UVA president resigns under pressure from Trump administration, per reports
The school's board of visitors voted in March to dissolve UVA's Office of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Community Partnerships.
'The Board of Visitors voted for common sense, saying 'no' to illegal discrimination and 'yes' to merit-based opportunity,' Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin said at the time. 'DEI is done at the University of Virginia. We stand for the universal truth that everyone is created equal, and opportunity is at the heart of Virginians' and Americans' future.'
Still, reports said the Department of Justice felt Ryan mispresented the steps he'd taken to eliminate the programs, and the Trump administration had pushed for his removal.
At the time this story was published, UVA has not released an official statement on Ryan's resignation, but the New York Times obtained a letter to the head of the Board of Visitors saying he submitted his resignation.
More: $15 million mental health crisis and detox facility to open near Augusta Health
Democrats Mark Warner and Tim Kaine, both United States Senators from Virginia, released a joint statement on Ryan's decision.
'Virginia's economy and prosperity depend on the strength and integrity of our higher education system,' the senators said. 'It is outrageous that officials in the Trump Department of Justice demanded the Commonwealth's globally recognized university remove President Ryan — a strong leader who has served UVA honorably and moved the university forward—over ridiculous 'culture war' traps.
'Decisions about UVA's leadership belong solely to its Board of Visitors, in keeping with Virginia's well-established and respected system of higher education governance. This is a mistake that hurts Virginia's future.'
Later, in a press call with Virginia reporters, Kaine called the move "a sad day for Virginia" and suggested that Ryan stepped down because he did not have the backing of the UVA Board to stand up to the administration. He urged other college boards across Virginia to stick to their appointed roles of overseeing those who run their colleges and back them to the hilt.
"If you're on a board, you have to have the back of your president and stand strong," Kaine said. He likened the move to a test of loyalty to the Trump Administration.
"It's like they now have a pelt and they are proud of it," Kaine said.
Rep. Jennifer McClellan, D-Virginia, said in a statement that the move by the administration goes against every foundation on which UVA was built.
'Thomas Jefferson founded the University of Virginia to serve as a bastion of academic freedom for students to engage in intellectual curiosity without fear of censorship or retaliation. He viewed education as a shield against tyranny," McClellan said. "The bullying of his beloved university by President Trump and his Justice Department are the exact brand of government overreach he feared. University leaders should be accountable to the university community and its governing bodies, not subjected to political pressure from the president of the United States.'
More: Augusta County residents speak out against Pride event cancellation
— Patrick Hite is a reporter at The News Leader. Story ideas and tips always welcome. Connect with Patrick (he/him/his) at phite@newsleader.com and on Instagram @hitepatrick. Subscribe to us at newsleader.com.
Bill Atkinson (he/him/his) is an award-winning journalist who covers breaking news, government and politics. Reach him at batkinson@progress-index.com or on X (formerly known as Twitter) at @BAtkinson_PI.
This article originally appeared on Staunton News Leader: UVA president resigns under pressure from Donald Trump, per reports
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
37 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Letters: Medicaid supports my daughter's 24/7 care. What will happen if Congress cuts funding?
My 35-year-old daughter, Flannery, is severely disabled and receives primary care from a Federally Qualified Health Center in San Rafael. As a way of giving back for the incredible work it has done for Flannery, I have served on the board of Marin Community Clinics for the past seven years. I understand that under the Senate version of the tax and spending bill, Marin Community Clinics and 1,400 other health centers stand to lose 30% of their Medicaid and block grant funding. Millions of Americans will lose access to health care. People are going to die. It's that simple. Flannery was born with cerebral palsy, is nonverbal and quadriplegic. She requires round-the-clock assistance. She is also supported by the state Regional Centers system, which indirectly receives funding from Medicaid. I do not know what these cuts will mean for Flannery, but I know they will be disastrous. All to provide large tax cuts to the super wealthy. Martin Weil, Sonoma Pay too low Regarding 'S.F. gave these homeless nonprofits nearly $2 billion. The salaries of their execs might surprise you' (San Francisco, June 27): I found the story surprising, but not because of the shock promised. Rather, I noted the effort to put nonprofit leaders on blast with backward speculation, troubling. Capitalism creates homelessness. And our region's contributions to free enterprise have been particularly egregious, with wealth gaps enabling some of the highest rents in the country. Our tech industry flourishes by selling fitness apps, payroll software, cryptocurrency, and refrigerators with computer screens on the door. We venerate commodities, claiming innovation, judgment-free. But if you opt out of (or are not privileged to) a tech career, the assumption is that you should not have equal access to this economy. The story notes one nonprofit's wage differential between executives and workers. Had they been asked, I'm sure the organizations would have thoughtful responses about values and wage philosophies. Because nonprofits pay attention to wealth equity — and attitudes that conflate this work with self-sacrifice require us to bring the receipts. This story shows we need to reevaluate our collective values. Given the Bay Area's staggering homelessness crisis, if anything, our nonprofit leaders — and all workers in this industry — deserve higher pay. Kristin Hatch, development director, Homeless Prenatal Program, San Francisco Don't misuse CEQA Regarding 'This rich California city is losing its mind over a housing project — and it shows why new rules are needed' (Emily Hoeven, June 28): Emily Hoeven's column on Menlo Park highlights how the California Environmental Quality Act and local resistance can stall needed housing. But in South San Jose, we face the opposite: The law is being manipulated to fast-track dangerous sprawl. A developer is proposing 173 market-rate homes on a hillside previously zoned for 54 units at the end of Harry Road in an area with no sidewalks, narrow roads, high wildfire danger, and known landslide risk. This is not infill. It's speculative development disguised as a housing solution. Even worse, the developer is attempting to bypass a full environmental impact report, under 2019's SB330, despite the parcel bordering wildlife corridors that support biodiversity and provide natural buffers in an already climate-sensitive area. This is exactly the kind of CEQA misuse that reform should prevent — not enable. If California is serious about climate, safety and equity, then it must protect the public's right to question unsustainable projects — not gut the laws that give us a voice. Lisa Lubliner, San Jose Bicoastal emissions Regarding 'Bicoastal living isn't just for the ultra wealthy. Here's how creatives make it work' (Bay Area, June 24): The story struck me as remarkably tone deaf. Airline flights are major contributors to greenhouse gas emissions. Ignoring this aspect in the reporting was a missed opportunity to discuss the repercussions of a bicoastal lifestyle. Liz Eva, Castro Valley
Miami Herald
40 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Exits by Tillis and Bacon demonstrate Trump's enduring grip on modern GOP
WASHINGTON - The looming departures of North Carolina Sen. Thom Tillis and Nebraska Rep. Don Bacon represent the latest retreat by members of the Republican mainstream and another sign of President Donald Trump's firm grip on his party. Tillis, especially, surprised political observers over the weekend when he announced his retirement after getting slammed by Trump over his opposition to the president's signature domestic policy legislation. "Trump is growing more confident in his leadership of the Republican Party,'' GOP strategist Alex Conant said. "You can't just get on his good side with some nice tweets. You have to vote for his agenda. ... Clearly, he's learned a lot about politics over the last 10 years, and one of the things he's learned is that political power is useless if you don't use it to advance your goals." Still, the president's brand of politics doesn't play in every House district, particularly the purple ones like Bacon's that the GOP needs to maintain its majority. And on the Senate side, while Republicans have a favorable map going into next year's midterms, Tillis' retirement gives Democrats an opening to gain a seat the party lost in 2014. Neither Bacon nor Tillis identifies as a moderate, and both have, by and large, voted with their party on most issues. Bacon, a retired Air Force brigadier general who reveres Ronald Reagan, has had to navigate Trump's demands while representing an Omaha-area district that's become increasingly Democratic on the presidential level - Kamala Harris carried it by 5 points last year, according to calculations by The Downballot. Yet his occasional criticisms of Trump, his support for Ukraine and his condemnation of Russia have made him an outlier in the modern GOP. Tillis has long been a reliable conservative, who, as North Carolina House speaker, helped steer the state rightward. He pushed for changes to the tax code that implemented a flat income tax and lowered corporate tax rates; backed a state ban on gay marriage; supported anti-abortion laws; and endorsed requiring drug testing for welfare recipients. In announcing their retirements, both men lamented the rise of tribal politics in the Trump era. "It's disconcerting to get attacked from the right,'' Bacon said Monday at a news conference in Omaha, at which he also highlighted his ability to work across the aisle. Tillis bemoaned the decline in bipartisanship in Washington and suggested his own party bore some culpability. "When people see independent thinking on the other side, they cheer. But when those very same people see independent thinking coming from their side, they scorn, ostracize, and even censure them," the two-term senator said in a statement Sunday. The sprawling GOP budget reconciliation bill - which passed the Senate on Tuesday by the slenderest of margins - has exposed deep rifts among congressional Republicans. Along with Tillis, two other GOP senators voted no: Kentucky's Rand Paul and Maine's Susan Collins, who is among the chamber's most vulnerable members on the ballot next year. The measure heads back to the House, where fiscal hawks have publicly railed against changes in the Senate version, leaving the bill's prospects for final passage uncertain. Trump, who threatened to back a primary challenger against Tillis after he voted against advancing the reconciliation bill, cheered the senator's impending departure from the chamber. "I had it out with this guy two nights ago, and he resigned, which I was happy about,'' the president told reporters aboard Air Force One on Tuesday after a trip to a new detention center for migrants in South Florida. "He did us all a favor." Tillis now joins a cadre of past senators, including Arizona's Jeff Flake, Tennessee's Bob Corker and Utah's Mitt Romney, who opted to walk away from politics rather than continue tangling with Trump. As Trump marks a decade in politics - and almost six months into his second term as president - most Republicans know that challenging him carries a steep price, said Jonathan Weiler, a political scientist at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. "Once (Tillis) decided to actually vote against the budget, he certainly knew what would be coming," he said. Trump's ever-shifting policy positions can at times complicate efforts by his fellow Republicans to remain in his good graces. "I found it difficult when I was in the Senate," Flake, who denounced Trump on the chamber floor in 2017 after deciding not to run for reelection, said in an interview. "We'd go to the White House in the morning and strike an immigration deal that was no longer valid in the afternoon." Flake, who bristles at the notion of being called a moderate, said Trump and his supporters demand that Republican lawmakers not only express their unyielding loyalty, but also emulate his combative style. "It's not just the issues," the former senator said. "You're expected by that subset of a subset of a subset that votes in Republican primaries to be mean and angry now. … That was never me, and that's not really Thom either." Trump's refusal to tolerate dissent could at least partly be attributed to the narrowness of the GOP's majority in both chambers, Conant said. "There's no room for dissent within the conferences,'' he said. "If [Trump] had huge majorities, he could look past dissent, but since he needs every vote, he has to wield his power aggressively.'' A successor to Tillis Senate Democrats greeted the news of Tillis' retirement with glee. "Thom Tillis' decision not to run for reelection is another blow to Republicans' chances as they face a midterm backlash that puts their majority at risk," Maeve Coyle, a spokesperson for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, said in a statement. As the Republican field to succeed the senator takes shape, Trump is expected to play an outsize role. While a few Republicans had already lined up to challenge Tillis before he ended his reelection bid, higher-profile hopefuls are certain to jump in. Potential contenders include Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Whatley and several congressmen such as Rep. Richard Hudson, who leads the House Republican campaign arm, and Rep. Pat Harrigan, a freshman lawmaker and retired Green Beret. Then there's presidential daughter-in-law Lara Trump, a North Carolina native and former RNC co-chair. The Trump name remains strong in a state that backed her father-in-law in all three of his elections. On Tuesday, Trump said Lara Trump would "always be my first choice" and that "she really knows North Carolina well." But he also noted that she now lives in Florida, where she was the subject of speculation for another Senate vacancy earlier this year. "I don't know who the candidates (in North Carolina) are going to be," Trump told reporters Tuesday. "I think you're going to have one of the congressmen step up, and should do very well." ------- (CQ-Roll Call's John T. Bennett contributed to this report.) ------- Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
Miami Herald
41 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
No Tax on Tips Passes in Trump's Big Beautiful Bill: What to Know
The Senate has passed President Donald Trump's highly anticipated tax agenda, including a provision to lower federal income taxes on worker tips. The proposal, part of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, would enable millions of tipped workers, including servers, bartenders, and hairdressers, to deduct their tipped income from their taxable wages. While the full repeal of tip taxation was a signature campaign promise for Trump, the Senate's version caps annual deductions at $25,000 and phases out the benefit for higher earners. The policy reflects one of Trump's central campaign pledges in 2024 and has gained bipartisan support. Estimates from the White House's Council of Economic Advisers suggest that eligible workers could see their take-home pay rise by an average of $1,675 per year. Critics, however, have raised concerns about who actually benefits from the change. Some experts and labor advocates warn that the majority of tipped workers already earn too little to owe federal income tax, which could mean the deduction disproportionately aids higher earners in tipped professions rather than low-wage workers. The "no tax on tips" provision within the Senate version of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act allows tipped workers to deduct tip income from their federal taxable income, up to $25,000 annually. The deduction phases out for individuals earning more than $150,000 and couples earning over $300,000. The deduction, if signed into law as part of the bill, applies to tax years 2025 through 2028 and does not eliminate payroll taxes for Social Security and Medicare, nor does it affect state or local tax obligations. A full list of eligible occupations for tip deductions will be released within 90 days of the bill becoming law. Supporters argue that the approach provides immediate benefits for working-class families and will help offset living costs amid ongoing inflation, with the White House saying that it will offer a "pay boost for millions" of working Americans. Critics highlight that the benefit may be limited because workers earning low wages in tipped jobs are often already exempt from paying federal income tax due to their overall income level. Data from the Yale Budget Lab shows that about 4 percent of workers earning less than $25 an hour receive tips. Economists have also flagged potential negatives. The Tax Foundation, an independent tax policy nonprofit, said in April of this year that the policy could introduce "severe horizontal inequity in the tax code," with two workers earning the same amount in different industries having vastly different tax obligations. The White House said in a post on X, formerly Twitter: "The One Big Beautiful Bill delivers the largest tax cut in history for middle- and working-class Americans." Joseph Camberato, CEO at told Newsweek: "I think it's a win for the people who actually live off tips. This could put real money back into the pockets of restaurant servers and others in the service industry, and that money gets spent, which helps the economy. "It's for the 1.8 million restaurant servers who rely on tips to pay their bills. For them, not getting taxed on that income is a big deal. This policy targets the right group and gives them a meaningful raise, basically overnight." Abir Mandal, senior policy analyst at the Tax Foundation: "The trend of tax exemptions on tips, overtime, and bonuses may sound like a win for workers, but it is a shortsighted fix with long-term drawbacks. It creates winners and losers among workers with equal incomes, distorts labor markets, and undermines public finances—all while failing to help the American workers struggling the most." The bill returns to the House of Representatives before heading to Trump's desk for his signature. If enacted, the policy will take effect for the 2025 tax year and remain in place through 2028. Related Articles No Tax on Overtime Passes in Trump's Big Beautiful Bill: What to KnowSocial Security Changes in Trump's Big Beautiful Bill: What to KnowThe 1600: Now Boarding the USS IdiocracyThe 1600: Trump's Tax Bill Clears House in Razor-Thin Vote 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
