‘Not my friend': Kim Williams lashes Austen Tayshus amid fresh scandal
Kim Williams has lashed Austen Tayshus after it emerged the once-prominent comedian continues to invoke the ABC chair's name in heated messages, this time to a former staffer at the broadcaster.
More correspondence was revealed by 2GB on Friday morning, two months after Media Watch exposed the comedian's use of Williams' name to pressure ABC staff to give him air time. This time, Tayshus, real name Sandy Gutman, refers to himself as 'mate of Kim Williams' in a message to former Radio Sydney host Josh Szeps.
The message, which was sent on Facebook Messenger to Szeps, appears to be in relation to an opinion piece written by Szeps in The Sydney Morning Herald. Gutman, who is Jewish, called Szeps' a 'half-Jew' for critiquing Israel over its military campaign in Gaza.
'What you did is dangerous to others. You can sleep well. Just shut up and keep these opinions to yourself at this dangerous moment,' Gutman wrote.
The opinion article by Szeps – who no longer works for the ABC – bears no relation to Williams.
Loading
Gutman signed off his message as 'Austen Tayshus. Difficult conversationalist and mate of Kim Williams', perhaps a reference to Szeps' podcast Uncomfortable Conversations.
Williams labelled the message and Gutman's ongoing use of his name for his own benefit 'disgusting', saying that the comedian is no friend of his.
'He is not, has never been, and would never be a friend of mine. It is disgusting,' Williams said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
13 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Iran warns Donald Trump not to inflame relationship in wake of social media post claiming he saved Khamenei's life
Tehran has issued a furious response to the United States after President Donald Trump said he saved the life of Iran's Supreme Leader. A ceasefire between Israel and Iran was introduced this week after it was brokered by the US, but there are fears it is fragile. The deal was brokered after the US struck three Iranian nuclear facilities in a targeted military operation known as Midnight Hammer. So far, the ceasefire has stood firm, despite a scare when Trump had to order Israel to turn back fighter jets from a planned attack after accusing Iran of launching a missile at the Jewish state after the deadline had passed. But President Trump's social media presence has rubbed Iran the wrong way after a post about their Supreme Leader, Grand Ayatollah Khamenei, where he claimed he saved his life. "I knew EXACTLY where he was sheltered," Trump posted to Truth Social. "I SAVED HIM FROM A VERY UGLY AND IGNOMINIOUS DEATH, and he does not have to say, 'THANK YOU, PRESIDENT TRUMP!'" Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi shared a post on X in response, warning the President to be careful with how he speaks about Iran's Supreme Leader. "If President Trump is genuine about wanting a deal, he should put aside the disrespectful and unacceptable tone towards Iran's Supreme Leader, Grand Ayatollah Khamenei, and stop hurting his millions of heartfelt followers," he said. Mr Araghchi did not stop there, as he made reference to off the cuff comments made by NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte where he described Trump as "daddy" when referring to how he handled the conflict in the Middle East. "The Great and Powerful Iranian People, who showed the world that the Israeli regime had NO CHOICE but to RUN to 'Daddy' to avoid being flattened by our Missiles, do not take kindly to Threats and Insults. "If Illusions lead to worse mistakes, Iran will not hesitate to unveil its Real Capabilities, which will certainly END any Delusion about the Power of Iran." The chilling message comes after Khamenei delivered his first public comments since the ceasefire, warning Iran won't hesitate to target American military bases in the Middle East if the US launches any future attacks. The 86-year-old said Iran "delivered a slap to America's face" when an Iranian missile attack struck a US base in Qatar, in retaliation to the US strikes on its nuclear facilities "The US President Trump unveiled the truth and made it clear that Americans won't be satisfied with anything less than an event will never happen," he said. "The fact that the Islamic Republic has access to important American centres in the region and can take action against them whenever it deems necessary is not a small incident, it is a major incident, and this incident can be repeated in the future if an attack is made."
Sky News AU
a day ago
- Sky News AU
ABC misses Pentagon meeting on Iran attack before copping Antoinette Lattouf judgement - despite employing 30 legal staff
At 10 pm (AEST) on Thursday 26 June, the United States Department of Defense held a press briefing at the Pentagon. It was addressed by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Dan Caine. Both men spoke and took questions. The briefing, on the US attack on Iran's nuclear facilities, took around 40 minutes. How does Media Watch Dog know this? – avid readers might ask. Well, it was shown live on Fox News in the US (which is available in Australia on Foxtel). And the Fox coverage was shown live on Sky News (available on Foxtel as well as Sky News Regional). And what about the ABC? – MWD hears avid readers cry. Well, zilch is the answer. ABC TV continued with its usual (boring) late night programming. And the ABC TV News Channel did not bother to cover the Pentagon gig – and was as dull as usual. Agree with President Donald J. Trump's decision to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities or not – this was riveting television. Hegseth (a one-time Fox News presenter) criticised sections of the media for their dismissive coverage of the attack. And Caine gave a fascinating account of how the air raid was conducted – covering events of up to 15 years ago. Retired General Jack Keane described the occasion as one of the most instructive Department of Defense briefings he had ever witnessed. But you would not know this if you watched the taxpayer-funded public broadcaster After Dark (as the saying goes) on 26 June. EDITORIAL YET ANOTHER ABC LEGAL HOWLER Media Watch Dog was not surprised by Federal Court Justice Darryl Rangiah's decision in Antoinette Lattouf v Australian Broadcasting Corporation which was handed down on 25 June. The judge found that the ABC had contravened the Fair Work Act 2009 by terminating Ms Lattouf's employment in late December 2023. MWD had this to say on 28 February 2025: As MWD has maintained from day one on this matter, the ABC should not have employed leftist activist journalist Antoinette Lattouf for five days as a fill-in presenter on ABC Radio Sydney's Mornings program. And it was most unwise for the ABC to terminate her employment after three days of a five-day contract. Both were instances of poor management. The process went through six lines of management and involved ABC managing director David Anderson and (former) ABC Chair Ita Buttrose – who are currently in disagreement about facts in the case. Mr Anderson and Ms Buttrose have since left the taxpayer funded public broadcaster as has the ABC's Christopher Oliver-Taylor who was involved in the decision making. Meanwhile the ABC – which has a legal staff of around 30 – has ended up paying more than $1 million dollars in compensation and costs. Meanwhile Ms Lattouf remains an activist journalist – saying this after Justice Rangiah's judgment was delivered: 'I was punished for my political opinion. I won't be taking any questions. I'll have more to say in due time. Thank you.' That's all well and good. Ms Antoinette Lattouf was not employed for her political opinions. However, she was treated much more harshly than some high-profile ABC journalists who proclaim their political opinions. CAN YOU BEAR IT? You've heard about the ABC – as in the Australian Broadcasting Corporation. But what about the ABC – as in the Always Bryant & Curran? As avid Media Watch Dog readers will recall, as recently as 14 June, Ellie's (male) co-owner drew attention to the political love-in between ABC presenter and former BBC journo Nick Bryant and the Professor of Modern History at Sydney University, James Curran. The reference was to a discussion on ABC Radio National's Saturday Extra about your man Curran's book The Unknown Nation: Australia After Empire – which is the outpouring of an alienated member of the leftist intelligentsia concerning Australia's (alleged) faults. It was one of those familiar events on the taxpayer-funded public broadcaster where the left-of-centre Bryant agreed with the left-of-centre Curran and, in time, the learned professor – well, you get the picture. On Saturday 21 June, Saturday Extra ran a segment titled 'Influence and Ignorance: A Short history of snubbed Aussie PMs'. The guest was James Curran and presenter Nick Bryant. It would seem that this ABC duo believes that the Australia-United States alliance can be judged with respect to the personal relationships between Australian prime ministers and the US presidents. In any event, this is how Comrade Bryant kicked off the discussion. Or bounced-the-ball as they would say in Australian Football League language: Nick Bryant: Now this weekend, the analysis pages of the newspapers should have been full of commentary on Anthony Albanese's first sit-down meeting with Donald Trump. But it didn't happen, of course. Because the US president left the G7 summit in Canada early to deal with the escalating war between Israel and Iran. Instead, there have been a rash of headlines about the Australian prime minister being snubbed. It's not the first time the press have seized upon the perceived slighting of an Aussie PM. Jimmy Carter called Malcolm Fraser, 'John'. Richard Nixon reportedly had to ask William McMahon how to pronounce his surname. And when he announced the AUKUS Defence Pact, Joe Biden seemed initially to struggle to recall Scott Morrison's name. Joe Biden: I want to thank – uh – that fella down under. Thank you very much, pal. Appreciate it Mr Prime Minister. Nick Bryant: But does all this get a little bit overblown? Well yes, it does. But this did not stop the Bryant/Curran discussion from extending for a further 15 minutes and 30 seconds. Soon after, Bryant acknowledged that the formal name of Australia's 22nd prime minister was John Malcolm Fraser. He already had conceded that President Biden, who was cognitively challenged at the time, remembered Scott Morrison's name after a ten-second, er, senior moment. As to whether President Nixon asked William McMahon how to pronounce his name – who knows? In any event, the US president might have been distracted by Sonia McMahon's dress – which was described by the Powerhouse Collection – 'Straight bodied, full-length evening gown…. Long slit sleeves decorated with a ladder-effect of rhinestones. The dress is slit from the underarm to the hem with an infill of flesh-coloured nylon fabric with bands of rhinestones extending from the underarm to the hip.' MWD avid readers might like to know this – it is certainly more interesting than yet another Bryant/Curran discussion. Then the learned professor (who is also the Australian Financial Review's 'international affairs expert') spoke about how Prime Minister John Gorton was denied 'a private sandwich with the president' which Prime Minister Harold Holt had previously experienced. Yawn. But it went on and on. Including this piece of trivia: Nick Bryant: And George Herbert Walker Bush actually tells the story of being reduced to tears when he delivered an address in the parliament in Canberra and saw his old friend Bob Hawke not sat in the Prime Minister's chair but on the back benches. [Interesting – I thought G.W.H Bush died in 2018. Maybe he was communicating from the other side via the psychic John Edward – MWD Editor.] James Curran: Yeah. Well, that's right. I think, as I said, the expectation was that he and Hawke would continue the chemistry. But as I said, he [Bush] got [Paul] Keating [who had replaced Hawke as prime minister] and then [Bush] went up and vomited in the lap of the Japanese prime minister. Nick Bryant: The famous moment which may even have cost George Herbert Walker Bush the presidency. [He] went on to lose that election in 1992, of course…. Go on. And they did. Comrade Curran went on to state and re-state his familiar critique of the Australian-American Alliance. Along the way, he had this to say about how/when Prime Minister Anthony Albanese should/could meet President Donald J. Trump. Let's go to the transcript: James Curran: …it's almost as if the nation's prestige and honour has been affronted. But you know, I mean, if you look back in history, it often has taken a good six months, sometimes longer for an Australian prime minister to secure a meeting, an initial meeting, with an American president. So, the kind of, the kind of hair pulling and hand wringing that's going on now, I think frankly, it's a little bit immature. I think it's a sign of a kind of almost a dedicated provincialism to the place sometimes. We just can't seem to rise above it. We panic. And the alarm bells go off. Which raises the question. How much hyperbole can an AFR international affairs expert drop into a couple of sentences? However, it continued with the learned professor telling listeners – if listeners there were – Australia 'can't keep sort of getting its knickers in a twist'. At this time, it being around 8.30 am (aka Hangover Time on a Saturday) MWD threw the switch to Zzzzzzz. He woke up asking: Can You Bear It? Media Watch Dog just loves it when ABC journalists interview ABC journalists on the taxpayer-funded public broadcaster. And so Ellie's (male) co-owner was thrilled – absolutely thrilled – when he found out that the ABC's Patricia Karvelas was to interview the ABC's Raf Epstein on the ABC's Politics Now podcast. It's the sort of thing that gives (political) incest a bad name – but it's great for Ellie's (male) co-owner. Now Comrade Epstein also stars in this issue's hugely popular 'A Moment' segment – in this instance, 'A Raf Epstein Moment' (re which see below). No surprise then that the Raf/PK exchange went to air on Monday – the day after Comrade Epstein appeared on Insiders . He seems to be in demand by ABC types to talk about Iran and Israel. It turned out that he repeated on Monday much of what he said on Insiders on Sunday. Including the point that Trump had once misspelled the nuclear facility of Fordow as Forgo on a Truth Social post. Yawn. And he criticised Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu but not Iran's Sayyid Ali Khamenei. And he quoted from Tucker Carlson. Yawn again. Here we go: Raf Epstein: And if I can end on a final point, Tucker Carlson got a brief mention over the weekend, and we glossed over him on Insiders. We're in a bad place if someone like that, who I don't actually regard as a good-faith actor in the American media landscape, if he's the only one saying to a proponent of war, "do you actually understand the country you seek to topple?" That's really important. I can't name every ethnic group in Iran – Patricia Karvelas: No, but I've got to say on that, that clip between, that went viral, between Tucker Carlson and Ted Cruz, what alarmed me is that I definitely could answer more of the questions than Ted Cruz. Wasn't that alarming, though? This is a lawmaker. Raf Epstein: In some ways it comes as a lawmaker because I would always expect you to answer more questions than a Senator from Texas. It's not accurate to describe Senator Cruz as a 'proponent of war'. After all, he merely supported a military air strike on Iran's nuclear capacity. The Trump administration has no intention of going to war with Iran. Moreover, Iran would be a nuclear threat whether it had a population of 10 million or 100 million. Cruz did not know the answer to Carlson's question about Iran's population but this was a mere 'media gotcha' moment. As to Comrade Epstein's put-down of Texas senators – this raises the question. Is Epstein a snob who is contemptuous of the American South? And here's another question: Can You Bear It? As avid MWD readers well know, Hendo loves ABC programs with a left-wing tendency and a lack of viewpoint diversity. Why? Because they provide lotsa copy for Ellie's (male) co-owner. Consequently, ABC Radio National's Late Night Live is a MWD fave because it's invariably 'Late Night Left'. Unfortunately, Laura ('the Morrison government was into ideological bastardry') Tingle has changed roles and exited LNL. She is now the ABC's Global Affairs Editor and – as such – intent on explaining Australia to the world, as she put it. A big task, to be sure. But, as the saying goes (or went), someone's gotta do it. MWD expects that the Conservative Free Zone will select another left-of-centre type to do the Australian national politics slot on Mondays. This leaves the Tuesday American politics slot to the left-of-centre Bruce Shapiro and the Wednesday British politics slot to the left-of-centre Ian Dunt. But, MWD digresses – not for the first time. On Tuesday 24 June, Late Night Live presenter David Marr interviewed an ex-ABC journalist, the left-of-centre Andrew Fowler. Discussion turned on the new edition of Comrade Fowler's book on Julian Assange titled The Most Dangerous Man in the World: Julian Assange and his secret White House deal for freedom. Andrew Fowler is a member of the Julian Assange Fan Club. While on Ellie's Late Night Walk, Hendo tuned into the Marr/Fowler exchange which was described by the ABC as follows: A year ago this week, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was released from prison after a 14-year fight for freedom. Assange accepted a guilty plea of conspiring to obtain and disclose classified U.S. documents in exchange for being returned home to Australia. But how did this deal come about and what happened in the lead-up to his return home? Journalist Andrew Fowler shares the inner-dealings and joins the dots on the backstory of the negotiations to release Assange. On the way home, Ellie's (male) co-owner noticed that Comrade Fowler had not made any reference to Comrade Assange's woman problem. However, towards the end of the interview, the issue was raised by David Marr. Let's go to the transcript: David Marr: Do the Swedish charges that were eventually abandoned, the accusations of sexual misconduct. Do those still hang over his reputation? Andrew Fowler: They do hang over his reputation, yeah, and they shouldn't. David Marr: What are his plans now? What's he going to do? Andrew Fowler: By the way, [the UN] Rapporteur on Torture Nils Melzer actually nailed that whole story of the, of the women and Assange in Sweden and what happened. And it's a long and complicated read. But his view, his view, was that this should not be proceeded with any further and he was quite strong in his condemnation of the way the whole process operated…. David Marr: Fair enough. Is it? The fact is that Assange's long incarceration in Britain's Belmarsh Prison was primarily due to the Swedish charges (as David Marr described them). By the way, MWD takes no position on the allegations against Assange – only that they were made and affected his long incarceration. In Human Rights Watch on 16 April 2019, Heather Barr (the associate director of the HRW's Women's Rights Division) described the situation as follows – note that HRW was broadly supportive of Assange. When WikiLeaks' founder Julian Assange was arrested in London last week so he could face charges in the US, it raised deep concerns around media freedom. Amid these concerns, however, let's remember that Assange is also accused of rape. Assange fled to London's Ecuador embassy seven years ago to escape pending extradition proceedings that would have seen him returned to Sweden to face charges of unlawful coercion, sexual molestation, and rape, based on allegations by two women. He stayed in the embassy since then, he says, because Sweden would not guarantee against his onward extradition to the US, should the US wish to prosecute him for leaking diplomatic cables. As Assange sheltered in the embassy, beyond the reach of law enforcement, the statute of limitations expired on the charges of unlawful coercion and sexual molestation, meaning that they can no longer be prosecuted because so much time has passed. The rape charge was shelved, but can be restored until its statute of limitations expires in August 2020. It is the Swedish prosecutor's job to determine whether to seek Assange's extradition to Sweden under a European Arrest Warrant (EAW). In short, Assange ended up in Belmarsh Prison because he skipped bail. This is a serious offence under English law. He remained in prison while extradition proceedings were underway. As former British prime minister Lord Cameron (aka David Cameron) put it on ABC TV's Insiders on 21 March 2024 when interviewed by Sarah Ferguson: Sarah Ferguson : You don't want to see him extradited to the US? David Cameron: I think there are legal processes that need to be gone through. I think, you know, part of this [delay] is because Assange himself decided to camp in the Ecuadorian embassy for years on end. That was unnecessary. He should have faced his accusers earlier, in my view. This point is frequently overlooked by members of the Julian Assange Fan Club. In 2010 Sweden sought Assange's extradition to face sexual assault charges with respect to two women. Assange, who was living in Britain, was arrested but bailed. Assange skipped bail and obtained entry into the Ecuadorian Embassy in London in August 2012. Andrew Fowler did not mention Assange breaking bail in his LNL interview. Can You Bear It? Here's how the Sydney Morning Herald's headings covered the US attack on Iran nuclear facilities between Monday 23 June and Thursday 26 June. This gives a pretty clear idea of where the powers-that-be at Nine's SMH stand on this issue. Can You Bear It? A RAF EPSTEIN MOMENT IN WHICH ABC PRESENTER RAF EPSTEIN RANTS AGAINST PRESIDENT TRUMP Did anyone see Raf Epstein in rant mode on ABC TV Insiders last Sunday? Comrade Epstein was on-the-couch with Phil Coorey ( Australian Financial Review ) and the zany Samantha Maiden ( ). David ('Please call me Speersy') Speers was the presenter. Coorey and Maiden made sensible and considered comments about the Israel/Iran War. Not so much with the others. Let's go to the transcript early in the program: David Speers: So, Raf, the pressure is building on Iran. But the pressure is also building on Donald Trump who has to make what's a difficult decision. Raf Epstein: It's pretty scary to be honest, seeing him say, "I don't care what the intelligence community thinks". I don't know any intelligence, I don't know of any American intelligence assessment that says what he says, what Bibi Netanyahu says… David Speers: Ann Coulter's quote about Donald Trump – that he's like a sofa, he bears the impression of the person who last sat on him. You just hope that it's not Netanyahu that he was listening to. The Israelis can make a case, and you can make a case for why something should happen. But the very first basic steps of, what does the intelligence actually say? I mean, that's that does seem to be something that's absent from the conversation. What a load of absolute tosh. As to Ann Coulter's comment about President Donald J. Trump 'resembling a sofa in that he hears the impression of the person who last sat on him', it is not only as old as Methuselah. It's also inaccurate. Trump does not act in accordance with the view of the last person to whom he talked. [I remember that DLP Senator Vince Gair used the sofa/impression put-down against Liberal Party leader Billy Snedden half a century ago. And it wasn't new even then. – MWD Editor.] Also, the message from the Second Gulf War of recent memory is that United States intelligence agencies make errors. The discussion continued: Phil Coorey: Well, they [Israel] don't want a country [Iran] sworn to their destruction having nuclear weapons. And they don't want them to have the wherewithal to build those weapons. Raf Epstein: And they [Israel] can make that argument. That's fine if they want to make that argument… But what is completely absent from the discussion, and as much as I love my colleagues, and you know, I'm talking about my friends as well as my colleagues, there has been not a single question about whether or not what Israel is doing is illegal. I have not seen Penny Wong or Anthony Albanese – no one asked that question. Comrade Epstein is an example of a taxpayer-funded journalist at the Conservative Free Zone that is the ABC criticising a Labor government – from the left. By this time your man Epstein was somewhat garrulous – and engaged in vigorous arm movements to give emphasis to what became an anti-Israel rant: Raf Epstein: The issue is, how does the world deal with the problem? And Israel's great at escalating conflicts…. Your man Epstein continued: Raf Epstein: The concern is also, and, I mean, it's a bit embarrassing as well. It takes Tucker Carlson, who's a charlatan in many respects, but it takes someone like him to expose – Samantha Maiden: You're on the Tucker bandwagon again are you? Raf Epstein: Well, you know how much I love him. But he's someone who's exposing that how weak and pale and shallow the American understanding is of Iran…. How about that? Raf Epstein favourably quoted Tucker Carlson's (alleged) knowledge of Iran. This is the same Tucker Carlson who exhibited woeful ignorance about the late Soviet Union and contemporary Russia in his fawning interview with Vladimir Putin in February 2024. David Speers made this point at the end of Epstein's comment re Carlson. Soon after, Comrade Epstein channelled Carlson – who had asked Senator Ted Cruz about the population of Iran – with this question: Raf Epstein: …Here's a pop quiz. Are Persians, a majority ethnic group or a minority ethnic group in Iran? Phil Coorey: Wouldn't have a clue. Raf Epstein: Right. Exactly. We're all talking about the fate of that country. Can I, I had to look up another ethnic group - I know there's Arabs and Kurds and Turkmen and Assyrians, but I have to look that up on Google . It is widely known that Iran is a majority Persian nation with very few Arab residents. But what matters in this context is not the size or composition of Iran's population – but rather whether the theocracy controlled by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps has the capacity to produce nuclear weapons. Then, near the end of Insiders , Speersy read out the breaking news that the US had attacked the Iranian nuclear family at Fordow. At this time, Epstein became a military expert: [Speers reads out Trump's Truth Social post about bombing Iran] David Speers: Well, that is some big, big news. Raf Epstein: That's a full plane load? Because there's two bombs per B2. Phil Coorey: Whatever. Raf Epstein: Well, no, it's important – David Speers: A full payload of bombs was dropped on the primary site Fordow. Raf Epstein: Because the speculation was that you need more than one plane because you need to drop a series of those bombs so that they get down and actually successfully destroy Fordow. David Speers: Well, we'll see how successful it was. That is a big, big development right at the end of our show. Let's get some quick Final Observations… This is how your man Epstein commenced his final observation: Raf Epstein: He [Trump] misspelt Fordow on his social media site as "Forgo" – which personally I find a little bit terrifying, but interesting breaking news…. It turned out that the US had sent seven B-2 Bombers to Iran which dropped a total of 14 bombs – not one as implied by Epstein. So, there you have it. The presenter of Mornings on ABC Radio Melbourne was terrified that President Trump had once made a typo by spelling Fordow as 'Forgo'. Really. [Come to think of it, your man Epstein's 'terrifying' moment may have been due to an autocorrect function. – MWD Editor.] Verily – A Raf Epstein Moment. AN ABC UPDATE On ABC Radio National Breakfast in 2025, ABC management has decided it is a good idea to get Melissa ('Please call me Mel') Clarke to comment on political interviews after they concluded – so much so that RN Breakfast has almost become the Mel Clarke Show. This is what she had to say, after New Zealand Foreign Minister Winston Peters was interviewed on Wednesday 25 June, concerning his view of the US bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities. Melissa Clarke: I did find it interesting that he [Peters] said that, you know, where he does have these concerns about the legality, that it's something that he would relay in private. It kind of put off a little bing inside my head, because it's only in the last couple of hours that we've seen Donald Trump publish a text message from Mark Rutte, the Secretary General of NATO. And Mark Rutte had sent a very, I think it's fair to describe it as a pretty obsequious text message to Donald Trump…and Donald Trump just posts it on Truth Social. So even if Winston Peters and others do want to raise their concerns in private with Donald Trump, sometimes you just never know where your communications might end up. Sally Sara: Yeah…. Clarke's analysis was highly opinionated – with reference to the bing within her head and the reference to Rutte's (allegedly) 'pretty obsequious text' to President Trump. It would appear that the powers-that-be at RN believe that listeners are so ill-informed that they need to have interviews conducted by Sally Sara explained to them by Melissa Clarke. On Radio National Breakfast on Thursday 26 June, Sally Sara interviewed Liberal Party leader Sussan Ley followed by Labor's Minister for Finance Senator Katy Gallagher. Sussan Ley was challenged by Sara. But Katy Gallagher was given soft questions – including an opportunity to criticise Ley: Sally Sara: Finally, the Opposition leader, Sussan Ley, gave her first major speech at the Press Club yesterday after the federal election – and is talking about having a fresh approach and doing things differently. Have you noticed a shift in the Opposition's approach since the election? Katy Gallagher: Well, time will tell, I guess. I think it's an important speech she gave yesterday. I think when I looked at the comments that she made about women, I think it is important that these matters are dealt with by the Opposition. I don't think problem identification is the issue, though. I think there's been many a time where problems have been identified about their policy offering, the number of women, how their organisation works. It's actually the next step that matters, which is what are you going to do about it? And I think we'll just have to wait and see whether the rhetoric actually is matched by action. Sussan Ley was not asked her opinion about Labor's Senator Gallagher. THE FLANN O'BRIEN GONG FOR LITERARY VERBAL SLUDGE As avid Media Watch Dog readers are aware, this occasional segment is inspired by the Irish humourist Brian O'Nolan (1911-1966) – nom de plume Flann O'Brien – and, in particular, his critique of the sometimes incoherent poet Ezra Pound. By the way, your man O'Brien also had the good sense not to take seriously Eamon de Valera (1882-1975), the Fianna Fail politician and dreadful bore who was prime minister and later president of Ireland for far too long. The Flann O'Brien Gong for Literary or Verbal Sludge is devoted to outing bad writing or incomprehensible prose or incoherent oral expression or the use of pretentious words – or a combination of all of the above. CHRIS WARREN SCORES FOR A REFERENCE TO HAMMERS, NAILS AND SO ON Lotsa thanks for the avid West Australian reader who drew MWD's attention to an article in Crikey on 25 June. It was written by Christopher Warren and titled 'The category error behind the ABC's latest 'Back to the Future' reset'. Comrade Warren is a former federal secretary of the Journos' Union – aka the Media Entertainment Arts Alliance. Essentially your man Warren called for new ABC managing director Hugh Marks to be sacked. Already. It seems that he wants a return of Q+A which was junked under the ABC's new management. Comrade Warren blamed News Corp, yes News Corp, for the current state of the ABC. Quelle Surprise! But he then threw the switch to written sludge. Here we go: There's a good rule of thumb at the ABC: if News Corp likes what you're doing, it's probably the wrong thing. The strategy is, in philosophical terms, a category error — the sort you get when the national broadcaster puts a commercial hammer in charge of the delicate knowledge-making network that is the ABC. All of a sudden, diffuse cultural creativity becomes just so many nails to be hammered into the planks of a mass medium. Clever, eh? But what does it all mean? Well done Comrade Warren – you won the Flann O'Brien award. Literary Criticism By Flann O'Brien of Ezra Pound My grasp of what he wrote and meant Was only five or six % The rest was only words and sound — My reference is to Ezra £ * * * * * Literary Criticism By Ellie of Chris Warren My grasp of what he wrote or meant Was only four or five per cent Maybe he just took the p*** The reference is to Comrade Chris **** Until Next Time ****
Sky News AU
a day ago
- Sky News AU
Israeli-Iranian coalition call on Albanese govt to 'crack down' on Islamic extremism before it can 'take root' on home soil
A Jewish and an Iranian-Australian coalition have called on the Albanese government to 'crack down' on Islamic extremism before it can "take root" on home soil. A Jewish and an Iranian-Australian coalition have called on the Albanese government to crack down on Islamic extremism before it can "take root" on home soil. Israeli-Australian Roz Mendelle said she was concerned about extremism being promoted by Greens politicians and prominent activists across Australia. Ms Mendelle became trapped in Jerusalem after Iran began targeting civilian centres in missile strikes on Israel earlier this month in retaliation to the IDF's tactical bombings of Iranian nuclear and military targets in mid-June. After she received videos of 'violent protests and marches' back home from Iranian colleagues and friends, Ms Mendelle said the Greens politicians and activists were calling for sanctions on Israel while 'excusing' the actions of the regime's terror proxies, such as Hamas and Hezbollah. 'With this in mind, I hope the government will crack down on these extremists who are spreading hate at home,' Ms Mendelle told Fighting Islamic extremism on home soil Ms Mendelle is the founder and co-director of Brisbane-based Minority Impact, a self-described group of Australians from multi-ethnic backgrounds united in promoting social cohesion and opposing radicalism. Minority Impact is currently running a national campaign in solidarity with Iranian refugees who are calling for a free Iran. Iranian-Australian Azin Naghibi, who is a co-director of Minority Impact, said she connected with Ms Mendelle after October 7 when Hamas shared footage of its barbaric attacks on Israeli citizens. Ms Naghibi said after October 7, radicalism had taken place on the steps of the Sydney Opera House which made her realise Israelis and Iranians had one thing in common. "(It) struck me that Israelis and Iranians are suffering from the same enemies: radical Islamists and terrorist ideology," Ms Naghibi told Ms Naghibi said she connected with Ms Mendelle and others, including members of the Hindu community who were also victims of persecution, to stave off radical Islamic extremism in Australia. "We have established the Minority Impact Coalition organisation to work together to make Australia safer for all minorities. We don't want to see radicalism take root here in our second home," she said. Ms Naghibi said the story of Israeli Shani Louk, who was kidnapped from the Nova festival before she was tortured, raped and killed, reminded her of a similar brutal repression of women in Iran. "We had a similar story that had happened in Iran during the 2022 national uprising known as the Woman, Life, Freedom movement. Her name was Nika Shakarami, whose life was taken facing similar brutality and violence at the hands of the IRGC, the terrorist organisation in Iran," she said. Ms Naghibi recounted a moment from 2009, before migrating to Australia, where she and her husband watched a young Iranian protester get shot "right in front of our eyes" by the IRGC. "My husband and I, along with others, helped put his body into a car to take him to the hospital, but later we found out it was too late," she said. "That moment was a turning point in our lives; we could no longer be the same people as before. From that day on, we committed ourselves to doing whatever we could against the Islamic regime and its oppressive forces." Ms Naghibi said she and her husband attended every protest and were beaten "several times" at demonstrations. They were also exposed to numerous threats after they stopped identifying as Muslims. "One significant incident was when the Islamic regime shut down our business, accusing us of being followers of Satan," she said. "In short, everything culminated in a situation where our lives were at risk, leading us to flee the country and seek for a safe haven in Australia." She said she and her husband fled Iran to Australia because they believed it would be "our safe haven", but realised the Islamic regime in Iran has attempted to "export their ideology, even here in Australia". "We have seen that after October 7, many terrorists used the anti-Israel movement to spread hate within society," she said. "We want the Australian government to make Australia safe for everyone.' — Morgan C. Jonas 🇦🇰 (@morgancjonas) June 23, 2025 Holding Australian society together Ms Mendelle said most Australians do not realise the war between Iran and Israel was 'unique'. 'It's a war against oppression and terrorism, at the source. The same extremist regime in Iran that funds Hamas and Hezbollah is also building nuclear weapons and silencing its own citizens,' she said Ms Mendelle said she wanted the same 'spirit of cohesion' and mutual respect in Australia as was prevalent in Israel among Jews, Arab Israelis, Druze, Baha'is and other groups. 'Since the October 7th massacre, which was funded primarily by this oppressive Iranian regime, Jewish Australians have struggled to feel support from the Labor government,' she said. 'Now, in a time when Israel is helping to prevent an oppressive dictator from building nuclear weapons, I expect our government to show moral clarity and unashamed support.' She urged Australians to listen to people who have fled the Iranian regime, who had 'lost daughters' and who still carry the scars of oppression. 'If you want peace—stand with the people, not the oppressors,' she said. 'We need a government that stands for truth and freedom. The Australian government can help bring Australian society together by demonstrating strength against violent and inciteful actors, adding the Iranian Regime's IRGC to the terror list (which USA and Canada have already done), and helping to humanise and support all minorities.' Trapped in the Middle East Ms Naghibi's family remains in Tehran and when Israeli media and the Trump administration alerted people to leave Iran's capital, she and her family immediately began to worry. "We were all panicked - what's going to happen? I hardly contacted my mum and asked if they had a plan to leave Tehran, she said they feel safe as the Israeli Airforce were only targeting the military bases and IRGC commanders," she said. "But (she) promised me as soon as they think it's not safe anymore they will go to the north." Ms Naghibi said Iranians believed their country had been "occupied by the Islamic regime". She said Ruhollah Khomeini - the first leader of the regime - said Islam was "against nationalism" and wanted people to be part of the Islamic Ummah, and not part of a nation. "Therefore, Iranians see the Islamic regime and the IRGC as our enemies who spend our money to export terrorism and radical ideology against Western civilisation," she said. "Iranians believe this was not, and will not be, our war; this is Ali Khamenei's war. He wants a nuclear bomb to make his dream come true: to wipe Israel off the map." Ms Mendelle said the war did not start with the exchange of rockets, but had been ongoing for decades. 'As Israelis, whether Jewish or Arab, we are accustomed to being the target of air strikes and terror. This war with the regime in Iran did not start with this escalation - the Islamic Regime has been funding terror networks around the world for decades, including Hamas and Hezbollah, bringing death and ruin to innocent civilians across the region,' she said before President Donald Trump announced Israel and Iran had agreed to a "complete and total ceasefire" 'We are scared. We all remain a stone's throw from a bomb shelter. When a siren rings, I have 90 seconds to get underground. It takes me, with both babies under three, 60 seconds from our door to the shelter.' Ms Mendelle said she shared a bomb shelter with a number of families from different backgrounds, including a family of Eritrean refugees, a Muslim Arab Israeli single mother and a number of Jewish families with children. She said her daughter, who celebrated her third birthday while sheltering from Iranian bombs, knew 'something serious' was happening, but forgot the stress and began playing with the other children despite the dangers outside. 'There is something different this time. Unity. Confidence. We know we are doing the most noble mission imaginable; preventing a diabolic dictator from using nuclear weapons,' Ms Mendelle said. She said it would help 'free the brave men and women of Iran' who had been 'begging' for the rest of the world to wake up and hear their cries since the Islamic Revolution of 1979. 'We all want peace, and we want nothing more than to help Iranians reclaim their rights, their freedoms, and build a true peace-waging democracy,' she said. 'After all, at least we have a bomb shelter. Here in Israel, our government does everything possible to protect its citizens—sirens, shelters, coordination. In Iran, the people are unprotected, censored, and silenced, with no access to internet or safety.' Ms Mendelle said this simple difference was a 'chilling reminder' of the privilege citizens of democracies take for granted.
