
A $715 billion tax cut turns into a $4.5 trillion sales job
During congressional consideration, Senate Republicans were adamant that the correct way to tally the cost of their plan was by comparing the changes to what the government was currently doing, not what was carved into law, as budget scorekeepers normally do.
So, by that light, extending current tax policies into next year should cost nothing, and not even be seen as a reduction in taxes. The only tax cuts that counted, Republicans said, were new provisions like Trump's proposals to reduce levies on tips, overtime, auto-loans and seniors, along with enhancements of existing breaks, like a $200-per-child increase in the Child Tax Credit.
The tactic drastically reduced the sticker price of the plan, no small deal given concern over federal red ink.
And it made it much easier for lawmakers to make many of their provisions a permanent part of the tax code. Otherwise, under the Senate's internal rules, they would have had to find a lot more pay-fors to cover the cost of making permanent breaks for business investment, research and interest expenses.
But that current policy baseline now not only makes their tax cuts look less consequential, it also shrinks the anticipated benefits to their constituents.
Under the conventional baseline that Republicans spurned, people making between $60,000 and $80,000 would see their taxes fall by an average 12 percent in 2027, the official Joint Committee on Taxation said in an analysis last week. But those people would only get a 4.2 percent cut under a current policy baseline.
Nevertheless, days after Trump signed the bill into law, Senate Republicans bragged on X that they had just cut taxes by $4.3 trillion.
And lawmakers are now routinely claiming to have passed the largest-ever tax cut, though with a $715 billion price tag, the legislation is not significantly bigger than tax cuts passed during the coronavirus outbreak.
The more conventional $4.5 billion estimate moves the legislation up the all-time-biggest-tax-cut list, though there were still larger ones, such as Ronald Reagan's 1981 tax cuts and when Harry Truman cut wartime taxes in 1945.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Countries push for last-minute deals as Thursday tariff deadline looms
An array of trade crosscurrents continued Tuesday afternoon. There has been a push for last-minute deals, continued fuzziness on previously announced trade commitments, and an indication from President Trump that a deal to delay tariffs on goods from China is "close." It all comes as global importers brace for the Thursday morning deadline. That's when President Trump promises to implement a central plank of his trade agenda: a tiered approach to "reciprocal" tariffs ranging from 10% to 50%. Meanwhile, talks continued on varied fronts. For example, the Swiss president announced she would fly to Washington, D.C., to try to win last-minute concessions. She added Tuesday that "the aim is to present a more attractive offer to the United States" to avert a 39% tariff on goods from her nation. Meanwhile, India faces a divergent situation, with Trump telling CNBC on Tuesday morning, "We settled on 25% [tariffs], but I think I am going to raise that very substantially over the next 24 hours." India has slammed Trump's threats as unjustified and has seen its chances of a deal dwindle. Top aides for Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi are also reportedly traveling this week — not to the US but instead to Moscow. It's all part of a flurry of last-minute moves and a message from Trump that he's full speed ahead, with no plans to delay a tariff increase starting Thursday. Read more: The latest news and updates on Trump's tariffs Trump even teased during the CNBC appearance that he probably won't run for president again but would like to, in part because, in his view, "people love the tariffs." (Trump is, of course, barred by the Constitution from running for a third term, though he's often floated the idea.) Switzerland and India are two countries currently on the outside looking in, but even nations that recently struck a trade deal continued to try to prepare for the tariff piece to take effect. Japan's top trade negotiator is also reportedly due in Washington, D.C., this week for talks to ensure that a plan to cut auto tariffs to 15% proceeds. Likewise, talks with the EU continue as negotiators there are reportedly still pushing for exemptions, such as on wine and spirits. Trump also weighed in Tuesday morning on talks with China. Markets are closely watching for any signs of an agreement to delay a tariff snapback scheduled for Aug. 12, with Trump saying, "We're getting very close to a deal." Trump suggested that he would likely meet with President Xi Jinping "at some point in the not-too-distant future." The president added that new sector-specific tariffs on semiconductors and pharmaceuticals are likely and that at least those pharmaceutical tariffs could be announced "within the next week or so." Read more: What Trump's tariffs mean for the economy and your wallet New details for some nations — and a focus on India and Switzerland There is also some new clarity on some technical details around how the new tariff landscape will likely work beginning at 12:01 a.m. ET on Thursday. US customs officials this week offered additional technical guidance in a new document on how it will handle some tariff exemptions. The news there may give some select importers a short-term breather. But with a full tally, according to Bloomberg Economics, the average US tariff rate is now expected to rise to 15.2% if duties go forward as planned. That's a jump from current rates of 13.3% and another jump from the 2.3% duties seen in 2024 before Trump took office. The overall landscape set to be in effect Thursday will cover nearly every country on the globe. It also comes after Trump and his team set "bespoke" rates largely based on the trade deficit, with many of America's top trading partners seeing a key new standard of 15% tariff, while others will see higher rates. Read more: 5 ways to tariff-proof your finances Countries from the European Union to South Korea to Japan struck deals at that 15% rate, but open questions remain. Other Asian countries have struck deals in the 19%-20% range. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer recently said on CBS that the published rates included many agreements, "some of these deals are announced, some are not," with other nations simply being dictated tariffs based on the level of the trade deficit. Switzerland is one nation for which the US has dictated tariffs. Its delegation will be in Washington on Tuesday to push for lower rates. But on Tuesday morning, Trump suggested that it would be an uphill climb and that a recent call with the country didn't go well because "they essentially pay no tariffs," even as talks are clearly set to continue there. As for India, any immediate offramp appears unlikely because of that nation's connections with Russia and Russian oil. A note Tuesday from Capital Economics suggested that India could, in theory, offer concessions to diversify its energy sources, "but we doubt that India would make a wholehearted effort to wean itself off Russian oil [as it could upset relations and] it would not play well to be seen caving to Trump's demands." At the same time, reports from Bloomberg and the Times of India revealed that two top aides to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi are traveling not to the US but to Russia in the coming days and weeks — even amid Trump's ever-escalating threats. Trump on Tuesday morning suggested talks are on ice for now and will be complicated when they resume, adding that "the sticking point with India is that tariffs are too high." This story has been updated with additional developments. Ben Werschkul is a Washington correspondent for Yahoo Finance. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices


UPI
28 minutes ago
- UPI
Trump: Federalize D.C. and prosecute teens as adults
President Donald Trump says conditions in Washington, D.C., must be made okay by lowering crime rates and charging teens as adults to prevent the federal government from taking control of the capital. Photo by Samuel Corum/UPI | License Photo Aug. 5 (UPI) -- Washington, D.C., would become a federal district and prosecute teens as adults if crime in the nation's capital does not recede soon, President Donald Trump said on Tuesday. Youths and gangs in the capital are randomly targeting people for violent crimes due to a lack of law enforcement, Trump said in a Truth Social post. "Crime in Washington, D.C., is totally out of control," Trump said. "Local 'youths' and gang members ... are randomly attacking, mugging, maiming and shooting innocent citizens," he added, "at the same time knowing that they will be almost immediately released." He said local youths do not fear law enforcement "because they know nothing ever happens to them." Trump's post includes a photo of a young male who is bloodied and sitting on what appears to be an asphalt parking lot. "The most recent victim was beaten mercilessly by thugs," Trump said. "Washington, D.C., must be safe, clean and beautiful for all Americans and, importantly, for the world to see." He said the federal government would have no choice but to take control of the capital and "put criminals on notice." "Perhaps it should have been done a long time ago," Trump added, "and then this incredible young man, with so many others, would not have had to go through the horrors of violent crime." Trump did not reference the recent shooting deaths of a House intern or two Israel Embassy staffers in Washington, D.C. Despite such shooting deaths and other crimes in the nation's capital, local police reported a 35% reduction in crime in 2024, which set a 30-year low, The Hill reported. So far this year, reported crimes in Washington, D.C., are lower than in 2024, which would establish a new 30-year low if the trend continues. Trump and Washington, D.C., Mayor Muriel Bowser have met several times since the Nov. 5 election. The president has said he and the mayor have an amicable relationship, and in a March 28 executive order, created the D.C. Safe and Beautiful Task Force. That task force includes representatives from several federal agencies and federal law enforcement, who are tasked with cleaning up the city by working with local officials. Such efforts are to include removing homeless encampments, supporting law enforcement, removing threats to public safety and streamlining the process for residents to obtain concealed carry permits for firearms. Parks, monuments, structures, roadways and buildings are to be beautified by being restored and graffiti removed from commonly visited local areas, according to the executive order. The Washington, D.C., mayor's office did not respond to a UPI request for comment on Tuesday.

Boston Globe
29 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
‘It's outrageous': Mass. governor forays into national debate over Texas redistricting vote
'It's outrageous, and it impacts all of us across this country,' Healey said at a news conference after meeting with the Democrats. 'This is what everybody hates about politics, and we're not standing for it.' Tuesday's visit was more than just a 'welcome to Boston,' Healey said, but instead an opportunity to sound the alarm on what she views as a nationwide threat. Advertisement If passed, the Texas maps would add five new Republican districts. The maps would also mean that for a primary election six months away, voters wouldn't know which district they'll vote in or who they can vote for. 'Not only is it stealing a voice from Texas voters, it's stealing the voice and the vote from voters around this country, from all Americans,' Healey said. 'All Americans are going to be impacted by what the next Congress looks like.' Advertisement By leaving the state, the Texas Democrats effectively blocked voting on the new maps by breaking a quorum, or the minimum number of lawmakers required for the legislature to conduct official business. If Democrats were still in Texas, they could be forcibly returned by Department of Public Safety state troopers, but the department doesn't have jurisdiction outside the state. A Texas senator on Tuesday asked the attorney general, Ken Paxton, also said Tuesday that if the Democrats did not return by Friday, he Democratic Texas state Representative Ron Reynolds spoke alongside other Texas Democrats during a news conference at the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers union hall on Monday in Warrenville, Ill. Scott Olson/Getty 'The price to pay pales in comparison to the rights of everyday people, everyday constituents that we represent proudly,' said Houston Representative Armando Walle, who traveled alongside his colleagues to Boston for the National Conference of State Legislators' annual summit, which is being held this week at the Thomas Michael Menino Convention & Exhibition Center. 'We're not scared, not scared at all.' Typically, state legislatures redraw congressional district lines once every 10 years to reflect the latest US Census. But Texas Republicans began their recent redistricting effort after pressure from the Trump administration, which demanded state leaders seven-member majority in the US House. Not all states allow for mid-decade redistricting. Texas, which has the second-largest congressional delegation in the country, does. In a CNBC interview on Tuesday morning, Trump blamed blue states like Massachusetts for initiating the current redistricting push. Advertisement 'They did it to us, the blue states you were talking about,' Trump said. 'In Massachusetts, I got, I think, 41 percent of the vote, a very blue state, and yet [Democrats] got 100 percent of Congress. One hundred percent. I got 40, 41 percent or something, and yet 100 percent of Congress in Massachusetts? No, it shouldn't be that way.' Trump received 36 percent of the vote in Massachusetts in 2024. Texas Democrats said the maps being proposed during this special legislative session are not only partisan but would also suppress the votes of people of color by breaking up voting blocs in districts with large minority populations. The US Supreme Court ruled in 2019 that states can draw electoral maps on partisan grounds, but the Voting Rights Act maintains that the map cannot suppress the voting rights of people of color. The current Texas map, passed in 2021, is being challenged in court on allegations that it violates the act. Secretary of State Bill Galvin, the state's top elections official who also met with the Democrats Tuesday, said the new maps would be 'splintering communities of color.' 'This is a very deliberate destruction of minority communities with the objective of trying to get more seats,' he said. Beyond Texas, Republicans have looked at redistricting in states where the party has control of the government, such as Missouri and Indiana, as a means to preserve a Republican majority in Congress after the 2026 midterm elections, which have historically gone against the party in the White House during a president's first term. Ohio is redrawing its map due to a court order, which could lead to Republican gains. Advertisement Democrats in California, Illinois, and New York hit back, When asked Tuesday if there is potential for Massachusetts to draw new maps before the next census, Galvin said it's not likely. 'We have no Republicans to give.' Matt Stout of the Globe staff contributed to this report. Samantha J. Gross can be reached at