
Edu officer who led inquiry into Nagpur teacher appointments fraud arrested
Vanjari's arrest marks a dramatic turn in a case. The police action against him comes a day after the arrest of a clerk in the deputy director of education's office, Laxman Upasrao Mangham, for allegedly creating fake IDs. According to investigators, Mangham's interrogation led to the flagging of Vanjari's name. Vanjari was also allegedly named during earlier interrogations of the other accused.
The scam, believed to have been running since 2019, involved the illegal generation of Shalarth IDs, digital identifiers used to disburse salaries for ineligible teaching and non-teaching staff, in Nagpur district. Many of these appointments took place even when the government's official recruitment process was on hold.
The scam came to light after Ravindra Dnyaneshwar Patil, a junior administrative officer, filed a formal complaint with the cyber police on March 12, reportedly on the instructions of then divisional deputy director, Ulhas Narad. Following this, a seven-member committee was formed in March under Narad to investigate the misuse of Shalarth IDs. However, on April 11, Narad was arrested after it was found he too had created fake Shalarth IDs.
After Narad's arrest, a new committee was led by Madhuri Savarkar, an education department officer. However, the inquiry was abruptly halted in April with no reason and Vanjari was brought in to lead the investigation. His report submitted to the education commissioner in February listed 244 suspicious appointments, triggering further scrutiny.
In April, the state government formed a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to probe into how the fabricated identities were uploaded onto the Shalarth portal to draw salaries of teachers and non-teaching staff. 'This case has exposed serious lapses and collusion within the education department,' a senior officer from the SIT said. 'We are closing in on the main masterminds.'
Police suspect that forged documents and signatures, including those of the late education officer Someshwar Naitam, were used to appoint teachers fraudulently between 2010 and 2014, with their IDs created years later. The SIT has now turned its attention to another senior officer already under suspicion, with further arrests likely

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
Raj govt stands by SI recruitment exam, refuses to cancel it
1 2 Jaipur: In a decisive move, the state govt informed the Rajasthan High Court Tuesday it would not cancel the controversial 2021 sub-inspector recruitment examination, despite allegations of paper leaks and use of dummy candidates. After months of protests for and against the demand to cancel the exam as well as the court's directives for administrative clarity in the matter, the state govt finally made its stand clear during the hearing before the single bench of Justice Sameer Jain. Advocate general Rajendra Prasad, representing the state govt, said, "The decision to continue with the recruitment process is based on recommendations by a cabinet sub-committee which met on June 28 and subsequently approved by Chief Minister Bhajan Lal Sharma." Prasad informed the court that just 53 candidates out of the 838 selected (6.3%) were found to be involved in exam malpractices. "These tainted candidates have already been terminated or suspended from the police service," he said. Additional advocate general Vigyan Shah outlined four key recommendations made by the committee, including continued investigation by the special investigation team (SIT) and debarment of any tainted candidates discovered in the future. "The committee has also recommended age relaxation for candidates in upcoming SI recruitment exams," said Shah. "With any decision in the matter, a situation should not arise where we cannot differentiate between right and wrong in the recruitment process," he added. Senior advocate RN Mathur, representing the selected candidates, supported the govt's decision, arguing that cancelling the entire recruitment process would unfairly punish innocent candidates for the actions of a few tainted ones. "The state govt's decision is fair. If the recruitment is cancelled, everyone will have to bear the brunt of the mistake of a few people," said Mathur. The govt decision was opposed by lawyers of petitioners seeking cancellation of the exam. Senior advocate Major RP Singh and advocate Harendra Neel, on behalf of the petitioners, pointed out that the same sub-committee had previously recommended cancellation of the recruitment process. "When the same sub-committee can make two different recommendations, then the high court also has the right to do a judicial review of the govt decision," said Singh. The high court has scheduled the final hearing of the matter for July 7, when a definitive decision is expected to be reached on this contentious case. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Doctor's Day 2025 , messages and quotes!


Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
Swiss court to examine if Yavatmal farmers used Polo pesticide in 2017 poisoning cases
Nagpur: A civil court in Basel, Switzerland, has ruled that it will examine whether the Yavatmal farmers who lost their lives or fell ill due to the series of pesticide poisonings in 2017 actually used Polo, a pesticide manufactured by Syngenta, a Swiss agrochemical multinational. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The entire case hinges on the proceedings to determine whether the victims used Polo at all. It may be recalled that 22 farmers died due to accidental inhalation of pesticides during the cotton season of 2017, and scores fell ill. Polo, a diafenthiuron-based pesticide, was among the chemicals reported to have been used by the deceased farmers. However, the use of other pesticides, such as those containing monocrotophos, another chemical widely used on cotton crops, was also reported. The Maharashtra govt also formed a special investigative team (SIT) on the matter. This was followed by a major campaign on the safe way to use pesticides. The entire episode also exposed the vulnerability of farmhands during pesticide spraying. Wives of the farmers, two of whom died and one left with an eye defect, had filed three different suits in 2021 in a court at Basel, which is also the headquarters of Syngenta. They were supported by an NGO, Pesticide Action Network (PAN). The Swiss court also granted them free legal aid to carry out the litigation. A week ago, the Swiss court ruled that it would now limit its proceedings to examine whether Polo — the brand made by Syngenta — was used. A source said that once this issue is decided, further proceedings, if any, will be announced. The court is of the view that proceedings are needed to ascertain if the product alleged to have caused the death was used. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now A negative answer to this would lead to a final decision. This means that the court has fixed the issue in the case. The litigation would further proceed to prove the point, said Devanand Pawar, a farm activist and convenor of the Maharashtra Action Group of Pesticide Poisoned People (MAPP). Meanwhile, Syngenta, in its response to the development, said the lawsuits filed relate to the incident that took place in India. The investigation by Indian authorities has not linked Syngenta or any of its products to it. Moreover, no case was filed in India. "We regret that the lawsuits were filed while none of the complaints and legal remedies available in India were pursued. It is important to note that no decision has yet been made by the civil court in Basel. The granting of free legal aid in 2022 was merely a provisional assumption of costs by the state. This does not in any way indicate the outcome of the legal proceedings," says Syngenta. The company also confirmed that the civil court in Basel-Stadt has limited the proceedings to the question of whether the product held responsible by the plaintiffs was actually used.


Hans India
9 hours ago
- Hans India
Telangana's blanket ban is turbo-charging the offshore online sports betting and casino economy, kills domestic gaming industry: finds PRAHAR consumer survey
A new report from Delhi-based civil society group PRAHAR (Public Response Against Helplessness and Action for Redressal) has uncovered the persistent rise of offshore online sports betting and casino platforms in Telangana despite a sweeping state-wide ban on all kinds of online real-money platforms. The study reveals how sports betting and casino operators—most of them foreign offshore entities—continue to engage users directly through aggressive digital marketing, celebrity endorsements, and encrypted platforms, circumventing enforcement and raising critical threats to digital sovereignty and public safety. The study titled Click. Bet. Repeat: Consumer Survey on Forces Driving Online Betting and Gambling in Telangana, is based on a comprehensive field study of 2,671 respondents who indulge in real money gaming . It uncovers how foreign betting operators target Indian users through online ads, YouTube videos, Telegram groups, and meme pages, often using local influencers to add legitimacy. Explains Mr. Abhay Raj Mishra, President & National Convenor of PRAHAR: 'Telangana led the way in 2017 with a blanket ban on all online real-money plays—skill or chance—without even drawing a line between legal and illegal play. What was hailed as a bold move has, in reality, created the perfect storm for offshore sports betting and casino to thrive unchecked.' 'Eight years on, the evidence is undeniable: the ban has failed. Instead of protecting citizens, it has driven domestic operators out and handed the market on a silver platter to offshore betting syndicates. This has left users more vulnerable than ever. The newly formed SIT has its work cut out—but let's be clear: more bans and crackdowns won't solve what is now a deep-rooted menace undermining national security.', he adds Calling out strong recommendations, Mr. Mishra said 'Telangana has a rare second chance. The first, cautious step was a blanket ban; the wiser next step is bold, inclusive policy. Citizens have already moved on—real-money gaming isn't vanishing, it's evolving. The ask isn't to rubber-stamp vice, but to stay ahead of its risks by providing clean avenues for people to play real money games of skill, instead of sports betting and casino. Lead with foresight, not fear, and turn a growing reality into a safer, transparent system that works for everyone.' KEY FINDINGS Illegal, but popular, making national security a casualty 96% of users know real money gaming in Telangana is banned, yet participate in sports betting and casino, with 87% playing daily. This has pushed domestic online platforms away from Telangana, paving way for more sinister activities, with a significant national security risk. Who's Playing — a young, mostly male, broadly educated crowd Nearly two-thirds of users are under 30 (45 % are 18-25 and 17 % are 26-30), and men outnumber women four to one (78 % vs 22 %), yet at 22% women participation is significant. Education is mixed: while 42 % stopped after school, 50% hold a college degree. Students (35 %) and salaried professionals and self-employed (52 %) dominate the occupation split, and the activity cuts across income levels even though 60 % come from households earning under ₹30 000 a month. Getting In and Paying Up — offshore apps, easy work-arounds, anonymous wallets Stake, colour-prediction apps, 1xBet, 1win and Teen Patti are the five most-tried platforms (each 47–70 %). Access is effortless for 89 % of players, with 69 % relying on VPNs to hide their real identity and another 20 % using Telegram links to dodge geo-blocks, and also because they are provided with VPN links in these Telegram groups. Almost everyone plays incognito: 94 % skip real-name KYC, and 86 % fund accounts via UPI transfers routed through friends or agents, indicating existence of mule accounts, far ahead of wallets (14 %), cash (8 %) and cards (6 %). Usage Intensity — daily play, modest tickets for most Engagement is extreme: 87 % log in every day. Seven in ten spend ₹500–₹2 000 a month and 73 % keep wagers below 1 % of household income, yet 12 % already risk 5 % or more, signalling an at-risk minority. Wins, Losses and the 'I'm Ahead' Illusion Losses are almost universal (99 %), but so are wins (99 %). Four-fifths have lost between ₹1 000 and ₹10 000, while 71 % have won in the same band; about one in five have crossed the ₹10 000 mark on winnings and 5 % on losses. The near balance feeds the belief—held by 83 %—that they are net positive overall. Mindset & Motivations — chasing quick cash and social proof A spectacular 97 % play for the chance of quick money, 61 % cite entertainment, and half mention social acceptance. Tales of huge payouts lure 87 % into their first game and remain the chief reason (86 %) that grim media stories of debt or suicide do not scare them off. Players also underestimate danger: 64 % think fewer than 1 % of gamblers get into serious trouble. Consumer Sentiment — ban rejected, legalizing welcomed Almost everyone (96 %) knows the pastime is illegal in Telangana, yet plays anyway; 94 % now want the state to legalise and regulate real-money gaming, while only 6 % back the current blanket ban.