Expanded SST a bold step, not 'Black Day', says Mahfuz
Its vice-president Datuk Mahfuz Omar described such remarks, particularly from Pas leaders, as populist and irresponsible attempts to stoke public emotions without a rational understanding of the country's economic needs.
He said the opposition's criticisms were devoid of facts and ignored the importance of sustainable national revenue generation.
"This expanded SST framework ensures that government revenue can be collected fairly and redirected to the people through targeted subsidies and aid," he said in a statement today.
Mahfuz stressed that essential items, such as rice, poultry, eggs, vegetables, fish, medicines, education and healthcare services remain exempted from the tax.
"The tax mainly targets luxury spending, not daily essentials. So it is the high-income earners who are more affected, not the general public," he said.
He said the funds generated through SST and the rationalisation of subsidies were being channelled into numerous government aid programmes.
Mahfuz also pointed out that Malaysia's SST rate remained among the lowest in the region, at eight per cent, compared to Indonesia's 11 per cent VAT, the Philippines (12 per cent), Vietnam (10 per cent), Cambodia (10 per cent), Laos (10 per cent) and Singapore's GST (9 per cent).
"Once again, Pas and the opposition have shown their failure to understand the complexities of governing a nation. They oppose for the sake of opposing, without offering constructive solutions. Yet when they govern their own states, they too impose taxes," he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Borneo Post
an hour ago
- Borneo Post
SST expansion will impact livelihoods, threaten SMEs, says SUPP man
Yong says the revised SST not only increases the tax rate to 8 per cent but also broadens its scope to include services such as leasing, construction, finance, private healthcare and segments of the education sector. KUCHING (July 4): The expanded Sales and Services Tax (SST) will impact people's livelihoods and threaten the survival of small and medium enterprises (SMEs), said a Sarawak United People's Party (SUPP) man. SUPP Kuching Youth member Raphael Yong said the revised SST not only increases the tax rate to 8 per cent but also broadens its scope to include services such as leasing, construction, finance, private healthcare and segments of the education sector. He said certain non-essential goods are also now subject to tax rates as high as 10 per cent, and warned of a chain reaction of price hikes that will further burden the public already grappling with high living costs. 'Many SMEs are overwhelmed by system overhauls, cost transfers and regulatory uncertainty, while ordinary citizens are ultimately the ones paying the price each time a new tax adjustment is made,' he said in a statement yesterday. Yong lamented that prices of eggs and chicken had risen by more than 13 per cent over the past two years, and vegetables by 4 to 8 per cent. He also said that food inflation overall had reached 4 to 5 per cent, but did not cite official statistics. 'These figures reflect the erosion of household purchasing power,' he said. Yong said the people have no qualms about the government increasing national revenue provided it is genuinely for the betterment of the nation and its citizens. He further pointed out that issues such as corruption, leakages in public spending and a bloated civil service continue to strain government finances, with little sign of improvement. Given this, he urged the Ministry of Finance to stop using the term 'reform' as a pretext to introduce new taxes. 'True reform should focus on easing the people's burden and restoring public confidence in the economy, not covering up poor fiscal management through increased taxation,' he said. Kuching lead Raphael Yong SST SUPP Youth
New Straits Times
9 hours ago
- New Straits Times
It's an investment in Malaysia's future and fiscal resilience
Taking a comparison between the Sales and Service tax (SST) and the Goods and Services Tax (GST) is actually engaging in a misguided debate. The focus should be on where the expected additional revenue derived from the SST expansion (SST 2.0) will be directed and invested, and how the reform in the SST 2.0 model can improve the fiscal resilience of the economy. The state of the Malaysian economy and the global economy at large today is different from a decade ago when GST was rolled out. When GST was introduced, SST was abolished. And when GST was abolished in 2018, SST was reintroduced. Now, we have SST 2.0. In Madani economic terms, it is about achieving the twin objectives of "raising the ceiling" and "raising the floor", which essentially seeks to empower the people and to transform the economy into a high-income nation. Today, a whole range of public support — schools, universities, clinics, hospitals, roads, Internet access, bridges, security, legal system, etc — is more crucial than ever and this involves government spending and investments. Imagine how we faced the Covid-19 pandemic without government support, just to show one example. Currently, humanity is facing a slew of existential and once-in-a-lifetime changes. Climate change, technological revolution, digital economy and ageing society all require a fundamental shift in the structure of the economy and, hence, the need for the government to broaden their revenue base in a sustainable manner. Adding to this is the global economic uncertainty and ongoing geopolitical risks which, again, require the government to play a greater role than in the past to mitigate their downside impact to the economy. To stay competitive, the government needs to invest in many "moonshot projects" and research and development that will anchor and propel the economy to greater heights. When it comes to paying taxes, the real question is always about the value that the people get from paying those taxes. For instance, Denmark, Sweden and Finland have among the highest tax rates in the world. But they are also always ranked at the top globally in the happiness report. Finland now has the "happiest people" for eight consecutive years. Denmark ranked second while Sweden came in fourth. What are the reasons behind their happiness? One factor that cannot be denied is their robust welfare system, including the comprehensive, high-quality and reliable healthcare, education and public transport systems. In Sweden and Denmark, their strong social safety net and pension systems are among the best in the world. To put it simply, it is about "higher taxes, higher rewards". The same argument can be extended to the business community. The issue is not so much about additional costs due to higher taxes, but the value these companies can get for paying those taxes. If the logic is that lower taxes will attract more businesses and investments, then many companies would have flocked to Paraguay, where its corporate income tax is one of the lowest in the world at 10 per cent. Even with the higher taxes, Stockholm has been dubbed the "Unicorn Factory". From Spotify to Minecraft, Stockholm has the highest number of tech unicorns (startups valued at above US$1 billion) per capita in the world after Silicon Valley in the United States. Meanwhile, with the extra revenue from SST 2.0, Malaysians must feel their well-being and prosperity will improve in the future. It is expected that the tax-to-gross domestic product ratio can be increased from the present 12 per cent to a level that is at least at par with our peers or with other Asia Pacific countries.
The Sun
11 hours ago
- The Sun
Subsidy reform must be done gradually with inclusion as core principle: Expert
KUALA LUMPUR: Subsidy reform is often considered a necessity, especially as governments grapple with fiscal constraints. however, the way subsidies are targeted can have serious implications for the poor. Dr Muhammed Abdul Khalid, research fellow at Institute of Malaysian and International Studies (Ikmas), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. said targeted subsidies frequently fail to reach the most vulnerable segments of society. Citing global examples, Muhammed highlighted Brazil's experience, where targeted median subsidies excluded a significant portion of the bottom 20–30% of the population. Similarly, he said, the Philippines cash transfer programme, one of the largest of its kind, also failed to include many in the lowest income bracket. 'Even in Malaysia, studies conducted before and during the Covid-19 pandemic found that around 30% of those living in low-cost housing did not receive any form of cash aid. 'In 2022 alone, 30% of needy residents in Kuala Lumpur were excluded from assistance,' he said at the Intellectual Discourse @ INCEIF titled 'The Rising Costs vs Flat Wages – Escaping the Wallet Squeeze' panel discussion today. Muhammed said this consistent pattern of exclusion underscores a key point: targeting the poor is inherently difficult, whereas identifying and excluding the rich is far easier. 'Administrative databases more prominently display the rich due to their smaller numbers. The poor, however, often fall through bureaucratic cracks due to informal employment, inconsistent documentation, or geographic isolation.' Muhammed said rather than stigmatise the poor with means-testing and labelling, a universal approach is more just and effective. In countries like Indonesia, he cited, programmes such as subsidised petrol have inadvertently caused hardship for the poor, forcing them to queue for basic entitlements and suffer the indignity of being publicly marked as 'needy'. If subsidy rationalisation is to be implemented, Muhammed said, it should be done gradually, with price floating introduced carefully to avoid shocks to vulnerable groups. 'At the heart of reform must be the principle of inclusion – not exclusion.' Muhammed also addressed broader fiscal and governance challenges. He said Malaysia's taxation system is described as regressive, where individuals are taxed heavily on basic consumption and wages but lightly on dividends and luxury assets. 'For instance, buying a cheap car incurs tax, while luxury vehicles often escape it. Salary earners may pay up to 24% in taxes, but dividend income is taxed at only 2%,' Muhammed pointed out. He questioned how tax revenue, particularly the recently introduced expanded Sales and Service Tax, is utilised. He said investing in mega projects such as high-speed rail, which mainly benefit the top 1% to 3% of the population, was criticised as an inefficient use of public funds, especially in the early stages of budget reform. Instead, spending should focus on public goods such as education, healthcare and public transport – services that benefit the majority. 'Ultimately, it comes down to governance. Countries with high tax rates, like those in the Nordic region, also have high trust in government and low levels of tax evasion. 'Why? Because their citizens see tangible outcomes: clean governance, quality public services, and accountability. When trust exists, people are more willing to contribute to the system,' Muhammed said. Bank Negara Malaysia assistant governor Fraziali Ismail said Malaysia's long-standing low-cost economic model – anchored by broad subsidies and price controls – is increasingly showing signs of strain. He said while this approach historically enabled competitiveness and affordability, especially for lower-income groups, he argue that the system may now be holding the country back. 'We've built our economy on being cost-competitive – producing and selling goods at low prices both domestically and internationally. But that model is fraying,' Fraziali said at the forum. He said subsidies have played a central role in sustaining Malaysia's affordability model, particularly in essential sectors such as fuel, utilities, and food. However, the policy's effectiveness is diminishing. 'Subsidies are not inherently bad. However, we have overextended them to their limits. We have maxed out the role of price controls and subsidies to the point where, instead of helping, they are starting to hinder further progress.' Fraziali said massive subsidies – estimated at RM60 billion with RM50 billion alone on fuel – have increasingly become regressive, benefitting the wealthier population more than the poor. And with the current fiscal situation, continuing this trajectory is neither sustainable nor equitable. 'We must shift away from blanket subsidies that distort prices and adopt better-targeted, inclusive policies. If we want to reform subsidies, we need to do it gradually, with floating prices and mechanisms to protect the vulnerable,' Fraziali said. Beyond subsidies, he said Malaysia is grappling with a broader cost-of-living crisis, a challenge that is both structural and global. While the official inflation rate is relatively low, reported at just 1.2%, many households continue to struggle. 'Affordability shouldn't come at the expense of progress. 'If we are serious about tackling the cost-of-living crisis and ensuring long-term prosperity, we must transition toward an economy driven by productivity, fair wages, and smarter social support, not just low prices,' Fraziali said.
