
Passing police detention powers to NHS staff ‘could cause significant harm'
In March, the Government suffered several defeats in the Lords as peers debated ways to modernise mental health legislation.
Conservative shadow health minister Lord Kamall proposed a change to the Mental Health Bill so that nurses, doctors and other staff could carry out detentions of patients without the need for police officers to attend incidents.
Health minister Baroness Merron told the Lords the Government did not support 'extending police powers in this way' but peers backed the Conservative proposal, resulting in changes to the draft new law.
The changes mean powers previously reserved only for police could be transferred to health or other professionals to detain and restrain people in crisis, in public spaces or at home.
It comes after concerns have repeatedly been raised by police leaders about the pressures mental health issues are placing on policing.
Launching a joint statement, major health organisations have expressed 'grave concerns' and argue the 'police play a crucial role in carrying out many tasks that medical practitioners cannot perform, such as assessing whether a home is safe to enter'.
They said 'reducing police involvement in mental health emergencies could lead to serious risks for both patients and clinicians.'
The joint statement said wording accompanying the amendment 'states that 'the proposed amendments would remove the need for the presence of police at mental health incidents in the absence of any risk.'
'This is misleading as instances of detentions under the Mental Health Act where there is no risk are almost non-existent.
'It also negates the fact that the mere presence of uniformed officers can ensure that an otherwise risky situation remains contained and safe.'
Transferring police powers to health professionals also risks damaging their 'therapeutic relationships' with patients, the signatories said.
This has the 'double-effect' of hindering the ability to provide care, while also deterring people from seeking help from services where they might be forcibly detained, they added.
The organisations said the changes 'have not been tested' with health professionals or discussed with patients.
Their statement said: 'We are keen to work with police and Government to find ways to improve responses to mental health crises to ensure the safety of all professionals involved, patients and the community.'
Dr Lade Smith, president of the Royal College of Psychiatrists, said delegating police powers to health professionals 'would not be within the spirit' of the proposed reforms to the Mental Health Act.
She added: 'It is well known that at times, people experiencing a mental health crisis cannot be safely reached and cared for without the assistance of the police.
'Delegating police powers without proper consultation or planning is likely to disproportionately affect those from minoritised backgrounds and would increase risk to patients and compromise the safety of others. It sets a dangerous precedent.
'Like mental health services, the police are facing significant workload pressures.
'It is simply logical and now vital that we work together to develop more effective ways of responding to mental health crises.'
A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: 'Extending police powers to other professionals would represent a major shift in the roles, responsibilities and practice for health and care staff and would place additional resource on an already stretched NHS at a time where we are trying to rebuild a health service fit for the future.
'It also raises questions around whether it is right for the health and social care professionals to have powers to use reasonable force which could have implications for patient, public and staff safety, as well as potentially damaging the relationships clinicians have with patients.
'We are grateful to health and social care stakeholders for their in-depth engagement on this complex issue.'
Signatories to the joint statement are:
– Association of Ambulance Chief Executives (AACE)– Association of Directors of Adult Social Services (ADASS)– Approved Mental Health Professional (AMHP) Leads Network– British Association of Social Workers (BASW)– British Medical Association (BMA)– College of Paramedics– Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM)– Royal College of Nursing (RCN)– Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCPsych)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


ITV News
22 minutes ago
- ITV News
'Plymouth is on the up': First section of a controversial Armada Way project opens
Watch Marina Jenkins' report on the opening of Armada Way regeneration scheme The opening of Plymouth's long-awaited Armada Way regeneration project marks a "major milestone" for the city, according to the council leader. It has become one of the city's most divisive developments in recent years. The first section, featuring the area surrounding the Phoenix Fountain, alongside a newly constructed amphitheatre and performance space, welcomed visitors this week. The completion comes nearly two years after the incident that sparked widespread public anger and legal challenges. At the opening, members of the public told ITV West Country: "I was a bit sceptical when they chopped the trees down, but this has opened up the space really nicely." Another said: "I've been sat here watching [the work] for a lot of the time, so I've seen it go from rough ground to this. It's really nice." At the unveiling today, leader for Plymouth City Council, Tudor Evans said: "That commitment to seeing it through is why we've had companies like Schroders buying up the Armada centre to invest in it on the basis of this project being implemented. "This is why Homes England are here, on the other side of Armada Way, buying up a huge site here, a derelict building for new housing. "Plymouth is on the up, the investors are really excited and this scheme will be a tribute to the people who have worked on it but more importantly, it'll be a sign of rebirth of our city centre." A night that changed everything In March 2023, Plymouth City Council's decision to fell 110 mature trees under cover of darkness sent shockwaves through the community. The controversial move, carried out by the then Conservative-controlled authority, was intended to clear the way for urban improvements, but instead triggered fierce opposition from environmental campaigners and residents. Protesters had been attempting to safeguard the trees, making the overnight operation particularly contentious. The decision ultimately landed the council in the High Court and resulted in a comprehensive independent investigation. Financial and political fallout When Labour seized control of the council in May 2023, they inherited not just the controversy but also the financial consequences. The new administration commissioned a fresh approach to the development, with costs spiralling to £30 million – more than double the original budget. An independent review conducted by local government organisation Solace revealed the true extent of the damage caused by the tree-felling. The additional costs totalled £3.3 million, though investigators suggest this represents 'the lower end of the likely cost.' The financial breakdown includes over £480,000 in legal expenses and more than £1.3 million attributed to inflation due to project delays. The review painted a picture of an organisation still grappling with the aftermath, noting 'regret, remorse, guilt, blame and defiance' persist within the council. The council has accepted criticism of its decision-making processes, admitting it 'didn't get it right' and acknowledged that governance principles were poorly applied during the original planning phase. As part of the restoration efforts, 29 new trees have been planted in the reopened section, with plans for 400 additional plant specimens and wildflower meadows.


Glasgow Times
24 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
It is not my job to dictate what you can create, says Swinney on eve of festival
He addressed invited guests at the headquarters of the Edinburgh International Festival as the capital's festival season is set to begin. Mr Swinney told the audience on Thursday he would be a protector of freedom of speech in his time in the top job. 'I also know that freedom of expressing is under greater and greater attack, both at home and abroad,' he said. 'I want to ensure that Scotland, the birthplace of the Enlightenment, remains a country of robust debate and inquiry. John Swinney spoke at the Edinburgh International Festival Hub (Jane Barlow/PA) 'I firmly believe that art and culture must be able to challenge us, to ask us tough questions, and to force us to look at things from different perspectives. 'And, yes, it must, at times, be allowed to shock and offend us, but it can also heal us. 'Let me be absolutely clear – as First Minister, I will always protect freedom of speech in our country. 'It's not the First Minister's job to tell you what to create, nor would I ever seek to do so.' Mr Swinney added that his and his Government's role is to assist artists in any way they can. The First Minister went on to make a plea to the crowd and to wider society – with a particular nod to tech firms – to look at how the arts can be better supported financially as the Government looks to boost funding to £100 million annually in the coming years. The First Minister attended an event on the eve of the start of Edinburgh's festival season (Jane Barlow/PA) 'I'm asking that from crowdfunding to patronage, to philanthropy to local authority support and much more, we all ask ourselves how can we do more to support the arts from the grassroots up?' he said. 'How can we better support emerging artists that don't necessarily fit the current mould? 'And how, in particular, can Scotland's emerging businesses in new sectors become the new generation of patrons of the arts and culture in Scotland? 'How do we incentivise a new guard of custodians and investors in Scotland's creative economy?' Speaking to journalists after his speech, Mr Swinney said he is open to discussions about new legislation to support the cultural sector. He said there is a sense that local authorities 'might not have a particularly explicit statutory duty to support artistic and cultural activity', suggesting this area 'might need to be strengthened'.

Leader Live
36 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Politicians attend funeral of ‘inspiring leader' Norman Tebbit
The service, at St Edmundsbury Cathedral in Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk where Lord Tebbit had lived, was attended by a cast of politicians including former Conservative MP and novelist Jeffrey Archer and his wife Mary. Former Tory MP Neil Hamilton and his wife Christine, former leader of the House of Commons Jacob Rees-Mogg and former deputy prime minister Therese Coffey were also present. Conservative grandee Lord Tebbit, who was one of Margaret Thatcher's closest political allies, died on July 7 aged 94. Tory peer and author Lord Michael Dobbs, who gave the eulogy at Thursday's service, described Lord Tebbit as 'a giant, an inspiring leader'. Former leader of the Conservative Party Iain Duncan Smith, who gave a reading from William Shakespeare's Hamlet, said afterwards that the service was 'glorious'. 'It was a glorious service and rather befitting for Norman, Norman Tebbit, who quite often was understated but never missed an argument,' said Sir Iain. He said the reading he was asked to read, from act one, scene three of Hamlet, 'could not have been more certainly Norman in every respect'. 'He was clear, he was himself from the word go, he didn't change his values throughout the whole of his time,' he said. 'He was a tough competitor but the beauty of it that came out was he had a real soft heart and was kind and had many friends on all sides of the house. 'He was my mentor throughout the early part of my political career.' Lord Archer said afterwards that the service was 'beautiful' and that Lord Tebbit 'was above all loyal, loyalty was his passion'. Lord Tebbit was injured in an IRA bombing during the Conservative Party conference in Brighton in 1984, which left his wife, Margaret, paralysed from the neck down. He served as employment secretary, taking on the trade unions, and as chairman of the Conservative Party from 1985 to 1987 he helped Mrs Thatcher secure her third general election victory. He also served as trade secretary and had a reputation as a political bruiser. After the 1987 election success he left his post as Tory chairman to help care for Margaret, who died in 2020. He left the Commons in 1992 and became a member of the House of Lords. His son William said his father died 'peacefully at home'. Lord Tebbit's coffin arrived at the cathedral in a black hearse driven at walking pace, with family members following behind on foot. Church bells rang as air cadets formed a guard of honour at the cathedral door and the coffin, covered with flowers, was carried inside. Lord Tebbit's children William, Alison and John each took turns to share reflections of their father, who Alison described as 'uncompromising' and 'loyal', also possessing humour and a 'sense of fun'. The service, also attended by Sir Graham Brady, Tory MP Mark Francois, Lord Deben and Labour MP for Bury St Edmunds Peter Prinsley, ended with the RAF March as the recessional music as people filed out.