Truist and Veterans Help Group Sponsor "An Evening of Honor" in Atlanta Featuring Medal of Honor Recipients
The Medal of Honor is the nation's highest award for valor in combat, and today there are only 61 living recipients - two of whom will be present at this event. Guests will hear firsthand reflections on service, sacrifice, and the moral courage required to lead in life's most challenging moments. These lessons transcend the battlefield - offering inspiration and guidance for anyone seeking to lead with integrity, whether in a classroom, boardroom, or community.
"We are deeply grateful to Truist and Veterans Help Group for making this evening possible," says Tom Hudner III, vice president for development and strategic initiatives at the National Medal of Honor Center for Leadership, himself the son of a Medal of Honor recipient, the late Thomas Hudner, Jr. "Their commitment to service and leadership aligns seamlessly with our mission, and their support enables us to elevate the voices and values of those who represent the very best of our nation."
This intimate gathering brings together civic and business leaders for a powerful exploration of leadership values inspired by the Medal of Honor - courage, integrity, commitment, sacrifice, citizenship and patriotism - and how those principles can guide meaningful action across today's communities and industries. This evening underscores the National Medal of Honor Center for Leadership's mission to equip young people, professionals, and public servants with the character-driven leadership tools they need to meet their moment.
About the National Medal of Honor Center for Leadership
The National Medal of Honor Center for Leadership's mission is to inspire, develop, empower and challenge leaders through the values embodied by our country's Medal of Honor Recipients. With leadership education opportunities that include fellowship programs and onsite trainings, as well as a nationwide digital educational platform and audience-curated visitor experiences, Americans of all ages, backgrounds and locations will learn leadership values of courage, sacrifice, citizenship, integrity, commitment and patriotism to inspire them to transform lives, shape the future, and carry forward the best traditions of what it means to be an American. For more information, visit www.mohcenterforleadership.org.
###
Media Contact: Anna Kate Twitty, AnnaKate@flockandrally.com
SOURCE: National Medal of Honor Center for Leadership
View the original press release on ACCESS Newswire
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
9 minutes ago
- Axios
Turns out the vibes were actually right this time
On Friday, the government's jobs report confirmed what Americans have been saying all year: The labor market isn't good. Why it matters: Call it a victory for vibes. The big picture: For years, consumer surveys about the economy, and even some "soft" data indicators, failed to predict what's actually happening in the real economy. The so-called vibecession predicted a recession that never came. But with this latest unemployment report, there's a sign that people are in touch with reality — at least when it comes to the job market. Americans know a stinker when they're living with it. Catch up fast: Job growth was anemic in July, worse than previously realized for the past few months, according to the closely watched Labor Department data released Friday. The numbers surprised the markets. Only 106,000 jobs were added to the economy over the last three months — the lowest since 2020, when the pandemic cratered employment. The resilient labor market was a "mirage," as Axios' Courtenay Brown writes. Zoom in: That would've been less of a shock if you'd been following the "anec-data," that is surveys and stories from the real world about the state of the job market. Glassdoor, the jobs site, has been tracking declining " employee confidence" all year. In May and June, it hit record lows — with a sinking share of workers reporting a positive business outlook for their employer. By the numbers: In June, only 43% of workers reported an upbeat outlook, the lowest since Glassdoor began tracking in 2016. Mention of "uncertainty" in Glassdoor job reviews spiked this spring. 66% of consumers surveyed in March said they expected more unemployment over the next year — the highest level in a decade, per University of Michigan data analyzed by Bank of America Institute. Unemployment, meanwhile, is still relatively low, but once you lose a job it's grown harder to find another. The share of Americans continuing to receive unemployment insurance has soared this year. Zoom out: Reports of a white-collar recession, and tales of professionals' struggles to land jobs have been growing. CEOs have been talking about workers being replaceable all year — a sign that they're not in desperate need of employees. Workers' pay expectations have been diminishing, too. The lowest wage Americans would be willing to accept for a new job fell sharply this year to $74,236 from a record high $82,135 in 2024, per a survey from the New York Federal Reserve on the so-called "reservation wage." Reality check: If you have a job, you're probably relatively OK — though it's become difficult to job hop. Layoffs are still relatively low. " Companies are holding onto workers since it was hard to hire them and then train them in the first place," Rick Rieder, BlackRock's chief investment officer of global fixed income, said in a Friday note about the jobs report. They still feel like things could improve, and will need staff going forward.


The Hill
9 minutes ago
- The Hill
Jury orders Tesla to pay $329M in Autopilot crash case, opening it up to other costly lawsuits
MIAMI (AP) — A Miami jury ordered Elon Musk's car company on Friday to pay $329 million to victims of a deadly crash involving its Autopilot driver assist technology, opening the door to other costly lawsuits and potentially striking a blow to Tesla's reputation for safety at a critical time for the company. The federal jury held that Tesla bore significant responsibility because its technology failed and that not all the blame can be put on a reckless driver, even one who admitted he was distracted by his cell phone before hitting a young couple out gazing at the stars. The decision comes as Musk seeks to convince Americans his cars are safe enough to drive on their own as he plans to roll out a driverless taxi service in several cities in the coming months. The decision ends a four-year long case remarkable not just in its outcome but that it even made it to trial. Many similar cases against Tesla have been dismissed and, when that didn't happen, settled by the company to avoid the spotlight of a trial. 'This will open the floodgates,' said Miguel Custodio, a car crash lawyer not involved in the Tesla case. 'It will embolden a lot of people to come to court.' The case also included startling charges by lawyers for the family of the deceased, 22-year-old, Naibel Benavides Leon, and for her injured boyfriend, Dillon Angulo. They claimed Tesla either hid or lost key evidence, including data and video recorded seconds before the accident. Tesla has previously faced criticism that it is slow to cough up crucial data by relatives of other victims in Tesla crashes, accusations that the car company has denied. In this case, the plaintiffs showed Tesla had the evidence all along, despite its repeated denials, by hiring a forensic data expert who dug it up. Tesla said it made a mistake after being shown the evidence and honestly hadn't thought it was there. It's not clear how much of a hit to Tesla's reputation for safety the verdict in the Miami case will make. Tesla has vastly improved its technology since the crash on a dark, rural road in Key Largo, Florida, in 2019.


The Hill
9 minutes ago
- The Hill
GOP congressman suggests he'd ‘lose money and go broke' if advisers stop stock trades
Rep. Rob Bresnahan (R-Pa.) dismissed the idea of directing his financial advisers to halt any stock trades amid his difficulties in establishing a blind trust that meets his standards, suggesting he would 'lose money and go broke.' Bresnahan, who has come under heat for continuing stock trades carried out by his advisers despite writing in support of banning congressional stock trades while campaigning for his seat, made the comment in an interview with local public news organization WVIA that was published Thursday. While Bresnahan said he has not been involved with the stock trades directed by his financial advisers, the outlet noted that he could order his advisers to stop trading stocks. 'And then do what with it?' Bresnahan told WVIA. 'Just leave it all in the accounts and just leave it there and lose money and go broke?' Bresnahan, a businessman whose net worth is estimated to be in the multi-millions, has said he would like to form a blind trust that would block him from having any control or knowledge of trades made on his behalf. But Bresnahan said he wants to use his existing financial advisers and wants to instruct the trustee to avoid investments that benefit foreign adversaries and avoid shorting American companies — running into problems with the House Ethics Committee. 'So, you would have to then find someone else that would even consider taking you to manage through a trustee account,' Bresnahan told WVIA. 'So, it became a disaster.' Last week, Bresnahan's lawyer sent a letter to the House Ethics committee saying that the Pennsylvania congressman prohibited his advisers from those types of investments or trades, the Washington Examiner reported. The letter also said Bresnahan is not consulted about any trade and is informed of trades only after they are complete. Bresnahan has also introduced a bill to ban stock trading for members of Congress and their spouses, and is open to working with other members on the issue. Still, Bresnahan has caught heat for being an active trader in Congress. The New York Times in April brought attention to Bresnahan continuing to trade despite writing a letter to the editor in The Citizens' Voice local newspaper in 2024 calling to ban congressional stock trading. The contrast between Bresnahan's statement during the campaign and his continued stock trades has made the freshman swing-district congressman a top target of Democrats hoping to win back the seat in 2026. 'Multi-millionaire Rob Bresnahan is full of shit,' Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Spokesperson Eli Cousin said in a statement in response to the WVIA interview. 'He campaigned on a promise to ban congressional stock trading, but is now saying that he must continue his prolific trading in order to prevent himself from going broke. He doesn't care about his constituents – he only cares about his bottom line.' Bresnahan's spokesperson Hannah Pope fired back by pointing to trades reported in former Speaker Nancy Pelosi's (D-Calif.) financial disclosures. 'Rep. Bresnahan was a small business owner before becoming a Member of Congress, and unlike the DCCC's long-time benefactor, prolific stock trader Nancy Pelosi, he does not plan on being a Member of Congress for the rest of his career. He does not trade his own stocks and is unaware of what is traded or when,' Pope said in a statement. The trades reported by Pelosi that have garnered scrutiny were made by her husband Paul Pelosi, according to the disclosures, and Pelosi has thrown her support behind an effort to ban stock trading by members of Congress. Bresnahan's spokesperson continued: 'He believes Members of Congress should not be allowed to profit off the information they are entrusted with, which is why he introduced legislation to ban Congressional stock trading, restoring the integrity Americans expect and deserve from their government. As a Member of Congress, his number one focus will always be the people of Pennsylvania's Eighth Congressional District.' Bresnahan's comments come as legislative action on stock trading bans heat up. A Senate committee this week advanced a bill to ban congressional stock trading, and Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) has pledged to file a discharge petition to try to force a vote on a bill to ban stock trading in the House.