Nacsa investigates alleged data breach of 11 government portals
A Nacsa spokesperson told LifestyleTech that the agency is aware of the situation and is currently looking into the matter.
'We are still investigating. We can't verify it yet. All claims by the actor have been escalated to relevant agencies to verify the authenticity. Some claims show inaccurate information.
'Some threat actors have a history of publishing recycled data and have claimed they are new ones. So their credibility is in question,' the spokesperson said.
The post on the data leak first appeared on Saturday (Aug 2). The hacker claimed to have breached at least 11 government portals, including those belonging to the Defence Ministry, Health Ministry, Higher Education Ministry, and the National Registration Department (JPN), among others.
Based on the sample data and screenshots shared in the post, the alleged leak includes 'display names', user IDs, passwords and IP addresses, along with screenshots that appear to show backend management dashboards.
The post also lists live access and data for sale at US$19,999 (RM84,645) in cryptocurrency.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Court of Appeal dismisses ex-student's bullying lawsuit appeal
PUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal has dismissed an appeal by a former special education student seeking damages and declaratory relief over alleged bullying and insufficient educational support. The appellant, now 27, has ADHD and Asperger's Syndrome. A three-member bench, comprising Justices Datuk Mohd Nazlan Mohd Ghazali, Datuk Azmi Ariffin, and Datuk Faizah Jamaludin, ruled that the appellant failed to substantiate his claims against the school, principal, Malaysian government, and Education Ministry. The lawsuit, filed in 2017, alleged negligence leading to physical and verbal abuse. The appellate court upheld the High Court's February 2023 decision, citing insufficient evidence. Justice Mohd Nazlan noted the appellant did not testify, and his adoptive mother's testimony was deemed hearsay. 'The alleged assailant was neither named in the suit nor called as a witness,' he said. While condemning bullying, the court found no proof of victimisation. Justice Mohd Nazlan emphasised schools' duty of care but found no breaches in this case. The appellant had claimed repeated bullying, including being tied to his bed and spat on, with no action taken despite complaints. - Bernama
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Court of appeal dismissed former special needs student's appeal in bullying suit
PUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal has dismissed an appeal by a former student of a special education secondary school who sought damages and declaratory relief over alleged bullying and the failure to provide proper special education. The appellant, now 27, had been diagnosed with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Asperger's Syndrome. The Court of Appeal three-member bench, comprising Justices Datuk Mohd Nazlan Mohd Ghazali, Datuk Azmi Ariffin and Datuk Faizah Jamaludin, dismissed the appeal after ruling that the appellant failed to prove his claim against the school, the school principal, the Malaysian government and the Education Ministry. The appellant, through his adoptive mother, had filed the lawsuit in 2017 at the High Court against the school, the school principal, the Malaysian Government and the Education Ministry. He claimed the respondents breached their duty of care, which caused him to be a victim of physical and verbal attacks whilst at the premises of the school. In the 44-page judgment, which was uploaded on the judiciary's website on Monday (Aug 4), the appellate court affirmed the Feb 2023 decision of the High Court in dismissing the suit filed by the young man. Justice Mohd Nazlan said there was insufficient evidence that the respondents failed to ensure a proper and appropriate education and teaching facilities for the young man. He said the appellant failed to prove the allegation of bullying incidents on the balance of probabilities, and also did not prove the actual occurrences of the verbal and physical assault as claimed by the appellant. Justice Mohd Nazlan observed that the appellant did not testify in his case, and the testimony provided by his adoptive mother was deemed hearsay and therefore inadmissible. "The appellants' (appellant and adoptive mother) case regarding the alleged incidents could not succeed, as the individual accused of harassing and assaulting the appellant was neither named as a party to the suit nor subpoenaed to testify as a witness,' he said. The court stressed that bullying has no place in any civilised society, but found the evidence presented in the case insufficient to prove that the appellant had been victimised. "In this case, we are not unsympathetic to the problems and plight encountered by the appellants. "There may have been disagreements or even altercations, especially involving the first appellant and H (the individual in question), but the court must decide based on facts and evidence,' said Justice Mohd Nazlan. He said school authorities, including teachers and staff, undoubtedly owe a duty of care to ensure the safety of their pupils and students within the compound and premises of the school and that they were responsible for the students' safety, welfare, and well-being. "Schools must, in their operations, adhere to the regulations, standards, and policies issued by the education authorities, particularly concerning the provision of special education for students with special needs,' he said. However, he added that no breaches of these duties had been established in this case. In the statement of claim, the appellant claimed he was bullied several times at the hostel, including being spat at while he was praying, tied to his bed, punched and kicked, and his belongings were stolen. He claimed that no action was taken by the school and its principal, despite numerous complaints lodged. In the statement of defence filed on July 24, 2017, the school stated that the placement of the student concerned was made based on the choice made by the boy and his adoptive mother during registration. — Bernama
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Sisters nabbed in Lahad Datu after shopping spree with lost debit card
KOTA KINABALU: What three sisters thought was a "paid" shopping spree turned into a costly lesson when they were arrested for misusing a lost debit card in Lahad Datu. The three women reportedly came across the misplaced card and used it for purchases in several malls around town. Lahad Datu OCPD Asst Comm Dzulbaharin Ismail said on Tuesday (Aug 5) that the owner of the card lodged a report after discovering that the card was missing. The issuing bank then found several transactions made using payWave, and this led to the arrest of the three women, he added. ACP Dzulbaharin said the women are being investigated for unauthorised access to computer material under the Computer Crimes Act 1997. In an unrelated case, two people were detained for providing false information in a MyKad application at the National Registration Department (NRD) in Sandakan on Monday (Aug 4). According to the Sandakan NRD, the first arrest involved a woman suspected of giving false information as the guarantor in an application. The second arrest involved an Indonesian man at the same premises for allegedly using another person's birth certificate as his own to apply for a Malaysian identity card. Both suspects are being investigated under the National Registration Regulations 1990. Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
