Washington, D.C. The move prompted a Texas House rule of $500 per day fines for any such future absences. But the Texas Tribune reported that in recent days, members of the state's Democratic congressional delegation were contacting their campaign donor base to put together funds to compensate missing members for fines as well as their accommodations in Illinois. One estimate put the cost at $1 million per month. Additionally, Texas Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton, who is mounting a primary challenge to GOP U.S. Sen. John Cornyn, has offered the services of his office in 'hunting down and compelling the attendance of anyone who abandons their office' to deny quorum. Pritzker, who is a billionaire, has no plans to pay for the Texas Democrats' stay in the Chicago area, but his campaign staff would make hotel recommendations and help with other logistics, according to the Pritzker source. The move by Democrats came a day after a Republican-led Texas House panel voted along party lines to advance a draft congressional map altering current district boundaries to create five districts that favor Republicans. The GOP currently holds a 25-12 advantage among the 38-member congressional delegation, with one vacancy. While the U.S. Department of Justice under Trump sought to offer legal justification for redrawing the map, contending four districts were unconstitutionally racially gerrymandered, Texas House Republicans flatly stated their goal was to increase GOP representation in the state's congressional delegation. 'Different from everyone else, I'm telling you, I'm not beating around the bush,' said state Rep. Todd Hunter, the Corpus Christi Republican who sponsored the remap legislation. 'We have five new districts, and these five new districts are based on political performance.' Texas Democrats said the new map would come at the expense of representation for Black and Latino voters who would either be packed into new districts or widely dispersed among them. It's not the first time that Illinois has become home for another state's Democratic lawmakers. In 2011, Indiana Democrats crossed the border and stayed for five weeks in the Champaign-Urbana area to deny a quorum over a Republican push for union-weakening legislation and creation of a school voucher program. A right-to-work bill passed the following year under GOP majorities achieved through the 2011 remap.

Food stamp cuts could deal a blow to small grocers
Food stamp cuts could deal a blow to small grocers

Boston Globe

time23 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Food stamp cuts could deal a blow to small grocers

Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Several states have said the changes will put hundreds of thousands of households at risk of losing some or all of their SNAP benefits. Some states, including Pennsylvania, have questioned whether they can continue operating the program if they cannot shoulder the extra costs of providing benefits. Advertisement Republicans say the changes will help reduce dependence on federal benefits and ensure that SNAP serves the neediest families. They have also said the changes would hold states better accountable. Advertisement But the measures have alarmed some researchers who say they could make it harder for small grocers to stay in business, particularly in rural areas that are more likely to have both higher shares of SNAP participants and lower access to food retailers. Roughly 27,000 food retailers that largely operate in rural counties face the highest risks from the cuts, according to an analysis from the Center for American Progress, a liberal think tank. Gina Plata-Nino, a deputy director at the Food Research and Action Center, a nonprofit that supports antihunger programs, said the changes could have broad consequences for local economies. If grocery stores bring in fewer dollars, employees at those stores could lose their jobs, she said. Property tax revenue could also fall because of store closures, she added. Plata-Nino said the cuts could be particularly painful for rural areas with fewer grocery stores. If grocers close or reduce their hours, people could spend more time and money traveling to buy food, she said. The changes could also result in families purchasing less fresh produce and more food with a long shelf life because it is less convenient to go to the store, she added. Robert Greenstein, a visiting fellow at the Brookings Institution, said that some families would squeeze other parts of their budgets to try to offset the loss of SNAP benefits, but the overall reduction in food purchases would be substantial. 'We'll likely see more independent grocery stores in low-income and rural areas going under, especially during a recession,' Greenstein said. Stephanie Johnson, the group vice president of government relations at the National Grocers Association, a trade group for independent grocers, said the domestic policy bill provided some benefits to businesses by making certain tax breaks permanent. But she said the group's members already had low net profit margins and some have said that jobs could be affected by the cuts to SNAP. Advertisement 'Those changes to their SNAP sales may be difficult,' Johnson said. The association has estimated that the federal program supports about 388,000 jobs across the food industry. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said the program was 'never intended to be a windfall for food companies, retailers, and nonprofits,' but rather a 'temporary safety net for families and communities in need.' 'Finally, President Trump's policies are improving the economy and communities across the country,' Rollins said in a statement. 'With those improvements come jobs, which will reduce dependence on government assistance, preserving it for those truly in need.' Some local officials said they worried about how the cuts could affect food access in their communities. Matt Wireman, the judge executive of Magoffin County, Ky., said there were only two full-service grocery stores in the county, along with several dollar stores that sold food items. Wireman said he was concerned that grocers could raise prices or struggle to stay in business, given that about 30 percent of the county's roughly 11,300 residents receive SNAP benefits. Store closures could lead to more people traveling as much as 30 minutes to surrounding counties to buy groceries, Wireman said. He added that he worried poverty could worsen because Republicans have also passed cuts to Medicaid. 'With looming cuts to that and SNAP, we are heading for an economic collapse in rural east Kentucky,' Wireman said. Advertisement Some researchers said they were skeptical about the extent of the cuts and did not expect to see a large effect on spending at grocery stores. Kevin Corinth, a senior fellow at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, praised the changes to SNAP. He said he hoped to see an increase in employment and thought the stricter work requirements would affect a 'relatively modest share' of people. He said he also expected many states to lower their error rates in the coming years, and that most would probably not have to pay a major portion of the benefits. 'I don't think there's going to be a large reduction in SNAP benefits going to households,' Corinth said. 'It's possible some states will have to cover a small share, but my guess is that this incentive will be pretty strong.' States will be subject to the new cost-share rules starting in fiscal year 2028, although certain states with higher error rates will have more time to adjust before the changes take effect. States with an error rate of 6 percent or greater will have to pay 5 percent to 15 percent of benefit costs. States with a lower error rate will not have to shoulder any of those costs. Some estimates have found that millions enrolled in the program, which provides monthly benefits to roughly 42 million people, could be affected by more stringent work requirements. The Congressional Budget Office estimated that changes to the work mandate would reduce participation in SNAP by more than 3 million people in an average month over the next decade, although that analysis is based on an earlier House version of the bill that included stricter work requirements for parents. Advertisement The left-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities has estimated that more than 5 million people live in a household that would be at risk of losing at least some food assistance because of the expanded work requirements. Katie Bergh, a senior policy analyst at the center, said that the bill dramatically expands work requirements and that she did not think they would help people achieve self sufficiency, pointing to a body of research that has found that work requirements do not increase employment. She also said the vast majority of states had error rates above 6 percent at some point over the past two decades. 'It is very likely that at least in some years, most, if not all, states will ultimately owe this cost share for food benefits,' Bergh said. This article originally appeared in

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store