Parliament passes revised draft law criminalising invasion of privacy
A revised bill from the Shura Council has been passed by Parliament, making it a criminal offence to secretly record private conversations, film accident victims, or share intimate details of someone's life.
In serious cases, offenders could face up to five years in prison and a fine of BD5,000. The bill amends Bahrain's Penal Code, focusing on Articles 354, 370 and 372.
It draws together two earlier drafts, one put forward by the Shura Council and the other by the government, and presents them as a single law.
Final version
The Foreign Affairs, Defence and National Security Committee backed the final version.
MP Mohammed Al Ma'arafi, a member of the committee, said the proposal was part of a wider push to improve legal protection for privacy.
He added that the committee had held 27 meetings during the current session, much of that time spent reviewing and debating the Penal Code changes.
Behaviour
The new law covers a range of behaviour. Eavesdropping, filming people without their knowledge in private or compromising settings, and sharing personal material, even if accurate, can lead to prosecution if it causes harm.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Tribune
17 hours ago
- Daily Tribune
Hilton Bahrain Brings Pet Lovers Together for ‘Raise the Woof!' Community Gathering
A senior Arab parliamentarian has described the Gaza situation as a 'humanitarian disaster' following a visit to the Rafah crossing, as lawmakers, including Bahrain's Mamdouh Al Saleh and Dr Hisham Al Ashiri, met in Cairo for the closing session. Mohammed Al Yamahi, who chairs the Arab Parliament, said the visit laid bare the suffering in Gaza. He praised Egypt's efforts to deliver aid in coordination with the Egyptian Red Crescent, and urged the international community to act to end the violence and violations against Palestinians. The session, held at the Arab League headquarters, drew MPs from across the Arab world. Among them were the two Bahraini representatives, who reaffirmed their country's backing for the Palestinian cause. Leadership Dr Al Ashiri linked Bahrain's stance to the leadership of HM King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa and the continued support of His Royal Highness Prince Salman bin Hamad Al Khalifa, the Crown Prince and Prime Minister. 'Bahrain's position is clear,' he said. 'The Palestinian people have a right to an independent state with Jerusalem as its capital.' Al Saleh said the Kingdom's presence formed part of its effort to back Arab causes on the global stage. The session also saw the swearing-in of new members and the unopposed appointment of Saudi Shura Council member Saad bin Sulaib Al Otaibi as First Deputy Speaker. Forums Proposals to establish forums for Arab women and youth MPs were approved. Reports from the Parliament's standing committees were also adopted for submission to the relevant authorities. Dr Adel Al Maawada, from Bahrain's Shura Council, took part in the session and contributed to the work of the committee on foreign, political, and security affairs. He said the meeting showed growing Arab engagement with core issues. 'The session discussed a number of key matters,' he said, 'including developments in Palestinian territories, regional tensions, the importance of maintaining the ceasefire, avoiding military conflict, and working to keep the region free of weapons of mass destruction.' Reports Members also reviewed reports from the legal, economic, social, and Palestinian affairs committees, as well as notes from the Rafah visit and a side meeting held during the Arab Summit in Baghdad. Other items on the table included plans for a conference on the blue economy, a draft law to address irregular migration, proposals to support social enterprises and home-run businesses, and steps to improve online education across the Arab world.
Gulf Insider
a day ago
- Gulf Insider
Bahrain: Court Restores Marital Home To Husband After Sham Sale To Ex-Wife
A man has won back ownership of his home after the High Civil Court ruled that a BD270,000 property transfer to his ex-wife was a sham intended only to protect the asset. The court found that the sale contract between the couple was not genuine and ordered the house to be returned to the husband's name. The decision followed the submission of a signed statement from the ex-wife, confirming that the sale was only on paper and that her husband had remained the rightful owner throughout. The statement, dated 21 February 2010, was presented by the man's lawyer, Zuhair Abdullatif. The court deemed it legally binding, noting that the ex-wife neither denied her signature nor challenged the content. Under Bahraini law, a private document stands as valid unless its signature is explicitly denied. The man had purchased the home in early 2010 but soon faced financial difficulties. To protect the property, he transferred it to his wife's name in a fictitious sale, trusting she would safeguard it. Just one day after the transfer, the property was registered in her name. Less than a year later, she divorced him through khula, a form of wife-initiated divorce. Despite efforts to resolve the matter privately over the years, the ex-wife refused to return the property and even threatened to sell it. The man eventually took legal action, presenting the court with his ex-wife's written admission that the deal had been for formality only. In its ruling, the court referred to precedents set by the Court of Cassation, affirming that in sham transactions, the true intent of the parties takes precedence over the registered deed. If it can be proven that a transfer was only symbolic, actual ownership must be honoured. The court concluded that the sale was not real and ordered the Survey and Land Registration Bureau to remove the ex-wife's name and reissue the property deed in the husband's name.
Gulf Insider
a day ago
- Gulf Insider
Bahrain: Woman Wins 25-Year Legal Battle To Register Home
After a 25-year legal struggle, a woman has finally secured ownership of her home, following a ruling by the High Civil Appeals Court that upheld the validity of a property sale contract once deemed invalid. The dispute dates back to the year 2000, when the woman purchased the house for BD80,000. She paid the amount in three instalments— BD40,000 followed by two payments of BD20,000—to an agent representing the heirs of the deceased property owner. Although she received the property documents, she was unable to register the home in her name due to a 17-year restriction imposed by the Ministry of Housing, which barred property transfers during that period. The situation worsened when the property was seized by the Execution Court to settle a debt owed by one of the heirs, who had never formally transferred the property title. The court ordered the house be sold. In response, the woman filed a lawsuit to enforce her ownership rights. However, the First Instance Court declared the contract void, citing the restriction that was in effect at the time of sale. Her lawyer, Nabeel Al Qassab, appealed the ruling and submitted new evidence, including powers of attorney from the heirs authorising her to complete the title transfer. He argued that this constituted their approval of the original sale. Despite this, the Appeals Court initially upheld the lower court's decision. The case then went to the Court of Cassation, which overturned the verdict and sent it back to the Appeals Court for review. Upon reconsideration, the Appeals Court ruled that the powers of attorney clearly demonstrated the heirs' ratification of the transaction—even if the agent lacked authority at the time of sale. Under Article 436 of Bahrain's Civil Code, such ratification validates a contract if it meets key conditions: mutual consent, a defined property, a lawful purpose, and an agreed price. With those elements confirmed, the court ruled in the woman's favour and ordered the property to be officially registered in her name—bringing an end to a dispute that had lasted a quarter of a century.
