Underwater Pacific volcano expected to erupt. What would that mean for WA?
The mountain is located around 300 miles off the northern Oregon coast, where the Pacific and Juan de Fuca plates meet — 4,600 feet below the surface.
'It's on an ocean spreading center, which is on one side of the Juan de Fuca tectonic plate, and the other side is the side that's subducting beneath the subduction zone,' William Wilcock, a University of Washington professor researching the volcano, told McClatchy in a phone call.
The volcano has erupted three times since 1998, with the most recent one in 2015. Recently, researchers have noticed that magma build-up has caused the volcano to inflate to near the levels seen in previous eruptions.
'The model that Bill Chadwick, who's at Oregon State University, and Scott Nooner at North Carolina, Wilmington, they basically observed… So there have been eruptions in 1998, 2011 and 2015. And they noted that the eruption in 2011 occurred at about the same amount of inflation,' Wilcock said.
If the theory is correct, it will provide insight into how researchers can predict other volcanic eruptions, Wilcock said.
'Why this volcano is interesting is the magma chamber beneath the volcano is pretty shallow. It's less than a mile deep… I think this volcano behaves in a more simple way than other volcanoes. So I think other volcanoes, they're not as predictable like this,' Wilcock said.
Another key indicator of when the volcano will erupt is seismic activity.
At the time of a UW news release in late April, the volcano was seeing around 200 to 300 earthquakes a day on average, with that number reaching 1,000 some days. That's well below the 2,000 earthquake-a-day average that it was seeing in the lead-up to its last eruption, and Wilcock said there's actually been a decrease in seismic activity.
'That's actually gone down a little bit down to more like between 100 to 200 a day at the moment, but it varies from week to week,' Wilcock said.
According to Wilcock, he expects the number of earthquakes a day to reach 500 before the volcano erupts.
'Over that six months, the number increased from basically 500 a day to 2,000 a day,' Wilcock said. 'And so we're not at 2000 a day at the moment, but then it was inflating at two feet a year. Now it's inflating more slowly. So we might not expect quite as many, but I think I would expect at least 500 a day.'
According to Wilcock, experts expect the volcano to erupt sometime this year or next year, but that it's difficult to pinpoint exactly when
'I think, based on the seismicity, we think it might be a little further away than the other predictions… But I think everybody would say that if it's not going to go this year, it's probably next year,' Wilcock said.
While a volcanic eruption and thousands of earthquakes a day off the coast of northern Oregon might sound frightening, Wilcock said the volcano is too far away from land for its effects to be noticeable.
'These earthquakes are really small,' Wilcock said. 'They're magnitude twos and threes. It's a very small effect, and so it's not going to have any impact in the subduction zone 300 miles away.'
Additionally, seismic activity around the volcano isn't linked to seismic activity on land, so it isn't expected to trigger any earthquakes in Washington or Oregon.
It will have an effect on the marine ecosystem, but Wilcock said that the impacted species will recover quickly.
'When it erupts, you know, many of those are many of those, the bigger organisms we kill, but they will repopulate pretty quickly,' Wilcock said. 'Then the nutrients that come out of the volcano are actually very good for the microbial community.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
9 hours ago
- Gizmodo
Wild Video Captures Alien-Like Creatures Thriving in the Deepest Ocean Ecosystem
Researchers recently dove more than 6 miles beneath the surface of the northwest Pacific Ocean to explore the bottom of two submarine trenches. In this harsh marine environment, they discovered flourishing communities of chemosynthesis-based sea creatures—the deepest and most extensive ones ever found. The groundbreaking findings, published in the journal Nature on Wednesday, July 30, include photos and footage of the alien-like organisms going about their business in two of the most unforgiving ecosystems on the planet. No light touches the bottom of the Kuril-Kamchatka trench or the Aleutian trench. These organisms survive by converting chemicals to energy rather than food or sunlight. Scientists have long believed that chemosynthesis-based communities are widespread in hadal trenches, but actually finding them has proved challenging, according to the study. 'It's exciting—especially for a deep sea scientist—to go to a place that human beings have not explored,' lead author Xiaotong Peng, deputy director of the Institute of Deep-sea Science and Engineering at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, told BBC News. 'It's a great opportunity to discover new things. And what we saw was quite amazing.' Hadal trenches are depressions in the seabed that reach depths roughly between 20,000 feet (6,000 meters) and 36,000 feet (11,000 meters). They form along subduction zones where the edge of one tectonic plate slides—or subducts—beneath another. The Kuril-Kamchatka Trench plunges over 31,000 feet (9,600 meters) beneath the ocean surface and stretches from a point off the coast of Hokkaido, Japan, to its intersection with the Aleutian Trench near Russia's Commander Islands. The Aleutian is slightly less deep, with a maximum depth of about 27,000 feet (8,000 meters), but it's significantly longer, extending from its intersection with the Kuril-Kamchatka to the Gulf of Alaska. From July to August 2024, Peng and his colleagues conducted a series of dives aboard a submersible called Fendouzhe. This manned vessel is capable of reaching the deepest parts of the ocean at nearly 36,000 feet (11,000 meters). At the bottom of the trenches, they discovered thriving chemosynthesis-based communities associated with abundant methane seeps—cracks in the seafloor that emit methane gas into the water column. These communities were dominated by marine tube worms called siboglinid polychaetes and mollusks called bivalves that synthesize energy from fluids rich in hydrogen sulfide and methane. They were extensive, spanning more than 1,500 miles (2,500 kilometers) at depths ranging from roughly 20,000 feet (5,800 meters) to 31,000 feet (9,533 meters). The discovery challenges the conventional view of hadal ecosystems as being sustained by organic materials sinking from the ocean surface, according to a Nature briefing on the study. This research shows that hadal-seep ecosystems are a hallmark feature of hadal trenches, home to abundant populations of rare chemosynthesis-based species 'As more hadal chemosynthesis-based communities are discovered, we could uncover previously undocumented species, as well as currently unknown interactions between animals and microorganisms that have evolved under the high-pressure conditions of the hadal zone,' the Nature briefing states.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Bizarre New Creatures Discovered 30,000 Feet Under the Sea
The Titanic lies about 12,500 feet under the ocean. The pressure down there is so immense that even submersibles supposedly built for those conditions can, as we know, tragically fail. Now imagine taking a sub nearly three times deeper. That's what an international team of scientists did last summer. Led by the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the researchers took a manned submersible to the bottom of deep-sea trenches in an area in the northwest Pacific Ocean, roughly between Japan and Alaska, reaching a depth of more than 31,000 feet. The researchers weren't looking for a shipwreck. They were interested in what else might be lurking on the seafloor, which is so deep that no light can reach it. It was there that they found something remarkable: entire communities of animals, rooted in organisms that are able to derive energy not from sunlight but from chemical reactions. Through a process called chemosynthesis, deep-sea microbes are able to turn compounds like methane and hydrogen sulfide into organic compounds, including sugars, forming the base of the food chain. The discovery was published in the journal Nature. This was the deepest community of chemosynthetic life ever discovered, according to Mengran Du, a study author and researcher at the Institute of Deep-sea Science and Engineering at the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Using a deep-sea vessel called Fendouzhe, the researchers encountered abundant wildlife communities, including fields of marine tube worms peppered with white marine snails. The worms have a symbiotic relationship with chemosynthetic bacteria that live in their bodies. Those bacteria provide them with a source of nutrients in exchange for, among other things, a stable place to live. Among the tube worms the scientists encountered white, centipede-like critters — they're also a kind of worm, in the genus macellicephaloides — as well as sea cucumbers. The researchers also found a variety of different clams on the seafloor, often alongside anemones. Similar to the tube worms, the clams depend on bacteria within their shells to turn chemical compounds like methane and hydrogen sulfide that are present in the deep sea into food. Unlike other deep-sea ecosystems — which feed on dead animals and other organic bits that fall from shallower waters — these trench communities are likely sustained in part by methane produced by microbes buried under the seafloor, the authors said. That suggests that wildlife communities may be more common in these extremely deep trenches than scientists once thought. 'The presence of these chemosynthetic ecosystems challenge long-standing assumptions about life's potential at extreme depths,' Du told Vox in an email. —Benji Jones, Vox ALSO ON YALE E360 Will U.S. Push on Seabed Mining End Global Consensus on Oceans? Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Why some underwater earthquakes cause tsunamis – and others, just little ripples
After a massive earthquake off the coast of Kamchatka, a peninsula in the far east of Russia, on July 30 2025, the world watched as the resultant tsunami spread from the epicentre and across the Pacific Ocean at the speed of a jet plane. In some local areas, such as in Russia's northern Kuril Islands, tsunami waves reached heights of over three metres. However, across the Pacific there was widespread relief in the hours that followed as the feared scenario of large waves striking coastal communities did not materialise. Why was this? Not all underwater earthquakes result in tsunamis. For a tsunami to be generated, the Earth's crust at the earthquake site must be pushed upwards in a movement known as vertical displacement. This typically occurs during reverse faulting, or its shallow-angled form known as thrust faulting, where one block of the Earth's crust is forced up and over another, along what is called a fault plane. It is no coincidence that this type of faulting movement occurred at a subduction zone on 'the Pacific ring of fire', where the dense oceanic Pacific plate is being forced beneath the less dense Eurasian continental plate. These zones are known for generating powerful earthquakes and tsunamis because they are sites of intense compression, which leads to thrust faulting and the sudden vertical movement of the seafloor. Indeed, it was the ring of fire that was also responsible for the two most significant tsunami-generating earthquakes of recent times: the 2004 Indonesian Boxing Day and March 2011 Tohoku earthquakes. Why did the Indonesian and Japanese earthquakes generate waves over 30 metres high, but the recent magnitude 8.8 earthquake off Kamchatka (one of the strongest ever recorded) didn't? The answer lies in the geology involved in these events. In the case of the 2004 Indonesian tsunami, the sea floor was measured to have risen by up to five metres within a rupture zone of 750,000 sq km. For the tsunami that struck Japan in March 2011, estimates indicate the seafloor was thrust upwards by nearly three metres within a rupture zone of 90,000 sq km. Preliminary data from the recent Kamchatka event has been processed into what geologists call a finite fault model. Rather than representing the earthquake as a single point, these models show where and how the crust ruptured, including the length of that rupture in Earth's crust, its depth and what direction it followed. The model results show that the two sides of the fault slipped by up to ten metres along a fault plane of 18°, resulting in about three metres of vertical uplift. Think of it like walking ten metres up an 18° slope: you don't rise ten metres into the air, you only rise about three metres, because most of your movement is forward rather than upward. However, since much of this occurred at depths greater than 20km (over an area of 70,000 sq km) the seabed displacement would probably have been reduced as the overlying rock layers absorbed and diffused the motion before it reached the surface. For comparison, the associated slippage for the Tohoku and Indonesian events was as shallow as 5km in places. An added complication So, while the size of sea floor uplift is key to determining how much energy a tsunami begins with, it is the processes that follow – as the wave travels and interacts with the coastline – that can transform an insignificant tsunami into a devastating wall of water at the shore. As a tsunami travels across the open ocean it is often barely noticeable – a long, low ripple spread over tens of kilometres. But as it nears land, the front of the wave slows down due to friction with the seabed, while the back continues at speed, causing the wave to rise in height. This effect is strongest in places where the sea floor gets shallow quickly near the coast. The shape of the coastline is also important. Bays, inlets and estuaries can act like funnels that further amplify the wave as it reaches shore. Crescent City in California is a prime example. Fortunately however, when the wave arrived in Crescent City on July 30 2025, it reached a height of just 1.22 metres – still the highest recorded in the continental US. So, not every powerful undersea earthquake leads to a devastating tsunami — it depends not just on the magnitude, but on how much the sea floor is lifted and whether that vertical movement reaches the ocean surface. In the case of the recent Russian quake, although the slip was substantial, much of it occurred at depth, meaning the energy wasn't transferred effectively to the water above. All of this shows that while earthquake size is important, it's the precise characteristics of the rupture that truly decide whether a tsunami becomes destructive or remains largely insignificant. Get your news from actual experts, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter to receive all The Conversation UK's latest coverage of news and research, from politics and business to the arts and sciences. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. Matthew Blackett does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
