Want to plant trees to offset fossil fuels? You'd need all of North and Central America, study finds.
Advertisement
Carbon offsetting essentially means investing in tree planting or other environmental projects to attempt to compensate for carbon emissions. Trees are one of the cheapest ways to do this because they naturally suck up planet-warming carbon. Fossil fuel corporations, along with other companies and institutions, have promoted tree-planting as key part of carbon offset programs in recent years.
Advertisement
For example, TotalEnergies, a global energy company, said in a statement that it is 'investing heavily in carbon capture and storage (CCS) and nature-based solutions (NBS) projects.'
To do their calculations, the researchers looked at the 200 largest holders of fossil fuel reserves — the fuel that companies promise shareholders they can extract in the future — and calculated how much carbon dioxide would be released if this fuel is burned. The researchers also focused solely on tree planting because the expense and technological development needed for other forms of carbon capture are still mostly cost-prohibitive.
Forestry expert Éliane Ubalijoro, who was not involved with the research, called the study 'elegant.'
It 'gives people a sense of proportion around carbon,' said Ubalijoro, CEO of CIFOR-ICRAF, an international forestry research center.
But she cautioned against oversimplifying the equation by looking only at carbon capture, noting that tree planting done right can foster food security and biodiversity and protect communities from natural disasters.
The paper effectively makes the point that it's financially impossible to offset enough carbon to compensate for future fossil fuel burning, said Daphne Yin, director of land policy at Carbon180, where her team advocates for U.S. policy support for land-based carbon removal. And the idea that companies would ever be required to account for the downstream emissions from the fossil fuel they extract is a 'fantasy,' she said.
The idea of planting trees is appealing to the public and to politicians because it's tangible — people can literally see the carbon being incorporated into branches and leaves as a tree grows, Friggens said. But she says other methods shouldn't be overlooked — microbes underground store carbon too, but they can't be seen.
Advertisement
And it's a physically and mathematically inescapable fact, illustrated in part by this study, that there's no getting around it — we have to stop emitting carbon, said Jonathan Foley, the executive director of Project Drawdown, who also was not part of the study. Carbon emissions are like an overflowing bathtub, he says: Before you start cleaning up, you have to turn off the water.
'Trees are the sponges and the mops we use to clean up the mess,' he said. 'But if the taps are still running and the water's pouring out over the edges of your bathtub, destroying your bathroom and your home, maybe you've got to learn to turn off the taps too.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
6 hours ago
- CBS News
Bay Area naturalist travels to Kenya to teach students about their environment
A Bay Area naturalist just returned from a trip to Kenya, where he and his wife are inspiring a group of students eager to learn more about their environment. He's teaching them wildlife camera trapping. Setting up camera traps in the wilderness, from Mount Tamalpais to Kenya, has given Peter Barto an extra tool to do what he loves. "It's tied to what I love, which is keeping wild animals alive and safe in their own habitat," said Barto. He and his wife embarked on a recent journey to Daraja Academy, a free boarding school for underserved girls in Nanyuki, Kenya, where he taught them to set up cameras, monitor, and document data. "We got the first two primates we've ever gotten- a Vervet monkey and a troupe of Olive Baboons. It's just getting started, but it's exciting," said Barto. Tracking wildlife, population sizes, and species interacting near the school campus has piqued some of the students' curiosity. Shakira Mwendwa first learned about camera trapping at Daraja. "I wanted to know what they do, what are they used for. Out of curiosity of the camera traps, I became an environmentalist," said Mwendwa. "I grew up in an environment where I saw people polluting the environment, the air and water. That always made me want to come up with a solution and impact them in the future," said Daraja Academy graduate Caroline Mwende. Shakira and Caroline just finished their internship at the renowned MPLA Research Center, jointly operated by Princeton University and the Smithsonian Institution. "Hopefully, this will be an option for the girls going forward in a career, working with wildlife conservation, a safari leader, or a bird guide," said Barto. Barto hopes students will learn more about native vultures, which are often killed, Barto says, by intentional lead poisoning. Other wildlife can also be seen as the enemy. "I'm hoping this program will help change that, and their understanding of animals, their place in the world, and why they do certain things," said Barto. It's one step for this environmental steward, doing what he can to protect nature, and inspiring others to do the same. Barto is a certified California naturalist.
WIRED
3 days ago
- WIRED
Google's Newest AI Model Acts like a Satellite to Track Climate Change
AlphaEarth Foundations is a chip off Google DeepMind block—and it's here to help save the world. Images: Alpha Earth Foundation Google's newest AI model is going to scour the Earth and, ideally, help it out. That's the plan, anyway. The mission is to find out once and for all, in fine detail, what we are doing to our planet. Crucially, once the model has supposedly done this it will also, apparently, explain where we might be able to best put things in place to help our world. AlphaEarth Foundations, an offshoot of Google's DeepMind AI model, aims to leverage machine learning and all the gobs and gobs of data that Google has absorbed about our planet over the last two decades, in order to understand how specific areas are changing over time. The model uses a system called 'embeddings' that takes terabytes of data collected from satellites every day, analyzes it, and compresses it down to save storage space. The result is a model of different filters overlaid over maps that are color coded to indicate material properties, vegetation types, groundwater sources, and human constructions such as buildings and farms. Google says the system will act as a sort of 'virtual satellite,' letting users call up on demand detailed information about any given spot on the planet. The goal, Google says, is for users of the service to be able to better understand how specific ecosystems on the planet work, including how air quality, sunlight, groundwater, and even human construction projects vary and change across a landscape. Ultimately, the company wants the model to help answer questions from paying governments and corporations that wish to know, for example, which ecosystems may have more access to sunlight or groundwater that can help determine the best spots to grow a certain crop. Alternatively, it may aid in identifying areas to plop down solar panels with maximum payoff, or build structures in more climate resilient locations. Google's new model has already mapped a complex surface in Antarctica—an area notoriously difficult to capture due to irregular satellite imaging—in clear detail. It has also supposedly outlined variations in Canadian agricultural land use that are invisible to the naked eye. Google's new model assigns colors to AlphaEarth Foundations' embedding fields. In Ecuador, the model sees through persistent cloud cover to detail agricultural plots in various stages of development. Photograph: Alpha Earth Foundation Chris Brown, a research engineer at Google DeepMind, says that historically, there have been two main problems for making reliable information about the planet more accessible: Getting overloaded with too much data; and that information being inconsistent. 'Before, the challenge was getting a look at it all,' Brown said in a press briefing. 'Now, the challenge is to unify all the ways that we have to observe and model our planet and get a complete picture.' Google, of course, has been at this for a while. While AlphaEarth isn't a broader consumer-facing application, Google Earth has had its own similar timelapse feature since 2021 that shows how global geography has changed over decades—largely due to climate change. Google has also gotten into the game of putting more specific types of satellites into orbit, such as ones that are designed to spot wildfires from space. The models aren't perfect. Google, in its frenzied push to build robust AI models, has hit a few snags with the accuracy of its AI generations, mostly when its AI overviews in Search have gone off the rails. But sucking up petabytes of satellite images and finding the trends is, weirdly, a more straightforward task for AI. Google says the models can generate accurate enough data about an ecosystem down to an area of 10 meters—and while it may get some things wrong, it is apparently 23.9 percent more accurate than similar AI models. (Goggle didn't name which ones it was talking about, but companies such as Privateer have been at this for years.) How AlphaEarth Foundations works: by taking non-uniformly sampled frames from a video sequence to index any position in time, the model creates a continuous view of the location while outlining measurements. Video: Alpha Earth Foundation Google has worked with partners to test the new system, such as MayBiomas in Brazil and the Global Ecosystems Atlas, which aim to better classify undermapped ecosystems including dense rainforests, deserts, and wetlands. 'It's very difficult to compress all the information available for a piece of land in a traditional way, which is spent literally hours and hours and hours of preparing,' said Tasso Azeved, founder of MayBiomas. After working with Google to test AlphaEarth for the past 18 months or so, Azeved says the software has made it easier to analyze great swathes of rainforest yet keep that data from overwhelming their storage capabilities. 'We were not even scratching everything that would be possible,' Azeved says. AlphaEarth is also being added in a more limited capacity into Google Earth Engine, the cloud-based platform that first launched in 2010 and is used for mapping by agencies and companies such as NASA, Unilever, and the Forest Service. It's worth noting here that this is separate from the more consumer-friendly Google Earth. Previously, Google's Earth Engine processes and analyzes satellite data that has then been used to create interactive, high-resolution maps of deforestation across the world and compile detailed views of bodies of water—rivers, lakes, oceans, and seas—and how these had changed over time. Now, annual snapshots of AlphaEarth's embeddings will be available as a dataset to track long-term trends, which a company rep says can be used to do more advanced custom mapping if users have a 'light coding background.' No stranger to privacy concerns, Google is eager to wave off any worries people might have about this new system scouring pictures from the sky. The company says the AlphaEarth dataset cannot capture individual objects, people, or faces.
New York Times
4 days ago
- New York Times
We Love Our Dogs and Cats. But Are They Bad for the Environment?
Our dogs and cats provide all kinds of benefits. They improve physical health, reduce stress and can fend off loneliness. Research shows that interacting with pets can lower blood pressure. Dogs need walks and playtime, which helps people stay active. And both dogs and cats can form deep bonds with humans. Basically, the enrich our lives. 'There's a whole body of literature supporting that,' said Pieter De Frenne, a bioscience engineer at Ghent University in Belgium. Yet for all the good, pets come with environmental costs. Cats and dogs eat a lot of meat, for example. They also kill wildlife. So, how can you get all those tangible and intangible benefits and keep the environmental, um, pawprint, as low as possible? Here's what the experts had to say. A whole lot of meat Gregory Okin, a geographer at the University of California, Los Angeles, calculated in a 2017 study that the estimated 163 million cats and dogs in the United States consume a whopping quarter of the country's animal-derived calories. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
