Govt Driving Away Kiwi Innovators And Scientists
Nationals decision to cut Callaghan Innovation has lost the country at least 60 skilled science jobs, meaning the expertise to commercialise great New Zealand innovations has evaporated.
The Government continues to obliterate science and innovation in New Zealand.
'New Zealand's world leading crown research institutes are being left to dwindle, and New Zealand's best scientists are losing their jobs and leaving the country,' Labour science and innovation spokesperson Reuben Davidson said.
'National's decision to cut Callaghan Innovation has lost the country at least 60 skilled science jobs, meaning the expertise to commercialise great New Zealand innovations has evaporated.
'GNS Science has axed nearly 10 percent of its workforce, despite its important work on seismic and climate research. ESR – the Institute of Environmental Science and Research – slashing eight percent of its workforce because of government cuts. NIWA was also proposing 13 percent of its workforce would have to go.
'Cuts to the Marsden Fund, which supports important research at universities, will mean less research in public health, nursing, law, education, Māori studies, and public policy.
'The Government has also closed the Sustainable Food and Fibre Futures fund and replaced it with a new, smaller fund, and decided not to award new funding through the Endeavour Fund in 2026.
'They've taken a total of $90 million out of grants and funds in Budget 2025. This is incredibly short-sighted, and gambles with New Zealand's technology future.
'National is happy to turn up to events like the Hi-Tech awards and congratulate winners when the cameras are rolling in Budget week, but behind the scenes they are cutting the funding that got lots of our best innovators there,' Reuben Davidson said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1News
22 minutes ago
- 1News
'Constitutional adventurism' in Treaty settlement sovereignty clause
Treaty Minister Paul Goldsmith says he was uncomfortable with what he called "constitutional adventurism" after negotiations over a Treaty settlement were halted over an "agree-to-disagree" Crown sovereignty clause. Goldsmith, a senior National MP, sat down with Q+A for a wide-ranging interview across his ministerial portfolios this morning. He was asked about the settlement with East Coast iwi Te Whānau-ā-Apanui that was halted at the final hurdle after Goldsmith said he became uncomfortable over a clause to "agree to disagree" over whether sovereignty was ceded between the iwi and the Crown. "All of those settlements up to now have not referred to this issue. They've been silent on this issue. They've focused on historical claims," the Treaty Negotiations Minister said. "The Te Whānau-ā-Apanui one was the first where it was directly responded to with an agree-to-disagree clause. I didn't feel comfortable with, ultimately, constitutional experimentation through a Treaty settlement, or constitutional adventurism, in a sense, and so that's why we didn't go forward." ADVERTISEMENT The Treaty of Waitangi (Source: 1News) He added that the "novelty" was introduced during the previous government. "This is the first time that it's been done, and we weren't comfortable going forward on that basis," Goldsmith said. "If you're doing a full and final settlement, handing over money to a group that, in the deed, doesn't accept that the Crown actually has — the way you could read it was the Crown doesn't have the authority to do this, because they've never ceded sovereignty and they're still sovereign. And so there's a disjuncture between those two things." In a landmark 2014 ruling, the Waitangi Tribunal concluded the rangatira who signed the Treaty of Waitangi did not cede sovereignty to the Crown. When asked specifically about the issue, Goldsmith said: "It's impossible to know, of course, what was in the mind of somebody in 1840. And so historians can argue about that all day, and what people were actually thinking in the moment." Opposition party leaders support the view that iwi did not cede sovereignty when signing the Treaty, with Labour's Chris Hipkins noting "that doesn't mean that the Crown doesn't have sovereignty now" during controversy over the issue last year. ADVERTISEMENT 'Pressure' on public sentiment about clause - Goldsmith In the Q+A interview, the minister was also questioned about the Crown's stalled efforts to strike a Treaty settlement with Ngāpuhi, and whether the Government would meet a goal aiming to have all settlements finalised by 2035. Goldsmith conceded that he believed the sovereignty clause could put "pressure" on public support for settlements, and that it was part of his decision-making. "That's one of the key factors I've got in the back of my mind everywhere, is that we want to maintain public support for the Treaty settlement process," he said. Asked if he had been worried about a revolt in public opinion to the process, he replied, "it puts pressure on public support. New Zealanders have been broadly supportive of the Treaty settlement processes, and I want to keep that, and we want to get to an end. Shane Jones' has proposed forcing New Zealand's largest iwi into a single commercial for a Treaty settlement. (Source: 1News) "Everybody's impatient. We've been going for 30 years. We want to see a resolution to this, so that we can move together as New Zealanders." ADVERTISEMENT In his Q+A interview, Goldsmith was also asked about his Cabinet colleague Shane Jones' plans for a member's bill to force Ngāpuhi to the negotiating table. "I get on very well with Shane, and we work very collaboratively. He's impatient. He wants to see things happen for Northland," the minister said. "It's all part of coalition politics." Watch the video above for the full interview Q+A with Jack Tame is made with the support of New Zealand On Air
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
Locals Prepare To Welcome Bike-Riding Teen For Māori Wards
This Wednesday, Wellington locals will prepare to welcome 15 year old Jack Karetai-Barrett as he completes his 894km bike ride to raise awareness about Māori wards. His goal is to deliver a letter to Christopher Luxon explaining why Māori wards matter. The Whakatāne High School student walked almost 80 kilometres from Whakatāne to Mauao (Mt Maunganui) earlier in the year, and has now taken on the next challenge. Friendly locals have been 'host families' as he makes his way down the country in wintery conditions. Jack has been passionate about Māori wards for a number of years, after he attended the petition delivery as a child, calling on the government to treat Māori wards like every other ward, and remove the requirement for a referendum. This petition resulted in the then-government changing the legislation, which sparked immense support for Māori wards. New ward seats went from three across the country, to forty-nine - a 1500% increase showing that councils and communities were ready to embrace Māori representation. In 2024, the Coalition Government reversed this legislation which brought back referendums in retrospect, or requiring councils to scrap the seats themselves. ActionStation Director, Kassie Hartendorp says that it's heartening to see a young person use his skills, talents and bravery to turn a divisive issue into a positive event. 'It's promising to see that the younger generation have clarity on political issues of the day and are willing to forge a different path that brings us all together. Which is exactly what Māori wards can do for communities too.' She says that communities in 42 different council areas will be asked whether to keep their local Māori wards during local body elections this September and October. 'Māori wards have made a difference for entire communities - let's keep a good thing going, and make sure they continue into the future.' ActionStation is co-organising a welcome event for Jack as he arrives at Parliament to deliver his letter on Wednesday 9 July. PM Christopher Luxon has declined to receive Jack's letter or meet with him, however, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins has offered to receive it instead. All supporters are welcome to welcome Jack as he arrives at Parliament after his massive bike ride. Notes: For more information on the event details, please contact rangimarie@ The Protect Māori wards report by ActionStation can be found here: More info can be found on Māori wards here [ ] at the VoteLocal website, which includes the 42 regions holding a referendum.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Government told after election it would have to quit fossil fuel group if new exploration started
Climate Change Minister Simon Watts says the government made a "principled decision to withdraw". Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone An international coalition for phasing out fossil fuels says it told the government after the election it would have to quit the group if it re-started looking for new oil and gas, contradicting what Climate Change Minister Simon Watts previously told the media. Before last year's world climate summit, Watts told Newsroom he did not expect New Zealand would have to leave the Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance once the repeal of the offshore exploration ban went through. But the alliance has put out a statement, saying it had made the New Zealand government aware of the implications of restarting exploration after the October 2023 election. It said the 2018 ban was the basis of New Zealand's status as Associate Member of the alliance. Watts said that while there was some limited dialogue with the Beyond Oil and Gas Secretariat post the election, New Zealand officials remained of the view that there were grounds that meant New Zealand could continue to qualify for associate membership, without the offshore oil and gas exploration ban. He said an officials' meeting with the secretariat after he made the statement clarified that once the legislation was repealed, the secretariat believed New Zealand would no longer be eligible. He said the government had "made a principled decision to withdraw". New Zealand [ quietly exited the group on 21 June. In a statement explaining New Zealand's exit, the alliance said it had informed the government that repealing the ban would be a breach of its membership commitments. "Following the election in October 2023, BOGA initiated a dialogue with the incoming government of New Zealand regarding their pledge to repeal the 2018 ban, which was the basis of their status as associate member of the alliance. The government of New Zealand was made aware of the implications of repealing the ban, and was informed that when the legislation passed, they would be in breach of their membership commitment and would leave the Alliance," it said. Green Party co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick said it was never credible for Watts to claim New Zealand that could remain in the alliance while gutting the policies that gained the country entry in the first place. "The government was warned, as far back as the elections in 2023, that rolling back the ban on fossil fuel exploration and extraction would put our membership in the Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance at serious risk. Knowing this, Minister Watts proceeded to publicly assure New Zealanders that everything would be fine and that there'd be no backlash from the international community," she said. She said if the government cared about energy security it would invest the $200 million it has allocated for for fossil fuel fields into distributed renewable energy. Watts, however, said New Zealand had one of the most renewable electricity sectors in the world and the government had been looking at all options to extend the supply of fossil gas as a "critical energy." He has said gas would play an important role in New Zealand's energy until viable alternatives were found. When the exit was announced WWF NZ called it "an international embarrassment", while Greenpeace said there was a "growing risk that the government's reversal of climate change policies will result in backlash from New Zealand's trading partners." New Zealand was a founding member of the Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance and helped launch it at the Glasgow climate summit in 2021. The international alliance of governments works together on the "managed phase-out of oil and gas production". It was led by Denmark and Costa Rica and includes France, Ireland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden and several Pacific island nations. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
