
I put an iPhone, Samsung Galaxy and Google Pixel through a 6-round AI assistant face-off — and here's the winner
With Apple, Samsung and Google all heavily promoting their latest phones with the enhanced intelligence of their AI tools, it's had us questioning who has the most capable digital assistant as we hit the halfway point of 2025. Is the reinvented Siri and Apple Intelligence powerful enough to take on Google and Gemini? And where does Samsung's blend of Gemini and its proprietary Galaxy AI tools fit into all of this?
That's what the following comparisons hope to answer. Using the same prompts, covering a number of common actions you may want to do on a daily basis, we'll show you which phone and which AI assistant does the best job of automating things and hopefully making your life easier.
A simple prompt to start with: make a reminder so I don't forget to grab some groceries later on. It's something digital assistants were capable of even before generative AI came in, so we shouldn't see any of the phones struggle here.
To nobody's surprise, the iPhone, Galaxy and Pixel are all able to do this easily. There are however some interesting limitations to note. For instance, Siri was only able to place the reminder in Apple's own Reminders app, not my usual TickTick app, nor Google Keep, nor even Apple Notes. Not a problem per se, but unfortunate if you were hoping to make Siri work with non-Apple apps.
Gemini on the Pixel set up the reminder in Google Tasks, an app which any Google Account owner can use, but one which I didn't have downloaded on my phone. Tapping the reminder after setting it opens Tasks in a Chrome tab, which would be a fair compromise if Gemini had then actually set up a task as commanded. So make sure you download the apps you need before trying to get Gemini to take care of important reminders for you.
It's a similar story on the Galaxy, except you can ask Gemini to place the reminder in either Google Tasks or Samsung Reminder. It can even transfer tasks between the two, albeit slightly clunkily by deleting one and recreating the same text and alert time in the other.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
Fortunately, unlike the Pixel, Samsung Reminder is automatically installed on the Galaxy S25 Ultra, meaning no weird Chrome shenanigans like on the Pixel.
Winner: Galaxy S25 Ultra
A good AI assistant should be able to accurately identify things on-screen or through your camera lens. So I opened up an image of the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge on each phone, and then asked what device I was looking at.
On the Galaxy and Pixel, the optimal way to do this is to call up Circle to Search and draw around the item you're interested in. And sure enough, with a tap and a swirl of your finger, Circle to Search was able to ID the phone, providing some basic detail and lots of matching images.
I did try to use Gemini and a screenshot on the Samsung to ID the phone as well. This didn't go well, with the chatbot declaring the phone was in fact a flash drive.
Siri needed to tag in ChatGPT to find an answer to my question. This is normally effective, but relying on an alternative service when you could simply have opened up ChatGPT yourself is a bit of a cop-out. But unfortunately for the iPhone, the short response and limited context of the image lead Siri to tell me it's a different Samsung phone.
Winner: Galaxy S25 Ultra/Pixel 9 Pro XL
Knowing oneself is perhaps the hardest thing, including for smartphone assistants. So we checked which of our testing phones could tell us how to change the brightness of the device's screen, or even take care of it for us.
The only one that was able to complete the task in full was, surprisingly, the iPhone. While it doesn't come across in the screengrab, my brightness was on about 50% before asking, and 75% afterwards, with Siri also popping up a slider so I could adjust things more precisely myself.
The Galaxy and the Pixel both gave the same response — that Gemini couldn't help me directly, but could provide a link to the relevant Settings page. That's still pretty useful, especially if you wanted full manual control over the brightness, but it's not as full a response as Siri could give.Winner: iPhone 16 Pro Max
It's only natural to change your mind sometimes, so I wanted to see how well our candidates would adapt to a command with an update midway through, specifically one about setting a timer. Everyone misreads the cooking time in recipes sometimes.
Siri and the Gemini twins both took this in their stride when I updated my request partway through making it. So as an additional test, I tried to see what would happen if I wanted to modify a timer.
This showed some interesting differences in capabilities. On the iPhone, Siri deleted the one-hour timer and then started a 30-minute one instead.
The Galaxy phone produced an error, perhaps because Gemini doesn't have the means to make a change like this in Samsung's Clock app, only the Google-made one. This seems likely since the Pixel was able to complete the same request in full, updating the one-hour timer so that it still had its original name while running for a different length of time. You could consider this a draw for Apple and Google or a win for the Pixel depending on which outcome you personally prefer for overwriting timers. But either way, Samsung loses here.
Winner: Google Pixel 9 Pro/iPhone 16 Pro Max
As we reach the end of our comparisons, it's time to see how Apple Intelligence, Galaxy AI and Gemini handle multi-part requests. This is a recently advertised addition to Gemini's capabilities, and could be a powerful time-saver if it works properly.
This two-action prompt should give me the date of the next Crystal Palace soccer game (against Liverpool in August at the start of the next Premier League season) and add that to my calendar, ideally my Google one since I use that more, but I would have accepted an Apple Calendar invitation as a compromise from the iPhone.
Unfortunately for the iPhone, it failed to recognise that I'm asking it to add a calendar event, not asking about one I already have. When I split the prompt into two, Siri offered up a link to Google Search results, which didn't directly tell me the date of the match, or to a ChatGPT response, which offered me the date of Palace's last game, not the next one. Disappointing all around.
This works flawlessly on the Galaxy S25 Ultra and Pixel 9 Pro XL, thank to Gemini's Cross-App Actions capability. Both parse the command in one go, reading out the date to me and setting up a Google Calendar event.
Winner: Galaxy S25 Ultra/Pixel 9 Pro XL
I've saved the most complicated task for last, one that requires finding and passing information between at least three different apps. This took a couple of tries for all three phones, and none of them did exactly as I asked. But in the end, there was a clear winner.
The iPhone only offered a ChatGPT response to the question. With the help of the third-party AI, Siri was the only assistant to ask what kind of gluten-free meal I wanted (I picked dinner to match the others). It then provided a transcribed recipe and method, but admitted it couldn't make a note or message with this information. It also didn't provide a link to the source of the recipe, which is a rough deal for whoever came up with it, but an unfortunately consistent problem with all AI chatbots.
The Pixel initially only tried to send a link to my work number, rather than creating a note as well. When I asked it to add a Google Keep note before sending the message, it was not able to do so. Breaking the tasks down into two separate prompts eventually got me the required result.
It was the Samsung that got the closest, setting up a Google Keep note (after asking if I wanted a Keep or Samsung Notes note) and a message to my work number with a recipe link. My only complaint was that the link that Gemini used in this instance was to the Gemini conversation, rather than to the website itself. The message link was to the actual recipe, which is more important for sharing purposes.
Winner: Galaxy S25 Ultra
I began my testing assuming that Siri was going to come in dead last in this comparison, with Samsung and Google, both using the same underlying Gemini chatbot, would be joint winners. But as we've found, things are more complicated.
Siri is not great at dealing with multi-part commands, and is obviously still tied firmly into Apple's app ecosystem. However, it was just as competent at understanding my more complicated queries as Gemini was on the other two phones, even if it couldn't always deliver or had to run to ChatGPT for help.
Gemini, be it on a Pixel or a Galaxy, is definitely the better AI assistant, with the Galaxy version perhaps slightly better overall due to it offering support for Samsung apps as well as Google ones. It also seemed to understand my multi-part queries better too, although that could be down to luck of the draw with the way Gemini happened to understand my queries at a given moment.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Datadog Earns Forbes Global 2000 Spot, Unveils New AI, Observability Features at DASH 2025
Datadog Inc. (NASDAQ:DDOG) is one of the best NASDAQ growth stocks to buy for the next 3 years. On June 20, Datadog announced its inclusion on the Forbes Global 2000 and Forbes Global 2000 United States Lists for 2025. The recognition highlights the company's global impact and financial strength, with Forbes' annual ranking based on sales, profits, assets, and market value. For the trailing 12 months ending March 31 this year, Datadog reported $2.8 billion in revenue, which was up 26% year-over-year. As of then, Datadog served ~30,500 customers, which included companies such as Samsung, NASDAQ, Shell, Autodesk, and Toyota. A close-up of a laptop with a software engineer coding on the monitor. This milestone closely followed Datadog's annual DASH conference, which was held in New York City from June 9 to 11 this year, which attracted record attendance. At the event, Datadog unveiled several new products and features. These innovations include new AI agents for rapid application issue resolution, new LLM observability capabilities to monitor agentic AI and improve model performance, and AI security capabilities for protection against critical AI risks. Datadog also launched an Internal Developer Portal to ship production-ready code quickly and introduced new long-term retention, search, and data residency capabilities. Datadog Inc. (NASDAQ:DDOG) operates an observability and security platform for cloud applications in the US and internationally. While we acknowledge the potential of DDOG as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: and . Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.


Tom's Guide
39 minutes ago
- Tom's Guide
I tested the AI photo editing tools for iPhone vs Google Pixel vs Samsung Galaxy — and there's a clear winner
This article is part of our AI Phone Face-Off. If you're interested in our other comparisons, check out the links below. It's incredible how much the phone landscape has changed in the last year with more devices embracing AI. There was a time when you needed to put in hundreds of hours in Photoshop or other photo editing programs to perform what today's best phones can do in a matter of minutes. It's unbelievable. For the past year, I've been using all the AI photo editing tools from Apple, Google, and Samsung to not only make complex photo edits a breeze to do, but to also save me time. I can't tell you how these tools change my workflow. From removing unwanted subjects in my shots, to using generative AI to switch backgrounds, I find myself using them constantly. While Google AI had a head start on everyone, Galaxy AI roared onto the scene when it debuted with the Galaxy S24 series last year — only to expand with the release of the Galaxy S25. Meanwhile, Apple Intelligence had a slightly different rollout that has continued to add new tools with each subsequent update. What follows is a comparison of these three different AI photo editing packages. I'll be discussing not only the breadth of features, but how practical they are to use, and how well they work to determine which phone maker offers the best tools. There are good reasons why I keep on saying that Google has the best AI phones around, and its robust and effective AI photo editing tools is one of them. Part of the reason why I still think this is due to the overwhelming amount of features at a user's disposal. Here's the quick list of all of the features: My love affair with Google's AI photo editing tools began with the Pixel 8 Pro, which introduced the world to Magic Editor. This AI-assisted feature has since become available through the Google Photos app, but it's still my favorite all-around photo editing tool thanks to its ability to remove subjects, resize stuff, and fill in gaps to make the overall image look realistic. Just take a look at the video below to see me using it in action. Another strong point of Google's AI photo editing tools, where it proves to be superior than the rest, is Pixel Studio's ability to take text descriptions and create realistic images. It's particularly good at generating people too, especially when compared to Apple Intelligence, as you can see for yourself below. What makes Google's AI photo editing unique amongst the rest is the Reimagine feature, which lets you take existing photos and edit them through text descriptions. It's great for giving specific details about changing the background to something else, or adding in something to the shot. Really, it's the biggest time-saving tool I use. While I think Google's AI editing tools are the best of the bunch, there are some parts that could stand to be better. For instance, there's Best Take and its ability to quickly swap out faces in group shots. My problem with this feature is that it requires me to take several photos in succession to properly work, in order for it to have enough faces to swap out from each person. But I think it would be much more useful if it used generative AI instead to take one snapshot and then give me different options. I was eager to see how Galaxy AI compared to Google when I first tried out some of its AI photo editing features on the Galaxy S24 Ultra. Samsung didn't disappoint then, and it has broadened its tool set further with the release of the Galaxy S25 series earlier this year. While it's a runner-up to Google, I have to give Samsung credit for taking it seriously, because these Galaxy AI photo editing tools are impressive. Generative Edit is without a doubt the best AI photo editing feature I've come across, even better than Magic Editor in my opinion. What I love most about it is how it knows what I want to edit in my photos with remarkable accuracy. With complex photos, it's proven it can still detect subjects, whereas other editors, including Magic Editor, can still require me to manually make additional selections. Even better is how well it fills in gaps realistically, such as removing a subject in the scene and using generative AI to fill it. More often than not, it delivers better results than Apple Intelligence and Google AI. I also like that I can use Generative Edit to quickly remove reflections from photos with shiny surfaces. Sketch to Image is also an impressive Galaxy AI feature, which leans on generative AI to turn hand-drawn sketches into something realistic that blends in with the photos. My colleague Mark Spoonauer was blown away by how well it works in his Galaxy Z Fold 6 review, and I've used it myself to take my own chicken scratches and transform them into something properly fleshed-out. I'm really surprised by all the AI photo editing tools that Galaxy AI offers, but it's nowhere close to the amount that Google offers. For what it does offer, they've all proven to be helpful in taking time consuming edits I've had to do in the past and making them effortless. I still can't get enough about the impressive performance of Generative Edit when it comes to automatically detecting subjects and filling in the gaps with realistic elements. Take a look at the photos I edited above of Amazon's Panos Panay and check for yourself how Samsung's Generative Edit compares to Google and Apple — you'll be convinced, just like me. After trying several of its photo editing features, there's no arguing that Apple Intelligence is still trying to catch up to its rivals. With the introduction of iOS 26, which is tipped for a fall release alongside the iPhone 17, it's Apple's opportunity to expand its tool set because it's clearly lacking in this area. Here's what it offers to date with iOS 18. When it first arrived, Photo Clean Up worked like a charm on some of my photos. Apple's image removal tool is pretty intuitive to use and it does a decent job at identifying subjects I select, but it gets hung up on more complex or busy shots. When there's a lot going on in the scene, I just find it ineffective at identifying what I'm trying to select — so I frequently have to make finer selections to get what I want. When I compared it to its rivals, Photo Clean Up performed the worst both in how it makes selections and what it fills in with the gaps. I tried removing a hat I was wearing on the beach and Photo Clean Up just could not properly remove it. Image Playground is a handy tool for those that need some inspiration to create images, but it has a tendency to fail in understanding all the details I want in my prompt. In my Pixel Studio vs Image Playground face-off, Google's AI image generator took every detail in my prompt and generated a realistic image — whereas Image Playground failed at generating a throne made out of yarn in the comparison shots above. Apple Intelligence is certainly lacking in photo editing features compared to the rest, so it'll need to introduce a bunch with iOS 26 if it has any chance at convincing people it's better. At the same time, Apple Intelligence needs to do a better job with Photo Clean Up. I purposefully don't use it as much. Google's head start in the AI wars has clearly been advantageous, especially when I look at the amount of photo editing features it offers against everyone else. Not only does it have the greatest depth, but they all work well together to make photo editing simple with my Pixel 9 Pro XL. Even though Galaxy AI came a little later to the party, I have to give Samsung credit for continually adding new features. I still can't get over how well its Generative Edit works in removing or repositioning subjects in scenes with great results, as the generative AI proves to me that it can produce realistic results. As for Apple? Well, it's a big opportunity for Apple to prove to everyone that it's serious about having meaningful AI features. There aren't that many, which is one of its problems, but it's also just not as good in its current iteration. Hopefully that changes with the Apple Intelligence features that could be announced with the iOS 26 roll out later this year.


Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Apple (AAPL) Sales Feel the Crunch in China
Sales of foreign-branded mobile phones in China, including U.S. tech giant Apple (AAPL), have dialed down. Don't Miss TipRanks' Half-Year Sale Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week. Shipments Fall According to new figures from the China Academy of Information and Communications Technology (CAICT), demand for overseas phones dropped 9.7% year-on-year in May. Calculations based on the data showed that May shipments of foreign-branded phones in China fell to 4.54 million handsets from the same month last year. Even though the CAICT doesn't break down its figures by brand, Apple is the largest foreign mobile phone maker in China's smartphone-dominated market. Apple has faced increased competition from domestic rivals and has cut prices to stay competitive. Chinese e-commerce platforms offered discounts of up to 2,530 yuan (351) on Apple's latest iPhone 16 models in May. High Huawei However, on a brighter note for Apple, data from another source – Counterpoint Research – revealed that in the second quarter between April 1 and June 22, iPhone sales increased 8% year-over-year. This was the first time since the second quarter of 2023 that Apple has seen growth in China. But Chinese rival Huawei saw sales climb 12% during the same period. 'Apple's adjustment of iPhone prices in May was well timed and well received, coming a week ahead of the 618 shopping festival,' Ethan Qi, associate director at Counterpoint Research, said in a statement. Ivan Lam, senior analyst at Counterpoint Research, added: 'Huawei is still riding high on the loyalty of its core users as they replace their old phones with new Huawei releases.' Is AAPL a Good Stock to Buy Now? On TipRanks, AAPL has a Moderate Buy consensus based on 15 Buy, 10 Hold and 2 Sell ratings. Its highest price target is $270. AAPL stock's consensus price target is $226.36 implying a 6% upside.