JP Morgan-backed ISG, Bank of Baroda UAE Launch Jaywan Cards In UAE
JP Morgan-backed ISG has partnered with Bank of Baroda UAE to launch Jaywan Cards, enhancing local payment solutions with lower costs.
JP Morgan-backed fintech venture, In-Solutions Global (ISG), has partnered with Bank of Baroda UAE to launch Jaywan Cards in the UAE.
The introduction of Jaywan Cards will significantly enhance merchant acceptance by offering lower costs and fees, improved transaction controls, and a fully digitised environment for payments and reporting. This creates a more efficient and attractive solution for the UAE's evolving payments ecosystem.
The Jaywan Scheme operates under defined scheme guidelines, ensuring transactions comply with the highest security and regulatory standards. The Jaywan Card seeks to simplify financial transactions using the UAE's own card network. As the card service provider, ISG will ensure high acceptance rates across various merchant categories in the UAE, including retail, hospitality, and e-commerce.
Jaywan Cards offer lower transaction costs and reduce reliance on foreign card networks by enabling optimized domestic payment processing. They also promote stronger financial inclusion by encouraging the shift from cash to digital payments. Additionally, the cards ensure enhanced security and full regulatory compliance under the framework set by the Central Bank of the UAE (CBUAE).
Praveen Balusu, SVP – Product & Delivery at ISG, added: 'ISG is proud to be at the forefront of fintech innovation in the UAE. By enabling end-to-end Jaywan card issuance, we are helping regional banks and financial institutions adopt a fully localized payment system that is both efficient and scalable. In future, Jaywan's interoperability with RuPay also provides a seamless cross-border experience, making it a game-changer for businesses and consumers alike"
ISG has been a trusted partner for major banks across the UAE and Saudi Arabia, providing industry-leading settlement and reconciliation services. The company's deep expertise in domestic payment processing ensures seamless Jaywan implementation, enabling banks like Bank of Baroda, UAE to offer innovative and cost-efficient solutions to their customers.
First Published:
May 26, 2025, 13:17 IST
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
12 hours ago
- Time of India
‘We will never stop fighting for…': Billionaire Tyler Winklevoss to JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon for ‘rejecting' his crypto exchange
Representative Image Billionaire co-founder of US-based cryptocurrency exchange Gemini, Tyler Winklevoss , has once again taken a dig at JPMorgan Chase. The latest jibe comes after JP Morgan allegedly paused the onboarding of his crypto exchange as a customer due to his recent public remarks against the bank on the social media platform X. All this started last week after Winklevoss shared a Bloomberg report that claimed JP Morgan has decided to start charging fintech companies for accessing its customers' bank account information. In this X post, the crypto billionaire shared his concern, noting that this action would 'bankrupt fintechs' that help consumers connect their bank accounts to exchanges like Gemini to purchase bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. What Winklevoss said to JP Morgan Chase and CEO Jamie Dimon In his recent post, Winklevoss named JP Morgan's CEO Jamie Dimon and wrote: 'My tweet from last week struck a nerve. This week, JPMorgan told us that because of it, they were pausing their re-onboarding of @Gemini as a customer after they off-boarded us during Operation ChokePoint 2.0. They want us to stay silent while they quietly try to take away your right to access YOUR banking data for free through third-party fintechs like @Plaid. Sorry, Jamie Dimon, we're not going to stay silent. We will continue to call out this anti-competitive, rent-seeking behaviour and immoral attempt to bankrupt fintech and crypto companies. We will never stop fighting for what is right! 🇺🇸' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Up to 70% off | Libas Purple Days Sale Libas Undo Last week, sharing the report revealing JP Morgan's decision to charge fintechs for its customer details, he wrote: 'JPMorgan and the banksters are trying to kill fintech and crypto companies. They want to take away your right to access your banking data for FREE via-third party apps like @Plaid and instead charge you and fintechs exorbitant fees to access YOUR DATA. This will bankrupt fintechs that help you link your bank accounts to crypto companies like @Gemini, @coinbase, and @krakenfx so you can easily fund your account w/ fiat to buy bitcoin and crypto. As of today, the 'Open Banking Rule' developed pursuant to Section 1033 of the Consumer Financial Protection Act gives you the right to access you banking data via 3rd party apps. The banksters are suing the CFPB to vacate the Open Banking Rule and end the open banking era. This is the kind of egregious regulatory capture that kills innovation, hurts the American consumer, and is bad for America. Jamie Dimon and his cronies are trying to undercut President Trump's mandate to make America the pro innovation and the crypto capital of the world. We must fight back! 🇺🇸' 7 Reasons that make Samsung GALAXY Z FLIP7 different from others AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Economic Times
12 hours ago
- Economic Times
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang calls AI the ‘greatest equalizer of our time', predicts it will create more millionaires than the internet
Synopsis Nvidia's CEO, Jensen Huang, predicts AI will create more millionaires in the next five years than the internet did in twenty, democratizing wealth creation by making everyone a programmer, artist, and author. He envisions companies operating both physical and digital factories, with small AI teams generating billions in value. Reuters Nvidia's CEO, Jensen Huang, predicts AI will create more millionaires in the next five years than the internet did in twenty, democratizing wealth creation by making everyone a programmer, artist, and author. He envisions companies operating both physical and digital factories, with small AI teams generating billions in value. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang is no stranger to making bold claims, but his latest prediction might just redefine how we view the next era of innovation. Speaking on the All-In podcast hosted by venture capitalist Chamath Palihapitiya, Huang forecasted that 'AI will create more millionaires in five years than the internet did in 20.' In an era where AI is evolving faster than policy and public understanding can keep pace, Huang's perspective offers both a reality check and a roadmap for those hoping to ride the next tech wave. The takeaway? The AI revolution is already here, and those who don't adapt may be left behind. When asked why he calls AI the 'greatest technology equaliser,' Huang responded with a transformative view: 'Everybody is a programmer now.' According to the Nvidia CEO, the traditional gatekeeping of coding languages like C++ or Python has faded. With AI interfaces, people now only need to express an idea in natural language to create something powerful. 'Everybody is an artist now; everybody is an author now,' Huang said, explaining that AI bridges the gap between imagination and execution. The CEO believes this accessibility will democratize wealth creation, empower creatives, and allow smaller teams to deliver enterprise-level impact. Huang believes that in the near future, every company will operate two factories—one physical and one digital. 'Tesla builds cars in one factory, and in another, it builds the AI that powers them,' he explained. This model, he claims, will soon apply to every major industrial business, not just tech startups. And the scale? Staggering. Nvidia plans to produce about $500 billion worth of AI supercomputers in Arizona and Texas over the next four years. These machines are expected to drive trillions in economic value across industries. In a conversation during the Hill and Valley Forum, Huang revealed the financial impact of compact, focused AI teams. Citing examples like OpenAI and China's DeepSeek—each initially staffed with about 150 researchers—Huang estimated these teams can produce value worth $20 to $30 billion, or roughly $200 million per person. 'No industry in history has ever had this kind of leverage,' he asserted, underlining how mid-sized teams, when backed with the right resources, can transform markets at lightning speed. In fact, Huang noted, 'I've created more billionaires on my management team than any CEO in the world. They're doing just fine.' In an unexpected insight into Nvidia's internal culture, Huang also shared his hands-on approach to employee compensation. He confirmed that he personally reviews every proposed salary and stock grant at the company—yes, all 42,000 employees—and uses machine learning to sort through recommendations. '100% of the time, I increase the company's spend on OpEx,' Huang said, 'because you take care of people, and everything else takes care of itself.' And yes, he jokingly added, he does 'carry stock options in his pocket.' Huang issued a word of caution for professionals stuck in old ways. 'Anybody who is not using AI is going to lose their jobs to someone with knowledge of AI,' he said. This wasn't framed as a threat, but rather a reflection of the new baseline in skill development. For those who've long felt tech was inaccessible, AI may offer an unexpected second chance to get ahead. 'The barrier between idea and execution has collapsed,' Huang declared.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
18 hours ago
- Business Standard
Meta clashes with Apple, Google as US states push age verification laws
The biggest tech companies are warring over who's responsible for children's safety online, with billions of dollars in fines on the line as states rapidly pass conflicting laws requiring companies to verify users' ages. The struggle has pitted Meta Platforms Inc. and other app developers against Apple Inc. and Alphabet Inc.'s Google, the world's largest app stores. Lobbyists for both sides are moving from state to state, working to water down or redirect the legislation to minimize their clients' risks. This year alone, at least three states — Utah, Texas and Louisiana — passed legislation requiring tech companies to authenticate users' ages, secure parental consent for anyone under 18 and ensure minors are protected from potentially harmful digital experiences. Now, lobbyists for all three companies are flooding into South Carolina and Ohio, the next possible states to consider such legislation. Meta Ahead Of Earnings Figures The debate has taken on new importance after the Supreme Court this summer ruled age verification laws are constitutional in some instances. A tech group on Wednesday petitioned the Supreme Court to block a social media age verification law in Mississippi, teeing up a highly consequential decision in the next few weeks. Child advocates say holding tech companies responsible for verifying the ages of their users is key to creating a safer online experience for minors. Parents and advocates have alleged the social media platforms funnel children into unsafe and toxic online spaces, exposing young people to harmful content about self harm, eating disorders, drug abuse and more. Blame Game Meta supporters argue the app stores should be responsible for figuring out whether minors are accessing inappropriate content, comparing the app store to a liquor store that checks patrons' IDs. Apple and Google, meanwhile, argue age verification laws violate children's privacy and argue the individual apps are better-positioned to do age checks. Apple said it's more accurate to describe the app store as a mall and Meta as the liquor store. The three new state laws put the responsibility on app stores, signaling Meta's arguments are gaining traction. The company lobbied in support of the Utah and Louisiana laws putting the onus on Apple and Google for tracking their users' ages. Similar Meta-backed proposals have been introduced in 20 states. Federal legislation proposed by Republican Senator Mike Lee of Utah would hold the app stores accountable for verifying users' ages. Still, Meta's track record in its state campaigns is mixed. At least eight states have passed laws since 2024 forcing social media platforms to verify users' ages and protect minors online. Apple and Google have mobilized dozens of lobbyists across those states to argue that Meta is shirking responsibility for protecting children. 'We see the legislation being pushed by Meta as an effort to offload their own responsibilities to keep kids safe,' said Google spokesperson Danielle Cohen. 'These proposals introduce new risks to the privacy of minors, without actually addressing the harms that are inspiring lawmakers to act.' Meta spokesperson Rachel Holland countered that the company is supporting the approach favored by parents who want to keep their children safe online. 'Parents want a one-stop-shop to oversee their teen's online lives and 80% of American parents and bipartisan lawmakers across 20 states and the federal government agree that app stores are best positioned to provide this,' Holland said. As the regulation patchwork continues to take shape, the companies have each taken voluntary steps to protect children online. Meta has implemented new protections to restrict teens from accessing 'sensitive' content, like posts related to suicide, self-harm and eating disorders. Apple created 'Child Accounts,' which give parents more control over their children's' online activity. At Apple, spokesperson Peter Ajemian said it 'soon will release our new age assurance feature that empowers parents to share their child's age range with apps without disclosing sensitive information.' Splintered Groups As the lobbying battle over age verification heats up, influential big tech groups are splintering and new ones emerging. Meta last year left Chamber of Progress, a liberal-leaning tech group that counts Apple and Google as members. Since then, the chamber, which is led by a former Google lobbyist and brands itself as the Democratic-aligned voice for the tech industry, has grown more aggressive in its advocacy against all age verification bills. 'I understand the temptation within a company to try to redirect policymakers towards the company's rivals, but ultimately most legislators don't want to intervene in a squabble between big tech giants,' said Chamber of Progress CEO Adam Kovacevich. Meta tried unsuccessfully to convince another major tech trade group, the Computer & Communications Industry Association, to stop working against bills Meta supports, two people familiar with the dynamics said. Meta, a CCIA member, acknowledged it doesn't always agree with the association. Meta is also still a member of NetChoice, which opposes all age verification laws no matter who's responsible. The group currently has 10 active lawsuits on the matter, including battling some of Meta's preferred laws. The disagreements have prompted some of the companies to form entirely new lobbying outfits. Meta in April teamed up with Spotify Technology SA and Match Group Inc. to launch a coalition aimed at taking on Apple and Google, including over the issue of age verification. Competing Campaigns Meta is also helping to fund the Digital Childhood Alliance, a coalition of conservative groups leading efforts to pass app-store age verification, according to three people familiar with the funding. Neither the Digital Childhood Alliance nor Meta responded directly to questions about whether Meta is funding the group. But Meta said it has collaborated with Digital Childhood Alliance. The group's executive director, Casey Stefanski, said it includes more than 100 organizations and child safety advocates who are pushing for more legislation that puts responsibility on the app stores. Stefanski said the Digital Childhood Alliance has met with Google 'several times' to share their concerns about the app store in recent months. The App Association, a group backed by Apple, has been running ads in Texas, Alabama, Louisiana and Ohio arguing that the app store age verification bills are backed by porn websites and companies. The adult entertainment industry's main lobby said it is not pushing for the bills; pornography is mostly banned from app stores. 'This one-size fits all approach is built to solve problems social media platforms have with their systems while making our members, small tech companies and app developers, collateral damage,' said App Association spokesperson Jack Fleming. In South Carolina and Ohio, there are competing proposals placing different levels of responsibility on the app stores and developers. That could end with more stringent legislation that makes neither side happy. 'When big tech acts as a monolith, that's when things die,' said Joel Thayer, a supporter of the app store age verification bills. 'But when they start breaking up that concentration of influence, all the sudden good things start happening because the reality is, these guys are just a hair's breath away from eating each other alive.'
