‘Well of change': Expert panel proposes targeted welfare schemes
To illustrate this concept, the committee offered a compelling analogy: envisioning a govt-dug well that serves as a central water source. Instead of allowing every household unfettered access to the well, regardless of their specific needs and capabilities, it would be more effective to install pipelines that deliver water directly to each home.
This approach ensures that resources are allocated based on actual requirements, allowing the most disadvantaged communities to receive the necessary support while promoting a more equitable distribution of welfare benefits.
You Can Also Check:
Hyderabad AQI
|
Weather in Hyderabad
|
Bank Holidays in Hyderabad
|
Public Holidays in Hyderabad
In its executive summary, the committee drew this analogy, opining that the index serves as a powerful tool to enable a shift toward targeted welfare initiatives. Rather than adopting a one-size-fits-all approach to social schemes, the govt can now design and implement welfare programmes specifically tailored to the unique needs of different communities.
The report also noted that even among the marginalised communities, the degree of backwardness is relative.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Pirates Climb Aboard Cargo Ship - Watch What The Captain Did Next
Tips and Tricks
Undo
Therefore, it is important to adopt target-based schemes to address these differences effectively.
As the comprehensive 300-page report detailing the backwardness index is set to be tabled before the cabinet for a discussion, deliberations are expected on whether the report should be presented in the assembly.
Sources indicate that there will be significant discussion concerning the public release of the findings, as both the Congress high command and the expert committee have recommended transparency to address any misconceptions about various communities.
It is important to note that the report's findings will only be made public if they are formally tabled in the assembly, ensuring that the dissemination of information follows proper legislative procedures.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
2 minutes ago
- First Post
Op Sindoor Debate LIVE Updates: Rajnath to open debate, Rahul key Opposition speaker; NDA meeting underway
Op Sindoor Debate LIVE Updates: The Lok Sabha on Monday (July 28) is holding a special discussion on Operation Sindoor, India's military response to the recent Pahalgam terror attack, during the Monsoon Session of Parliament. Defence minister Rajnath Singh is set to open the debate whereas, Rahul Gandhi is key Opposition speaker. read more Ahead of the crucial debate on Operation Sindoor, Union Minister Kiren Rijiju urged the Congress and Opposition parties to refrain from making any statements in Parliament that could harm India's national interest or appear to favour Pakistan. "Everyone must ensure the dignity and spirit of the Indian Army is upheld. The country's enemies should not be emboldened by foul language used by opposition leaders," Rijiju said. Sources say both Houses are expected to witness uproar over the Bihar SIR row, while the Lok Sabha will function in the afternoon for the Operation Sindoor debate. Both the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha resumed proceedings on Monday, with the Lower House seeing protests from Opposition members before the Operation Sindoor discussion began. The Lok Sabha on Monday(July 28) is holding a special discussion on Operation Sindoor, India's military response to the recent terror attack in Pahalgam, as part of the ongoing Monsoon Session of Parliament. Union Minister Kiren Rijiju emphasised that the Business Advisory Committee has scheduled the debate, following requests from the Opposition, including the Congress, which had earlier written to the government seeking a discussion on the operation. While several issues were on the Opposition's agenda, it was agreed that Operation Sindoor would be taken up first. What to expect from the debate
New Indian Express
2 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
'Why do you assume that they came from Pakistan': Chidambaram's remark on Pahalgam attackers stirs row
A political row has erupted ahead of the high-stakes parliamentary debate on 'Operation Sindoor', India's military response to the April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam. The controversy was sparked by remarks from former finance minister and senior Congress leader P. Chidambaram, who, in an interview with The Quint, questioned the narrative that the attackers came from Pakistan. 'There is no evidence so far that the killers were Pakistani,' Chidambaram said, suggesting that "homegrown terrorists" could have been involved. He also slammed the government's handling of the investigation, asking why the attackers had not yet been apprehended or identified. His comments triggered a sharp backlash from the BJP, with the party accusing Congress of undermining national security. 'Once again, the Congress rushes to give a clean chit to Pakistan, this time after the Pahalgam terror attack,' BJP IT cell head Amit Malviya posted on X, sharing a clip from the interview. He further added, 'When it comes to national security, there should be no ambiguity. But with the Congress, there never is – they always bend over backwards to protect the enemy.'
Mint
2 minutes ago
- Mint
Operation Sindoor debate: Opposition questions — ‘huge security lapse', ‘no proof terrorists came from Pakistan'
Parliament is gearing up for a fierce debate over Operation Sindoor and the Pahalgam terror attack on Monday. Defence Minister Rajnath Singh is expected to address the Lok Sabha around noon, while Congress leader Gaurav Gogoi is likely to lead the debate from the Opposition's side. Ahead of the Parliament session, Gaurav Gogoi said, "...the government will have to tell the truth, today." Reacting to Congress leader P Chidambaram's "no proof Pahalgam terrorists came from Pakistan" comment, Gogoi said, "He [Chidambaram] will be able to give more information on this." Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut also said, "Chidambaram sahib might be saying the right thing." He also said that Home Minister Amit Shah should have resigned over the Pahalgam terror attack incident. "The Pahalgam attack was a huge security lapse in Centre-governed J&K. The terrorists entered 400 km inside J&K. These terrorists have not been found yet. This is a lapse on the part of the Home Ministry. The Home Minister should have resigned," Sanjay Raut said. He also questioned the government over US President Donald Trump claims about the "US-brokered' ceasefire deal between India and Pakistan during May conflict. "I think the Prime Minister will not come as he will have to answer questions about President Trump," he said. Meanwhile, Samajwadi Party MP Akhilesh Yadav said, "Firstly, one has to accept that there are two separate issues. Firstly, we congratulate the Armed Forces for their bravery and valour during Operation Sindoor. If they had got a chance, they might have even taken PoK." "Before the Pahalgam attack, there was another incident that the public has not yet been informed about. The question is - why are terrorist incidents happening again and again under the BJP government? Where did the Pahalgam terrorists go? The government should answer where these terrorists went," Yadav asked. A fiery debate on the Pahalgam attack and Operation Sindoor is expected to unfold in Parliament between top leaders from the ruling alliance and the opposition. Lok Sabha List of Business for Monday states, "Special Discussion on India's strong, successful and decisive 'Operation Sindoor' in response to terrorist attack in Pahalgam". Twenty-six civilians were killed in the April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam in Jammu and Kashmir, after which India retaliated through precision strikes under Operation Sindoor, targeting terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK).
