
Boston trial over Trump's push to deport campus activists concludes
The administration has argued that it can deport visa and green card holders under the Immigration and Nationality Act, which has a provision granting the secretary of state the authority to remove people from the country if they undermine its foreign policy interests.
But the trial in American Association of University Professors v. Rubio, which began on July 7, raised questions about whether the administration was violating the First Amendment by retaliating against people for their political speech.
The lawsuit - filed March 25 on behalf of the association's campus chapters at Harvard, New York and Rutgers universities, along with the Middle East Studies Association - accused the administration of fostering a "climate of repression and fear on university campuses."
The trial came amid the backdrop of a high-profile case involving Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia University graduate and pro-Palestinian activist. Last month, a federal judge in New Jersey ordered Khalil released from Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody.
That judge had previously ruled that the government's actions were chilling Khalil's right to free speech. The Trump administration has said the basis for its March 8 detention was Khalil's supposed alignment with Hamas, a designated terrorist group.
Trump administration 'systematically violating the First Amendment,' lawyers say
Here in Boston, closing arguments took place before U.S. District Judge William Young, a Harvard Law School graduate.
Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, along with co-counsel Sher Tremonte LLP, represented the association of professors in the case, and Young first asked them what evidence they had to support the notion that an "ideological deportation" policy exists.
Alexandra Conlon, a Sher Tremonte lawyer representing the plaintiffs, said that was proven by the administration revoking visas and green cards based on noncitizens' pro-Palestinian activism. In doing so, she said, the federal government was "systematically violating the First Amendment" and seeking to chill speech it disagrees with.
She said the administration conflates antisemitism with pro-Palestine, anti-Israel or anti-war viewpoints.
Ramya Krishnan, an attorney at the Knight First Amendment Institute , went on to argue that legal precedent affirms noncitizens' right to First Amendment protections. Further, she said, lawyers representing the administration hadn't proven that its actions against noncitizen activists were necessary for national security.
Noncitizens don't have the same First Amendment rights, administration argues
Justice Department attorney Ethan Kanter, representing the Trump administration, argued noncitizens do not have First Amendment rights to the same extent as U.S. citizens. While they may have such rights in some capacity, he said, they are "context dependent and in relation to the compelling government interest at play."
He cited a 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision in 2024 that allowed the state of Ohio to ban foreign nationals from contributing to political campaigns while litigation continued. The court said the state was likely to succeed on the merits of the case, saying the state's law was narrowly tailored to serve the government's compelling interest in preventing foreign influence on elections.
William Kanellis, another attorney representing the administration, at one point referenced the novel "Don Quixote." He cited a particular story in which Quixote mistakes windmills for giants and tries to fight them, leading to him falling off his horse.
The plaintiffs had similarly "been knocked off their horse" in the trial, he said, adding that the notion of an "ideological deportation policy" was, like Don Quixote's vision, based on the plaintiffs' "imagination and creative conjuring."
If such a broad policy existed, he said, "you'd see many more arrests."
In their complaint, the plaintiffs requested that Young, among other actions, recognize the existence of an "ideological deportation policy" and deem it, along with "threats to arrest, detain and deport noncitizen students and faculty," to be unconstitutional. They asked for the policy to be set aside and for Young to bar the administration from making such threats moving forward.
Closing arguments lasted about 90 minutes. Young said he appreciated the "vigorous advocacy" and "high level of civility" shown by the legal counsel and witnesses throughout the trial. He said he now has the responsibility to consider all arguments and deliver a "fair and just" ruling.
Young previously blocked the administration's termination of National Institutes of Health grants that cut funding for research related to minority communities. In that case, he'd said that the funding cut "represents racial discrimination," the New York Times reported.
BrieAnna Frank is a First Amendment Reporting Fellow at USA TODAY. Reach her at bjfrank@usatoday.com.
USA TODAY's coverage of First Amendment issues is funded through a collaboration between the Freedom Forum and Journalism Funding Partners. Funders do not provide editorial input.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


South Wales Guardian
12 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Trump will get ‘warm welcome' from UK Government during visit, says minister
The US president is expected to visit both his golf clubs north of the border – in Aberdeenshire and South Ayrshire – during the four-day visit. The PA news agency understands Mr Murray is expected to meet Mr Trump as his plane arrives in Scotland. The president is also expected to meet Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Scottish First Minister John Swinney. The Scottish Secretary told BBC Radio Scotland the UK will extend a 'warm welcome' to the president, given the historic ties between the two countries. 'Of course it's a warm welcome,' he said. 'We would always have a warm welcome for the president of the United States. 'The office of the president of the United States and the office of the Prime Minister are ones that work very, very closely together, and should do, because it's in our national interest to do so. 'We should make sure those relationships are in place because it's important for our defence, our security, our economy – especially for jobs – and it's really, really important to the finer details of the US trade deal that's been done.' Mr Murray's comments come despite a 2019 motion in the House of Commons which he backed – along with Foreign Secretary David Lammy and Health Secretary Wes Streeting – while in opposition which accused the president of 'misogynism, racism and xenophobia'. Pressed on his support for the motion, Mr Murray did not answer, instead focusing on the importance of the relationship between the two countries. Mr Murray said the Scottish Secretary has a 'duty' to welcome foreign dignitaries. Shadow Scottish secretary Andrew Bowie accused Mr Murray of having 'no credible explanation' for his support of the motion. 'So let me help him: in 2019 he was shamelessly playing to the gallery like a student politician, whereas today he is a Government minister forced to get real and behave like a grown-up,' he added. 'I'm glad that Ian Murray has belatedly recognised how vital it is for Scotland to welcome, and work constructively with, the US president – but he'd have more credibility if he put his hands up and owned his past juvenile opportunism.' Protests are expected in parts of Scotland during the visit, with police expected to be stretched and requests for extra officers being issued to other forces in the UK. The Scottish Police Federation, which represents rank-and-file officers, said policing will be 'seriously affected'. Mr Swinney said this week that Mr Trump's time in Scotland would not put policing in a 'detrimental position'.


Daily Mail
12 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trump suggests new name for artificial intelligence
By President Donald Trump attended an artificial intelligence summit on Wednesday, even as he revealed to the audience of eager tech moguls he was not a fan of the name. 'Around the globe, everyone is talking about artificial intelligence,' Trump said. 'Artificial. I can't stand it, I don't even like the name.' As the audience stared wordlessly at the president, he suggested they change the name. 'I don't like anything that's artificial so can we straighten that out please?' Trump asked. 'We should change the name.' As some in the audience laughed in response, Trump continued, 'I actually mean that. I don't like the name artificial anything, because it's not artificial, it's genius. It's pure genius,' he said, indicating he would prefer the name 'genius intelligence' better than 'artificial intelligence.' The president spoke after the White House released its AI Action Plan on Wednesday, which detailed the administration's efforts to boost the development and innovation of the technology. The document recommends that Trump streamline regulations and permitting to allow companies to build massive data centers and energy sources quickly to help accelerate the AI or 'genius' industry. During his speech, Trump announced he was getting rid of President Biden's executive order which outlined a preference preference for companies who prioritized DEI programs and climate goals. 'We're getting rid of woke,' Trump said triumphantly, adding that, 'It's so uncool to be woke.' He said his goal was to root out 'partisan bias' or ideological agendas from tech companies and artificial intelligence models such as 'critical race theory' which he described as 'ridiculous.' 'The American people do not want woke Marxist lunacy in the AI models and neither do other countries,' Trump said. 'From now on the US government will only work with AI that works with truth.' Trump acknowledged the dangers of artificial intelligence, but described the race with China and other countries on the technology as one the United States had to win. 'This technology brings the potential for bad as well as for good, for peril as well as for progress but the daunting power of AI is not going to be a reason for retreat from this new frontier,' he said.


Daily Mail
12 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Ravens coach John Harbaugh destroys reporter's Trump question in heated grilling about White House visit
Donald Trump isn't the only leader battling the beltway media. Speaking with reporters at the opening Baltimore Ravens training camp on Wednesday, head coach John Harbaugh objected to the framing of a question about his family's recent Oval Office meeting with the President. Harbaugh was specifically asked about his decision to meet with Trump in light of the President's previous comments about Baltimore. In 2019, for instance, Trump described the nearly 300-year-old city as a ' disgusting, rat and rodent infested mess ' where 'no human being would want to live.' 'How you framed that question — I would have framed that question like: "You got a chance to go visit with the president, man. What was that experience like?" 'It was amazing,' Harbaugh said, answering his own question. 'It was awesome.' Harbaugh, 62, and his 61-year-old brother Jim, the Los Angeles Chargers head coach, were recently spotted leaving the White House, leading to speculation the two had met with Trump. Soon after, Outkick's Clay Travis posted a photo online showing the brothers with Trump, NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang, U.S. trade representative Jamieson Greer and U.S. commerce secretary Howard Lutnick in the Oval Office. Ravens head coach John Harbaugh on meeting with President Donald Trump in the White House earlier this month: "I promise you I root for our president" — Baltimore Banner Sports (@AllBannerSports) July 23, 2025 Clay Travis posted a photo online showing the Harbaugh brothers with Trump, NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang, U.S. trade rep Jamieson Greer and commerce secretary Howard Lutnic On Wednesday, the elder Harbaugh brother refrained from any political commentary and instead emphasized his support for the office of the President. 'And I promise you I root for our president,' Harbaugh said. 'I want our president to be successful just like I want my quarterback to be successful and I want my team to be successful, and it was an amazing experience.' Harbaugh has met with three other presidents, including Barack Obama after Baltimore won Super Bowl XLVII in February of 2013. But as proud as he is of that, he concedes Jim has got him beat. 'He's got seven, I got four,' John Harbaugh said Wednesday. 'I had a chance to meet President Obama twice — incredible experience. 'Had a chance to meet President Biden when he was vice president in Iraq, and spent a lot of time with him in Iraq,' Harbaugh continued. 'Jim got invited also to the White House to meet President Reagan because he was a Heisman Trophy candidate. We got to go as a family, so I met President Reagan — have a picture in my office of that.' As for the details of the Harbaugh family meeting with Trump and Lutnick, the Chargers' head coach previously said it was a first-time encounter for everyone involved. And although it was intended to be brief, Trump wasn't rushing him out the door. 'Met President Trump at 4:30, 4:45, and then it was after 5, and we were still talking,' Jim Harbaugh said last week. 'You could tell he wasn't going to be the first to leave. I'm sure he wanted to go get dinner or something.' Trump even asked about Chargers quarterback Justin Herbert, leading Harbaugh to say POTUS is 'very knowledgeable about all sports and especially football.'