Defeating Hamas is more important than freeing Gaza hostages, Netanyahu says
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Thursday that defeating Hamas is more important than freeing the remaining 59 hostages in Gaza, angering the captives' families.
Speaking at the annual Independence Day Bible Contest in Jerusalem, Netanyahu said Israel was committed to saving the hostages after 573 days in Hamas captivity, but claimed that there was something more important for Israel to complete.
'That is a very important goal,' he said of freeing the hostages before adding,' the war has a supreme objective. And that supreme objective is victory over our enemies. And that is what we will achieve.'
4 Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu claimed defeating Hamas was more important than freeing the 59 remaining hostages in Gaza.
via REUTERS
4 Netanyahu is facing increasing pressure to agree to a deal to free the hostages, who have spent 573 days under Hamas captivity.
Saeed Qaq/NurPhoto/Shutterstock
The speech marked the first time Netanyahu has explicitly described the hostages' safety as a secondary goal of the war, which he has been long accused of by the captives' families.
'Prime minister, the return of the hostages is not 'less' important – it is the supreme goal that should guide the government of Israel,' the Hostages and Missing Families Forum said in a statement. 'The families of the hostages are concerned.'
The forum said the controversial remarks fall out of line with what the 'majority of the Israeli public' wants, accusing Netanyahu of emboldening Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich.
Smotrich garnered backlash last week when he insisted that the hostages come second to defeating Hamas.
4 The families of the hostages slammed Netanyahu's remark as out of line with what the rest of Israel wants.
Getty Images
'We need to tell the truth – bringing back the hostages is not the most important goal,' Smotrich said. 'It is, of course, a very, very, very, very important goal, but anyone who wants to destroy Hamas and eliminate the possibility of another Oct. 7 must understand that in Gaza, there can't be a situation where Hamas remains present and intact.'
Protesters in Israel continue to criticize Netanyahu's decision to end the cease-fire deal with Hamas, leading the Jewish state to return to war with fears growing over the fate of the hostages.
While Israel believes that only 24 of the 59 hostages are still alive — including American Edan Alexander, of New Jersey — the figure came into doubt when Netanyahu's wife, Sara, was overheard on a hot mic saying that 'fewer' than 24 hostages are still alive.
4 Netanyahu's wife, Sara, caused uncertainty to erupt when she was caught on hot mic saying that less than 24 hostages were still alive.
Hungarian Defence Ministry/AFP via Getty Images
The remark spurred further backlash against Netanyahu as the captives' families demanded to know the truth of what their government knows, and why the prime minister's wife would have access to such sensitive information while they knew little about their loved ones' statuses.
'You sowed indescribable panic in the hearts of the families of the hostages – families already living in agonizing uncertainty,' the forum said. 'If there is intelligence or new information regarding the condition of our loved ones, we demand full disclosure.'
As the well-being of the hostages and their importance comes into question, there have been little developments made at the negotiating table.
Hamas has repeatedly refused to release any more hostages until Israel commits to a permanent cease-fire deal, which Netanyahu has repeatedly rejected, insisting that no deal can be reached if it includes Hamas' continued existence.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
31 minutes ago
- USA Today
American students reveal how they fled the Israel-Iran war
They left with excitement to visit a new country, connect with their Jewish identity and gain first-hand knowledge about one of the world's most storied regions. They left with memories of air raid sirens and bomb shelters. After Israel's surprise attack on Iran earlier this month, young Americans on study abroad programs and birthright trips to Israel made harrowing escapes back to the U.S. as the two countries traded missiles and the American military directly entered the conflict, bombing three Iranian nuclear sites. The thousands of escapees included 17 high schoolers from Arizona who huddled in bomb shelters before boarding a cruise ship to the Mediterranean island of Cyprus. A dozen Florida State University students studying geopolitics in the Middle East fled to Israel's mountainous Dead Sea region and crossed into Jordan. "It was a fear that I have never felt before," Aidan Fishkind, who was in Israel for a two-month birthright and internship program, told USA TODAY. "We had a missile land two miles from our hostel." The conflict, which has calmed under a delicate ceasefire, came during Israel's busiest tourism season – when birthright trips and programs affiliated with American universities were in full swing. According to the Birthright Israel Foundation, a nonprofit that sponsors young people to visit Israel, the group safely evacuated approximately 2,800 young adults from the country – many of them aboard a luxury cruise ship. The nonprofit canceled its scheduled programs through July 10, according to its website. Meanwhile, the spiraling war also sent Americans in Iran looking for a safe place to wait out Israeli bombardments. Hundreds of Americans fled the country as the conflict escalated, according to an internal State Department cable seen by Reuters last week. More: Iran-Israel conflict leaves Iranian Americans feeling helpless, hopeless 'I was scared for my life' Fishkind, of Detroit, Michigan, arrived in Israel on June 3 for what was to be a two-month trip where he'd intern in the marketing department at the Jaffa Institute, a nonprofit based in Tel Aviv. But a little after his first week, the war broke out and left him and his fellow students scrambling for safety. He recalled the first night after Israel launched its attack on Iranian nuclear sites and Iran responded with a barrage of missiles. He and his group of Detroit-area students received phone alerts about incoming rocket fire and rushed into rooms and stairwells designated "safe zones." Throughout the night, he heard deep dooms that shook the building. He considered whether the rumbles were the sound of Israel's air defense system intercepting rockets or Iranian missiles landing in the city. It was both, he would later learn. "I was scared for my life," he said. In Detroit, his mother, Jennifer Fishkind, booked him multiple flights back home. But one-by-one each flight was canceled as Israeli officials closed the country's airspace. "You just feel helpless being thousands of miles away," she said. "We kept telling him 'You're going to be OK. You're going to be OK.'" The next day, Fishkind and his group left for the Dead Sea region in the south, which was considered much safer than Tel Aviv. There, Fishkind stayed in a hotel and met scores of other students from across the U.S. and Canada. After almost a week, he boarded a cruise ship to Cyprus. Once on the island, he immediately got on a flight to Rome and, eventually, Detroit. Fishkind, who is preparing for his junior year at Elon University in North Carolina, said being back home has been an adjustment. The memories of the sirens and the night he spent sheltering from missiles will take time to process, he said. "When I got back home and laid in bed, I kept thinking 'Did that actually happen?'" Tallahassee student recounts memories of sirens and bunkers Madeline King traveled to Israel with a group of over 20 Florida State University students as part of a mission trip to examine and study the Israel-Gaza conflict. It was organized by FSU's Hillel, the university's largest Jewish campus organization. The group was set to leave Israel and return to Florida on Saturday, June 14 – the day after the Israeli military attacked Iran's nuclear program. The unrest left them temporarily stranded in Tel Aviv, which had become a target of Iranian missiles. "We would hear sirens through the night ... and at every time we would find ourselves going down to the bunkers," King told the Tallahassee Democrat, part of the USA TODAY Network. Like Fishkind, her group headed to the Dead Sea region near the West Bank. They then crossed into Jordan, where they boarded a flight bound for Cyprus. There, King and hundreds of others got on flights to Florida in an operation coordinated with the state's Division of Emergency Management agency. In all, more than 1,400 state residents have been evacuated from Israel by plane and passenger ferry, Florida state officials said last week. A tearful reunion The group of 17 high school students from Arizona arrived in Israel on June 4 and traveled through the country for a week, learning Jewish religious traditions and the culture and history of Israel. Like their fellow American students, the group soon discovered they couldn't leave by plane as they had originally intended. 'It is such a helpless, scary feeling to have your child thousands of miles away going into a bomb shelter multiple times a day as warning sirens ring out and missiles approach Israel,' Brett Kurland, a parent to one of the Arizona students, said in a statement, according to the Arizona Republic, part of the USA TODAY Network. With the help of Arizona Sens. Ruben Gallego and Mark Kelly, the students managed to get on a luxury cruise ship departing for Cyprus. After an 18-hour voyage they made it to the island and then flew back to the U.S. Scores of families waited for the students at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport on June 25. Some stood anxiously with homemade signs while others held flowers and balloons. When the students emerged from the jet bridge, the families cheered and embraced their loved ones in a tearful reunion. Similar scenes unfolded at international airports across the U.S. In Michigan, Jennifer Fishkind and a group of parents embraced their children as they descended from their plane at Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport. "After all that, you're just waiting to get your arms around them," Fishkind said. "It was the best feeling."
Atlantic
35 minutes ago
- Atlantic
The Iran-China-Russia Axis Crumbles When It Matters
As Israel and then the United States battered Iran this month, the reaction from China and Russia was surprisingly muted. For years, shared antagonism toward the U.S. has been pushing China, Russia, and Iran together. All three benefit from embarrassing the West in Ukraine and the Middle East, and widening the gaps between Washington and Europe. So after Israel's first strike, on June 13, China—the strongest partner in the anti-America triad—could have been expected to rush short-range missiles and other air-defense equipment to Iran. Surely, Beijing would use its growing diplomatic muscle to isolate Israel and the U.S., demand an emergency session of the United Nations Security Council, and introduce a resolution deploring the two governments that were attacking China's ally. Instead, recent events in Iran have revealed that anti-Americanism can bind an alliance together only so much. After ritually denouncing Israel's first strike as 'b razen ' and a ' violation of Iran's sovereignty, ' Beijing proceeded cautiously, emphasizing the need for diplomacy instead of further assigning blame. Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi refrained from condemning Israel's actions, in a call with his Israeli counterpart on June 14, and President Xi Jinping waited four days before calling for 'd e-escalation ' and declaring that 'China stands ready to work with all parties to play a constructive role in restoring peace and stability in the Middle East.' After Iran's parliament voted to close the Strait of Hormuz, Beijing's foreign-affairs spokesperson stressed—in what looked like a warning to Iran —that the Persian Gulf is a crucial global trade route for goods and energy, and called for partners to 'prevent the regional turmoil from having a greater impact on global economic growth.' In calmer times, China, like Russia, is happy to use Iran as a battering ram against the U.S. and its allies. But when tensions turn into military confrontation and global stability is at risk, backing Iran looks like a far less sensible investment to Beijing than preserving its own economic and diplomatic relations with the West. China's mild reaction isn't just a blow to Iran; it may also suggest that the much ballyhooed 'no limits' partnership between Xi and Russia's President Vladimir Putin might not be as sturdy as Moscow and Beijing advertise. Iran, Russia, and China have different ideologies, political regimes, and strategic aims. Iran's relations with its two larger partners are wildly asymmetric. China, for example, is Iran's lifeline. It buys about 90 percent of Iran's oil and supplies materials and technologies central to Iran's weapons development. Yet the trading relationship matters less to China, which gets only about 10 percent of its oil from Iran. Plus, China has an economy more than 40 times as large, and it does far more business with the U.S. and the European Union. Russia has interests that similarly diverge from Iran's, and it, too, has conspicuously refrained from coming to the Islamic Republic's aid. But China following a similar approach toward Iran likely does not please Moscow. Although Moscow's relations with Beijing are less lopsided than Tehran's are, Russia's economy is still less than one-eighth the size of China's. One-third of Russia's state budget comes from oil sales, and China is the largest customer by far. Russia also depends on Chinese supplies for its war machine. This past March, the G7 foreign ministers called China a ' decisive enabler ' of Russia's war in Ukraine. But should the Kremlin begin to run out of money or soldiers, China's willingness to bail out its ally is very much in doubt. Even among authoritarian regimes, differences in values can limit cooperation. In 2023, Xi called Russia's 1917 October Revolution a 'cannon blast' that 'brought Marxism-Leninism to China, demonstrating the way forward and offering a new choice for the Chinese people who were seeking a way to save China from subjugation.' Putin, despite his formative years in the Soviet-era KGB, now laments the fall of the Russian empire and describes Vladimir Lenin's coup as the deed of 'political adventurists and foreign forces' who 'divided the country and tore it apart for selfish benefit.' The head of China's Communist Party may resent Putin's reduction of its Russian counterpart—the country's second-largest party—to the status of another bit player in Russia's rubber-stamping parliament. Since World War II, leaders of Western democracies have successfully collaborated in part because they have shared a common worldview. Whether Iran's Islamic theocrats can say the same about Xi, the leader of an avowedly atheist state, or Putin, who now positions himself as the champion of Orthodox Christianity, is another question entirely. Beijing's response to Iran's predicament ought to make the West feel cautiously optimistic. If Donald Trump finally learns to distinguish the aggressor from the victim—or at least realizes that Putin has been playing him—the U.S. president could support Ukraine in earnest without worrying much about China expanding its assistance to Russia. As long as both Iran and Russia keep providing cheap oil and antagonizing the West and its allies, they are serving China's purposes. But at least for now, Beijing looks unlikely to back either of its supposed partners if they jeopardize China's interest in stability or its extensive and profitable relations with the West.
Chicago Tribune
36 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Clarence Page: New York's mayoral race could be a testing ground for a Democratic comeback
A seasoned veteran of Chicago politics once told me that it often takes Democrats a couple of four-year cycles out of office before they can pull their fractious factions together into a winning coalition. There's a lot of truth in that, and that's why I am not surprised to see the off-year energy and enthusiasm well up around the neophyte campaign of relatively unknown New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani. Politics will often amaze you. Who would have expected in a time of wars in the Middle East, and reverberations of those conflicts across the United States, that a young Muslim American would have a fighting chance of becoming mayor of the country's largest city? Yet in New York, along came Mamdani to pull ahead of the pack in the Big Apple's Democratic mayoral primary. As Mamdani moved up through the stages of the city's ranked-choice voting from 'Zohran who?' to new prominence as a rising star among next-generation Democratic leaders, I was reminded of young, relatively unknown Barack Obama campaigning through Illinois corn country on his way to winning a hotly contested Democratic U.S. Senate primary in 2004. Obama won the Senate race, and four years later he followed the same meteoric path to win the U.S. presidency. As Obama was, Mamdani is a conventional wisdom longshot who has risen up against a racial-ethnic glass ceiling. A gregarious and jovial 33-year-old state assembly member and self-declared democratic socialist, Mamdani also may be the first major candidate to include 'rapper' on his resume. Early handicapping favored Andrew Cuomo, 67, to prevail in the primary. Cuomo, you may recall, dominated New York's politics for a decade as governor before resigning four years ago amid corruption and sexual misconduct allegations. But despite Cuomo's boatload of campaign money and endorsements by a pantheon of establishment Dems, Mamdani emerged the clear winner, confounding many regular Democrats, including some Jewish party faithful who see in the young candidate an implacable foe of the state of Israel. Many centrist observers bemoan the fact no better consensus candidate than Cuomo entered the race. Even Cuomo's allies complained that he didn't seem to have his old energy or enthusiasm about the race, and the feeling seemed to be contagious. Whatever else you may say about the ex-governor, he hardly represented a departure from the hidebound, conventional election strategies that sank the party in 2024. You know, the performance that brought out the circular firing squads as Donald Trump began his Revenge Tour of 2025. Making a big difference in the New York Democratic primary were voters who are younger and more interested in bold change on pressing bread-and-butter issues, such as New York's notoriously high rent and other high costs of Big Apple living. Mamdani appears to have a lot of ground to make up to reach older traditional Democratic voters who can't hear the label 'socialist' without having heart palpitations. The congenial Mamdani hardly comes across as threatening, but he's going to have to deal with that credibility perception with assurances he still sees something good about free market capitalism, about which he has been uncomfortably snide on occasion. He will also be called upon to state explicitly what his views are on Israel's right to exist, and on how far he's planning to commit the city of New York to oppose what he has termed the genocide in Gaza and apartheid in the territories Israel controls. These are important positions to New York voters on both sides of the question. In my view, Mamdani also needs to distance himself from the 'defund the police' movement, a misguided reaction to the very real issue of police misconduct. While New York enjoys lower crime rates than other major U.S. cities, its citizens still place a high value on law and order. There's time for Mamdani to flesh out some genuine plans for improving enforcement and helping New Yorkers feel safe, too often an under-appreciated priority in liberal politics. Mamdani is well-placed to help New Yorkers of various backgrounds work together and save their communities, beat back the 'soft on crime' stereotypes and restore the sense of safety that many recall from the days before former Mayor Rudy Giuliani went full MAGA with President Trump. Moreover, after all the hand-wringing and soul-searching that followed the Democrats' 2024 disaster, Mamdani offers a ray of hope for a recovery before the next national election cycle takes shape. Among the many postmortem conclusions in Democratic ranks is the sense that it's time for the party's old guard to step aside for a new generation. Here again, the comparison of Mamdani to Obama is apt. He is an avid and appealing campaigner. He is a compelling speaker. He articulates a point of view on kitchen-table issues that Democrats have begun ceding to right-wing populists. Even where he is arguably the most controversial — on the Israeli-Hamas conflict — he seems to place high importance on genuine dialogue based on common notions of justice. As polarizing as Mamdani may appear to some — and make no mistake, the mighty right-wing noise machine is firing on all cylinders to demonize him — the points of contention that surround him are all too real and endemic in the Democratic 'coalition' writ large. Whether Mamdani wins or loses the mayoral race, the issues that challenge his election campaign also challenge the Democrats fortunes nationally in 2026 and 2028. The sooner Democrats mend their coalition, the better their chances will be to redeem American democracy. As Obama might say, keep hope alive!
