
Reclaim Your Power: How To Deal With A Toxic Manager
getty
Toxic managers are a common feature of toxic workplaces. These are leaders who undermine their teams' performance by damaging their confidence, productivity and wellbeing. Examples of toxic manager behavior include setting unrealistic expectations, micromanaging, picking favorites, public criticism, taking credit for other people's ideas and blaming others for their mistakes. Their actions can be hard to predict and they specialize in creating fear and uncertainty.
Unfortunately, toxic managers cause people to leave jobs in their droves. In fact, a study of U.K. employees by people analytics provider Visier found that 43% of workers have left a job at some point in their career as a result of their manager. So, what are your options if your own manager is toxic, but you don't want to quit?
'Toxic managers erode confidence, damage morale and cultivate a stressful work environment,' notes Dorothy Herson, a mental health activist and author of The Rag Doll Contract. 'They often employ divide-and-conquer tactics, creating false alliances where they pit colleagues against each other, making you feel isolated and undermining team trust.'
According to Herson, the first step toward dealing with a toxic manager is acknowledging that your manager's toxicity isn't about you. 'Many people internalize criticism, doubting their own competence,' she says. 'Detach emotionally from their behavior and remind yourself that their issues are not a reflection of your worth. It can help to mentally reframe them as someone whose approval is neither necessary nor valuable.'
Don't try to navigate the challenge alone, either. 'Speak to trusted colleagues, mentors or HR for guidance,' Herson advises. 'Toxic managers thrive in isolation, so building a strong support network ensures you're not gaslit into believing the problem is you.'
'Dealing with a toxic manager can be challenging, but there are ways to navigate the situation while protecting your wellbeing and career,' argues Lord Mark Price, author of Happy Economics and founder of workplace happiness platform WorkL.
Document everything, he advises. 'Keep records of interactions, unreasonable demands or inappropriate behavior. This can serve as evidence if you need to escalate the issue.'
Price emphasizes the importance of remaining professional as you deal with your toxic manager. 'Avoid emotional reactions and maintain calm and composed,' he suggests. 'Respond with facts and logic rather than frustration. Toxic workplaces can be mentally exhausting, so engage in activities that help you relax and recharge.'
'Toxic managers hold their teams hostage,' says George Kohlrieser, co-author of Hostage at the Table. 'Not with physical restraints, but through fear, control, and psychological pressure. Many employees feel trapped, believing they have no choice but to endure abusive leadership. No one has to remain a hostage to toxicity, however. The key lies in reclaiming personal power, fostering emotional resilience and engaging in effective dialogue.'
Recognize that you are not powerless, Kohlrieser advises. 'Toxic leaders thrive on emotional hijacking, triggering fear and compliance,' he says. 'Instead of reacting with hostility or avoidance, use confident, non-confrontational dialogue. Frame your concerns in a way that speaks to the leader's goals. Say 'I want to improve team efficiency; how can we align expectations?' rather than 'You're micromanaging me.''
If your manager's toxicity involves appropriate behavior such as being abusive, then you should report them to HR, says Nik Kinley, a leadership consultant and author of Rewriting Your Leadership Code. But the situation may not necessarily be that extreme or clear-cut.
'A common challenge is that you may think they're toxic, but others might not, and the leader themselves certainly won't,' Kinley observes. 'So, a critical step forward is establishing that there is a problem – something you can both agree isn't right and can work on together. The most effective approach here is often to focus on how they can help you to be at your best or achieve some objective. They're more likely to respond positively to a request for support than a complaint.'
Kinley recommends planning out what you want to say before you speak to your manager. Then keep the conversation focused on practical issues – for example, you'll be able to do X if they can do Y – and be sure to keep emotion out of it. 'You're trying to solve a problem together and your objective is to get them to change their behavior, not tell them how you feel,' he emphasizes.
'Dealing with a toxic manager can be difficult, but there are strategies to protect your own wellbeing while navigating the position you are in,' says Lee Chambers, a psychologist and author of Momentum: 13 Ways to Unlock Your Potential.
Firstly, advises Chambers, it is essential to establish clear boundaries, define acceptable behavior and communicate your limits. Then find a trusted person to give an objective opinion on your manager's behavior. This can help you to build your support network and manage the stress of the situation.
Finally, don't forget to take create space for yourself. Chambers says: 'Whether it's through small wellbeing moments like mindfulness, activities that bring you joy and energy, or professional support, be kind to yourself during this period to reduce your stressors.'
Unfortunately, dealing with a toxic manager can suck all the joy out of your working life. If you reach that point, moving on might be the best option – no matter how reluctant you are to leave your role. As Herson says: 'Above all, remember you deserve to work in a healthy environment. If the situation becomes unbearable, exploring exit strategies – whether an internal transfer or a new role – can be the ultimate act of self-preservation.'
If dialogue and boundary-setting fail, Kohlrieser also recommends considering your exit strategy. 'Staying in a toxic environment can damage mental health and limit professional growth,' he says. 'The most successful professionals are those who refuse to be hostages, either by transforming the situation or stepping away to regain control of their career. Toxicity persists when it is tolerated. Choose leadership over victimhood. Choose freedom over fear.'
Enjoyed this article? Follow me by clicking the blue 'Follow' button beneath the headline above.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
In The Corporate World, AI Is Surging. Training? Not So Much
New research reveals that AI adoption is outpacing training efforts. Companies are racing to roll out artificial intelligence — deploying new systems for customer support, process automation, financial forecasting and more. But when it comes to preparing people to actually use these tools? That's where a gap starts to show. It's a story we've heard before: the tech shows up before the team is ready. In the Forbes Research 2025 CxO Growth Survey, which polled more than 1,000 global C-suite executives between November and December 2024, 93% of respondents said their organization plans to increase investment in AI over the next two years — with more than half (56%) upping their budgets by 16% or more. That makes AI one of the top two tech investment areas, alongside cybersecurity. The tools aren't just coming — they're already reshaping how businesses operate. Sixty-nine percent of CxOs said AI agents are transforming automation, freeing teams to focus on more strategic priorities. And nearly half of chief information officers (48%) say they're focused on integrating AI and machine learning across the enterprise, with another 29% planning to do so within the next two years. But there's a problem: most companies haven't made the leap from AI adoption to workforce readiness. The AI Skills Gap Only 49% of chief human resources officers say they're currently prioritizing training employees in AI and data analysis. Among the companies investing heavily in AI, that number jumps — but not drastically — to 57%. So, even many of the biggest AI spenders aren't equipping their teams to leverage its potential. While AI upskilling ranks as a top-two talent development focus for CHROs (behind expanding use of data-driven insights about employees and benefits, which 56% are prioritizing), those efforts aren't keeping pace with the speed of implementation. This deficit shows up even in the technology sector, where only 38% of CHROs say AI and data analysis training is at the top of the agenda. In the rush to deploy AI, many companies appear to be leaving it to their teams to sort out the details. Companies may be buying impressive AI solutions — but without people qualified to use them, they likely won't deliver. That can lead to underutilization, poor adoption or worse: costly implementation failures that get blamed on the tech, not the prep. Will companies pausing long enough to develop their talent actually move faster in the long run?


Fast Company
8 hours ago
- Fast Company
Companies need leaders. Here's how to stand out
Companies are struggling with the rise of AI, high levels of employee burnout, and managing hybrid teams. Now, there's a new challenge: no one wants to be a leader. According to DDI's 2025 HR Insights report, based on a survey of 2,185 HR professionals and 10,796 leaders, 75% of companies prioritize promoting employees to leadership roles from within. However, less than 20% of Chief Human Resource Officers say they actually have employees who are ready to fill critical leadership roles. On average, there are only enough internal candidates to fill less than half (49%) of open leadership positions. Going forward, it looks like the leadership vacuum is likely to get worse. According to the report, Gen Z is 1.4 times more likely than other generations to reject a leadership role. At the same time, Gen Z is also 2.8 times more likely to quit a job because of subpar leadership. However, as Fast Company contributor Tracey Brower points out, the dearth of qualified candidates creates an opportunity for anyone who wants to be a leader. What can companies do to create more leaders? Historically, leadership roles have been desirable but as navigating the business landscape becomes more complicated, leadership roles have become less attractive. 'Leadership is becoming a tougher job every day,' said Tacy M. Byham, Ph.D., CEO of DDI, in a press release. 'While organizations can't control the deluge of external challenges they face this year, strategic HR executives can build resilience by using trusted people analytics to forecast needs, build their bench, and reinvigorate the next generation of leaders.' Essentially, companies need to create a strong leadership pipeline. Promotions are six times more likely when employees receive adequate coaching from managers. Likewise, companies should always be thinking about their strongest employees' potential, even before leadership positions become available. Tara Rasmussen, a hiring manager for Hapi, a hospitality tech company, points out that employee expectations have evolved. While she says older professionals cling to habits like 'micromanagement' and 'habits of overworking,' young employees are pushing back—even those who want to be leaders are setting firm boundaries around their personal time. 'Elder millennials and Gen Z employees are more inclined to say 'No thanks' to giving up personal time even with decent salary increases,' she explains. In the past while future leaders stood out by working long hours, today selection committees need to understand that even leaders want time off. What can employees looking for leadership roles do to stand out? Cultivate soft skills Strong leadership is built on a solid foundation of soft skills. Rasmussen, notes that when it comes to new leadership, 'soft skills,' like communication and interpersonal skills, are more important than ever before. She notes that soft skills are the ability to navigate nuance while communicating with others and doing work. It's not a one way lane,' Rasmussen explains. 'Leaders in the current climate cannot expect to step into a role and communicate one way to all team members and be successful because everyone is different.' Humility Given the current environment where leaders face all kinds of challenges from technological changes to a turbulent economy, Rasmussen also points out 'humility' is a key attribute modern leaders must have. 'The ability to say, 'I don't know but I'll find out,' is absolutely critical,' she explains. 'Leaders we look for now are not just 'bosses' that micromanage and order employees around. They must be able to be, well, human. Admit when wrong and grow alongside their teams.' Embracing AI and adaptability Jeffrey Pole, CEO and cofounder of Warden AI, tells Fast Company that, in 2025, leaders have to be innovative, adaptable, and knowledgeable about how to work alongside AI. 'There is much fear in the workforce today, with economic uncertainty, technology disruption, and a constant need for new skills and new career paths,' Pole explains. 'The best leaders of this generation will be the ones who can adapt to change, embrace new opportunities, and motivate people to explore and experiment with the technologies and markets that are opening up.'


Forbes
a day ago
- Forbes
How To Keep Top Talent When Existing Incentives No Longer Work
Companies with valued employees exiting amid falling share prices need to restructure their ... More incentives. Even with the major U.S. stock indices hitting new heights over the past two years, many companies have seen their share values plummet. When the share price is under pressure, CEOs need their teams to stay intact and pull together. It's also at times like these that the incentives companies typically offer to maintain stable leadership teams and retain top talent may no longer be adequate. As Meldon Wolfgang, an expert in helping Boards, CEOs and human resources officers make decisions during uncertainty, explains, 'When the value of long-term incentive programs shows signs of eroding, companies must re-examine the entire range of incentives they offer—financial and non-financial alike. This is the ultimate strategic HR question. And it applies not only to senior leadership, and to management, but to your entire employee family.' Traditionally, stock awards and option grants—giving employees the right to buy company stock at a specified price—have been the cornerstone of executive and employee retention. The logic is straightforward: equity incentivizes people to stick around and help the company build long-term value. This works well when the company's share price is rising—and there's an expectation it will continue to rise. But when the price sags, especially when it falls below the price at which an employee can exercise his or her option, incentives lose their attractiveness. That's the situation some companies face today. In many cases, there will be fixes and turnarounds, and earnings and stock prices will rebound. Until then, however, stock options may cease to function as incentives. Employees may feel the option awards are meaningless and could become worthless, or worth much less. This is when executives and employees may start looking elsewhere. While replacing any employee is costly, replacing seasoned, specialized, and executive talent is especially costly, carrying hidden costs in lost productivity, morale, and institutional knowledge. By some estimates, the cost of replacing such workers—both hard costs (recruiting, onboarding, etc.) and soft costs (lost productivity, loss of institutional knowledge, etc.)—can be as high as four times the employee's annual salary. Companies that find themselves in such a bind—with valued employees exiting amid falling share prices—clearly need to restructure their incentives. The key is to be creative; while financial incentives are critically important, cultural and other non-economic benefits may be equally important (and more doable for some). On the financial side, the most direct way to restore the power of incentives is to put real value back in employees' hands. Beyond equity grants, there are multiple effective levers companies can use: Retention bonuses. This is immediate: Commit to stay and we give you money. According to a WorldatWork inventory of corporate rewards programs, 67% of the companies surveyed offered some form of a one-time retention bonus in 2022. Evidence shows they work: a 2023 survey found 86% of employees would commit to staying with their company for a period of time in exchange for an immediate cash bonus. Of course, this depends on the company having sufficient cash on-hand to be able to fund a retention payment. Stock incentives. As a variation on direct equity, employers can shift to stock grants, such as Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) and other awards where employees receive the full value of the shares as soon they qualify. Unlike options, RSUs retain value as long as the stock price remains above zero. By granting more stock or RSUs, instead of options, companies can ensure that employees still have skin in the game, while ensuring the employees that market dips won't wipe out their equity. 'Phantom stock' and SARs. Phantom stock, or 'shadow shares,' mimic the real thing, and typically include Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) —meaning their value increases in tandem with share-price gains. Shadow shares can be converted into cash or equity at a future date—but not if the employee leaves. Convertible retention bonds. Similar in intent, though not in structure, to shadow shares, convertible retention bonds are employee-owned investment instruments that convert to equity if the company meets certain growth benchmarks–or are paid in cash (or expire) if it doesn't. Option repricing/exchanges. Some companies are replacing underwater stock options with new option grants or RSUs that have intrinsic value equal to or exceeding their original grants. Deferred compensation. Deferred compensation plans, commonly referred to as 'golden handcuffs,' are usually intended to keep key employees until retirement. But they can be structured in other ways as well, such as deferred bonus pools tied to performance benchmarks—where there is no immediate cost to the company, but employees receive a cash bonus if business improves. Compensation, while important, doesn't fully explain why employees choose to stay where they are or seek employment elsewhere. Other frequently expressed concerns include job security, professional growth opportunities, feeling valued at work, having a voice, and family. Employers can best address these concerns culturally and structurally. Here are some suggestions: Job security. There's no better way to tell employees that their jobs are safe than by announcing, 'No layoffs,' a long-standing policy, for example, at Marvin Windows and Doors, Nucor Corporation, Publix Super Markets, and Torani, the syrup and flavorings maker, which has gone 100 years without a layoff. This doesn't mean no changes; changes already are underway due to artificial intelligence (AI), advanced robotics, and other new technologies. What a 'no layoffs' policy does is create stability, since employees are less likely to preemptively look for a new job when their existing job is secure. Advancement opportunities. Most employees gladly will pursue new challenges inside your organization—if you make it possible. If they need upskilling or reskilling, provide it. Also consider creating internal talent, or project, 'marketplaces' and tour-of-duty rotational programs across departments or business units that enable employees to try new things and facilitate career moves. Research shows that workers who make internal moves tend to stay longer. A LinkedIn analysis, for example, found that after three years an employee who had been promoted or moved laterally within a company had a 65% to 70% chance of still being there, versus about 45% for someone who hasn't changed roles. Even in uncertain or troubling times, when a company's stock may be down or flat, senior leaders have many tools available to help keep key employees. But retention requires purposeful, strategic effort. When employees see multiple reasons to stay—a financial upside and a fulfilling work environment—the retention calculus shifts dramatically. Instead of asking, 'Why stick around?', they see staying as the smart choice.