logo
Map Reveals How Much Money Each State Has Made From Legal Marijuana

Map Reveals How Much Money Each State Has Made From Legal Marijuana

Newsweek22-04-2025
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Adult-use cannabis legalization has generated more than $20 billion in tax revenue across different states since sales first began in 2014, according to new data from the Marijuana Policy Project.
The latest update, which includes figures through the first quarter of 2024, shows the economic scale of legal marijuana markets and the range of policy models used by different states.
Why It Matters
As of March 2024, 24 states had legalized and taxed adult-use cannabis sales, with 22 of those states generating tax revenue. Together, the sales brought in $20,068,051,561, according to cumulative tax collections reported between January 1, 2014, and March last year.
Legal cannabis states brought in a record-breaking $4 billion in adult-use tax revenue in 2023—the most ever collected in a single year.
According to the Marijuana Policy Project, this growing revenue stream has funded public education, substance abuse treatment, law enforcement training, infrastructure projects and social equity initiatives.
Several states also use cannabis taxes to support reinvestment in communities "disproportionately affected by the war on cannabis," per the organization, which is dedicated to legalizing cannabis.
What To Know
California leads all states, with $5.7 billion in adult-use cannabis tax revenue since launching legal sales in 2018. Washington follows with $4.1 billion since 2014.
Rahi Abouk, director of Cannabis Research Institute at the William Paterson University, told Newsweek that tax revenue is high in California because of several factors, including the culture and higher population.
Washington was the state with the second highest tax revenue most likely because it has a higher tax rate, Caulkins added, and because it has "done better than some other states at preventing illegal sale that does not pay taxes."
Dr. Arthur Robin Williams, a professor at the Columbia University Department of Psychiatry, told Newsweek that California and Washington also "have higher rates of cannabis use than the rest of the country and were early adopters of medical and adult recreational cannabis sales."
"Having more progressive constituents, it is not a surprise that they also have some of the highest tax rates on cannabis products," he added.
California is also simply just a "gigantic state," Jonathan Caulkins, a professor at Carnegie Mellon University, told Newsweek.
Meanwhile, Colorado, the first state to open legal cannabis stores in 2014, has collected $2.4 billion in tax revenue.
Other states in the top 10 earners of tax revenue from adult-use marijuana include:
Illinois: $1.98 billion
Michigan: $1.22 billion
Nevada: $1.1 billion
Oregon: $1 billion
Massachusetts: $989 million
Arizona: $703 million
Alaska: $161 million
The report shows that even newer markets have quickly brought in substantial revenue—with Missouri, which began sales on February 6, 2023, earning $136 million through to the first quarter of 2024.
Other newer markets that have seen substantial tax revenue from adult-use marijuana include:
Maryland (sales began July 1, 2023): $40 million
Connecticut (sales began January 10, 2023): $29.5 million
New York (sales began December 29, 2022): $21 million
Rhode Island (sales began December 1, 2022): $15.7 million
Vermont (sales began October 1, 2022): $24 million
Smaller states and those with slower rollouts are also reporting steady gains. Montana, for example, has reported $106 million since beginning sales in 2022. Maine, which began sales in October 2020 and has had a more gradual expansion, has taken in $80 million.
Two states—Delaware and Ohio—legalized adult-use marijuana in 2023 but had not begun sales by March 2024.
States still developing their systems—such as New York, which has faced slow licensing and competition from unregulated sellers—may begin to see larger returns as regulatory frameworks mature.
Tax revenue models vary by state, with some levying excise taxes by product weight or potency, and others applying flat retail percentage rates.
The Marijuana Policy Project noted in its report that tax figures did not include medical cannabis revenues, business licensing fees or federal taxes, meaning the fiscal footprint of legal cannabis might be even larger.
What People Are Saying
Jonathan Caulkins, a professor at Carnegie Mellon University, said: "The most important thing to recognize here is taxes don't represent economic benefit or creation of value. It just transfers money from you to the government."
He added that the main impacts of marijuana legalization include that it "moves a bunch of economic activity from off the books to on the books." He said that it also means that economic activity is "much more efficient," as after legalization, "we have people who are much more knowledgeable about plants growing it."
Dr Arthur Robin Williams, a professor at Columbia University's Department of Psychiatry, said: "As with nicotine products and beverage alcohol, states and municipalities can layer additional excise taxes on cannabis based products to drive revenue streams. While there has been a lot of hype about how lucrative this can be for states, there is downward pressure on tax rates for cannabis products as higher costs drive consumer behavior to black markets"
Rahi Abouk, director of the Cannabis Research Institute at William Paterson University, said: "The tax revenue from [marijuana] legalization may be utilized in several dimensions depending on the state and local laws. For example, in Washington State, the tax revenue is used to fund public schools and healthcare. In Colorado, part of the tax revenue is used to fund the police."
Dr. Kevin Hill, director of addiction psychiatry at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and an associate professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School, told Newsweek: "There are pros and cons to legalizing cannabis. While taxes have created a new revenue stream, it is unclear if the economic benefits have outweighed the costs of legalization, particularly from a public health perspective. In many states, only a nominal portion of tax revenues has been invested in cannabis research, making this a missed opportunity."
What Happens Next
With adult-use markets expanding and more states considering legalization, nationwide cannabis tax revenues are expected to continue rising.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Barack Obama, Michelle Share Update on Divorce Rumors—'Hard Times'
Barack Obama, Michelle Share Update on Divorce Rumors—'Hard Times'

Newsweek

time18 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Barack Obama, Michelle Share Update on Divorce Rumors—'Hard Times'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Former President Barack Obama and his wife, Michelle Obama, shared an update on divorce rumors during a new episode of her podcast. Newsweek reached out to the Obamas' representative via email for comment on Wednesday. The Context Barack Obama was the 44th President of the United States and served two terms from 2009 until 2017. The former president, 63, and former first lady, 61, got married on October 3, 1992 and share two children together: daughters Malia Obama, 27, and Sasha Obama, 24. At the start of this year, Michelle Obama did not attend former President Jimmy Carter's state funeral, and she skipped out on President Donald Trump's inauguration, too. Meghan McCain—the daughter of the late Republican Senator John McCain—added fuel to the fire on her Citizen McCain podcast, claiming she heard rumors that they were splitting up "by reputable people." What To Know On Wednesday's episode of IMO with Michelle Obama and Craig Robinson—which Michelle Obama co-hosts with her older brother, Craig Robinson—Barack Obama appeared as a guest, and the spouses addressed their relationship. President Barack Obama and Michelle Obama greet parents, trick-or-treaters and local school children at the north portico of the White House in Washington, D.C., during a Halloween celebration on October 31, 2009. President Barack Obama and Michelle Obama greet parents, trick-or-treaters and local school children at the north portico of the White House in Washington, D.C., during a Halloween celebration on October 31, 2009. Kristoffer Tripplaar-Pool/Getty Images "Welcome to IMO, look at you," Michelle Obama said to her husband, to which Robinson teased: "Wait, you guys like each other?" "Oh yeah really, huh. That's the rumor mill," the Becoming author replied. "It's my husband, y'all." "She took me back!" Barack Obama joked, which prompted his wife to say: "Now don't start." "It was touch and go for a while," the politician playfully added. As the trio laughed, Robinson chimed in: "It's so nice to have you both in the same room." "I know because when we aren't, folks think we're divorced," Michelle Obama said. Later on in the podcast, she further shut down any rumors. "There hasn't been one moment in our marriage where I've thought about quitting my man, and we've had some really hard times," the attorney shared. "We've had a lot of fun times, a lot of adventures, and I have become a better person because of the man I'm married to." In response, Barack Obama told her not to "make me cry right at the beginning of the show." "Don't let me start tearing up now," he said. This isn't the first time Michelle Obama has touched on split rumors. In June, she pushed back on speculation during NPR's Wild Card with Rachel Martin. "It's like, OK, so we don't Instagram every minute of our lives," the Harvard Law School graduate said. "We are 60. We're 60, y'all. We just, you just are not gonna know what we're doing every minute of the day, you know?" What People Are Saying IMO teased the Barack Obama episode on Tuesday with a video posted to Instagram. In the comments, fans shared their excitement for the conversation. Black Panther actor Ricky Barksdale wrote in a note with 6,964 likes: "Hey man we need you back here, this babysitter is crazy." HBCU Symphony founder, who goes by @sirthebaptist on Instagram, said in a message: "Man I miss this guy being in charge of America." @_fabulousray shared in a reply with 56 likes: "I AMMMMMMMM SO ELATEDDDDDDDDD THAT OUR FOREVER PRESIDENT WILL FINALLLLLLLLY BE ON THE @imopodcasts. I have been waiting on his appearance since this podcast launched 4 months ago! God really does answers prayers. I am ready to see the swag and hear the laughter and jokes all while gaining more wisdom. I love y'all so much." @thenajahall remarked: "Mom and Dad!!!" @gemstone2014 added: "Very good conversation." What Happens Next IMO with Michelle Obama and Craig Robinson airs new episodes on Wednesdays on platforms like Spotify, YouTube and Apple Podcasts.

How Donald Trump's Plan to Arm Ukraine Differs From Joe Biden's
How Donald Trump's Plan to Arm Ukraine Differs From Joe Biden's

Newsweek

time19 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

How Donald Trump's Plan to Arm Ukraine Differs From Joe Biden's

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's push for European NATO members to purchase U.S.-made weapons for Ukraine marks a shift from the more direct military support for Kyiv of his predecessor, Joe Biden. But unlike Biden, Trump has been more direct in engaging with Moscow, and both have taken their own approaches to economic measures to pressure Russian President Vladimir Putin. Why It Matters The United States is the world's biggest provider of military support for Ukraine, but when Trump took office, there were fears that the Republican president would cut or curb this lifeline. Trump's move in the first half of 2025 to reset economic ties with Moscow also raised concerns about whether Biden-era sanctions aimed at choking revenues for Putin's war machine would be eased. The president's tone has shifted both towards Putin and regarding the continuation of U.S. military support for Ukraine, raising hope in Kyiv that the U.S. commitment to Ukraine may be as significant, albeit delivered differently, as Biden's. Then-President Joe Biden (L) and Donald Trump arrive at Trump's presidential inauguration ceremony on January 20, 2025. Then-President Joe Biden (L) and Donald Trump arrive at Trump's presidential inauguration ceremony on January 20, To Know Putin invaded Ukraine just over 13 months into Biden's White House term. Between February 24, 2022, and January 20, 2025, the U.S. became the world's biggest supplier of weapons and aid for Ukraine's fight, pledging over $175 billion in support. The Democratic president also signed the Ukraine Democracy Defense Lend-Lease Act of 2022 and led the Ukraine Defense Contact Group, a coalition of about 50 countries coordinating military assistance. "President Biden was able to organize a broad coalition of Western countries that helped transform the Ukrainian military into a formidable force, capable of resisting a much larger and better-funded Russian army supported by Iran and North Korea," Yuriy Boyechko, the CEO of Hope for Ukraine, told Newsweek. But his approach to arming Ukraine was criticized as piecemeal, as the Biden administration took pains to avoid escalation, opposing Kyiv's use of American equipment against military targets within Russia. Volodymyr Zelensky and Joe Biden on the sidelines of the 79th Session of the United Nations General Assembly in New York on September 25, 2024. Volodymyr Zelensky and Joe Biden on the sidelines of the 79th Session of the United Nations General Assembly in New York on September 25, 2024. ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images By July 2022, the U.S. had supplied HIMARS (High Mobility Artillery Rocket System), and on July 6, 2023, Biden approved cluster munitions to Ukraine. However, deliveries of long-range ATACMS (Army Tactical Missile System) missiles were delayed and eventually allowed, provided they would never be used to hit targets within Russia. Ukraine had been requesting U.S.-made F-16 fighters since 2022, but only started receiving them in July 2024 through third countries. Other weapons systems that were blocked or held up included Patriot surface-to-air missiles, M1 Abrams tanks, and Gray Eagle drones—delays which Kyiv said have added to battlefield losses among its forces. Sanctions Not Talks Rather than focusing on direct talks with Moscow, Biden's actions towards Putin centered on sanctions. As a parting shot, his administration imposed another round of measures, bringing the total to over 3,500, according to Statista, which are still in place today. "The Biden administration's approach did not really include direct negotiations with the Russians," George Beebe, former director of the CIA's Russia analysis and director of grand strategy at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, told Newsweek. "They approached this by saying 'we're going to put enough economic and military pressure on Russia and isolate Russia internationally and diplomatically turn Russia into a persona non grata,'" Beebe said. The aim was to force the Russians to recalculate the costs and benefits of the invasion and capitulate, he said, "and that didn't work." Trump's Approach NATO chief Mark Rutte and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz have welcomed Trump's proposal for the U.S. to provide new weapons to Ukraine. The NATO-coordinated arms plan for Kyiv was unveiled as a novel approach to the direct aid from Biden, which is touted as ensuring the continued flow of American arms to Ukraine, paid for by Europe. Trump has repeatedly stated that the U.S. had spent $350 billion on helping Ukraine, although the actual amount was significantly less. But a deal in which NATO and European Union states purchase U.S.-made weapons systems, deliver some to Ukraine, and replace them through agreements with Washington could satisfy Trump's MAGA base, who do not want to see American taxpayers footing the bill. "Clearly a situation where the Europeans are paying for this is a better deal for the United States than providing aid directly to Ukraine that probably will never be paid back," said Beebe, "that certainly was one of the considerations that President Trump bore in mind." Rutte said the deal included missiles, ammunition, and air defense, while Trump announced that Patriot missiles—critical to defend against Russia's drone and missile bombardment on civilian structures—were "already being shipped," to Ukraine. U.S. President Donald Trump (L) and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House on February 28, 2025. U.S. President Donald Trump (L) and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House on February 28, Tariffs The prospect of weapons shipments follows Trump's issuing an ultimatum to Moscow of "severe" tariffs unless Russia agrees to a peace deal within 50 days to end its war in Ukraine. He has since teased a shorter time frame. These would be, according to Trump, 100 percent secondary tariffs, in which any country doing business with Russia would face a significant levy on selling their products to the U.S. Demanding Russian action within a deadline is a tactic that differs from Biden's approach, although there are questions about its effectiveness. Beebe said the Biden administration likely considered such a move but concluded it would rebound against the U.S. in terms of inflation and the prospect of higher global oil prices. However, Russia realizes that imposing these tariffs on Europe, as well as its major trading partners, Turkey and China, "would go very poorly for the United States," he added, with potential impacts on inflation and global oil prices. What People Are Saying President Donald Trump on July 14 at the White House: "We're gonna be doing very severe tariffs if we don't have a deal in 50 days." U.S.-based Nova Ukraine said in a statement to Newsweek regarding the 50-day deadline and delivery of U.S weapons: "We have long advocated for decisive U.S. leadership to help Ukraine defend itself and deter further Russian aggression." Brian Taylor, a political science professor at Syracuse University's Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, told Newsweek: "The good news for Ukraine is has finally figured out that Putin is the main obstacle to peace." George Beebe, the director of grand strategy at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, told Newsweek: "We have to focus on a geopolitical compromise that the West concedes that Ukraine won't be in NATO and NATO forces won't be in Ukraine, and Russia, in turn, concedes that it will not block Ukrainian accession to the European Union. So far, neither Biden nor Trump has focused on pursuing that compromise." What Happens Next Boycheko, whose group provides support to Ukrainian communities on the frontline, said Trump's approach to aiding Ukraine is so far mostly just promises and statements. If Trump follows through on promises like secondary sanctions and the deployment of the most advanced military capabilities to Ukraine, "then we will be able to compare what was done by the current administration vs the previous administration," he said. Meanwhile, Taylor said that by deferring these proposed sanctions for 50 days, "Trump left himself plenty of time to change his mind again, while Putin keeps bombing Ukrainian cities nightly and his army remains on the offensive."

Gen Z Is the Loneliest Generation at Work, Study Finds
Gen Z Is the Loneliest Generation at Work, Study Finds

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

Gen Z Is the Loneliest Generation at Work, Study Finds

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. While it continues facing workplace stereotypes of laziness, Generation Z has emerged as the loneliest age demographic on the job, a new study finds. Roughly 38 percent of Gen Zers reported feeling lonely on the job, higher than any other age demographic, according to a report from food tech workplace platform ezCater. Why It Matters Gen Z has dealt with its fair share of challenges in the workforce. A recent report from found companies were rapidly firing Gen Z employees just months after hiring them. One in six businesses said they were hesitant to hire recent college graduates, and six in 10 employers had already fired college graduates who were hired that year. A mismatch between Gen Z and workplace culture and expectations may be leading to higher rates of loneliness at work, prompting high turnover and reduced productivity. Illustration of a woman who works from home, in Paris on May 15. Illustration of a woman who works from home, in Paris on May 15. RICCARDO MILANI/Hans Lucas/AFP via Getty Images What To Know While 80 percent of surveyed employees said having friends at work makes them feel more engaged, only 43 percent of remote employees had a close work friend, according to the ezCater survey of 1,000 employees. That marked a substantial difference to the 69 percent of on-site and hybrid workers who had a close friend at work. This was heightened among Gen Z employees, of which 38 percent reported being lonely at work. "With remote work and empty offices becoming more common, it's no surprise that many young professionals feel isolated," Kevin Thompson, CEO of 9i Capital Group and host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek. "The modern workforce is still adjusting to hybrid and remote models, and with frequent job-hopping, it's harder to build lasting relationships. Gen Z in particular has more mobility—both professionally and geographically—often without the traditional anchors of family or long-term commitments." HR consultant Bryan Driscoll said the workplace reality Gen Z faces looks significantly different from that of previous generations. "Older generations had real mentorship, face time, after-work drinks. Gen Z got calendar invites and 'per my last email,'" Driscoll told Newsweek. "We told them to hustle, compete, and keep it professional and now we're surprised they feel isolated?" "This isn't a Gen Z problem. It's a workplace and societal design failure." Across the Gen Z cohort, which includes adults age 18 to 28, 56 percent expected their company to provide opportunities for socializing, and 85 percent said having friends at work makes them feel more engaged. "The narrative shouldn't be about forcing people back to their desks, but about building a destination where they want to be," Robert Kaskel, vice president of people at ezCater, said in the report. "For example, offering a food program does more than just ensure folks eat. It encourages collaboration, strengthens team bonds, and shows employees they are valued. For companies struggling with engagement, it's the most direct path to building a vibrant workplace experience." What People Are Saying Kaskel added in the report: "Companies are telling employees to come back, but they're missing the 'why.' Our data clearly shows that today's office is an opportunity for connection, not just independent work. The younger generation of workers crave better perks and friendship. Employees with friends at work are considerably more engaged, so it's in companies' best interest to create an environment that fosters socialization." Thompson also told Newsweek: "Longer-term, this could reshape how companies think about workplace culture. How this impacts mental health, retention and productivity is still to be seen. Companies will need to create an environment where people want to stay versus having such high turnover, possibly with more competitive wages or compensation packages." Alex Beene, financial literacy instructor at the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "When you consider all of the economic pressures Gen Z is facing, it's easy to see why loneliness is weighing on them. Entry level jobs have been subject to layoffs, and the labor market is at a difficult time for most younger Americans. When your professional opportunities are dim, you're dealing with rising costs, and social media exposes you to many who aren't facing those concerns, you can easily fall into feelings of loneliness." Driscoll also told Newsweek: "Of course Gen Z is the loneliest generation at work. They were thrown into the workforce during a pandemic, onboarded over Zoom, and told that Slack threads count as culture. It's not that they don't want connection, it's that employers never gave them the tools or space to build it." What Happens Next Heightened feelings of loneliness among Gen Zers could have significant mental health consequences, Beene said, but the younger generation has also shown more interest in seeking out therapy. "We're already seeing the ramifications of this, as more demand for mental health services is common nationwide," he said. "The good news is while Gen Z may be lonelier, they are more likely to reach for help than prior generations. The hope is as they receive help, and their personal and financial outlooks improve, they'll struggle less."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store