logo
Swiss court to examine if Yavatmal farmers used Polo pesticide in 2017 poisoning cases

Swiss court to examine if Yavatmal farmers used Polo pesticide in 2017 poisoning cases

Time of India2 days ago
Nagpur: A civil court in Basel, Switzerland, has ruled that it will examine whether the Yavatmal farmers who lost their lives or fell ill due to the series of pesticide poisonings in 2017 actually used Polo, a pesticide manufactured by Syngenta, a Swiss agrochemical multinational.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The entire case hinges on the proceedings to determine whether the victims used Polo at all.
It may be recalled that 22 farmers died due to accidental inhalation of pesticides during the cotton season of 2017, and scores fell ill. Polo, a diafenthiuron-based pesticide, was among the chemicals reported to have been used by the deceased farmers. However, the use of other pesticides, such as those containing monocrotophos, another chemical widely used on cotton crops, was also reported.
The Maharashtra govt also formed a special investigative team (SIT) on the matter.
This was followed by a major campaign on the safe way to use pesticides. The entire episode also exposed the vulnerability of farmhands during pesticide spraying.
Wives of the farmers, two of whom died and one left with an eye defect, had filed three different suits in 2021 in a court at Basel, which is also the headquarters of Syngenta. They were supported by an NGO, Pesticide Action Network (PAN).
The Swiss court also granted them free legal aid to carry out the litigation.
A week ago, the Swiss court ruled that it would now limit its proceedings to examine whether Polo — the brand made by Syngenta — was used. A source said that once this issue is decided, further proceedings, if any, will be announced.
The court is of the view that proceedings are needed to ascertain if the product alleged to have caused the death was used.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
A negative answer to this would lead to a final decision. This means that the court has fixed the issue in the case. The litigation would further proceed to prove the point, said Devanand Pawar, a farm activist and convenor of the Maharashtra Action Group of Pesticide Poisoned People (MAPP).
Meanwhile, Syngenta, in its response to the development, said the lawsuits filed relate to the incident that took place in India.
The investigation by Indian authorities has not linked Syngenta or any of its products to it. Moreover, no case was filed in India.
"We regret that the lawsuits were filed while none of the complaints and legal remedies available in India were pursued. It is important to note that no decision has yet been made by the civil court in Basel. The granting of free legal aid in 2022 was merely a provisional assumption of costs by the state. This does not in any way indicate the outcome of the legal proceedings," says Syngenta.
The company also confirmed that the civil court in Basel-Stadt has limited the proceedings to the question of whether the product held responsible by the plaintiffs was actually used.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ED arrests Bobby Patel, gets 4-day remand in money laundering, human trafficking case
ED arrests Bobby Patel, gets 4-day remand in money laundering, human trafficking case

Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • Indian Express

ED arrests Bobby Patel, gets 4-day remand in money laundering, human trafficking case

The Ahmedabad Zonal Office of Enforcement Directorate (ED) has arrested human trafficker Bharatkumar Rambhai Patel alias Bobby Patel, said a statement on Thursday. Bobby Patel, who has cases against him in Gujarat, West Bengal and Delhi for illegally sending Indian nationals abroad, was arrested by the ED under the provisions of Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). Patel was produced before the Special Judge (PMLA), Mirzapura Court, Ahmedabad, which remanded him to ED custody for four days custody, the agency said in the statement. The ED said that it had initiated its investigation against Patel and others based on an FIR registered for illegally sending Indian citizens abroad since 2015 by Sola High Court Police Station in Ahmedabad City. The ED said that its probe allegedly revealed that Patel has been involved in sending 'desirous Indian nationals abroad illegally for exorbitant consideration on the basis of bogus or fabricated documents for getting visas of different countries with duplicate or bogus passports used as genuine by impersonating the passengers wrongly'. For this purpose, Patel and others, 'used to collect Rs 60 to Rs 75 lakh for one passenger, Rs 1 to 1.25 crore for a couple (husband and wife) and Rs 1.25 to 1.75 crore if children were also accompanying the passengers abroad'. In India, the ED said, multiple FIRs have been registered against Patel in Gujarat, Delhi and West Bengal. The 'Proceeds of Crime (POC) generated in this case are valued at Rs 7 crore (approx)', said the ED. Further investigation into the matter is under progress.

Indian-origin man chokes co-passenger mid-flight, arrested upon landing in US
Indian-origin man chokes co-passenger mid-flight, arrested upon landing in US

India Today

time2 hours ago

  • India Today

Indian-origin man chokes co-passenger mid-flight, arrested upon landing in US

An Indian-origin man from New Jersey was arrested after allegedly attacking a fellow passenger during a violent mid-air brawl on a Frontier Airlines flight from Philadelphia to Miami on Monday Sharma, 21, was taken into custody upon landing at Miami International Airport. He has been charged with shot on a mobile phone shows Sharma and another passenger, Keanu Evans, exchanging blows as other flyers and a flight attendant attempt to break up the fight. advertisement 'Let him go. Stop, let him go,' a fellow passenger can be heard pleading, while a crew member tells them, 'Sir, you have to sit down.'Evans, speaking to WSVN, said the altercation was unprovoked and began after Sharma started behaving erratically and issuing death threats. 'He was doing some, like, dark laugh like, 'Ha ha ha ha ha,' and he was saying things like, 'You puny, mortal man, if you challenge me, it will result in your death,'' Evans said he alerted the crew and was advised to press the assistance button if Sharma continued. Moments later, Sharma allegedly confronted him again. 'He just got up, put his forehead on mine like he was challenging me, and then grabbed me by the throat and started choking me,' Evans recalled. 'At that moment, it was fight or flight... all I could do was defend myself.'The scuffle left Sharma with a cut above his left eyebrow, while Evans had scratches on his face. Witnesses said Sharma returned to his seat grinning and took selfies of his bloodied face before being escorted off the plane in to The Daily Mail, Sharma was first taken to Jackson West Hospital for treatment and then booked into custody. During his court appearance on Tuesday, his attorney Renee Gordon claimed the incident began because Sharma was meditating. 'My client is from a religion where he was meditating,' Gordon said. 'Unfortunately, the passenger behind him did not like that.'The judge, however, was not convinced. Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Gerald Hubbart set Sharma's bond at $500 and issued a stay-away order, barring him from contacting Evans or going near his school or workplace.'I don't want people to get the wrong idea about who I am,' Evans told 7News. 'I'm a good person. I recently got baptised. I just wish I had been more firm in asking to be moved away from him.'Frontier Airlines has yet to respond publicly to the incident.- Ends

HC denies bail to man for posts against PM, armed forces
HC denies bail to man for posts against PM, armed forces

Hindustan Times

time2 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

HC denies bail to man for posts against PM, armed forces

The Allahabad high court on Wednesday rejected the bail application of a man accused of posting objectionable content on social media targeting the Prime Minister and the Indian Armed Forces. The Allahabad high court observed that the freedom of speech guaranteed under the Constitution does not extend to such acts which disrespect high dignitaries and incite disharmony among citizens. (File Photo) The high court observed that the freedom of speech guaranteed under the Constitution does not extend to such acts which disrespect high dignitaries and incite disharmony among citizens. Rejecting the bail application of Ashraf Khan alias Nisrat, justice Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal said it has become a 'fashion among certain groups of people' to misuse social media under the guise of freedom of expression by making unfounded allegations against national leaders and circulating content that spreads hatred and division. The accused was booked under sections 152 (acts that endanger the sovereignty, unity, and integrity of India) and 197 (imputations and assertions prejudicial to national integration) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) at the Sasni police station of Hathras district. It was alleged that the accused uploaded edited videos to his Facebook account during the recent India-Pakistan military face-off. According to the prosecution, one video allegedly depicted Prime Minister Narendra Modi walking alongside a donkey pulling a cart fitted with an aircraft, and later portrayed him as apologising to Pakistan. Another portion of the post allegedly showed Wing Commander Vyomika Singh of the Indian Air Force seated beside the Pakistan Army chief, with captions suggesting that the PM was running to save himself from a Pakistani missile. Additional posts allegedly included slogans such as 'Pakistan Air Force Zindabad' and visuals of Indian aircraft being destroyed by Pakistani jets. Other objectionable content targeting defence minister Rajnath Singh and the PM was also found, according to the prosecution. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel argued that Khan was innocent and had not forwarded the objectionable posts himself, though they were found on his mobile phone. In contrast, the state counsel opposed the bail plea, arguing that the posts created social disharmony and insulted the Indian military establishment. In its order dated July 2 (Wednesday), the court concluded that the nature of the posts reflected disrespect not only towards the Prime Minister but also towards the Indian Armed Forces and its officers. 'Though our Constitution grants the right to freedom of speech and expression to every citizen, that freedom does not extend to posting videos and content that insult the Prime Minister, the Indian Military and its officers. Such actions not only cause social disharmony but also promote separatist sentiment and pose a threat to the sovereignty, unity, and integrity of India,' the court observed. Accordingly, the bail application was rejected.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store