Germany's Merz faces pressure to toughen stance on Israel
BERLIN - German Chancellor Friedrich Merz is under pressure to take a firmer stance towards Israel, with members of his own coalition calling for Berlin to join a statement by dozens of Western nations condemning the "inhumane killing" of Palestinians.
Merz, who leads Germany's centre-right CDU, has been increasingly critical of Israel. But Germany was notably absent from the joint statement issued on Monday by the EU and 28 Western countries including Britain and France, which called on Israel to immediately end the war.
The countries condemned what they called the "drip feeding of aid" to Palestinians in Gaza and said it was "horrifying" that more than 800 civilians had been killed while seeking aid.
Reem Alabali Radovan, international development minister in Merz's cabinet and a member of the centre-left SPD junior coalition partners, said on Tuesday she was unhappy with Germany's decision not to sign it.
"The demands in the letter from the 29 partners to the Israeli government are understandable to me. I would have wished for Germany to join the signal sent by the 29 partners," she said.
Merz's office says Germany's criticism of Israel is similar to that of other allies. Merz said on Tuesday he had told Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu "very clearly and very explicitly that we do not share the Israeli government's policy on Gaza".
"Above all we see the great suffering of the civilian population there. That is why I would like to once again renew my call to truly provide the necessary humanitarian aid to the civilian population in the Gaza Strip. The way the Israeli army is operating there is not acceptable," he said.
Government spokesperson Stefan Kornelius said that although Germany did not sign the joint declaration, Merz and his foreign minister "expressed very critical views of Israel's actions in the Gaza Strip yesterday – and in terms of substance and significance, said the same thing."
"Their statements are in no way inferior to the joint declaration," Kornelius said.
But the decision to withhold Germany's signature from the declaration follows many months in which Germany has taken particular care in public to restrain its criticism of Israeli actions.
German officials say their approach to Israel is governed by a special responsibility, known as the Staatsraeson, arising from the legacy of the Nazi Holocaust. They believe they can achieve more through diplomatic back channels than public statements.
German statements on Gaza typically include a demand for the immediate release of hostages held by Hamas. The joint statement that Merz declined to sign to this week stopped short of such a demand, although it noted that the hostages were suffering under worsening conditions.
Merz is one of the few European leaders who has publicly offered to host Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, without arresting him on a warrant for suspected war crimes issued by the International Criminal Court in the Hague.
Israel rejects the charges against Netanyahu and says they are political motivated. The ICC says all signatories of the court's founding statute, which include all 27 EU members, are obliged to arrest Netanyahu if he enters their territory.
Critics of Merz's approach, including within the SPD coalition partners, say the legacy of the Holocaust cannot be an excuse for ignoring Israeli crimes, and, on the contrary, the post-Holocaust motto of "never again" should apply to Gaza now.
'The situation in Gaza is catastrophic and represents a humanitarian abyss," said a joint statement by two senior SPD lawmakers - foreign policy spokesperson Adis Ahmetovic and rapporteur for the Middle East Rolf Mützenich - who called for Berlin to join the joint declaration.
There should be "clear and immediate consequences" for Israel, including the suspension of a pact governing EU-Israeli relations and a halt to the export of weapons to Israel that are used in violation of international law, they said. REUTERS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
EU-China trade frictions
Find out what's new on ST website and app. FILE PHOTO: A drone view shows containers at the terminals at the port in Kwai Chung in Hong Kong, China, April 3, 2025. REUTERS/Tyrone Siu/File Photo BEIJING - Chinese and European Union leaders will meet in Beijing on Thursday for a summit marking 50 years of diplomatic ties. Here is a timeline of EU-China trade tensions in recent years. Mar 22, 2021 - The EU sanctions four Chinese officials over alleged human rights abuses in Xinjiang, its first significant sanctions on China since the 1989 Tiananmen Square crackdown. China sanctions 10 EU politicians and think tanks in response. May 20, 2021 - The European Parliament halts ratification of a comprehensive investment pact with China following Beijing's sanctions. Dec 3, 2021 - China imposes an unannounced embargo on Lithuanian exports, after Vilnius allowed Taiwan to open a de facto embassy. Mar 30, 2023 - European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen says the EU must "de-risk" from trade and supply chain dependencies on China. Sep 13, 2023 - The EU launches an anti-subsidy probe into Chinese EV exports to assess whether to impose punitive tariffs. Jan 5, 2024 - China opens an anti-dumping investigation into brandy imports from the EU. Apr 9, 2024 - The EU announces an investigation into subsidies received by Chinese suppliers of wind turbines. Jun 17, 2024 - China opens an anti-dumping investigation into pork and its by-products from the EU. Aug 21, 2024 - China opens an anti-subsidy probe into dairy imports from the EU. Oct 8, 2024 - China imposes temporary anti-dumping tariffs on EU brandy, hitting brands from Hennessy to Remy Martin. Oct 29, 2024 - The EU approves imposing extra tariffs of up to 35.3% on Chinese-made EVs for five years, but negotiations continue. Jan 20, 2025 - On the day of U.S. President Donald Trump's inauguration, Von der Leyen says the EU should "expand trade and investment ties" with China where possible, in an apparent softening of Brussels' stance. Apr 30, 2025 - China lifts sanctions on some EU lawmakers and institutions imposed in 2021. Jun 20, 2025 - The EU bars Chinese companies from participating in public tenders for medical device purchases exceeding five million euros. Jul 4, 2025 - China spares major cognac producers from duties of up to 34.9% on European brandy imports. Jul 6, 2025 - China retaliates with restricting government purchases of medical devices from the EU that exceed 45 million yuan ($6.3 million) in value. Jul 8, 2025 - Von der Leyen accuses China of flooding global markets with overcapacity and enabling Russia's war economy in a fiery speech at the EU Parliament. REUTERS
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
More than 100 aid, rights groups call for action as hunger spreads in Gaza
More than 100 largely aid and rights groups on Wednesday called for governments to take action as hunger spreads in Gaza, including by demanding an immediate and permanent ceasefire and the lifting of all restrictions on the flow of humanitarian aid. In a statement signed by 111 organizations, including Mercy Corps, the Norwegian Refugee Council and Refugees International, the groups warned that mass starvation was spreading across the enclave even as tons of food, clean water, medical supplies and other items sit untouched just outside Gaza as humanitarian organizations are blocked from accessing or delivering them. "As the Israeli government's siege starves the people of Gaza, aid workers are now joining the same food lines, risking being shot just to feed their families. With supplies now totally depleted, humanitarian organisations are witnessing their own colleagues and partners waste away before their eyes," the organizations said. "The Government of Israel's restrictions, delays, and fragmentation under its total siege have created chaos, starvation, and death." The organizations called for governments to demand that all bureaucratic and administrative restrictions be lifted, all land crossings be opened, access to everyone across Gaza to be ensured and for the rejection of military-controlled distribution and a restoration of a "principled, UN-led humanitarian response." "States must pursue concrete measures to end the siege, such as halting the transfer of weapons and ammunition." Israel, which controls all supplies entering Gaza, denies it is responsible for shortages of food. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Business Singapore's digital banks finding their niche in areas like SMEs as they narrow losses in 2024 World Trump says US will charge 19% tariff on goods from Philippines, down from 20% Singapore Two found dead after fire in Toa Payoh flat Singapore 2 foreigners arrested for shop theft at Changi Airport Opinion Most companies onboard wrong – here's how to get it right Life Ozzy Osbourne, Black Sabbath's bat-biting frontman turned reality TV star, dies aged 76 Singapore Singaporeans continue to hold world's most powerful passport in latest ranking Singapore Ports and planes: The 2 Singapore firms helping to keep the world moving More than 800 people have been killed in recent weeks trying to reach food, mostly in mass shootings by Israeli soldiers posted near Gaza Humanitarian Foundation distribution centers. The foundation, backed by the United States, has been fiercely criticized by humanitarian organizations, including the United Nations, for an alleged lack of neutrality. Israeli forces have killed nearly 60,000 Palestinians in airstrikes, shelling and shooting since launching their assault on Gaza in response to attacks on Israel by the Hamas group that killed 1,200 people and captured 251 hostages in October 2023. For the first time since the war began, Palestinian officials say dozens are now also dying of hunger. Gaza has seen its food stocks run out since Israel cut off all supplies to the territory in March and then lifted that blockade in May with new measures it says are needed to prevent aid from being diverted to militant groups. The Norwegian Refugee Council told Reuters on Tuesday its aid stocks were completely depleted in Gaza, with some of its staff now starving, and the organization accused Israel of paralysing its work. REUTERS
Business Times
3 hours ago
- Business Times
Energy and climate cooperation still key for China-EU ties
MUCH attention has focused on the chill in ties between Brussels and Beijing in recent years. However, ahead of the EU-China summit in Beijing on Thursday, there are still potential areas of deep bilateral cooperation. Perhaps the standout example is climate change which has been an issue helping to define bilateral ties in the 21st century. So much so, in fact, that the EU Emissions Trading System was very influential in China's design of its own carbon markets. Earlier this month, the two powers held their latest high-level summit on the environment and climate. On the 50th anniversary of bilateral ties, both are hoping to further promote the effective implementation of the 2015 Paris Agreement. With US President Donald Trump seeking US withdrawal from the Paris treaty, the importance of EU-China climate cooperation has only grown. This is particularly true given that all nations face a mid-September deadline to submit new 2035 climate targets to the UN. These submissions precede the United Nations Climate Change Conference – COP30 – in Brazil, which will set out country-specific greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction targets in the next decade. Earlier this year, the European Commission proposed a 2040 climate target of reducing net GHG emissions by 90 per cent, compared to 1990 levels. In response, Chinese Vice-Premier Ding Xuexiang told European Commission Executive Vice-President for a Clean, Just and Competitive Transition Teresa Ribera that Beijing will release a new national climate plan in autumn, potentially timed around September's UN deadlines. In 2024, the world surpassed 1.5 deg C of annual warming for the first time and is on a trajectory for 2.6 deg C by the end of the century, even under current emission reduction plans. Meeting the Paris Agreement's 2 deg C target – let alone the 1.5 deg C one – demands far more ambitious cuts. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 12.30 pm ESG Insights An exclusive weekly report on the latest environmental, social and governance issues. Sign Up Sign Up Yet, since the pandemic, there have been new complications in climate ties between Brussels and Beijing. For instance, China has criticised the EU for what it perceives as the protectionist slant of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, a European initiative aimed at addressing carbon leakage by imposing a price on carbon emissions for imported goods. The EU has rejected this narrative with Ribera saying that Brussels does not intend 'to go down a race towards low incomes, lower labour rights or lower environmental standards'. Correspondingly, the EU has urged Beijing to stop building new coal power plants. Increased approvals for such plants have added to worries that Beijing may backtrack on ambitions to peak GHG emissions at or before 2030, ahead of carbon neutrality by 2060. Another source of friction is the alleged dumping of Chinese-made electric vehicles in Europe. Ribera has said that 'there is this assumption that counting on cheap equipment could be good to boost the potential of new developments and new decarbonisation pathways in the European market that could be beneficial. And there may be truth on one side, but as you also know, it may be difficult in terms of how it could impact on the capacity to ensure a level playing field'. EU decision-makers such as Ribera appear to believe that encouragement, not condemnation, is the best way to secure climate cooperation from Beijing. The assumption is that, especially with Trump in office, Beijing needs to be at the table on climate issues rather than left off it. With China being the world's largest GHG emitter by far, any international climate action during this era would be much weakened without Beijing's involvement. Beyond this, however, many EU officials have long believed that Chinese policymakers fundamentally share Europe's vision for a prosperous, energy-secure future in a stable climate and recognise the need for bilateral collaboration. Indeed, China, too, is vulnerable to the threats of global warming, including intense heat waves and severe flooding. The heart of EU-Chinese cooperation on this agenda is the 2015 EU-China Joint Statement on Climate Change. Under this, both parties agreed to cooperate on developing a cost-effective low-carbon economy, including intensifying cooperation in domestic mitigation policies, carbon markets, low-carbon cities, greenhouse gas emissions from the aviation and maritime industries, and hydrofluorocarbons. Even amid the complexities of the climate crisis, both Chinese and EU policymakers still see that accelerating the transition to a low-carbon future holds vast, complementary opportunities. They believe that with the right vision and commitment, this potential can be realised, deepening a collaboration that is poised to grow. China's planned investment in the green economy could be a game-changer, a fact that the EU is increasingly recognising. For instance, China is already the world's biggest and fastest-growing producer of renewable energy. This investment is buttressed by Beijing's policy commitments on the climate, clean air and energy agendas. Chinese President Xi Jinping has set a strategic direction for the economy, with determination to deepen the transition of the country's development model towards a greater emphasis on services and innovation. Europe has clear strengths in clean technology that are valuable to China. As the latter continues its trajectory to potentially become the world's largest economy, there are substantial commercial opportunities for EU's leading science and technology firms. Crucially, this collaboration is not one-sided. China is already the world's largest investor in renewable energy, and it is possible that technology and expertise can flow in both directions. This two-way exchange can accelerate the growth of low-carbon industries, and align Europe more closely to the world's future largest economy. As a key architect of the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement, Europe must continue to lead the fight against climate change. This includes the growing need for the EU to accelerate its emissions cuts to meet its goals in coming years, such as the 2040 target of a 90 per cent reduction. Ultimately, despite a wider chill in ties, the EU and China still have much to gain from a deep partnership on the clean-energy transition. Now is thus the moment to double down on cooperation, and collectively chart the course for the 21st-century clean-energy economy. The writer is an associate at LSE IDEAS at the London School of Economics
