Delayed Parakiore Recreation and Sport Centre expected to cost $500 million
Photo:
SUPPLIED / CROWN INFRASTRUCTURE DELIVERY
The cost for a long-delayed sports centre in central Christchurch is expected to reach about $500 million, more than double the sum originally forecast.
The new Parakiore Recreation and Sport Centre is due to be completed in October, almost a decade later than planned.
The project has been plagued by a littany of problems including construction headaches, unfavourable ground conditions, cost blowouts and legal wrangling.
In a statement on Friday, Crown Infrastructure Delivery confirmed the centre was now 90 percent complete following the construction of a five-metre deep dive pool.
The agency said it was expected to cost "around $500 million upon completion".
Considered one of the city's main post-quake anchor projects, the centre was originally expected to be completed in 2016.
However, a $75m budget blow-out saw a deal with a preferred contractor axed by the government, with the project later handed over to Crown-led project managers.
Photo:
SUPPLIED / CROWN INFRASTRUCTURE DELIVERY
The delivery agency originally known as Ōtākaro Limited has had two re-brands over the course of construction, changing to Rau Paenga in 2023 and then Crown Infrastructure Delivery.
Construction finally began in 2018 with a revised completion date of October 2021.
This was revised to late-2023 as the pandemic presented further logistical obstacles.
The situation sagged further by 2022 as contractors CPB claimed for an additional $212m, a figure that ballooned to $439m in 12 months.
Both parties initially agreed on a contract price of $220m.
CPB took legal action in a bid to terminate its agreement in 2023 after Crown Infrastructure Delivery rebuffed claims of sizeable cost increases.
Lawyers for CPB described the situation as "a case where Humpty Dumpty could not be put back together again".
Photo:
SUPPLIED / CROWN INFRASTRUCTURE DELIVERY
The High Court ruled against CPB barring the firm from suspending on-site construction works, with an appeal dropped in March 2024.
The Christchurch City Council's contribution to the project has been capped at $147m.
With the finish line in sight, Crown Infrastructure Delivery project director Alistair Young said they were starting to see several finishing touches to the project.
"The structure's platform stands about three metres high, with the tallest decorative leaves reaching up to seven metres," he said.
"It includes 36 different features - from lights and interactive water elements to three fun-filled slides. Surrounding the structure are an additional 28 ground-level water features, creating an engaging play zone for children of all ages."
The 32,000 square metre centre will be the country's largest indoor sport and aquatics facility.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter
curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Teenagers who gain work experience at school more likely to be employed by age 20
Gateway supported short-term, work-based placements while Trades Academies provided learning in trades-related. (File photo) Photo: Supplied/ UCOL Teenagers who gain trade and workplace experience at school are more likely to get a qualification and complete apprenticeships, a report finds. A Ministry of Education report said students who participated in the Gateway and Trades Academy programmes were also more likely to be in substantial employment by the age of 20 than other students with similar characteristics. The report considered the cohorts that participated in the programmes in 2014 and in 2018 and compared their education and employment outcomes with similar students who did not participate. It said Gateway was set up in 2001 and supported short-term, work-based placements while Trades Academies had provided learning in trades-related fields since 2010. "Both programmes increased the likelihood of students staying in education at age 17 and achieving a Level 2 or higher qualification by age 18. "These effects were consistent across genders and ethnic groups," the report said. "Men in both programmes were more likely to enrol in and complete apprenticeships, though rates remained lower for Māori and Pacific men. Women's apprenticeship participation remained low. "Both programmes reduced the likelihood of being in limited employment and increased students being in substantial employment, particularly for men. "Gateway had a stronger effect than Trades Academies in reducing limited employment for women, especially Māori and Pacific women." The report said 87-90 percent of Gateway and Trades Academy students had a level two qualification by the age of 18, compared with 78-79 percent for similar students who had done neither programme. It said 10-12 percent had completed an apprenticeship by age 24, compared with six percent for similar students. About a quarter of the group of similar students were in limited employment when they were 18, compared to 16-19 percent for the cohorts that had participated in the programmes. By age 20, 46-53 percent of the Trades Academy and Gateway cohorts were in substantial employment, compared with 35-38 percent for the group that had done neither programme. The report said the programmes appeared to have "a protective role for educational participation and achievement during the pandemic". Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
8 hours ago
- RNZ News
How to get into the housing market with $80
HomeShare has worked with the Financial Market Authority to finetune its offering. Photo: Supplied/Susan Edmunds If you want to get into the property market, but don't have the money to do so, you may be about to get your chance - again. New fintech start-up HomeShare plans to launch later this year, offering investors the opportunity to buy a share in residential property. If that sounds familiar, that's because it's not the first attempt to offer this sort of investment scheme - The Property Crowd and The Ownery have both tried it within the past decade. In 2022, the Financial Markets Authority suspended the crowdfunding licence of The Property Crowd, after it contravened licensee obligations. No investors were using the platform at that point. The Ownery launched in 2016, offering shares in an Ellerslie house, but there was reportedly underwhelming investor interest and less than a quarter of shares were sold. It has not responded to a request for comment. Homeshare founder Martin van Blerk said the key difference between those previous attempts and his latest was that he had worked with the Financial Markets Authority in its fintech sandbox. The 'sandbox' is designed to encourage innovation, and allow participants to test their new products and services in a controlled environment, getting a better understanding of what the regulator will expect of them and adjusting as required. Van Blerk said HomeShare would offer 10,000 shares in a property based on an independent valuation. Its first property would be in Hamilton. People could buy single shares or many. On an $800,000 property, a share would be $80. Martin van Blerk is aiming for an October launch for HomeShare. Photo: Supplied/Susan Edmunds "The goal is making housing more affordable, more transparent and just easier to access for a lot of people, who'd otherwise be locked out, either because they don't have enough for a deposit or a mortgage, or they just don't know how to go about it." He said he aimed for an October launch and hoped to eventually have properties all over New Zealand. "Instead of buying one property in Auckland, you could buy shares in 100 throughout New Zealand, so it's a great way to diversify risk for property owners." Owners would receive a proportionate amount of rental income from the property and pay a proportional amount of the cost of ownership, including maintenance. People who wanted to exit their investment could sell their shares on HomeShare's secondary marketplace, as long as the price was set within what the company said was a reasonable range. Fees would be charged when shares were bought and sold. For first-home buyers, the fee is 0.95 percent "or slightly higher if you're a traditional investor". Van Blerk said the model had proved popular in other countries. "New Zealand is sort of lagging behind. I think this is a chance to put us at the front of a shift that's happening." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Scoop
15 hours ago
- Scoop
Country Life: Dollars For Nature – Can Biodiversity Credits Fix NZ's Conservation Woes?
Country Life: What are biodiversity credits and how can they work for NZ?, for Country Life If mud and dead things aren't your thing but you still want trees planted, pests killed and wetlands to flourish, you could pay others to do the hard slog through biodiversity credits. Not to be confused with carbon credits, they are a way for private investors and corporations to pay others to save the skink or clean up sludgy streams and, in so doing, meet the expectations of a company's increasingly green customers. A biodiversity credit market is something the government has been perusing for a few years now, given limited public funds to pay for the huge costs involved in protecting and restoring nature. At Fieldays this month Associate Minister for the Environment Andrew Hoggard said farmers and other landowners were already doing their bit to protect biodiversity and wanted to do more. 'Supporting voluntary nature credits markets is a chance for the government to show them the carrot, not just the stick. 'We want to connect those caring for the land with investors who support conservation.' This week, Christchurch-based business consultancy Ekos launched its own biodiversity credit scheme, BioCredita, where investors can purchase bundles of credits to fund nature projects, including Sanctuary Mountain Maungatautari, a fenced eco-sanctuary in Waikato. The project, covering 3363 hectares, costs $5000 daily to run and is hoping to fund operations through credits or units priced at $12 each, representing the cost of protecting one hundredth of a hectare. The first buyer, according to Ekos' chief executive Sean Weaver, is a window manufacturer 'who liked the idea of selling biodiversity-enriched windows'. 'They can't do much biodiversity conservation in the factory, but they can support a nearby project, which is what they've done,' Weaver told Country Life. Follow Country Life on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, iHeart or wherever you get your podcasts. The Ekos credits are measured, independently verified and registered, and the project monitored to ensure operators do what they say they're doing, Weaver said. 'We've built a standard called the Ecos SD standard, which defines all of the things you need to do in order to demonstrate the benefits that you're delivering. And then we've built a registry, a digital registry on blockchain technology, so that these units can be issued once they've been verified to the standard, and then they can be tracked and traced across.' Weaver stresses the credits, unlike carbon credits, are not for use to offset damage to the environment. The Maungatautari project is among several pilot projects which the government is hoping to learn from. Others include a Silver Fern Farms project and Te Toa Whenua Northland which is transitioning around 100 ha from exotic forestry to native trees and includes pest control on iwi-owned land. Foreign funding for local projects A voluntary biodiversity credit market is just another tool for companies, both here and overseas, which want to fund New Zealand's conservation efforts, according to Hayden Johnston, GM for the Natural Environment at the Ministry for the Environment. 'We know that in New Zealand, companies are spending in the millions of dollars each year to keep up with either their regulatory requirements or claims that they want to make about their brands. 'I think people see New Zealand as a … country that has high credibility in the international space, and I feel really confident that we could be creating some really high-end premium products or credits to be offered internationally. 'One of the key questions we've always had is, you know, who is going to buy these things, and what do they want to buy?' Ekos' Sean Weaver said his scheme ultimately wants to attract foreign revenue to New Zealand which is seen as a hotspot for biodiversity. 'Imagine going to Europe and lassooing, I don't know, 10,20,30,40 hundred million dollars worth of demand from big actors in those economies so that we can create a fire hose of money to point at New Zealand conservation interests. That's really the goal here.' Greenwashing, commodifying nature? But what about criticism the credits could be another vehicle for greenwashing – companies exaggerating or misleading consumers about their green credentials? The integrity of biodiversity schemes is key, given the world's chequered experience with carbon trading. Already critics are flagging concerns around the nascent biodiversity credit industry, not just greenwashing – but scaleability, distaste at the 'commodification' of nature and the risk of distracting governments from their funding obligations. Johnston said the government hopes to develop 'guardrails' by following the pilot projects' experience. 'Principles like transparency, so that the buyer knows exactly what they're buying; additionality, so that what they're buying is clearly an additional benefit from what would have happened otherwise; longevity, so that the action or the outcome will occur over a longish period of time.' A central registry for the credits is something they will be considering too, he said. Weaver describes credits as a variation on philanthropy. 'Are they commodifying nature? No, they're not. They're commodifying the human labour and technology cost to look after nature. So no nature is being traded in these credits.' It's not a goldrush Johnston said biodiversity credits could work well for farmers and landowners working collaboratively, say, in catchment groups, to fund things like fencing and pest control. 'One of the things I'm really keen we test is how you can do this in a way that is cost effective. 'We know that examples of projects that are using international verification, for example, can be quite costly, and we want to find ways to make this an available tool in New Zealand for New Zealand circumstances.' Weaver said the Ekos credits, which are tradeable, should not be seen as a goldrush, but essentially a form of sustainable financing. 'Everybody in the value chain, in our programme has to make a profit, but nobody is allowed to make a super profit, like an unjustifiable super profit. 'The main reason for that is that the end-user of biodiversity credits is buying a conservation outcome, and they want to be confident that they're funding the true cost of looking after the place, and not funding, you know, somebody's super profit that will help them just buy another yacht.' 'Projects still need to go out and hunt for buyers, and our system is a new net to go fishing for that money,' Weaver said. Learn more:
