Some community college students could lose their financial lifeline under the 'Big Beautiful Bill'
Hundreds of thousands of community college students are at risk of losing financial assistance under the proposed ' Big Beautiful Bill,' which would tighten eligibility requirements for Pell Grants.
Students would be required to enroll full time to maintain eligibility for the federally subsidized grants that serve as a financial lifeline for many low- to middle-income students.
The bill would increase the number of credit hours students must take each semester from 12 to 15 and could strain those who work, parent, suffer financial distress or otherwise find it difficult to increase their course loads, according to the American Association of Community Colleges.
More than 10 million people are enrolled in community colleges across the United States. Students who attend four-year colleges can also apply for Pell Grants, but community colleges are often a gateway into the higher education pipeline for low- to middle-income students.
'I don't have any other options,' said Lakina Mabins, 41, a mother of five who worked two jobs before becoming valedictorian last month at Kennedy King College in Chicago. 'I couldn't take out a loan if I wanted to because you have to have good credit.'
Students can receive between $740 and $7,395 a year from the Pell Grant program, according to the the American Association of Community Colleges.
It costs $4,050 a year on average to attend a community college, while the average four-year, in-state tuition at a public university is $11,610 a year, the association said.
Tighter restrictions for Pell Grant eligibility are part of a sweeping congressional budget bill advanced by Republicans and aimed at cutting taxes and government spending.
House Republicans approved their version of the bill in May, and it's now being considered by the Senate.
Student Maria Baez, who attends the Community College of Philadelphia, said she would likely have to drop out of school if the bill becomes law because she would not be able to afford it.
She said she received about $3,600 through the Pell Grant program last semester.
'I don't even have a backup plan,' said Baez, 41, who wants to own a small marketing business one day. 'But I want so badly to further my education so that I can have a career.'
Hundreds of thousands of students could be at risk of losing their grants if the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is approved, said Martha Parham, a spokeswoman for the American Association of Community Colleges.
Many students are unable to attend college full time because they have other responsibilities, she said.
'Community colleges are the on-ramp to the middle class,' Parham said, but costs can pose a strong barrier.
The first grants were awarded in 1973; the program was later named for the late Sen. Claiborne Pell, D-R.I.
The Big Beautiful Bill would also do away with subsidized federal loans, which would force college borrowers to accumulate more debt.
'It's going to be extremely hard for people to get out of debt with these changes,' Astra Taylor, co-founder of the Debt Collective, an organization that helps people fight debt, told CNBC.
Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, which is playing a key role in drafting the Senate's version of the bill, was unavailable for comment this week, his office said.
Cassidy has said the entire Big Beautiful Bill would save an estimated $300 billion in government spending and lift the burden on taxpayers who subsidize college graduates' loan payments.
But student Michael Weaver, 34, who attends Stanly Community College in Albemarle, North Carolina, on a Pell Grant, said part of the appeal of attending a two-year college is to take courses at your own pace.
'It's a bit of a stretch for most students, and to be honest, the majority of students receiving the grant are working people who only have the option of attending school part time,' Weaver said.
Mabins, who plans to attend National Louis University in downtown Chicago this fall, considers herself a low-income student because she lives in public housing and is enrolled in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, commonly known as food stamps.
'The government wants me off assistance, but they are creating more debt and making it harder for me to better myself,' she said. 'I have goals, and in the next five years, I see myself with a master's degree and working in my career field.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
37 minutes ago
- The Independent
What's in the latest version of Trump's big bill now before the Senate
At some 940-pages, the legislation is a sprawling collection of tax breaks, spending cuts and other Republican priorities, including new money for national defense and deportations. Now it's up to Congress to decide whether President Donald Trump 's signature's domestic policy package will become law. Trump told Republicans, who hold majority power in the House and Senate, to skip their holiday vacations and deliver the bill by the Fourth of July. Senators were working through the weekend to pass the bill and send it back to the House for a final vote. Democrats are united against it. Here's the latest on what's in the bill. There could be changes as lawmakers negotiate. Republicans say the bill is crucial because there would be a massive tax increase after December when tax breaks from Trump's first term expire. The legislation contains roughly $3.8 trillion in tax cuts. The existing tax rates and brackets would become permanent under the bill. It temporarily would add new tax breaks that Trump campaigned on: no taxes on tips, overtime pay or some automotive loans, along with a bigger $6,000 deduction in the Senate draft for older adults who earn no more than $75,000 a year. It would boost the $2,000 child tax credit to $2,200 under the Senate proposal. Families at lower income levels would not see the full amount. A cap on state and local deductions, called SALT, would quadruple to $40,000 for five years. It's a provision important to New York and other high tax states, though the House wanted it to last for 10 years. There are scores of business-related tax cuts. The wealthiest households would see a $12,000 increase from the legislation, which would cost the poorest people $1,600 a year, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office analysis of the House's version. Middle-income taxpayers would see a tax break of $500 to $1,500, the CBO said. Money for deportations, a border wall and the Golden Dome The bill would provide some $350 billion for Trump's border and national security agenda, including $46 billion for the U.S.-Mexico border wall and $45 billion for 100,000 migrant detention facility beds, as he aims to fulfill his promise of the largest mass deportation operation in U.S. history. Money would go for hiring 10,000 new Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers, with $10,000 signing bonuses and a surge of Border Patrol officers, as well. The goal is to deport some 1 million people per year. The homeland security secretary would have a new $10 billion fund for grants for states that help with federal immigration enforcement and deportation actions. The attorney general would have $3.5 billion for a similar fund, known as Bridging Immigration-related Deficits Experienced Nationwide, or BIDEN, referring to former Democratic President Joe Biden. To help pay for it all, immigrants would face various new fees, including when seeking asylum protections. For the Pentagon, the bill would provide billions for ship building, munitions systems, and quality of life measures for servicemen and women, as well as $25 billion for the development of the Golden Dome missile defense system. The Defense Department would have $1 billion for border security. How to pay for it? Cuts to Medicaid and other programs To help partly offset the lost tax revenue and new spending, Republicans aim to cut back some long-running government programs: Medicaid, food stamps, green energy incentives and others. It's essentially unraveling the accomplishments of the past two Democratic presidents, Biden and Barack Obama. Republicans argue they are trying to rightsize the safety net programs for the population they were initially designed to serve, mainly pregnant women, the disabled and children, and root out what they describe as waste, fraud and abuse. The package includes new 80-hour-a-month work requirements for many adults receiving Medicaid and food stamps, including older people up to age 65. Parents of children 14 and older would have to meet the program's work requirements. There's also a proposed new $35 co-payment that can be charged to patients using Medicaid services. Some 80 million people rely on Medicaid, which expanded under Obama's Affordable Care Act, and 40 million use the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program. Most already work, according to analysts. All told, the CBO estimates that under the House-passed bill, at least 10.9 million more people would go without health coverage and 3 million more would not qualify for food stamps. The Senate proposes a $25 billion Rural Hospital Transformation Fund to help offset reduced Medicaid dollars. It's a new addition, intended to win over holdout GOP senators and a coalition of House Republicans warning that the proposed Medicaid provider tax cuts would hurt rural hospitals. Both the House and Senate bills propose a dramatic rollback of the Biden-era green energy tax breaks for electric vehicles. They also would phase out or terminate the various production and investment tax credits companies use to stand up wind, solar and other renewable energy projects. In total, cuts to Medicaid, food stamps and green energy programs would be expected to produce at least $1.5 trillion in savings. Trump savings accounts and so, so much more A number of extra provisions reflect other GOP priorities. The House and Senate both have a new children's savings program, called Trump Accounts, with a potential $1,000 deposit from the Treasury. The Senate provided $40 million to establish Trump's long-sought 'National Garden of American Heroes.' There's a new excise tax on university endowments, restrictions on the development of artificial intelligence and blocks on transgender surgeries. A $200 tax on gun silencers and short-barreled rifles and shotguns was eliminated. One provision bars money to family planning providers, namely Planned Parenthood, while $88 million is earmarked for a pandemic response accountability committee. Billions would go for the Artemis moon mission and for exploration to Mars. The bill would deter states from regulating artificial intelligence by linking certain federal AI infrastructure money to maintaining a freeze. Seventeen Republican governors asked GOP leaders to drop the provision. Also, the interior secretary would be directed to sell certain Bureau of Land Management acreage to provide for housing. The sale of public lands would cover at least 600,000 acres and up to 1.2 million acres, according to a projection from the Center for Western Priorities, a conservation group. What's the final cost? Altogether, keeping the existing tax breaks and adding the new ones is expected to cost $3.8 trillion over the decade, the CBO says in its analysis of the House bill. An analysis of the Senate draft is pending. The CBO estimates the House-passed package would add $2.4 trillion to the nation's deficits over the decade. Or not, depending on how one does the math. Senate Republicans are proposing a unique strategy of not counting the existing tax breaks as a new cost because those breaks are already 'current policy.' Senators say the Senate Budget Committee chairman has the authority to set the baseline for the preferred approach. Under the Senate GOP view, the tax provisions cost $441 billion, according to the congressional Joint Committee on Taxation. Democrats and others say this is 'magic math' that obscures the true costs of the GOP tax breaks. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget puts the Senate tally at $4.2 trillion over the decade.
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Senate Republicans scramble to pass Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill'
Senate Republicans are racing to pass a budget bill that is pivotal to President Donald Trump's second-term agenda ahead of a self-imposed 4 July Senate Republican leadership have been twisting arms for an initial vote on the "Big Beautiful Bill" by Saturday afternoon, following the release of its latest version - all 940 pages - shortly after rank-and-file of the president's party have been divided on how much to cut from welfare programmes in order to cover the cost of extending some $3.8tn (£2.8tn) in Trump tax sprawling tax and spending measure narrowly passed the House of Representatives two weeks ago. A look at the key items in Trump's 'big, beautiful bill'The woman who could bust Trump's 'big beautiful bill'The latest version is designed to appease some backbench Republican holdouts. It includes an increase in funding for rural hospitals, after some party moderates argued the original proposal would harm their constituents. Another tweak was made to State and Local Taxes (Salt) - a bone of contention for representatives from high-tax states such as New is currently a $10,000 cap on how much taxpayers can deduct from the amount they owe in federal taxes. In the new bill, Senate Republicans have raised the Salt limit to $40,000 for married couples with incomes up to $500,000 - in line with what the House of Representatives the latest Senate version ends the $40,000 cap after five years - when it would drop back to $10, legislation still contains some of its core components, including extending tax cuts passed by Republicans in 2017, as well as the addition of new cuts that Trump campaigned on, such as a tax deduction on Social Security benefits and the elimination of taxes on overtime work and tips. More contentious measures are also still in place, including restrictions and requirements on Medicaid - a healthcare programme used by millions of elderly, disabled and low-income Americans. Trump has pressured Congress to pass the bill Majority Leader John Thune called a possible Saturday vote "aspirational", and it is still unclear whether Republicans can advance the bill. One Republican senator from Wisconsin, Ron Johnson, told the Fox & Friends programme on Saturday he will be voting "no", saying he still needed time to read it. "We just got the bill," Johnson said. "I got my first copy at about 01:23 in the morning."
NBC News
4 hours ago
- NBC News
Senate Republicans release 940-page bill for Trump's agenda as they race to vote this weekend
WASHINGTON — Moments before midnight, Senate Republican leaders released text of their 940-page bill on Friday, with the goal of beginning votes on it Saturday. GOP lawmakers are racing to pass the sweeping package for President Donald Trump's agenda by a self-imposed deadline of July 4, but it continues to face hurdles along the way. And it's unclear if Senate Republicans have enough votes to begin debate on it. The legislation would extend the tax cuts Trump signed into law in 2017 and slash taxes on tips and overtime pay. It includes a $150 billion boost to military spending this year, along with a surge of federal money to carry out Trump's mass deportations and immigration enforcement agenda. It partially pays for that with cuts to Medicaid, SNAP and clean energy funding, although the legislation is likely to add to the national debt. It also contains a $5 trillion increase in the debt ceiling ahead of an August deadline to avert a default on the country's obligations. With a 53-47 majority in the chamber, Republicans can afford just three defections on the vote, with no hope of winning Democratic support. Republicans are seeking to pass the bill through the budget reconciliation process, which allows them to bypass the Senate's 60-vote threshold. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., is aiming to hold a first test vote on the mammoth package Saturday but is running into problems from rank-and-file Republicans who are trying to pump the brakes on the process. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., said during an appearance on Fox News Saturday morning that he would vote against the initial motion to start debate on the bill until he has more time to review it. "We just got the bill, and I got my first copy about 1:23 in the morning, this morning. About 300 provisions, by my count," Johnson said. "We shouldn't take the Nancy Pelosi approach and pass this bill to find out what's in it. We need to know exactly what's in it." Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., told NBC News on Friday that he will oppose the bill, but that he would reconsider if Republicans strip out the debt ceiling hike. That is highly unlikely to happen. Paul, the only GOP senator who has voted against the measure throughout all the steps of the process this year, said it is 'much more of a spending bill than a bill that rectifies the debt problem.' The GOP package prohibits Medicaid funding for entities that provide abortion, including Planned Parenthood, seeking to make good on a longstanding conservative priority. But that pursuit has faced opposition from Sens. Susan Collins, R-Maine, and Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, so the provision could imperil their votes. Leaving the Capitol Friday night, Thune said he's not certain that Republicans have the votes to advance the measure but that it's time to act. "It's a process and hopefully the votes will be there," Thune said, "but we won't know for sure until we actually have the vote." Even if the package can pass its first hurdle Saturday, it still would have a long way to go. There would be at least 10 hours of debate before senators can start voting on amendments, and Democrats are threatening to force the reading of the entire bill. The House, which passed its own version in May, would need to pass the Senate bill before it heads to Trump's desk. GOP leaders are making daring bet that reluctant members won't vote to scuttle Trump's "big, beautiful bill" when push comes to shove. And they've said they may need to enlist the president to twist arms and sway holdouts. The Senate legislation seeks to resolve a standoff over the state and local tax (SALT) deduction. It lifts an existing $10,000 cap to $40,000 for five years — down from a decade in the House-passed version — before lowering it back to $10,000. That represents a significant concession for blue-state House Republicans who had insisted on solidifying the higher cap. The bill seeks to mitigate the pain of Medicaid cuts on some providers by creating a rural hospital fund worth $25 billion over five years. It includes work requirements and other new rules for recipients to qualify Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., slammed the bill. "At the behest of Big Oil, in the dead of night, Senate Republicans released a new version of their 'Big, Beautiful Betrayal' that retroactively raises taxes on energy," he said in a statement Saturday. "Republicans want to jack up your electric bills and jeopardize hundreds of thousands of jobs, all so they can give billionaires tax breaks."
